Chapter published in:
The Grammatical Realization of Polarity Contrast: Theoretical, empirical, and typological approaches
Edited by Christine Dimroth and Stefan Sudhoff
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 249] 2018
► pp. 173201
References

References

AnderBois, Scott
2011Issues and Alternatives. PhD dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia
2015A kérdő modalitás jelölése a beágyazott poláris kérdésekben és viszonya a funkcionális bal perifériák történetéhez (Marking the interrogative mood in polar questions and its relation to the history of functional left peripheries). In Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok XXVII: Diakrón mondattani kutatások (Studies in General Linguistics XXVII: Investigations in Diachronic Syntax), Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), 13–45. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Beck, Sigrid
1996Quantified structures as barriers for LF movement. Natural Language Semantics. 4: 1-56.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel & Gunlogson, Christine
2000Aren’t positive and negative polar questions the same? Ms, UCSC/UCLA.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ariel & Krifka, Manfred
2011Superlative quantifiers as modifiers of meta-speech acts. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6: 1–56.Google Scholar
Domaneschi, Filippo, Romero, Maribel & Braun, Bettina
2017Bias in polar questions: Evidence from English and German production experiments. Glossa 2(1): 1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
2002The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Negative quantifiers in Hungarian. In Approaches to Hungarian 11. Papers from the 2007 New York Conference, Marcel den Dikken & Robert M. Vago (eds), 65–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010An adjunction analysis of quantifiers and adverbials in the Hungarian sentence. Lingua 120(3): 506–526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka & Bruce, Kim
2010On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics 27(1): 81–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gärtner, Hans-Martin & Gyuris, Beáta
2012Pragmatic markers in Hungarian: Some introductory remarks. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 59(4): 387–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Stokhof, Martin
1984Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. PhD dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel & Castroviejo Miró, Elena
2011The dimensions of VERUM. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 8, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds), 143–165. Paris: CSSP.Google Scholar
Gyuris, Beáta
2017New perspectives on bias in polar questions: A study of Hungarian ‘-e’. International Review of Pragmatics 9(1): 1–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L.
1973Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10(1): 41–53.Google Scholar
Horvath, Julia
2007Separating “focus movement” from focus. In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 101], Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds), 108–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kenesei, István, Vago, Robert Michael & Fenyvesi, Anna
1998Hungarian. London: Routledge.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kornai, András & László, Kálmán
1988Hungarian sentence intonation. In Autosegmental Studies in Pitch Accent, Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds), 183–193. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2015Bias in commitment space semantics: Declarative questions, negated questions, and question tags. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 25: 328–345.
2017Negated polarity questions as denegations of assertions. In Contrastiveness and Scalar Implicatures, Chungmin Lee, Ferenc Kiefer & Manfred Krifka (eds), 359–398. Berlin: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert
1981A first look at the semantics and pragmatics of negative questions and tag questions. Papers from the Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistics Society 17: 164–171.
1996Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1981Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Northrup, Oliver Burton
2014Grounds for Commitment. PhD dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Olsvay, Csaba
2000Formális jegyek egyeztetése a magyar nemsemleges mondatokban (Agreement of formal features in Hungarian non-neurtal sentences). In A mai magyar nyelv leírásának újabb módszerei 4 (New Methods in the Description of Contemporary Hungarian 4], László Büky & Márta Maleczki (eds), 119–151. Szeged: Szegedi Tudományegyetem.Google Scholar
Rédei, Károly
1986–1991Uralisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Reese, Brian
2007Bias in Questions. PhD dissertation, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Repp, Sophie
2006¬(A&B). Gapping, negation and speech act operators. Research on Language and Computation 4(4): 397–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Common ground management: Modal particles, illocutionary negation and VERUM. In Beyond Expressives: Explorations in Use-conditional Meaning, Daniel Gutzmann & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds), 231–274. Leiden: Brill.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Frank
1993Settling the truth: Verum focus in German. Ms, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roelofsen, Floris, Venhuizen, Noortje & Weidman Sassoon, Galit
2013Positive and negative polar questions in discourse. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17, Emmanuel Chemla, Vincent Homer & Grégoire Winterstein (eds), 455–472. Paris: ENS.Google Scholar
Romero, Maribel & Han, Chung-hye
2004On negative yes/no questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(5): 609–658.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Rooij, Robert & Šafářová, Marie
2003On polar questions. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 13: 292–309.
Silk, Alex
2016Expectation biases and context management with negative polar questions. Ms.Google Scholar
Simoncsics, Péter
2003Egy uráli párhuzamosság: A nyenyec költői dikció ngey (ngæy) töltőeleme és a magyar –É szintaktomorféma (An Uralic parallel: The ngey (ngæy) particle of poetic diction and the Hungarian syntactomorpheme –É). Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 100: 238–244.Google Scholar
Sudo, Yasutada
2013Biased polar questions in English and Japanese. In Beyond expressives: Explorations in Use-conditional Meaning, Daniel Gutzmann & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds), 275–296. Leiden: Brill.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Surányi, Balázs
2008Határozóosztályok és mondattartományok (Classes of adverbials and sentential domains). Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 105: 164–192.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
2002Hungarian disjunctions and positive polarity. In Approaches to Hungarian 8: Papers from the Budapest Conference, István Kenesei & Péter Siptár (eds), 217–239. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
2015What do quantifier particles do? Linguistics and Philosophy 38(2): 159–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trinh, Tue
2014How to ask the obvious – A presuppositional account of evidential bias in English yes/no questions. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 71: 227–249.Google Scholar
Varga, László
1994A hanglejtés (Intonation). In Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 2, Fonológia (A Structural Grammar of Hungarian 2, Phonology), Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), 468–549. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar