Prepositions, Case and Verbal Prefixes

The case of Slavic

| University of Leipzig
Hardbound – Available
ISBN 9789027203083 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book –
ISBN 9789027262646 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
This monograph is concerned with prepositional elements in Slavic languages, prepositions, verbal prefixes and functional elements of prepositional nature. It argues that verbal prefixes are incorporated prepositions projecting their argument structure in the complement of the verbal root and that their meaning is based on the two-argument meaning of prepositions, enriched with the CAUSE operator. The book investigates idiomaticity in the realm of prefixed verbs and proposes a novel analysis of non-compositional prefixed verbs based on the operation of predicate transfer. It also offers a uniform analysis of cases. Prepositional as well as non-prepositional cases are treated as a reflection of the agreement operation, whereat the type of prepositional case is determined by semantic properties of the decomposed preposition. Furthermore, it examines prepositions from a diachronic perspective and argues that they can be grammaticalised as future markers under certain circumstances.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 255]  2019.  vii, 231 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.255
Table of Contents
Abbreviations
Chapter 1. Introduction
1–3
Chapter 2. Verbal prefixes
5–48
Chapter 3. Prefixed verbs and compositionality
49–72
Chapter 4. Prefixes in target state participles
73–125
Chapter 5. The future prefix po-
159–157
Chapter 6. Decomposed prepositional phrases and case
160–206
Chapter 7. Conclusions
207–209
References
211–228
Index
References

References

Ackerman, Farrell & Goldberg, Adele E.
1996 Constraints on adjectival past participles. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), 17–30. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Acquaviva, Paolo.
2009 Roots and lexicality in Distributed Morphology. In York-Essex Morphology Meeting 5, Alexandra Galani, Daniel Redinger & Norman Yeo (eds), 1–21. York: Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2008 Structuring participles. In Proceedings of the 26th WCCFL, Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 33–41. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Rathert, Monika & von Stechow, Arnim
2003 Introduction: The modules of perfect constructions. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), vii–xxxviii. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alsina, Alex, Mohanan, Karuvannur Puthanveetli & Mohanan, Tara
2005 How to get rid of the COMP. In Proceedings of the LFG05 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracey Holloway King (eds), 21–41. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2003 Participles and voice. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 1–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John, M.
1971 The Grammar of Case: Towards a Localist Theory. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2006 Modern Grammars of Case. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anstatt, Tanja
2003 Das Verbalpräfix po- im Polnischen. Zeitschrift für Slavische Philologie 62: 359–385.Google Scholar
Arsenijević, Boban
2006 Inner Aspect and Telicity: The Decompositional and the Quantificational Nature of Eventualities at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, Leiden University [LOT Dissertation Series 142].Google Scholar
2007 Slavic verb prefixes are resultative. Cahiers Chronos 17: 197–213.Google Scholar
Asbury, Anna, Gehrke, Berit & Hegedűs, Veronika
2007 One size fits all: Prefixes, particles, adpositions and cases as members of the category P. In UiL OTS Yearbook 2006, Cem Keskin (ed.), 1–17. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Assmann, Anke, Edygarova, Svetlana, Georgi, Doreen, Klein, Timo & Weisser, Philipp
2014 Case stacking below the surface: On the possessor case alternation in Udmurt. The Linguistic Review 31: 447–485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Babko-Malaya, Olga
1999 Zero Morphology: A Study of Aspect, Argument Structure, and Case. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
2003 Perfectivity and prefixation in Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11: 5–36.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
1988 Incorporation: A theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2008 The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Case: Its Principles and Parameters. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartnicka, Barbara
1970 Adiektywizacja imiesłowów w języku polskim. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Bartnicka, Barbara, Hansen, Björn, Klemm, Wojtek, Lehmann, Volkmar & Satkiewicz, Halina
2004 Grammatik des Polnischen. München: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Bąnk, Piotr
2010 Gramatyka języka polskiego: Zarys popularny. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.Google Scholar
Beck, Sigrid
2005 There and back again: A semantic analysis. Journal of Semantics 22: 3–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
1981 The syntax of ne: Some theoretical implications. The Linguistic Review 1: 117–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergsma, Shane, Bhargava, Aditya, He, Hua & Kondrak, Grzegorz
2010 Predicting the semantic compositionality of prefix verbs. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 293–303. Cambridge MA: MIT, Association for Computational Linguistics.
Bertinetto, Pier Marco
2001 On a frequent misunderstanding in the temporal-aspectual domain: The ‘perfective = telic confusion’. In Semantic Interfaces. Reference, Anaphora and Aspect, Carlo Cecchetto, Gennaro Chierchia & Maria Teresa Guasti (eds), 177–210. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred
1967 Syntactic features in morphology: General problems of so-called pronominal inflection in German. In To Honor Roman Jakobson, Vol. 1, 239–270. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1988 On the grammar of local prepositions. In Studia grammatica 29, Manfred Bierwisch, Wolfgang Motsch & Ilse Zimmermann (eds), 1–65. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
1996 How much space gets into language? In Language and Space, Paul Bloom, Merrill F. Garrett, Lynn Nadel & Mary A. Peterson (eds), 31–76. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert I.
1991 Time and the Verb. A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr
2007 P(refixe)s and P(reposition)s. Ms, University of Leipzig.
2009a Prefixes as prepositions and multiple cases. In Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure. Proceedings of FDSL 7, Leipzig 2007, Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Denisa Lenertová & Petr Biskup (eds), 3–17. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2009b The syntactic structure of PPs. In Czech in Formal Grammar, Mojmir Dočekal & Markéta Ziková (eds), 9–29. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2010 The syntax and semantics of prefixed adjectival participles. Ms, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
2011 Adverbials and the Phase Model [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 177]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Slavic prefixes and adjectival participles. In Slavic Languages in Formal Grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010, Markéta Ziková & Mojmir Dočekal (eds), 271–289. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2015 On (non-)compositionality of prefixed verbs. In Slavic Languages in the Perspective of Formal Grammar: Proceedings of FDSL 10.5, Brno 2014, Markéta Ziková, Pavel Caha & Mojmir Dočekal (eds), 59–78. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2016a The non-identity reading in ATB constructions: The case of slavic. Ms, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
2016b Prefixed adjectival participles. Linguistica Brunensia 64: 7–26.Google Scholar
2016c Das Futur-Präfix po- . In Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik. XXIII. JungslavistInnen-Treffen in Dresden, 18.-20. September 2014, Holger Kuße & Marina Scharlaj (eds), 9–26. Munich: Biblion Media.Google Scholar
2017 Decomposing prepositional cases in Russian and Polish. In Aspects of Slavic Linguistics: Formal Grammar, Lexicon, and Communication, Olav Mueller-Reichau & Marcel Guhl (eds), 50–68. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. To appear. Case syncretism in Russian, Polish and Czech ATB constructions. In Proceedings of the 25th Meeting of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. The Cornell Meeting 2016, Wayne Browne, Miloje Despić, Naomi Enzinna, Robin Karlin, Simone De Lemos & Draga Zec (eds), 418–437. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr & Putnam, Michael
2012 One P with two spell-outs: The ent-/aus-alternation in German. Linguistic Analysis 38: 69–109.Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr, Putnam, Michael & Smith, Laura C.
2011 German particle and prefix verbs at the syntax-phonology interface. Leuvense Bijdragen 97: 106–135.Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr & Zybatow, Gerhild
2015 Verbal prefixation in Slavonic: A minimalist approach. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 2. [HSK 40.2], Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 1492–1515. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bláha, Ondřej
2008 Vyjadřování budoucnosti v současné češtině (se zřetelem k ostatním slovanským jazykům). Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J.
2001 Case. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Błaszczak, Joanna
2007 The nom/gen “subject” puzzle in Polish. In Linguistic Investigations into Formal Description of Slavic Languages. Contributions of the Sixth European Conference Held at Potsdam University, November 30-December 02, 2005, Peter Kosta & Lilla Schürcks (eds), 127–146. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Błaszczak, Joanna & Klimek-Jankowska, Dorota
2012 Futures in Polish and Slovenian from the perspective of a force-dynamic model. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16: The Utrecht Meeting, 2011, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Anna Chernilovskaya & Rick Nouwen (eds), 85–98. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric
2008 Bare Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bogusławski, Andrzej
1960 Prefiksalne pary aspektowe a semantyka prefiksalna czasownika rosyjskiego. Slavia Orientalis 9: 139–175.Google Scholar
1963 Prefiksacja czasownikowa we współczesnym języku rosyjskim. Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków: Zakład Narodowy imienia Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1971 The nominal in the progressive. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 246–250.Google Scholar
Bondarko Aleksandr V.
1961 K voprosu o glagolach dviženija v češskom jazyke (formy tipa ponesu, poletím). Slavia 30: 527–547.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005 Structuring Sense. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borik, Olga
2002 Aspect and Reference Time. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University [LOT dissertation series].
2013 Past participle formation and the eventive/adjectival passive in Russian. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17, Emmanuel Chemla, Vincent Homer & Grégoire Winterstein (eds), 115–132. http://​semanticsarchive​.net​/sub2012/Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko
2009 More on the no-DP analysis of article-less languages. Studia Linguistica 63: 87–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Botwinik-Rotem, Irena
2008 An exploration of Hebrew locative PPs. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 331–364. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowern, Claire & Aygen-Tosun, Gülşat
2000 Titan's tensed prepositions. In Proceedings of the 36th Chicago Linguistics Society. Vol. 2, Arika Okrent & John P. Boyle (eds), 35–48. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Brecht, Richard D.
1985 The form and function of aspect in Russian. In Issues in Russian Morphosyntax, Michael S. Flier & Richard D. Brecht (eds), 9–34. Columbus OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Brennan, Jonathan
2008 Irish prepositions: Agreement and impoverishment. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 105–113. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin
2014 Word formation is syntactic: Adjectival passives in English. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32: 363–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin & Al Khalaf, Eman
2017 Category mismatches in coordination revisited. Ms, University of Delaware and University of Jordan. http://​udel​.edu​/~bruening​/Downloads​/SelectionInCoordination5​.1​.pdf
Caha, Pavel
2009 The Nanosyntax of Case. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Caha, Pavel & Ziková, Markéta
2016 Vowel length as evidence for a distinction between free and bound prefixes in Czech. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 63: 331–377.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caponigro, Ivano
2003 Free Not to Ask: On the Semantics of Free Relatives and Wh-Words Crosslinguistically. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
Caponigro, Ivano & Pearl, Lisa
2008 Silent prepositions: Evidence from free relatives. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 365–385. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cetnarowska, Bożena
2000 Resultative adjectives in Polish. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47: 47–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 On inherent inflection feeding derivation in Polish. In Yearbook of Morphology 1999, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 153–183. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1964 Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1973 Conditions on transformations. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 232–286. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–156. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale. A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008 On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Jason H.
2011 The Prefix PO- and Aspect in Russian and Polish: A Cognitive Grammar Acccount. PhD dissertation, University of Kansas.
Chvany Catherine V.
1986 Jakobson’s fourth and fifth dimensions: On reconciling the cube model of case meanings with the two-dimensional matrices for case forms. In Case in Slavic, Richard D. Brecht & Jafmes S. Levine (eds), 107–129. Columbus OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
2010 Mapping spatial PPs: An introduction. In Mapping Spatial PPs. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 3–25. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Colette G.
1977 The Structure of Jacaltec. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2008 Spatial cases. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 609–625. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Csirmaz, Aniko
2006 Particles and a two component theory of aspect. In Event Structure and the Left Periphery of Hungarian, Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), 107–128. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cvrček, Václav, Kodýtek, Vilém, Kopřivová, Marie, Kováříková, Dominika, Sgall, Petr, Šulc, Michal, Táborský, Jan, Volín, Jan & Waclawičová, Martina
2010 Mluvnice současné češtiny 1. Jak se píše a jak se mluví. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Karolinum.Google Scholar
Čechová, Marie, Dokulil, Miloš, Hlavsa, Zdeněk, Hrbáček, Josef & Hrušková, Zdeňka
2000 Čeština – řeč a jazyk. Praha: ISV nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Damborský, Jiří
1967a Participium l-ové ve slovanštině. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
1967b Neurčité a jmenné tvary slovesné v polštině. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Danon, Gabi
2006 Caseless nominals and the projection of DP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24: 977–1008.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, William & Dubinsky, Stanley
1998 Sentential subjects as complex NPs: New reasons for an old account of subjacency. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Part 1: Papers from the Main Session, Catherine M. Gruber, Derrick Higgins, Kenneth S. Olson & Tamra Wysocki (eds), 83–94. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Wiltschko, Martina
2002 Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Miriam
1997 The syntax of temporal relations. A uniform approach to tense and aspect. In Proceedings of the 16th WCCFL, Emily Curtis, James Lyle & Gabriel Webster (eds), 145–159. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2000 The primitives of temporal relations. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 157–186. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dickey, Stephen M.
2000 Parameters of Slavic Aspect: A Cognitive Approach. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Dickey, Stephen. M.
2007 A prototype account of the development of delimitative po- in Russian. In Cognitive Paths into the Slavic Domain, Dagmar Divjak & Agata Kochańska (eds), 329–374. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
1995 Particles: On the Syntax of Verb-Particle, Triadic and Causative Constructions. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2010 On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs. In Mapping Spatial PPs. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 74–126. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, Mila
1999 Verb Semantics, Diathesis and Aspect. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2012 Voice. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert I. Binnick (ed.), 937–959. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Slabakova, Roumyana
2005 Quantification and aspect. In Perspectives on Aspect, Henk J. Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds), 61–80. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny
1997 Quantifiers and Selection. On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch and English. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
Dostál, Antonín
1954 Studie o vidovém systému v staroslověnštině. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1979 Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dvořák, Emil
1983 Ke kodifikaci pravidel užívání přechodníků. Naše řeč 66: 180–192.Google Scholar
Embick, David
2004 On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 355–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E.
1976 A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure Preserving, and Local Transformations. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985 A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Endresen, Anna, Janda, Laura A., Kuznetsova, Julia, Lyashevskaya, Olga, Makarova, Anastasia, Nesset, Tore & Sokolova, Svetlana
2012 Russian ‘purely aspectual’ prefixes: Not so ‘empty’ after all? Scando-Slavica 58: 231–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Ulrich, Rytel-Kuc, Danuta, Cirko, Lesław, Dębski, Antoni, Gaca, Alicja, Jurasz, Alina, Kątny, Andrzej, Mecner, Paweł, Prokop, Izabela, Sadziński, Roman, Schatte, Christoph, Schatte, Czesława, Tomiczek, Eugeniusz & Weiss, Daniel
1999 Deutsch-polnische kontrastive Grammatik, Band 2. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Energeia.Google Scholar
Ertl, Václav
1925/1926 A. Mazon: Grammaire de la langue tchèque. Slavia 4: 772–805.Google Scholar
Fasske, Helmut
1981 Grammatik der obersorbischen Schriftsprache der Gegenwart. Bautzen: Domowina.Google Scholar
Filip, Hana
1999 Aspect, Eventuality Types and Noun Phrase Semantics. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
2000 The quantization puzzle. In Events as Grammatical Objects, James Pustejovsky & Carol Tenny (eds), 3–60. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2003 Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11: 55–101.Google Scholar
2005 On accumulating and having it all. Perfectivity, prefixes and bare arguments. In Perspectives on Aspect, Henk J. Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds), 125–147. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Lexical aspect. In The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, R. I. Binnick (ed.), 721–751. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fong, Vivienne
1997 The Order of Things: What Directional Locatives denote. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Forsyth, James
1970 A Grammar of Aspect. Usage and Meaning in the Russian Verb. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fowler, George
1996 An articulated theory of aspect and prefixation in Slavic. In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The College Park Meeting 1994, Jindřich Toman (ed.), 97–122. Ann Arbor MI: Slavic.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven
1995 Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gehrke, Berit
2008 Ps in Motion: On the Semantics and Syntax of P Elements and Motion Events. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University. [LOT Dissertation Series 184].Google Scholar
Geist, Ljudmila
2010 The argument structure of predicate adjectives in Russian. Russian Linguistics 34: 239–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2004 Grammaticalization as Economy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 The Linguistic Cycle. Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giger, Markus
2003 Resultativa im modernen Tschechischen unter Berücksichtigung der Sprachgeschichte und der übrigen slavischen Sprachen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2009 Der Resultativ in den slavischen Sprachen. In Die slavischen Sprachen. Ein internationales Handbuch zu ihrer Struktur, ihrer Geschichte und ihrer Erforschung, Sebastian Kempgen, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger & Karl Gutschmidt (eds), 269–274. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Pianesi, Fabio
1997 Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gribanova, Vera
2009 Phonological evidence for a distinction between Russian prepositions and prefixes. In Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure. Proceedings of FDSL 7, Leipzig 2007, Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Denisa Lenertová & Petr Biskup (eds), 383–395. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2013 Verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis and the structure of the Russian verbal complex. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 91–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grochowski, Maciej
1975 Zależności semantyczne między czasownikiem a wyrażeniem lokatywnym. Polonica I: 113–131.Google Scholar
Groves, Terab'ata R., Groves, Gordon W. & Jacobs, Roderick
1985 Kiribatese: An Outline Description [Pacific Linguistics 64]. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Gruet-Skrabalova, Hana
2012 VP-ellipsis and the Czech auxiliary být (‘to be’). XLinguae 5: 3–15.Google Scholar
Grzegorczykowa, Renata, Laskowski, Roman & Wróbel, Henryk
1984 Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Morfologia. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Gvozdanović, Jadranka
1992 The verbal prefixes po- and pro- in Russian: Their meanings and uses. Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 17: 111–123.Google Scholar
2012 Perfective and imperfective aspect. In The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, Robert I. Binnick (ed.), 781–802. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude
2010 Adpositions. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert
2004 Pre- and postverbal adverbials in OV and VO. Lingua 114: 779–808.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hamel, Patricia
1993 Serial verbs in Loniu and an evolving preposition. Oceanic Linguistics 32: 111–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Noyer, Rolf
1999 State-of-the-article: Distributed morphology. Glot International 4: 3–9.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Ritter, Elisabeth
2002 Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78: 482–526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, Ray
2007 Māori: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993 A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 Passive participles across languages. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 151–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hausenblas, Karel
1963 Slovesná kategorie výsledného stavu v dnešní češtině. Naše řeč 46: 13–28.Google Scholar
Hay, Jen, Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth
1999 Scalar structure underlies telicity in degree achievements. In Proceedings of SALT 9, Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovich (eds), 127–144. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika
1998 Semantics in Generative Grammar. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis
1935 La catégorie des cas: Etude de grammaire générale I. Acta Jutlandica 7: 1–184. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Horálek, Karel
1955 Slovesné tvary typu ponesu, poletím . Naše řeč 38: 21–24.Google Scholar
Horecký, Ján, Buzássyová, Klára, Bosák, Ján
a kolektív 1989 Dynamika slovnej zásoby súčasnej slovenčiny. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo Slovenskej akadémie vied.Google Scholar
van Hout, Angeliek
2008 Acquiring telicity crosslinguistically: On the acquisition of telicity entailments associated with transitivity. In Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure: Implications for Learnability, Melissa Bowerman & Penelope Brown (eds), 255–278. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Irmer, Matthias & Mueller-Reichau, Olav
2018 Script knowledge and the felicity of phase particles in German adjectival passives. Journal of Semantics, 1–53. doi:Crossref.Google Scholar
Isačenko, Aleksandr V.
1962 Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart. Formenlehre. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1973 Base rules for PPs. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 345–356. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1983 Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacko, Jozef
1973 Slovenská morfológia v škole. Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1936/1971 Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6 : 240–288. (In Roman Jakobson. Selected Writings, II: Words and Language, 23–71. The Hague: Mouton).Google Scholar
1958/1971 Morfologičeskie nabljudenija nad slavjanskim skloneniem. (Sostav russkix padežnyx form). In American Contributions to the Fourth International Congress of Slavicists, Moscow, September 1958, 127–156. s-Gravenhage: Mouton. (In Roman Jakobson. Selected Writings, II: Words and Language, 154–183. The Hague: Mouton.]Google Scholar
Janaš, Pětr
1976 Niedersorbische Grammatik für den Gebrauch der Sorbischen Erweiterten Oberschule. Budyšin: Domowina.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A. & Lyashevskaya, Olga
2012 Semantic profiles of five Russian prefixes: po-, s-, za-, na-, pro-. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 21: 211–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Junghanns, Uwe
1997 On byť (and byti). In Formale Slavistik [Leipziger Schriften zur Kultur-, Literatur-, Sprach- und Übersetzungswissenschaft 7], Uwe Junghanns & Gerhild Zybatow (eds), 251–265. Frankfurt: Vervuert.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Stefan, Ichikawa, Yasuko, Kobayashi, Noriko & Yamamoto, Hilofumi
2013 Japanese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kalakuckaja, Larisa P.
1971 Ad”ektivacija pričastij v sovremennom russkom literaturnom jazyke. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Kaleta, Zofia
1995 Gramatyka języka polskiego dla cudzoziemców. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński.Google Scholar
Karlík, Petr
2004 Pasivum v češtině. Slovo a slovesnost 65: 82–113.Google Scholar
Karlík, Petr, Nekula, Marek & Rusínová, Zdenka
(eds) 1995 Příruční mluvnice češtiny. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M.
1964 An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne Richard
2004 Here and there. In Lexique, Syntaxe et Lexique-Grammaire/Syntax, Lexis, and Lexicon-Grammar: Papers in Honour of Maurice Gross [Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 24], Christian Leclère, Éric Laporte, Mireille Piot & Max Silberztein (eds), 253–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth
2008 Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics and Discourse, Louise McNally & Chris Kennedy (eds), 156–182. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Rod
1984 Semantic roles – the language speaker’s categories (in Kala Lagaw Ya). Papers in Australian Linguistics 16: 153–169.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1998 Partitive case and aspect. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 265–307. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1990 Überall und nirgendwo. Subjektive und objektive Momente in der Raumreferenz. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 78: 9–42.Google Scholar
1991 Raumausdrücke. Linguistische Berichte 132: 77–114.Google Scholar
1994 Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1995 A time-relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 71: 669–695.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Komárek, Miroslav
