Chapter published in:
Thetics and Categoricals
Edited by Werner Abraham, Elisabeth Leiss and Yasuhiro Fujinawa
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 262] 2020
► pp. 312333
References

References

Bailey, Nicholas Andrew
2009Thetic Constructions in Koine Greek: With Special Attention to Clauses with εἰµί be, γίνοµαι occur, ἔρχοµαι come, ἰδού/ἴδε behold, and Complement Clauses of ὁράω see’. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bentley, Delia, Ciconte, Francesco Maria & Cruschina, Silvio
2013Existential constructions in cross-linguistic perspective. Italian Journal of Linguistics 25(1): 15–43.Google Scholar
Bentley, Delia & Cruschina, Silvio
2018The silent argument of broad focus: Typology and predictions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1): 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brentano, F.
1870–1877[1956]Die Lehre vom Richtigen Urteil, published posthumously in an edition edited by Franziska Mayer-Hillebrand. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Khalilov, Madzhid & Khalilova, Zaira
2015Valency and valency classes in Bezhta. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages: Introducing the Framework and Case Studies from Africa and Eurasia, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 541–570. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2015Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), Harvard Dataverse, Version 2. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
2007Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Macías, Jose Hugo Garcia
2016From the Unexpected to the Unbelievable: Thetics, Miratives and Exclamatives in Conceptual Space. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Marty, Anton
1908Untersuchungen zur Grundlegung der allgemeinen Grammatik und Sprachphilosophie. Halle an der Saale: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hatav, Galia
1997The Semantics of Aspect and Modality: Evidence from English and Biblical Hebrew [Studies in Language Companion Series 34]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018The Semantics-pragmatics Interface of the Biblical Hebrew Verb Forms. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1972Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 269–320.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1972The categorical and the thetic judgment: Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of language 9(2): 153–185.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud & Polinsky, Maria
1997Typological variation in sentence-focus constructions. In Proceedings of the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Papers from the Panels, Kora Singer, Eggert Randall & Gregory Anderson (eds), 189–206. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Martin, Wayne Michael
2010Fichte’s logical legacy: Thetic judgment from the Wissenschaftslehre to Brentano. In Fichte and the Phenomenological Tradition, Violetta L. Waibel, J. Daniel Breazeale & Tom Rockmore (eds), 379–406. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matić, Dejan
2003Topics, Presuppositions, and Theticity: An Empirical Study of Verb-Subject Clauses in Albanian, Greek, and Serbo-Croat. PhD dissertation, University of Cologne.Google Scholar
Murray, Sarah E.
2009A Hamblin semantics for evidentials. In Proceedings of SALT 19, Ed Cormany, Satoshi Ito, and David Lutz (eds), 324–341. Washington DC: LSA. http://​www​.semanticsarchive​.net​/Archive​/2I5ZjdmY/ (28 March 2020).
2010Evidentiality and the Structure of Speech Acts. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University. http://​www​.semanticsarchive​.net​/Archive​/WViOGQxY/ (28 March 2020).
2014Varieties of update. Semantics and Pragmatics 7: 1–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craige
2012Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 5: 6–1. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sasse, Hans Jürgen
1987The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25(3): 511–580. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Theticity [Arbeitspapiere 27]. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Anne
2016Discourse principles in grammar: The thetic/categorical dichotomy. eTropic: Electronic Journal of Studies in the Tropics 9. https://​journals​.jcu​.edu​.au​/etropic​/article​/view​/3425​/3363 (18 May 2016). Crossref
Seidel, George Joseph
1993Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre of 1794: A Commentary on. West Lafayette IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Shkapa, Maria
2012Cleft as a marker of a thetic sentence: Evidence from Irish and Russian. In Transforming Traditions: Studies in Archaeology, Comparative Linguistics and Narrative: Proceedings of the Fifth International Colloquium of Societas Celtas-Slavica, Held at Příbram 26–29 July 2010 [Studia Celto-Slavica 6], Maxim Fomin, Václav Blažek & Piotr Stalmaszczyk (eds), 51–63. Łódź: Łódź University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
1986Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C.
1978Assertion. In P. Cole (ed.), Pragmatics, 315–332. New York: New YorkAcademia Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sumbatova, Nina
2011Complementation and Finiteness in Dargwa. Доклад на рабочем сове-‐щании про проблемам сложного предложения. Майнц, Университет г. Майнца, но-‐ябрь 2011.Google Scholar
Van der Merwe, Christiaan Hendrik Jacobus
1999The elusive Biblical Hebrew term וַיְהִי : A perspective in terms of its syntax, semantics, and pragmatics in 1 Samuel. Hebrew Studies 40(1): 83–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Daniel J.
2017Copular and Existential Sentences in Biblical Hebrew. PhD dissertation, University of the Free State.Google Scholar
2019 Wayhi- and theticity in Biblical Hebrew. Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 45(1): 89–118.Google Scholar
Zólyomi, Gábor
2014Copular Clauses and Focus Marking in Sumerian. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar