Epistemological issue with keynote article “The illusion of language acquisition” by William O’Grady
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3:3] 2013. iv, 131 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
[ p. 253 ]The illusion of language acquisitionWilliam O’Grady | pp. 253–285
-
[ p. 287 ]Just who didn’t eat what, exactly? Negation and universal quantification in the real worldBen Ambridge | pp. 287–288
-
[ p. 289 ]Grammar in parsing and acquisitionVasiliki Chondrogianni and Marco Tamburelli | pp. 289–295
-
[ p. 296 ]The delusion of processingJoão Costa | pp. 296–300
-
[ p. 301 ]What’s parsing got to do with it?Stephen Crain | pp. 301–307
-
[ p. 308 ]Beyond the first step: A commentary on O’Grady (2013)Cecile De Cat | pp. 308–311
-
[ p. 312 ]Individual differences and the nature of the processorTheres Grüter | pp. 312–315
-
[ p. 316 ]Can pattern recognition explain grammatical learning?Julia Herschensohn | pp. 316–320
-
[ p. 321 ]Commentary on O’GradyBrian MacWhinney | pp. 321–323
-
[ p. 324 ]The emergence of quantifier scopeStephen Matthews and Virginia Yip | pp. 324–329
-
[ p. 330 ]Grammatical constraints and reductionism in sentence processingAkira Omaki | pp. 330–334
-
[ p. 335 ]Is it all processing all the way down?Robyn Orfitelli and Maria Polinsky | pp. 335–340
-
[ p. 341 ]Whose ease of processing?Julie Sedivy | pp. 341–344
-
[ p. 345 ]On the relationship between syntactic competence and language processingWilliam Snyder | pp. 345–349
-
[ p. 350 ]Individual differences and streams of processingDarren Tanner | pp. 350–356
-
[ p. 357 ]Testing the Amelioration Hypothesis: Does the illusion hold for other scope phenomena?Sharon Unsworth | pp. 357–361
-
[ p. 362 ]Input matters: The processor as a statisticianStefanie Wulff | pp. 362–366
-
[ p. 367 ]Doing away with syntaxJames Hye Suk Yoon | pp. 367–371
-
[ p. 373 ]Facts and issues: Response to the commentariesWilliam O’Grady | pp. 373–383
Epistemological-paper
Commentaries
Response-to-the-commentaries