1984 Prefixace a slovesný vid: K prefixům prostě vidovým a subsumpci. Slovo a slovesnost 45: 257–267.Google Scholar
2006 Příspěvky k české morfologii. Olomouc: Periplum.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda J.
2000 Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions and particles: The structure of Dutch PPs. In The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads: Collected Essays of Hilda J. Koopman, Hilda J. Koopman (ed.), 204–260. London: Routledge.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopečný, František
1958 Základy české skladby. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
1959 Forma v syntaxi. Jazykovědné studie 4: 51–52.Google Scholar
1962 Slovesný vid v češtině. Praha: Nakladatelství Československé akademie věd.Google Scholar
1973 Etymologický slovník slovanských jazyků. Slova gramatická a zájmena. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Kosta, Peter & Frasek, Jens
2004 Neakuzativita (ergativita) vs. neergativita v češtině, polštině a jiných slovanských jazycích na rozhraní morfologie a syntaxe. In Čeština – univerzália a specifika 5, Zdeňka Hladká & Petr Karlík (eds), 172–194. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.Google Scholar
Kracht, Marcus
2002 On the semantics of locatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 157–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 The fine structure of spatial expressions. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Ana Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 35–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1994 The event argument and the semantics of voice. Ms, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
2000 Building statives. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 26, Lisa J. Conathan, Jeff Good, Danya Kavitskaya, Alyssa B. Wulf & Alan C. L. Yu (eds), 385–399. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Krchňavá, Kristina
2010 Verbální a adjektivní participia v češtině. MA dissertation, Masarykova univerzita Brno.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1989 Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen. München: Fink.Google Scholar
1992 Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Lexical Matters, Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds), 29–53. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Lamprecht, Arnošt, Šlosar, Dušan & Bauer, Jaroslav
1986 Historická mluvnice češtiny. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Lang, Ewald
1991 A two-level approach to projective prepositions. In Approaches to Prepositions, Gisela Rauh (ed.), 127–167. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K.
1988 On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert
1960 The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1984 Der Relativsatz. Typologie seiner Strukturen. Theorie seiner Funktionen. Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Volkmar
2009 Aspekt und Tempus. In Slavische Sprachen – Slavic Languages [HSK 32.1], Sebastian Kempgen, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger & Karl Gutschmidt (eds), 526–556. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1993 Theoretical Bases of Indo-European Linguistics. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lenerz, Jürgen
1984 Syntaktischer Wandel und Grammatiktheorie: eine Untersuchung an Beispielen aus der Sprachgeschichte des Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leu, Thomas
2008 The Internal Syntax of Determiners. PhD dissertation, New York University.
Levin, Beth & Rappaport, Malka
1986 The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 623–661.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995 Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mahajan, Anoop
1997 Universal grammar and the typology of ergative languages. In Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 13], Artemis Alexiadou & Tracy Alan Hall (eds), 35–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia
2007 Das Zustandspassiv: Grammatische Einordnung – Bildungsbeschränkungen – Interpretationsspielraum. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 35: 83–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
2001 Words and things. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
2007 Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, Sook-Hee Choe (ed.), 191–222. Seoul: Dong In.Google Scholar
Mareš, Franz Wenzel
1984 Die partielle Neutralisierung der markierten präpositionalen Rektion in der russischen und weissrussischen Gegenwartssprache. Wiener slawistischer Almanach 13: 197–209.Google Scholar
Markova, Angelina
2011 On the nature of Bulgarian prefixes: Ordering and modification in multiple prefixation. Word Structure 4: 244–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markowski, Andrzej
(ed.) 2000 Nowy słownik poprawnej polszczyzny. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Maslov, Jurij S.
1958 Rol’ tak nazyvaemoj perfektivacii i imperfektivacii v processe vozniknovenija slavjanskogo glagol’nogo vida. Doklady 4 meždunarodnogo c”ezda slavistov Moskva 1958. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR.Google Scholar
1988 Resultative, perfect, and aspect. In Typology of Resultative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 12], Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 63–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matushansky, Ora
2002 On formal identity of Russian prefixes and prepositions. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 42: 217–253.Google Scholar
2008 A case study of predication. In Studies in Formal Slavic Linguistics. Contributions from Formal Description of Slavic Languages 6.5, Franc Marušič & Rok Žaucer (eds), 213–239. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D.
1988 Adverbial NPs: Bare or clad in see-through garb? Language 64: 583–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew
2002 Idiosyncrasy in particle verbs. In Verb-Particle Explorations, Nicole Dehé, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre & Silke Urban (eds), 97–118. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 The integration of directional PPs: Thoughts on the way to getting towards knowing if we are (be)coming or going. Paper presented at the Conference on the Syntax and Semantics of Spatial Prepositions, June 2–4, 2006, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University.
2007 Particle verbs and argument structure. Language and Linguistics Compass 1: 350–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Adjectival passives and adjectival participles in English. In Non-Canonical Passives [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 205], Artemis Alexiadou & Florian Schäfer (eds), 21–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015a Particle verb formation. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 1 [HSK 40.1], Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 434–449. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2015b Event modifiers in (German) adjectival passives: Remarks on Gehrke (this issue). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33: 939–953.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Medová, Lucie
2012 Anticausatives are derived unergatives. In Slavic Languages in Formal Grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010, Markéta Ziková & Mojmir Dočekal (eds), 291–306. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Meltzer-Asscher, Aya
2011 Adjectival passives in Hebrew: Evidence for parallelism between the adjectival and verbal systems. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29: 815–855.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2006 Polyvalent cases, geometric hierarchies, and split ergativity. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Jackie Bunting, Sapna Desai, Robert Peachey, Chris Straughn & Zuzana, Tomkova (eds), 47–67. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Miklosich, Franz
1926 Vergleichende Grammatik der slavischen Sprachen, Vol. IV: Syntax . Heidelberg: Carl Winters.Google Scholar
Miller, Gary D.
