Right Peripheral Fragments

Right dislocation and related phenomena in Romance

| University of Gdańsk
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027204776 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027261694 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
In recent years, a number of authors (De Vries 2009, Truckenbrodt 2015, Ott and de Vries 2016, inter alia) have defended that right dislocations (RD) should be treated as bisentential structures, where the “dislocated” constituent is actually a remnant of a clausal ellipsis operation licensed under identity with an antecedent clause. Although Romance RD is a fertile area of research, the consequences of the biclausal analysis remain unexplored in these languages. This monograph intends to fill this gap. Adopting this approach not only solves some issues that have always been at the core of dislocation structures in general; it also allows us to uncover novel sets of data and to provide straightforward explanations for well-known generalizations. Further, it brings RD along with a set of phenomena which are structurally very similar, like afterthoughts or split questions, which have been independently argued to display a bisentential structure. Under alternative, monoclausal approaches to RD, the striking similarities between these phenomena must be rendered anecdotal.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 258]  2020.  ix, 214 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.258
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
Chapter 1. Introduction
2–15
Chapter 2. A tale of two clauses
18–59
Chapter 3. Previous accounts
63–97
Chapter 4. Locality without movement
100–143
Chapter 5. Other right peripheral fragments
146–188
Chapter 6. Concluding remarks
190–191
References
193–211
Index
References

References

Abe, Jun 2014 Make short answers shorter: Support for the in-situ approach. Ms, Tohoko Gakuin University.
2015 The In-situ Approach to Sluicing [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 222]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abe, Jun & Tancredi, Christopher
2013 Non-constituent deaccenting and deletion: A phase-based approach. Ms, Tohoku Gakuin University and Keio Tancredi.Google Scholar
Abeillé, Anne, Bîlbie, Gabriela & Mouret, François
2014 A Romance perspective on gapping constructions. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 15], Hans C. Boas & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds), 227–265. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Abels, Klaus
2012a Don’t repair that island! It ain’t broke. Presented at Islands in Contemporary Linguistic Theory. < https:/​/ehutb​.ehu​.eus​/video​/58c66684f82b2b4c3a8b45e6 > Google Scholar
2012b The Italian left periphery: A view from locality. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 229–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 Locality of covert operations: Lessons from multiple sluicing. Paper presented at the Ellipsis across Borders Conference, 20–21 June, Sarajevo University.Google Scholar
Abels, Klaus & Neeleman, Ad
2009 Universal 20 without the LCA. In Merging Features: Computation, Interpretation, and Acquisition, José M. Brucart, Anna Gavarró & Joan Solà (eds). Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aboh, Enoch
2004 The Morphosyntax of Complement – Head Sequences. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad
2004 Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formation. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adger, David
2003 Core Syntax. A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Aelbrecht, Lobke
2011 The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 149]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2016 What ellipsis can do for phases, and what it can’t, but not why. Linguistic Review 33(4): 453–482. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
1989 Themes and tails: The discourse functions of dislocated elements. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 12: 137–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
An, Duk-Ho
2007 Syntax at the PF Interface: Prosodic Mapping, Linear Order, and Deletion. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Anagnostopoulou, Elena
1997 Clitic left disloation and contrastive left dislocation. In Materials on Left Dislocation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 14], Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds), 151–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena 2006 Clitic doubling. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 1, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 519–581. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Angelopoulos, Nikos and Dominique, Sportiche
2017 Scrambling(s)+clitics=CLLD (The case of French). Paper presented at the 2016 Going Romance conference at Goethe Universität FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
Arregi, Karlos
2003 Clitic left dislocation is contrastive topicalization. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 9(1): 31–44.Google Scholar
2010 Ellipsis in split questions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28: 539–592. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Astruc, Lluisa
2004 Right dislocations: Influence of information structure on prosodic phrasing and intonation. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1: 1–14.Google Scholar
Authier, J.-Marc & Haegeman, Liliane
2015 French adverbial clayses, rescue by ellipsis and the truncation vs intervention approach. Probus 27: 33–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Averintseva-Klisch, Maria
2008a German right dislocation and afterthought in discourse. In Constraints in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 172], Anton Benz & Peter Kühnlein (eds), 225–247. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008b To the right of the clause: Right dislocation vs. afterthought. In ‘Subordination’ vs. ‘Coordination’ in Sentence and Text. A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 98], Catherine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds), 217–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Averintseva-Klisch, Maria & Buecking, Sebastian
2008 Dislocating NPs to the right: Anything goes? Semantic and pragmatic constraints. In Proceedings of SuB12, Atle Grønn (ed.), 32–46. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon & Horn, George
1976 Remarks on ‘Conditions on Transformations’. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 265–299.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
2003 Lexical Categories. Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Chris
2012 Quantificational binding does not require c-command. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 614–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barrenechea, Ana María
1973 A propósito de la elipsis en la coordinación. In Studia Hispanica in Honorem R. Lapesa, Vol. II, 105–121. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Barros, Matthew
2014 Sluicing and Identity in Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Barros, Matthew, Elliott, Patrick & Thoms, Gary
2014 There is no island repair. Ms, Rutgers, UCL & University of Edinburgh.
Batllori, Montserrat & Hernanz, M. Lluïsa
2009 Foco oracional y polaridad: En torno a una asimetría entre el español y el catalán. In Actas del VIII cogreso internacional de historia de la lengua española, Emilio Montero Cartelle (ed.), 2621–2636. Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
1998 Inversion as focalization. Ms, University of Siena.
2001 Inversion as focalization. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke C. J. Hulk & J.-Yves Pollock (eds), 60–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004 Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP, The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Luigi Rizzi (ed.). Oxford: Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Belloro, Valeria A.
2015 To the Right of the Verb: An Investigation of Clitic Doubling and Right Dislocation in Three Spanish Dialects. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola 2001 The position of topic and focus in the left periphery. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 39–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia
2004 Topic, Focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Luigi Rizzi (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Berruto, G.
1985 Dislocazioni a sinistra e grammatica dell’italiano parlato. In Sintassi e morfologia della lingua italiana d’uso. Teoria e applicazioni descrittive, Annalisa Franchi de Bellis & Leonardo Maria Savoia (eds), 59–82. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Frascarelli, Mara
2010 Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia 2(1): 43–88.Google Scholar
Bleam, Tonia
1999 Leísta Spanish and the Syntax of Clitic Doubling. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Bocci, Giuliano
2013 The Syntax-prosody Interface. A Cartographic Perspective with Evidence from Italian [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 204]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric
2003 Islands and Chains: Resumption as Stranding [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 63]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Bare Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1958 A theory of pitch accent in English. Word 14: 109–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia
1984 Aproximació a l’entonació del català central. MA thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
1990 Subjects in Catalan. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 13: 1–26.Google Scholar
Boone, Enrico
2015 The Syntax and Licensing of Gapping and Fragments. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.
Borer, Hagit
1984 Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko
2014 Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1): 27–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Gallego, Ángel
2014 Reconsidering subextraction: Evidence from Spanish. Borealis 3: 223–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Picallo, Carme
1996 Postnominal adjectives in Spanish DPs. Journal of Linguistics 32: 349–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brucart, José M.
1987 La elisión sintáctica en español. Bellaterra: Publicacions de la UAB.Google Scholar
1999 La elipsis. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2787–2863. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Brucart, José M., Gallego, Ángel & Fernández-Sánchez, Javier
2019 Ellipsis (in Romance languages). Ms, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/Uniwersytet Gdański.
Bruening, Benjamin
2009 Selectional asymmetries between CP and DP suggest that the DP hypothesis is wrong. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 27–35.Google Scholar
2015 Non-constituent coordination: Prosody, not movement. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 21(1): article 5.Google Scholar
Brunetti, Lisa
2003 “Information” focus movement in Italian and contextual constraints on ellipsis. In WCCFL 22: Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Gina Garding & Mimu Tsujimura (eds), 95–108. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Buell, Leston 2008 VP-internal DPs and right-dislocation in Zulu. In Linguistics in the Netherlands, Vol. 25, Marjo van Koppen & Bert Botma (eds), 37–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2003 On D-trees, beans and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 511–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1999 Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 33–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Camacho, José
2002 Wh-doubling: Implications for the syntax of wh movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 157–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 The coarse structure of the center periphery. Ms, Rutgers University.
Cardinaletti, Anna
2002 Against optional and null clitics. Right dislocation vs. marginalization. Studia Linguistica 56: 29–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo
1999 A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance. Studia Linguistica 53: 40–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Doubling structures and reconstruction. Probus 12(1): 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo & Chierchia, Gennaro
1999 Reconstruction in dislocation constructions and the syntax/semantics interface. In WCCFL 17: The Proceedings of the Seventeenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Kinary N. Shahin, Susan Blake & Eun-Sook Kimpp (eds), 132–146. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati, Caterina
2015 Please do not move that remnant too much! In Remnant Movement, Günther Grewendorf (ed.), 179–200. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1976 Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 27–55. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1977 On wh-movement. In Formal Syntax, P. Culicover, T. Wasow, A. Akmajian (eds). New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1993 A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008 On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honour of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta, Robert Freidin & Carlos Peregrín Otero (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard
1977 Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8(3): 425–504.Google Scholar
1993 A minimalist program for linguistic theory. The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra 2005 Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Rebecca Cover & Yuni Kim (eds), 73–91. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
2013 Syntactic identity in sluicing: How much and why. Linguistic Inquiry 44: 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra, Ladusaw, William & McCloskey, James
2011 Sluicing(:) Between structure and inference. In Representing Language: Essays in Honor of Judith Aissen, Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo, Line Mikkelsen & Eric Potsdam (eds), 31–50. San Diego CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1977 The movement nature of left dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 397–412.Google Scholar
1983 Topic constructions in some European languages and connectedness. In Connectedness in Sentence, Discourse and Text, Konrad Ehlich & Henk van Riemsijk (eds), 7–41. Tilburg: KUB.Google Scholar
1990 Types of A-dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1993 A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239–297.Google Scholar
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi
2008 The cartography of syntactic structures. In CISCL Working Papers on Language and Cognition, Vol.2, Vicenzo Moscati (ed.), 43–59. Siena: Università degli Studi di Siena.Google Scholar
Constantini, Francesco
2005 On obviation in subjunctive clauses: The state of the art. Annali di CaFoscari 44(1-2): 97–132.Google Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth
2001 Gapping: In defense of deletion. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Mary Andronis (ed.), 133–147. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
Crocco, Claudia
2013 Is Italian clitic right dislocation grammaticalised? A prosodic analysis of YN-questions and statements. Lingua 133: 30–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2010 Syntactic extraposition and clitic resumption in Italian. Lingua 120: 50–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray
2005 Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cat, Cécile
2002 French Dislocation. PhD dissertation, University of York.
De Cat
(2007) French dislocation without movement, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 485–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cat, Cécile
2007 French Dislocation. Interpretation, Syntax, Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Delais-Roussaire, Elisabeth, Doetjes, Jenny & Sleeman, Petra
2004 Dislocation. In Handbook of French Semantics, Francis Corblin & Henriëtte de Swart (eds), 505–530. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida
1991 Resumptive Chains in Restrictive Relatives, Appositives and Dislocation Structures. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Depiante, Marcela
2000 The Syntax of Deep and Surface Anaphora. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
2004 Dos casos de elipsis con partícula de polaridad en español: Evidencia a favor de una visión no uniforme de la elipsis. Revista de la Sociedad Argentina de Lingüística 1: 53–69.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
2005 A comment on the topic of topic-comment. Lingua 115: 691–710. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen 1990 Clitic doubling, wh-movement and quantification in Romanian. Linguistic Inquiry 21(3): 351–397.Google Scholar
Döring, Sandra
2015 Parentheticals are – presumably – CPs. In Parenthesis and Ellipsis, Marlies Kluck, Dennis Ott & Mark de Vries (eds), 109–145. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Downing, Laura J.
(2011) The prosody of dislocation in selected Bantu languages. Lingua 121: 722–786. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, Ineŝ & Figuereido-Silva, M. Cristina
2016 The null subject parameter and the structure of the sentence in EP and BP. In The Handbook of Portuguese Linguistics, W. Leo Wetzels, João Costa & Sergio Menuzzi (eds), 234–253. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
1976 A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
1997 The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2007 The architecture of topic and focus. In The Architecture of Focus, Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds), 33–58. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Escobar, Linda
1995 Lefthand Satellites in Spanish. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
Espinal, Maria Teresa
1991 The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67: 726–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio
2016 Complementizer phenomena in Spanish: Information structure and its syntactic manifestation. Borealis 5(2).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert
2006 On pure syntax (uncontaminated by information structure). In A Festschrift Presented to Günther Grewendorf on Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Patrick Brandt & Eric Fuss (eds), 137–157. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldhausen, Ingo
2008 The Prosody-Syntax Interface in Catalan. PhD dissertation, University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
2010 Sentential Form and Prosodic Structure of Catalan [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 168]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Lagunilla, Marina
1983 El comportamiento de "un" con sustantivos y adjetivos en función de predicado nominal. Sobre el llamado "un" enfático. In Serta Philologica F. Lázaro Carreter, 195–208. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Fernández-Rubiera, Francisco J.
2014 When phonology undergenerates: Evidence from Asturian enclitic structures. In Proceedings of the 40th Berkeley Linguistics Society, 85–101. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Fernández-Sánchez, Javier
2012 The Syntax of PredNPs. MA thesis, University College London.
2013 How left is right? Locating Romance CLRD. In XXIII Colloquium on Generative Grammar. Madrid.Google Scholar
2016 Topics at the left edge of infinitive clauses in Spanish and Catalan. Borealis 5(2): 111–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Embedded gapping isn’t gapping. Ms, UAB/CLT.
2019 Against a clausal ellipsis account of all stripping strings in Spanish. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 55(1): 53–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fiengo, Robert & May, Robert
1994 Indices and Identity. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fortin, Catherine
2007 Indonesian Sluicing and Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Description and Explanation in a Minimalist Framework. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
Fox, Danny 1999a Focus, parallelism and accomodation. In Proceedings of the 9th SALT, Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (eds), 70–90. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
1999b Reconstruction, binding theory, and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 157–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Danny & Lasnik, Howard
2003 Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 143–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Francesconi, Armando
2005 La dislocación en la sintaxis italiana y española. Aspectos textuales y traductivos. Actas del XXIII AISPI (Associazione ispanisti italiani), 202–222.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven
2005 What is “that”? Indiana University Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 33–62.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara
2000 The Syntax-phonology Interface in Topic and Focus Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 Dislocation, clitic resumption and minimality. A comparative analysis or left and right topic constructions in Italian. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 256], Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe & Petra Sleeman (eds), 99–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Dislocations and framings. In Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, Andreas Dufter & Elizabeth Stark (eds), 472–501. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland
2007 Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Generalizations across Languages [Linguitstik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Ramaglia, Francesca
2013 (Pseudo)clefts at the syntax-prosody-discourse interface. In Cleft Structures [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 208] Katharina Hartmann & Tonjes Veenstra (eds), 97–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, Lyn & Clifton Jr, Charles
2005 The syntax-discourse divide: Processing ellipsis. Syntax 8(2): 121–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner
2004 Notes on the syntax and pragmatics of German left dislocation. In The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds), 203–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina
2012 El margen derecho del enunciado. Revista Española de Lingüística 42(2): 63–93.Google Scholar
Fukaya, T.
2007 Sluicing and Stripping in Japanese and Some Implications. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Gallego, Ángel
2009a Defective C-T in Romance. Probus 21: 163–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009b Ellipsis by phase. Paper presented at the XIX CGG, EHU-UPV.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana
1996 Is there a FocusP and a TopicP in the noun phrase structure? University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 6(2): 105–128.Google Scholar
Gracanin-Yuksek, Martina
2007 On Sharing. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1963 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther 2002 Left dislocation as movement. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2: 31–81.Google Scholar
Griffiths, James
2013 Parenthetical verb constructions, fragment answers and constituent modification. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(1): 191–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 On appositives. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
2019 A Q-based approach to clausal ellipsis: Deriving the P-stranding and island sensitivity generalisations without movement. Glossa 4(1).Google Scholar
Griffiths, James & Lipták, Anikó
2014 Contrast and island sensitivity in clausal ellipsis. Syntax 17(3): 189–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes K.
2000 A movement approach to contrastive left dislocation. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 25: 3–65.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo
2002 Structural Markedness and Syntactic Structure: A Study of Word Order and the Left Periphery in Mexican Spanish. PhD dissertation, University of California Santa Cruz.
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier & González-Rivera, Melvin
2013 Spanish PredNPs and the left periphery. In Selected Proceedings of the 16th HLS, Jennifer Cabrelli-Amaro (ed.), 1–14. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1991 Parenthetical adverbial: The radical orphanage approach. In Aspects of Modern English: Papers Presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday, Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Nawada, Osamu Koma & Takao Yagi (eds), 232–254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.Google Scholar
2003 Notes on long adverbial fronting in English. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 640–649. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116: 1651–1669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Adverb Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena and the Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert
2006 Mittelfeld phenomena (Scrambling in Germanic). In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 3, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 204–274. Malden MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1967 Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3(2): 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian
2004 Hallidays Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halpert, Claire
2012 Argument Licensing and Agreement in Zulu. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Halpert, Claire & Zeller, Jochen
2013 Right dislocation and raising-to-object in Zulu. Ms, University of Minnesota and University of KwaZulu-Natal.
Hankamer, Jorge
1973 Unacceptable ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 17–68.Google Scholar
1979 Deletion in Coordinate Structures. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Harizanov, Boris
2014 Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface: A-movement and morphological merger in Bulgarian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(4): 1033–1088. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Katherina
2000 Right Node Raising and Gapping. Interface Conditions on Prosodic Deletion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haugen, Jason D. 2008 Morphology at the Interfaces. Reduplication and Noun Incorporation in Uto-Aztecan [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 117]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herburger, Elena
2000 What Counts. Focus and Quantification. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa
2001 En bonito lío me he metido! Notas sobre la afectividad en español. Moenia 7: 93–109.Google Scholar
2007a Emphatic polarity and C in Spanish. In Studies in Spanish Syntax, Laura Brugè (ed.), 105–150. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
2007b From polarity to modality: Some (a)symmetries between bien and sí in Spanish. In Coreference, Modality and Focus, [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 111], Luis Eguren & Olga Fernández-Soriano (eds), 133–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa & Brucart, José M.
1987 La sintaxis, 1: Principios teóricos. La oración simple. Barcelona: Crítica.Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa & Suñer, Avellina
1999 La predicación no copulativa. Las construcciones absolutas. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española,Vol.2, Ch.39, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Herringa, Herman
2012 A multidominance approach to appositional constructions. Lingua 122(6): 554–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2015 Verb second. In Syntax: Theory and Analysis, Vol. 1, Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 324–383. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan & Thompson, Sandra
1973 On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465–497.Google Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh J.
1982 Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Iatridou, Sabine
1995 Clitics and island effects. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 2, Roumyana Izvorski & Victoria Tredinnick (eds), 11–30. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Irurtzun, Aritz
2007 The grammar of focus at the interfaces. PhD dissertation, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).
2009 Why Y: On the centrality of syntax in the architecture of grammar. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8: 141–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 On the nature and distribution of split wh-questions in Basque. Talk given at the Information Structure Workshop at the UAB, November.
Jackendoff, Ray
1971 Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 21–35.Google Scholar
1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997 The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002 Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo
1982 Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil
1990 Incomplete VP deletion and gapping. Linguistic Analysis 20: 39–75.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. & Miyagawa, Shigeru
2014 A feature Inheritance approach to root phenomena and parametric variation. Lingua 145: 276–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kyle 2006 Gapping. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 407–435. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Gapping is not (VP-) ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 289–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Michael Allan
1993 Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kalbertodt, Janina, Primus, Beatrice & Schumacher, Petra
2015 Punctuation, prosody and discourse: Afterthought vs. right dislocation. Frontiers in Psychology 6. Crossref. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2010 Why there are no directionality parameters? In WCCFL 28: Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer & Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds), 2–23. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, Paula
1986 Romance Subjunctive Clauses and Logical Form. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
2009 What can the subjunctive disjoint reference effect tell us about the subjunctive? Lingua 119(12): 1788–1810. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, Hiroko
2010 A wh-in-situ strategy for sluicing. English Linguistics 27: 43–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kluck, Marlies
2014 Who, me? Ellipsis in inquisitive fragment answers. Paper presented at the TINdag 2014.Google Scholar
Kluck, Marlies, Ott, Dennis & de Vries, Mark
(eds) 2015 Parenthesis and Ellipsis: Crosslinguistic and Theoretical Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kluck, Marlies & de Vries, Mark
2013 Cumulative rightward processes. In Rightward Movement in a Comparative Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 200], Gert Webelhuth, Manfred Sailer & Heike Walker (eds), 281–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kölbel, Max
2003 Faultless disagreement. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104: 53–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koster
Jan. 1978 Why subject sentences don’t exist. In Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages, Samuel J. Keyser (ed.), 53–64. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jan. 2000 Extraposition as parallel construal. Ms, University of Groningen.
Kramer, Ruth
2014 Clitic doubling or object agreement: The view from Amharic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32: 593–634. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred & Féry, Caroline
2008 Information structure. Notional distinctions, ways of expression. In Unity and Diversity of Languages, Piet van Sterkenburg (ed.), 123–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1978 Danwa-no Bunpoo. Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar
Ladd, Robert D.
1996 Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1981 Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-standard French [Pragmatics & Beyond II:6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, Eva
1979 La dislocation en français. Étude de syntaxe générative. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard 2001 When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 31, Vol.2, Minjoo Kim & Uri Strauss (eds), 301–320. Amherst MA: GSLA.Google Scholar
2013 Multiple sluicing in English? Syntax 17(1): 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Stowell, Tim
1991 Weakest crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 22(4): 687–720.Google Scholar
Laurens, Frédéric
2008 French predicative verbless utterances. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Stefan Muller (ed.), 152–172. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Lebeaux, David
1988 Language Acquisition and the Form of Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Lechner, Winfried
2004 Ellipsis in Comparatives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jeong-Shik
2009 A verb initial single clause analysis of right dislocated constructions in Korean. Studies in Modern Grammar 57: 127–157.Google Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel & Escandell, Victoria
2009 Fronting and verum focus in Spanish. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 155–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leung, Tommi
2014 The preposition stranding generalization and conditions on sluicing: Evidence from Emirati Arabic. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 332–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark & Pierrehumbert, Janet
1984 Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In Language Sound Structure, Mark Aronoff & Richard T. Oehrle (eds), 157–233. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Vivian
2002 Coordination and sharing at the interfaces. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Lobeck, Anne
1995 Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing and Identification. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
López, Luis
1999 VP-ellipsis in English and Spanish and the features of auxiliaries. Probus 11(2): 263–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 Dislocations. In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 402–421. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Luján, Marta
1999 A unified approach to control and obviation. In Grammatical Analyses in Basque and Romance Linguistics. Papers in Honor of Mario Saltarelli . [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 187], Jon A. Franco, Alazne Landa & Juan Martín, 104–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Rita
1994 Syntactic dependencies and their properties: A note on strong islands. Ms, University College London.
Mayol, Laya
2007 Right dislocation in Catalan. Languages in Contrast 7(2): 203–219.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James
1982 Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 91–106.Google Scholar
1990 Resumptive pronouns, A-bar binding and levels of representation in Irish. In Syntax of the Modern Celtic Languages, Randall Hendrick (ed.), 199–248. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James 2006 Resumption. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. IV, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 94–117. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2001 The Syntax of Silence. Oxford: Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004a Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 661–738. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004b Resumptivity and non-movement. Studies in Greek Linguistics 24: 471–481.Google Scholar
2005 Revisiting syntactic identity conditions. Handout given at the Workshop on ellipsis, University of California, Berkeley.
2010 Three kinds of ellipsis. In Context-dependence, Perspective and Relativity, Francois Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftali Villanueva (eds), 141–192. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jerry
1973 Sentence fragments and the notion of ’sentence’. In Issues in Linguistics: Essays in Honour of Henry and Renée Kahane, Braj Kachru (ed.), 719–751. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Yukiko
2002 Prominence mismatches and differential object marking in Bantu. In Proceedings of the LFG 02 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 292–314. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Murphy, Andrew
2016 Subset relations in ellipsis licensing. Glossa. A Journal of General Linguistics 1(1): 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Szendröi, Kriszta
2004 Superman sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 149–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Vermeulen, Reiko
(eds) 2012 The Syntax of Topic, Focus and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neijt, Anneke
1979 Gapping: A Contribution to Sentence Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene
1986 Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew
2011 Multiple agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs omnivorous number. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29: 939–971. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nishigauchi, Taisuke
1998 Multiple sluicing in Japanese and the functional nature of wh-phrases. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 121–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nykiel, Joanna
2013 Clefts and preposition omission in sluicing. Lingua 123: 74–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Preposition stranding and ellipsis alternation. English Language and Linguistics 21: 127–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco
1997 Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and other Romance Languages. PhD dissertation, CUNY Graduate Center, New York.
1998 Postverbal asymmetries in Spanish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16: 313–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco & Treviño, Esthela
1999 Left dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of Spanish. Lingua 107: 39–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ormazábal, Javier & Romero, Juan
2011 Object clitics and agreement. Ms, University of the Basque Country, University of Extremadura.
Ortega-Santos, Iván 2016 Focus-related Operations at the Right Edge in Spanish: Subjects and Ellipsis [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Santos, Iván, Yoshida, Masaya & Nakao, Chizuru
2014 On ellipsis structures involving a wh-remnant and a non-wh-remnant simultaneously. Lingua 138: 55–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ott, Dennis
2008 Notes on noun ph(r)ases. Ms, Harvard University.
2012 Movement and ellipsis in contrastive left-dislocation. In WCCFL 30: Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Nathan Arnett & Ryan Bennet (eds), 281–291. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
2015 Connectivity in left-dislocation and the composition of the left periphery. Linguistic Variation 15(2): 225–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ott, Dennis & de Vries, Mark
2012 Thinking in the right direction: An ellipsis analysis of right-dislocation. Linguistics in the Netherlands 29: 123–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 Right dislocation as deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34(2): 641–690. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ott, Dennis & Struckmeier, Volker
2016 Deletion in clausal ellipsis: Remnants in the middle field. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Penn Linguistics Conference 22: 225–234.Google Scholar
Padilla, Xavier
2001 El orden de palabras en el español coloquial. València: Publicaciones Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Park, Myung-Kwan & Kim, Sun-Woong
2009 The syntax of afterthoughts in Korean: Move and Delete. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 17: 25–53.Google Scholar
Paul, Ileana
2006 Great coffee, that Maxwell House. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Paul, Ileana & Stainton, Robert
2006 Really Intriguing, that Pred NP! Philosophy Publications, paper 24.Google Scholar
Pérez Bello, G.
1998 Uso de las dislocaciones a la derecha y a la izquierda en castellano e italiano. Interlingüística 9: 253–259.Google Scholar
Philippova, Tatiana
2014 P-omission under sluicing, P-clitic and the nature of P-stranding. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XXII, Martin Kohlberg, Kate Bellamy & Eleanor Dutton (eds), 133–155. Leiden: Leiden University.Google Scholar
Picallo, Carme
1985 Opaque Domains. PhD dissertation, CUNY.
Planas-Morales, Sílvia & Villalba, Xavier
2013 The right periphery of interrogatives in Catalan and Spanish: Syntax/prosody interactions. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 12: 193–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Pollock, Jean-Yves
2004 On the left periphery of some Romance wh-questions. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 251–296. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Preminger, Omar
2009 Breaking agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic doubling by their failures. Linguistic Inquiry 40(4): 619–666. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prieto, Pilar
2002 Entonació. In Gramàtica del català contemporani, Joan Solà, M. Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds), 393–462. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen
1984 Topicalization and left dislocation: A functional analysis. In Discourses in Reading and Linguistics, Sheila White & Virginia Teller (eds), 213–225. New York NY: Anyas.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik Jan. 1972 A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Jan. 1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reich, Ingo
2006 Toward a uniform analysis of short answers and gapping. In Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society Conference, Pascal Denis (ed.), 69–78. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1981 Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53–93.Google Scholar
Rezac, Milan
2008 Phi-agree and theta-related case. In Phi Theory, Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds), 83–129. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rivero, Maria L.
1980 On left dislocation and topicalization in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 363–393.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1982 Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986 Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3): 501–557.Google Scholar
1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 Relativized minimality effects. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 Locality and left periphery. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Structures and Beyond, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Bocci, Giuliano
2016 The left periphery of the clause – primarily illustrated for Italian. Ms, to appear in Blackwell Companion to Syntax,2nd edn.Google Scholar
Roca, Francesc
1999 La determinación y la modificación nominal en español. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Rodman, Robert
1974 On left dislocation. Papers in Linguistics 7: 437–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Cilene, Nevins, Andrew & Vicente, Luis
2009 Cleaving the interaction between sluicing and P-stranding. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2006: Selected Papers from “Going Romance” [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 303], Danièle Torck & W. Leo Wetzels (eds), 175–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Cilene & Saab, Andrés
2018 The limits of pseudo-sluicing. Paper presented at the VIII Encuentro de Gramática Generativa, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1992 A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1967 Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
1969 Guess who? In Papers from the 5th RegionalMeeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Robert Binnick et al.. (eds), 252–286. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
1970 Gapping and the order of constituents. In Progress in Linguistics, Manfred Bierwisch & Karl Heidolph (eds), 249–259. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Rossi, M.
1999 L’intonation. Le système du français: description et modélisation. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Rubio, Carlos
2014 Syntactic Constraints on Topicalization Phenomena. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
Sæbø, Kjell J. 1997 Topic, focus and quantifier raising. In Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium, Paul Dekker & Michael Franke (eds), 67–72. Amsterdam: ILLC.Google Scholar
2009 Judgement ascriptions. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 327–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sailor, Craig & Schütze, Carson T.
2014 Is there repair by ellipsis? Ms, University of Groningen and UCLA.
Sailor, Craig & Thoms, Gary
2014 On the non existence of non constituent coordination and non constituent ellipsis. In WCCFL 31: Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Robert E. Santana-LaBarge (ed.), 361–370. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri
2006 When right dislocation meets the left periphery. Lingua 116: 687–755. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Information structure in Italian clauses. Talk given at the Information Structure Workshop, UCL, November.
2009 Topic, focus and background in Italian clauses. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jakob (eds), 359–362. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 The Interaction of Focus and Givenness. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Ana Lucía
2009 The problem of fragment answers. Iberia 1(1): 115–142.Google Scholar
Sato, Yosuke
2011 P-stranding under sluicing and repair by ellipsis: Why is Indonesian (not) special? Journal of East Asian Linguistics 20: 339–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1977 Constraints on coordination. Language 53: 86–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Stefan
2007 Reduced Parenthetical Clauses as Mitigators [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 27]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger
1999 GIVENness, AvoidF and other constraints in the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7: 141–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sedano, Mercedes
2012 Dislocación a la izquierda y a la derecha: Semejanzas y diferencias. In Cum corde et in nova grammatica: Estudios ofrecidos a Guillermo Rojo, Tomás Jiménez-Juliá et al.. (eds), 791–805. Santiago de Compostela: Servizio de Publicacións da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
2013 Dislocación a la izquierda y derecha en España y Latinoamérica. Lingüística 29(2): 153–190.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1978 On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In Nordic Prosody, Torsten Fretheim (ed.), 128–149. Trondheim: TAPIR.Google Scholar
1984 Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995 The prosodic structure of function words. In Papers in Optimality Theory, Vol. 18, Jill N. Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey & Suzanne C. Urbanczyk (eds). Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
2011 The syntax-phonology interface. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, John A. Goldsmith & Alan C. L. Yu (eds). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin 2009 German and English left-peripheral elements and the ‘orphan’ analysis of non-integration. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse, Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 366–397. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin, Cook, Philippa, Frey, Werner & Maienborn, Claudia
(eds) 2009 Dislocated Elements in Discourse. Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin & Frey, Werner
2003 Integrated and non-integrated left peripheral elements in German and English. In Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop, Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn, 435–484. Berlin: ZAS.Google Scholar
Shimoyama, Junko, Drummond, Alex, Schwarz, Bernhard & Wagner, Michael
2015 Movement and ellipsis in afterthought right dislocation, sluicing and fragments. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistics Association. Ottawa: CLA.Google Scholar
Shopen, T.
1972 A Generative Theory of Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
Sportiche, Dominique
2006 Reconstruction, binding, and scope. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. IV, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 35–93. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stainton, Robert
2006 Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis and the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
1974 Pragmatic presuppositions. In Semantics and Philosophy, Milton K. Munitz & Peter K. Unger (eds), 197–214. New York NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Stepanov, A.
2001 Cyclic Domains in Syntactic Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Stigliano, Laura
2018 Revisiting the interaction between P-stranding and clausal ellipsis in Spanish. Ms, The University of Chicago.
Stowell, Tim
1981 Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Stoyanova, Marina
2008 Unique Focus: Languages without Multiple Wh-questions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 123]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suñer, Margarita
1988 The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6: 391–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szczegielniak, Adam
2008 Islands in sluicing in Polish. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds), 404–412. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Shiochi & Husley, Sarah
2009 Wholesale late merger: Beyond the A/A’-distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 387–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Takita, Kensuke
2012 Pseudo-right dislocation and the bare-topic construction in Japanese. Nauzan Linguistics 8: 147–171.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Hidekazu
2001 Right-dislocation as scrambling. Journal of Linguistics 37: 551–579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tancredi, Christopher
1992 Deletion, Deaccenting and Presupposition. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Temmerman, Tanja
2013 The syntax of Dutch embedded fragment answers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31(1): 235–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thoms, Gary
2010 Verb floating and VP-ellipsis: Towards a movement account of ellipsis licensing. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 10: 252–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
2007 The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Russell S.
1986 Basic Word Order. Functional Principles. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Toosarvandani, Maziar. To appear. Embedding the antecedent in gapping: Low coordination and the role of parallelism. Linguistic Inquiry.
