Article published in:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 8:2 (2018) ► pp. 193–216

L3 acquisition of English attributive adjectives

Dominant language of communication matters for syntactic cross-linguistic influence

| Yazd University, Safa-ieh, Iran
| Yazd University, Safa-ieh, Iran
This study examines three L3 transfer proposals, namely the L1 Factor (Hermas, 2010, 2014a, 2014b), the CEM (Flynn et al., 2004) and the TPM (Rothman, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2015) as well as investigates the role of the language of dominance in L3 acquisition of English attributive adjectives. Three groups of bilinguals took part in this study: L1 Mazandarani/L2 Persian, with Mazandarani as the dominant language of communication, L1 Mazandarani/L2 Persian, with Persian as the dominant language of communication and L1 Persian/L2 Mazandarani, with Persian as the dominant language of communication. The results of a grammaticality judgment task and an element rearrangement task show that the predictions of the above-mentioned L3 transfer proposals were not realized. Instead, the dominant language of communication turns out to be the main source of syntactic crosslinguistic influence at the initial stages of L3 acquisition, irrespective of its status as an L1 or L2.
Keywords: The L1 Factor, the CEM, the TPM, third language acquisition, CLI
Published online: 12 October 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16003.fal
References

References

Bardel, C., & Falk, Y.
(2007) The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23, 459–484. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E.
(2005) Consequences of bilingualism for cognitive development. In J.F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds), Handbook of bilingualism (pp. 417–432). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cabrelli Amaro, J., Amaro J. F., & Rothman, J.
(2015) The relationship between L3 transfer and structural similarity across development: Raising across an experiencer in Brazilian Portuguese. In H. Peukert (Ed), Transfer effects in multilingual language development (pp. 21–52). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cinque, G.
(1995) Italian syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dabir-Moghaddam, M.
(2006) Internal and external forces in typology: Evidence from Iranian languages. Journal of Universal Language, 7, 29–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dopke, S.
(1992) One parent one language: An interactional approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Y., & Bardel, C.
(2011) Object pronouns in German L3 syntax: Evidence for the L2 status factor. Second Language Research, 27, 59–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fallah, N., Jabbari, A. A, & Fazilatfar, A. M.
(2016) Source(s) of syntactic CLI: The case of L3 acquisition of English possessives by Mazanderani-Persian bilinguals. Second Language Research, 32, 225–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I.
(2004) The Cumulative-Enhancement Model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. The International Journal of Multilingualism, 1, 3–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghomeshi, J.
(1997) Non-projecting nouns and the Ezafe construction in Persian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15, 729–788. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giancaspro. D., Halloran, B., & Iverson, M.
(2015) Examining L3 transfer: The acquisition of differential object marking in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 191–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W.
(1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F.
(1982) Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Chan, Y-HC.
(1997) The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed functional features hypothesis’. Second Language Research, 13, 187–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hermas, A.
(2010) Language acquisition as computational resetting: Verb movement in L3 initial state. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7, 343–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014a) Multilingual transfer: L1 morphosyntax in L3 English. International Journal of Language Studies, 8, 1–24.Google Scholar
(2014b) Restrictive relatives in L3 English: L1 transfer and ultimate attainment convergence. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34, 361–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, M.
(2009) N-drop at the initial state of L3 Portuguese: Comparing simultaneous and additive bilinguals of English/Spanish. In A. Pires & J. Rothman (Eds.), Minimalist inquiries into child and adult language acquisition: Case studies across Portuguese (pp. 221–244). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kayne, R.
(1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E.
(1983) Now you see it, now you don’t. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 112–134). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Klausen, T., Subritzky, M., & Hayashi, M.
(1993) Initial production of inflections in bilingual children. In D. J. Messer, & G. J. Turner (Eds.), Critical influences on child language acquisition and development (pp. 65–92). New York: St Martin’s Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson, R. K.
(2009) Chinese as a reverse ezafe language. Yuyaxue Luncong (Journal of Linguistics), 39, 30–85.Google Scholar
Lozano, C.
(2003) Focus pronouns and word order in the acquisition of L2 and L3 Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Essex, England.Google Scholar
Moinzadeh, A.
(2006) The Ezafe phrase in Persian: How complements are added to N°s and A°s? Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities of Shiraz University, 23, 45–57.Google Scholar
Na Ranong, S., & Leung, Y- K.
(2009) Null objects in L1 Thai-L2 English-L3 Chinese: An empirical take on a theoretical problem. In Y-K. Leung (Ed.), Third language acquisition and universal grammar (pp. 162–191). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Paradis, M.
(2004) A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) L1 attrition features predicted by a neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. In B. Köpke, M. S. Schmid, M. Keijzer, & S. Dostert (Eds.), Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 121–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radford, A.
(1997) Syntactic theory and the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J.
(2010) On the typological economy of syntactic transfer: Word order and relative clause high/low attachment preference in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Teaching (IRAL), 48, 245–273.Google Scholar
(2011) L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The Typological Primacy Model. Second Language Research, 27, 107–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Cognitive economy, non-redundancy and typological primacy in L3 acquisition: Evidence from initial stages of L3 Romance. In S. Baauw, F. Dirjkoningen, & M. Pinto (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory (pp. 217–247). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2015) Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Cabrelli Amaro, J.
(2010) What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 initial state. Second Language Research, 26, 189–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Halloran, B.
(2013) Formal linguistic approaches to L3/Ln acquisition: A focus on morphosyntactic transfer in adult multilingualism. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 51–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Iverson, M.
(2013) Strong islands and null objects in L2 Spanish of Brazilian Portuguese natives: Do you know the learners who drop___? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(4), 589–618. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samiian, V.
(1983) Structure of phrasal categories in Persian: An X-Bar analysis. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UCLA, USA.Google Scholar
Schlyter, S.
(1993) The weaker language in bilingual Swedish-French children. In K. Hyltenstam & A. Viberg (Eds.), Progression and regression in language (pp. 289–308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Treffers-Daller, J.
(2011) Operationalizing and measuring language dominance. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(2), 147–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Angelovska, Tanja, Dietmar Roehm & Sabrina Weinmüller
2020. Uncovering transfer effects of dominance and proficiency in L3 English acquisition using the visual moving window paradigm and grammaticality judgments. Applied Linguistics Review 0:0 Crossref logo
González Alonso, Jorge & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2020. You Know More than You Say. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism Crossref logo
Jo, Kyuhee, Kitaek Kim & Hyunwoo Kim
2020. Children's interpretation of negation and quantifier scope in L3 English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Puig-Mayenco, Eloi, Jorge González Alonso & Jason Rothman
2020. A systematic review of transfer studies in third language acquisition. Second Language Research 36:1 ► pp. 31 ff. Crossref logo
Puig-Mayenco, Eloi, David Miller & Jason Rothman
2018.  In Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism, 55], ► pp. 229 ff. Crossref logo
Puig-Mayenco, Eloi, Jason Rothman & Susagna Tubau
2020. Language dominance in the previously acquired languages modulates rate of third language (L3) development over time: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Rothman, Jason, Jorge González Alonso & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2019.  In Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer, Crossref logo
Schwartz, Bonnie D. & Rex A. Sprouse
2020. The Full Transfer/Full Access model and L3 cognitive states. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.