1993 Complex Verb Formation [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Młynarczyk, Anna Katarzyna
2004 Aspectual Pairing in Polish. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Mulder, René
1992 The Aspectual Nature of Syntactic Complementation. PhD dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden.
Müller, Gereon
1995 A-Bar Syntax. A Study of Movement Types. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 Incomplete Category Fronting: A Derivational Approach to Remnant Movement in German. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 A distributed morphology approach to syncretism in Russian noun inflection. In Proceedings of the 12th Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. The Ottawa Meeting 2003, Olga Arnaudova, Wayles Browne, Maria Luisa Rivero & Danijlo Stojanovic (eds), 353–373. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon & Sternefeld, Wolfgang
1995 Extraction, lexical variation and the theory of barriers. In Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 114], Urs Egli, Peter E. Pause, Christoph Schwarze, Arnim von Stechow & Götz Wienold (eds), 35–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Jachontov, Sergej Je
1988 The typology of resultative constructions. In Typology of Resultative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 12], Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Neidle, Carol
1988 The Role of Case in Russian Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Němec, Igor
1954 O slovanské předponě po- slovesné. Slavia 23: 1–22.Google Scholar
1956 Kategorie determinovanosti a indeterminovanosti jako základ slovanské kategorie vidu. Slavia 25: 496–534.Google Scholar
1958 Vznik a vývoj vidu v souvislosti s vývojem tvoření slovesných kmenů. In Československé přednášky pro IV. mezinárodní sjezd slavistů v Moskvě. Praha, 137–150.Google Scholar
Noonan, Máire
2010 À to zu. In Mapping Spatial PPs. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 161–195. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nossalik, Larissa
2007 Slavic perfective prefixes: Are they telicity markers? In Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Milica Radišić (ed.). http://​www​.chass​.utoronto​.ca​/~cla​-acl​/actes2007​/Nossalik​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Noyer, Rolf
1997 Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey
1995 Transfers of meanings. Journal of Semantics 12: 109–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey, Sag, Ivan A. & Wasow, Thomas
1994 Idioms. Language 70: 491–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Jairo
2004 Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nübler, Norbert
2004 Česká participia ze syntaktického hlediska. In Čeština – univerzália a specifika 5, Zdeňka Hladká & Peter Karlík (eds), 384–390. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.Google Scholar
Oertle, Simon
2016 Die slavischen Verbalpräfixe und Präpositionen: Polysemie und Grammatikalisierung. Herne: Gabriele Schäfer Verlag.Google Scholar
Paducheva, Elena
1998 On non-compatibility of partitive and imperfective in Russian. Theoretical Linguistics 24: 73–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panevová, Jarmila, Benešová, Eva & Sgall, Petr
1971 Čas a modalita v češtině. Praha: Universita Karlova.Google Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina B.
2008 The place of PLACE in Persian. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Ana Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 305–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Decomposing Path: The Nanosyntax of Directional Expressions. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence
1990 Events in the Semantics of English. A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Paslawska, Alla & von Stechow, Arnim
2003 Perfect readings in Russian. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 307–362. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann & Stolte, Heinz
1962 Kurze deutsche Grammatik: Auf Grund der fünfbändigen deutschen Grammatik 3rd edn. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pauliny, Eugen
1950 Odvodzovanie slovies podl’a slovesného vidu. Slovo a tvar 4: 88–93.Google Scholar
Pauliny, Eugen, Ružička, Jozef & Štolc, Jozef
1967 Slovenská gramatika. Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya
2000 On accusative adverbials in Russian and Finnish. In Adverbs and Adjunction, Artemis Alexiadou & Peter Svenonius (eds), 155–176. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
2004 Aspect lost, aspect regained: Restructuring of aspectual marking in American Russian. In Aspectual Inquiries, Paula Kempchinsky & Roumyana Slabakova (eds), 369–395. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
2006 Small nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24: 433–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995 Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge MA: The MIT. Press.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther
2004 Tense, case, and the nature of syntactic categories. In The Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds), 495–539. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2006 Probes, goals and syntactic categories. In Proceedings of the Seventh Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Yukio Otsu (ed.), 25–61. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Petr, Jan
(ed.) 1986a Mluvnice češtiny 1. Fonetika – Fonologie – Morfonologie a morfemika – Tvoření slov. Praha: Academia.
(ed.) 1986b Mluvnice češtiny, II: Tvarosloví. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Piernikarski, Cezar
1975 Czasowniki z prefiksem po- w języku polskim i czeskim na tle rodzajów akcji w językach słowiańskich. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Piñón, Christopher J.
1994 Accumulation and aspectuality in Polish. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, Mercè Gonzàles (ed.), 491–506. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
1995 An Ontology for Event Semantics. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Pitz, Anneliese P.
1994 Nominal Signs in German. PhD dissertation, Trondheim University.
Przybylska, Renata
2002 Polisemia przyimków polskich w świetle semantyki kognitywnej. Kraków: Universitas.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1995 The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian C.
2004 Time and the event: The semantics of Russian prefixes. Nordlyd 32.2: Special Issue on Slavic Prefixes: 323–361.Google Scholar
2008 Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, Irene
1996 Zustand? Passiv? – Überlegungen zum sogenannten „Zustandspassiv“. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 15: 231–265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 Partizipien und semantische Struktur. Zu passivischen Konstruktionen mit dem 3. Status. Tübingen: Staufenburg.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans
1947 Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rejzek, Jiří
2001 Český etymologický slovník. Voznice: Leda.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin
2013 Lardil “case stacking” and the timing of case assignment. Syntax 16: 42–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Kylie
2007 Case and Aspect in Slavic. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk C.
1978 A Case Study in Syntactic Markedness: The Binding Nature of Prepositional Phrases. Amsterdam: Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk C.
1990 Functional prepositions. In Unity in Diversity, Pinkster, Harm & Genée Inge (eds), 229–241. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk
2007 Case in spatial adpositional phrases: The dative-accusative alternation in German. In Pitar Mos: A Building with a View. Festschrift for Alexandra Cornilescu, Gabriela Alboiu, Andrei Avram, Larisa Avram & Isac Dana (eds), 1–23. Bucharest: Bucharest University Press,Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk C. & Huijbregts, Riny
2002 Location and locality. In Progress in Grammar: Articles at the 20th Anniversary of the Comparison of Grammatical Models Group in Tilburg, Marc van Oostendorp & Elena Anagnostopoulou (eds), 339–364. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
1999 A formal approach to grammaticalization. Linguistics 37: 1011–1041.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Syntactic change. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romanova, Eugenia
2004 Superlexical vs. lexical prefixes. Nordlyd 32.2: Special Issue on Slavic Prefixes : 255–278.Google Scholar
2006 Constructing Perfectivity in Russian. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Rosenbaum, Peter
1967 The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, John R.
1967 Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Rozwadowska, Bożena
2003 Initial boundary and telicity in the semantics of perfectivity. In Investigations into Formal Slavic Linguistics. Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages – FDSL 4, Potsdam, 28–30 November 2001, Peter Kosta, Joanna Błaszczak, Jens Frasek, Ljudmila Geist & Marzena Żygis (eds), 859–872. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rozwadowska, Bożena & Willim, Ewa
2004 The role of the accusative/partitive alternation in aspectual composition in Polish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 39: 125–142.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy
1984 Cyclic and Lexical Phonology. The Structure of Polish. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rusínová, Zdena
1984 Tvoření staročeských adverbií. Brno: Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně.Google Scholar
Rytel-Schwarz, Danuta, Jurasz, Alina, Cirko, Lesław & Engel, Ulrich
2012 Deutsch-polnische kontrastive Grammatik, Bd. 4: Die unflektierbaren Wörter. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
van Schooneveld, Cornelis H.
1951 The aspect system of the Old Church Slavonic and Old Russian verbum finitum byti . Word 7: 96–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Schooneveld Cornelis H.
1959 The so-called „préverbes vides“ and neutralization. In Dutch Contributions to the Fourth International Congess of Slavicists: Moscow, September 1958, 159–161. S-Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar
van Schooneveld, Cornelis H.
1986 Jakobson’s case system and syntax. In Case in Slavic, Richard D. Brecht & James S. Levine (eds), 373–385. Columbus: Slavica.Google Scholar
Schoorlemmer, Maaike
1995 Participial Passive and Aspect in Russian. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht [OTS Dissertation Series].
1997 The role of the internal argument in the Russian aspectual system. In Formale Slavistik, Uwe Junghanns & Gerhild Zybatow (eds), 229–239. Frankfurt: Vervuert.Google Scholar
Sekaninová, Ella
1980 Sémantická analýza predponového slovesa v ruštine a slovenčine. Bratislava: Veda.Google Scholar
Skibicki, Monika
2007 Polnische Grammatik. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Skoumalová, Zdena
1968 O komplexní analýzu verbální prefixace. In Kapitoly ze srovnávací mluvnice ruské a české 3. O ruském slovese, Alexandr Vasiljevič Isačenko (ed.), 153–231. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S.
1991 The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Herbert W.
1920/1974 Greek Grammar. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal
2001 Move Dissolves into Merge. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.
von Stechow, Arnim
1996 The different readings of wieder “again”. Journal of Semantics 13: 87–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Spatial prepositions in interval semantics. Paper presented at the Semantics Network Worskhop, Barcelona, September 2006.
2007 Syntactic and lexical causativization: cause and become again. Draft 10.1.2007. http://​www​.sfs​.uni​-tuebingen​.de​/~astechow​/Handouts​/StechowBruessel​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara
1996 Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte: Zum semantischen Beitrag von verbalen Präfixen und Partikeln. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
1998 Complex denominal verbs in German and the morphology-semantics interface. In Yearbook of Morphology 1997, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 265–302. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara & Wunderlich, Dieter
1994 Morphology feeds syntax: The case of particle verbs. Linguistics 32: 913–968.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stroik, Thomas S.
1996 Minimalism, Scope, and VP Structure. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2003 Limits on P: Filling in holes vs. falling in holes. In Nordlyd 31: Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, 431–445.Google Scholar
2004 Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP. Nordlyd 32(2): Special Issue on Slavic Prefixes: 205–253.Google Scholar
2006 The emergence of axial parts. Nordlyd 33: 49–77.Google Scholar
2007 Adpositions, particles, and the arguments they introduce. In Argument Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 108], Eric J. Reuland, Tanmoy Bhattacharya & Giogos Spathas (eds), 63–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Projections of P. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Ana Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 63–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Swart, Henriёtte
2012 Verbal aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert I. Binnick (ed.), 753–780. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Szober, Stanisław
1957 Gramatyka języka polskiego. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Szucsich, Luka
2007 Die (Ohn)Macht zur Veränderung: (Morpho)Syntaktische Eigenschaften von Präfixen in slavischen Sprachen. In Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik XIV, Ljudmila Geist & Grit Mehlhorn (eds), 177–196. München: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
2014 Restriktionen bei mehrfacher Prä- und Suffigierung. In Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik. XXI. JungslavistInnen-Treffen in Göttingen, 13.-15. September 2012 [Specimina Philologiae Slavicae 180], Hagen Pitsch (ed.), 199–217. München: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Šimík, Radek
2011 Modal Existential Wh-Constructions. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen [LOT Dissertation Series 269].Google Scholar
Šlosar, Dušan
1981 Slovotvorný vývoj českého slovesa. Brno: Univerzita Jana Purkyně.Google Scholar
Śmiech, Witold
1986 Derywacja prefiksalna czasowników polskich. Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków: Zakład Narodowy imienia Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Šmilauer, Vladimír
1969 Novočeská skladba. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Štícha, František
1986 Systémový a funkční status konstrukcí s n/t-ovými participii v současné češtině. Slovo a slovesnost 47: 177–185.Google Scholar
Švedova, Natal’ja Ju
(ed.) 1970 Grammatika sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1980 Russkaja grammatika. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Shoichi
2010 The hidden side of clausal complements. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 343–380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taraldsen, Tarald & Medová, Lucie
2007 The Czech locative chameleon. Nordlyd 34(2): Special issue on Space, Motion, and Result, 200–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei
2007 Measuring individuals, partitioning events: Semantics of cumulative verbs in Russian. In Linguistic Investigations into Formal Description of Slavic Languages, Peter Kosta & Lilia Schürcks (eds), 529–544. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2008 Intermediate prefixes in Russian. In Proceedings of the Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 16. The Stony Brook Meeting, Andrei Antonenko, John F. Bailyn & Christina Y. Bethin (eds), 423–445. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Tichonov, Aleksandr N.
1964 Čistovidovye pristavki v sisteme russkogo vidovogo formoobrazovanija. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1: 42–52.Google Scholar
Timofeev, Kirill A.
1966 O funkcijax glagol’noj pristavki po- v russkom jazyke. In Voprosy jazyka i literatury 1: 29–41. Novosibirsk: Novosibirskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.Google Scholar
Tokarski, Jan
2001 Fleksja polska. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Trávníček, František
1923 Studie o českém vidu slovesném. Praha: Česká akademie věd a umění.Google Scholar
1951 Mluvnice spisovné češtiny II. Skladba. Praha: Slovanské nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Vasmer, Max
1976 Russisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Večerka, Radoslav
1999 Das Präfix po- als Morphem des imperfektiven Futurs in den altkirchenslavischen Denkmälern. In Festschrift für Klaus Trost zum 65. Geburtstag. Die Welt der Slaven, Vol. 5, Ernst Hansack, Walter Koschmal, Norbert Nübler & Radoslav Večerka (eds), 301–305. München: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
2006 Staroslověnština v kontextu slovanských jazyků. Olomouc, Praha: Euroslavica.
Verkuyl, Henk J.
1972 On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 Aspectual Issues: Studies on Time and Quantity. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Veselovská, Ludmila
2008 The extended verbal projection in Czech: Three variants of the verb be . In Formal Description of Slavic Languages. The Fifth Conference, Leipzig 2003, Gerhild Zybatow, Luka Szucsich, Uwe Junghanns & Roland Meyer (eds), 555–569. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Veselovská, Ludmila & Karlík, Petr
2004 Analytic passives in Czech. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 49: 163–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vinogradov, Viktor V.
1947 Russkij jazyk (grammatičeskoe učenie o slove). Moskva, Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe učebno-pedagogičeskoe izdatel’stvo Ministerstva prosveščenija RSFSR.
1952 Grammatika russkogo jazyka. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Walinska de Hackbeil, Hanna
1986 The Roots of Phrase Structure: The Syntactic Basis of English Morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
Weinsberg, Adam
1973 Przyimki przestrzenne w jȩzyku polskim, niemieckim i rumuńskim. Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków, Gdaňsk: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Weiss, Daniel
1977 Syntax und Semantik polnischer Partizipialkonstruktionen im Rahmen einer generativ-transformationellen Sprachbeschreibung. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth & Culicover, Peter W.
1980 Formal Principles of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1967 On the semantics of verbal aspect in Polish. In To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday, 2231–2249. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wiese, Bernd
2004 Über Lokalisationssysteme. Zur Struktur des Inventars der deutschen Lokalpräpositionen mit Berücksichtigung finno-ugrischer Lokalkasussysteme. Ms, Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache.
Wiland, Bartosz
2012 Prefix stacking, syncretism, and the syntactic hierarchy. In Slavic Languages in Formal Grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010, Markéta Ziková & Mojmir Dočekal (eds), 307–324. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina
2014 The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a Formal Typology. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wróbel, Henryk
2001 Gramatyka języka polskiego: podręcznik akademicki. Kraków: Od nowa.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
1987 An investigation of lexical composition: The case of German be-verbs. Linguistics 25: 283–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 How do prepositional phrases fit into compositional syntax and semantics? Linguistics 29: 591–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993 On German um: Semantic and conceptual aspects. Linguistics 31: 111–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Lexical decomposition in Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, Markus Werning, Wolfram Hinzen & Edouard Machery (eds), 307–327. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter & Herweg, Michael
1991 Lokale und Direktionale. In Semantik. Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung [HSK 6], Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 758–785. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yadroff, Michael & Franks, Steven
2001 The origin of prepositions. In Current Issues in Formal Slavic Linguistics, Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Grit Mehlhorn & Luka Szucsich (eds), 69–79. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, Anna A. & Šmelёv, Aleksej D.
1997 Lekcii po russkoj aspektologii. München: Otto Sagner.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Vvedenie v russkuju aspektologiju. Moskva: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Zeller, Jochen
2001a Lexical particles, semi-lexical postpositions. In Semi-Lexical Categories, Norbert Corver & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 505–549. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001b Particle Verbs and Local Domains [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 41]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning
2002 Movement within a spatial phrase. In Perspectives on Prepositions, Hubert Cuyckens & Gunter Radden (eds), 47–63. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Ilse
2009 Satzmodus. In The Slavic Languages. An International Handbook of their Structure, their History and their Investigation, Sebastian Kempgen, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger & Karl Gutschmidt (eds), 484–509. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zinova, Yulia & Filip, Hana
2015 Biaspectual verbs: A marginal category? In Logic, Language, and Computation. 10th International Tbilisi Symposium on Logic, Language, and Computation, TbiLLC 2013, Gudauri, Georgia, September 23–27, 2013, Martin Aher, Daniel Hole, Emil Jeřábek & Clemens Kupke (eds), 310–332. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Joost
2005 Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 739–779.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Aspect of a typology of direction. In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspects [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 110], Susan D. Rothstein (ed.), 79–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Žaucer, Rok
2009 A VP-Internal/Resultative Analysis of 4 “VP-External” Uses of Slavic Verbal Prefixes. PhD dissertation, University of Ottawa.
2012 The syntax of perdurative-prefixed verbs (and the VP-internal/VP-external prefix distinction). In Slavic Languages in Formal Grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010, Markéta Ziková & Mojmir Dočekal (eds), 339–355. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Subjects

Linguistics

Generative linguistics
Syntax
Theoretical linguistics
Balto-Slavic linguistics
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009060 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Syntax
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2018061042 | Marc record