Torrego, Esther
1998 Pronouns and determiners: A DP analysis of Spanish nominals. University of Massachusetts, Boston.
Torrence, Harold
2005 On the Distribution of Complementizers in Wolof. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
2013 The Clause Structure of Wolof: Insights into the Left Periphery [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 198]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
1995 Phonological Phrases: Their Relation to Syntax, Focus and Prominence. PhD dissertation, MIT.
1999 On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 219–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 The syntax-phonology interface. In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Paul de Lacy (ed.), 435–456. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2013 Some distinctions in the German Nachfeld. Ms, ZAS Berlin.
2015 Intonation phrases and speech acts. In Parenthesis and Ellipsis. Crosslinguistic and Theoretical Perspectives, Marlies Kluck, Dennis Ott & Mark de Vries (eds), 301–349. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2016 Some distinctions in the right periphery of the German clause. In: Innersentential Propositional Proforms. Syntactic Properties and Interpretative Effects [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 232], Werner Frey, André Meinunger & Kerstin Schwabe (eds), 105–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Umbach, Carla
2016 Evaluative propositions and subjective judgements. In Subjective Meaning, Cécile Meier & Janneke van Wijnbergen-Huitink (eds), 127–168. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan
1995 Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79–123.Google Scholar
Vallduví, Enric
1992 The Informational Component. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Valmala, Vidal
2007 The syntax of little things. Ms, UPV/EHU.
2014 Island repair by ellipsis: Handle with care. In XI Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Phonology, 5–6 June, Barcelona.Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen
(ed.) 2009 Alternatives to Cartography. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Merchant
(eds) 2013 Ellipsis phenomena. In Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, Marcel den Dikken (ed.), 701–745. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vat
Jan. 1981 Left dislocation, connectedness and reconstruction. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 20: 80–103.Google Scholar
Vicente, Luis
2008 Syntactic isomorphism and non-isomorphism under ellipsis. Ms, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Villalba, Xavier
1996 Sobre la dislocació a la dreta. Llengua i Literatura 7: 209–234.Google Scholar
1998 Right dislocation is not right dislocation. In Studies on the Syntax of Central Romance Languages, Olga Fultana & Fransesc Roca (eds), 227–241. Girona: University of Girona.Google Scholar
1999 Nihil est in LF quod prius non fuerit in SS. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 239–252.Google Scholar
Villalba, Xavier 2000 The Syntax of the Sentence Periphery. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
2007 La dislocació a la dreta en català i castellà: Microvariació en la intefície sintaxi/pragmàtica. Caplletra 42: 273–302.Google Scholar
Villalba, Xavier & Bartra-Kauffman, Anna
2009 Predicate focus fronting in the Spanish determiner phrase. Lingua 120(4): 819–849. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vinet, Marie-Thérèse
1991 French non-verbal exclamative constructions. Probus 3: 77–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Mark
2009 Specifying coordination: An investigation into the syntax of dislocation, extraposition and parenthesis. In Language and Linguistics: Emerging Trends, Cynthia R. Dreyer (ed.), 37–98. New York NY: Nova.Google Scholar
2013a Locality and right-dislocation. Linguistics in the Netherlands 30: 160–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Invisible constituents? Parentheses as B-merged adverbial phrases. In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds), 203–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012a Unconventional mergers. In Ways of Structure Building, Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria & Vidal Valmala (eds), 143–166. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b Parenthetical main clauses – or not? On appositives and quasi-relatives. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Lliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 177–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 The Syntax of Relativization. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
2013b Multidominance and locality. Lingua 134: 149–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Arthur
2007 Sluicing and resumption. In NELS 37: Proceedings of the Thirty-seventh Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Weir, Andrew
2012 Left-edge deletion in English and subject omission in diaries. English Language and Linguistics 16: 105–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Fragments and Clausal Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Wells, John C.
2006 English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Whitman, John
2000 Right dislocation in English and Japanese. In Syntactic and Functional Explorations in Honor of Susumu Kuno, Kenichi Takami, Akio Kamio & John Whitman (eds), 445–470. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Wilder, Chris
1995 Some properties of ellipsis in coordination. In Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 13]. Artemis Alexiadou & Tracy Alan Hall (eds), 59–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1978 Across the board rule application. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 31–43.Google Scholar
Winkler, Susanne
2005 Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi
2017 Stripping and topless complements. Linguistic Inquiry 48(2): 341–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zagiu, Rodica
2013 Information structure. In The grammar of Romanian,Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.), 568–574. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Zeller, Jochen 2012 Object marking in Zulu. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30(2): 219–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zerbian, Sabine
2007 Phonological phrasing in Northern Sotho (Bantu). The Linguistic Review 24: 233–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
1994 Grammatical representation of topic and focus: Implications for the structure of the clause. Cuadernos de Lingüística 2: 181–208.Google Scholar
1998 Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter
2001 Backgrounding (right-dislocation) in Dutch. Ms, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
2011 The Syntax of Dutch. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Fernández‐Sánchez, Javier & Dennis Ott
2020. Dislocations. Language and Linguistics Compass 14:9 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Linguistics

Generative linguistics
Romance linguistics
Syntax
Theoretical linguistics
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009060 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Syntax
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2019044651 | Marc record