Chapter published in:
Thetics and Categoricals
Edited by Werner Abraham, Elisabeth Leiss and Yasuhiro Fujinawa
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 262] 2020
► pp. 156177
References

References

Abraham, Werner
3 2013Deutsche Syntax im Sprachenvergleich. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2014Thetic sentence at the level of modality – An exercise in modal event quantification. Ms, LMU Munich.Google Scholar
2020Thetics and categoricals revisited. From judgment to syntax to speech act. In Thetics and Categoricals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 262], Werner Abraham, Elisabeth Leiss & Yasuhiro Fujinawa (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana & Zwarts, Joost
2010Weak definites and reference to kinds. In Proceedings from SALT 20, Nan Li & David Lutz (eds), 179–196. Ithaca NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana, Le Bruyn, Bert & Zwarts, Joost
2014Advance in weak referentiality. In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219], Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn & Joost Zwarts (eds), 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana & Schulpen, Maartje
2014Modified weak definites. In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219], Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn & Joost Zwarts (eds), 273–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz
1874/1924Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. (English translation: Brentano, Franz 1973 Psychology from an Empirical Point of View, trans. by Antos C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, and Linda L. McAlister).Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1934/1982Sprachtheorie [Ullstein Taschenbuch 1159]. Stuttgart: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Carlson, Greg N.
1977Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Carlson, Greg N., Sussmann, Rachel, Klein, Nathalie & Tanenhaus, Michael
2006Weak definite noun phrases. In Proceedings of NELS 36, Amy Rose Deal, Christopher Davis & Youri Zabbal (eds), 179–196. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen, Bleam, Tonia & Espinal, M. Teresa
2006Bare nouns, number and types of incorporation. In Non-definiteness and Plurality. [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 95], Svetlana Vogeleer & Liliane Tasmowski (eds), 51–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hallab, Amina Christine
2011Referenziälität, Prädikation und die Struktur der Nominalphrase. Kontrastierung artikelloser nominaler Prädikate und Indefinita in Kopulasätzen im Deutschen. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars
1981On semantic scope. In Ambiguities in Intensional Contexts, Frank Heny (ed.), 47–81. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus
1997Salienz und Referenz. Der Epsilonoperator in der Semantik der Nominalphrase und anaphorischer Pronomen [Studia Grammatica 43]. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1958A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York NY: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. -T. James
1987Existential sentences in Chinese and (in)definiteness. In The Representation of (In)definiteness, Eric Reuland & Alice ter Meulen (eds), 226–253. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ioup, Georgette
1977Specificity and the interpretation of quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 233–245.Google Scholar
Jäger, Gerhard
2001Topic-comment structure and the contrast between SL and IL predicates. Journal of Semantics 18(2): 83–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1972The categorial and the thetic judgment. Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9(2): 153–185.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topics, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1981Mandarin Chinese. A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher
1999Definiteness. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Molnár, Valéria
1993Zur Pragmatik und Grammatik des TOPIK-Begriffes. In Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur [Linguistische Arbeit 306], Marga Reis (ed.), 155–202. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Russel, Bertrand
1905On denoting. Mind 14: 479–493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1987The thetic/categorial distinction revisited. Linguistics 25: 512–580. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Florian
2009Two types of definites in natural language [Open Access Dissertations 122]. https://​scholarworks​.umass​.edu​/open​_access​_dissertations​/122 (23 March 2020).
Shyu, S. -i.
2011Aspect selection and sentence final particle de . Paper presented at the 19th Annual Meeting of the International Association on Chinese Linguistics, Nankai University, Tianjin.
Strawson, Peter F.
1950On referring. Mind 59(235): 320–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsao, Feng-fu
1979A Functional Study of Topic in Chinese: The first step towards discourse analysis. Taipei: Student Book Co.Google Scholar
Wu, Guo
1992The thetic-categorical distinction as expressed by subject-predicate sentence in Chinese. Australian Journal of Linguistics 12: 271–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, De-Xi
1982Yǔfǎ jiǎngyì (Lectures on Chinese grammar). Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar