Chapter published in:
The Grammatical Realization of Polarity Contrast: Theoretical, empirical, and typological approaches
Edited by Christine Dimroth and Stefan Sudhoff
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 249] 2018
► pp. 109128
References

References

Adger, David & Quer, Joseph
2001The syntax and semantics of unselected embedded questions. Language 77(1): 107–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Altmann, Hans
1987Zur Problematik der Konstitution von Satzmodi als Formtypen. In Satzmodus zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik, Jörg Meibauer (ed.), 22–56. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef
2004Decomposing the left periphery. Dialectal and cross-linguistic evidence. In The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds), 59–95. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred
1980Semantic structure and illocutionary force. In Speech Act Theorie and Pragmatics, John R. Searle, Ferenc Kiefer, Manfred Bierwisch (eds), 1-35. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1978Yes/no questions are not alternative questions. In Questions, Henry Hiz (ed.), 87–105. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borchert, Donald M.
2006Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 7. Detroit MI: Macmillan Reference.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2007The syntax and pragmatics of embedded yes/no questions. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 447–467. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia
1998Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)veridical Dependency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Inquisitive assertions and nonveridicality. In The Dynamic, Inquisitive, and Visionary Life of Phi, ?Phi, and Possibly Phi. A Festschrift for Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof and Frank Veltman, Maria Aloni, Michael Franke & Floris Roelofsen (eds), 115–126. Amsterdam: ILLC Publications.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Janet
1979Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10(2): 279–326.Google Scholar
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Stokhof, Martin
1982Semantic analysis of wh-complements. Linguistics and Philosophy 5(2): 175–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L.
1976Questions in Montague English. In Montague Grammar, Barbara H. Partee (ed)., 247–259. New York NY: Academic Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N.
1988Vorwort und Nachwort zu Verumfokus. Sprache und Pragmatik 5(1): 1–7.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D.
1994The contrast between interrogatives and questions. Journal of Linguistics 30(2): 411–439.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri
1977Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(1): 3–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1978Semantik der Rede. Kontexttheorie – Modalwörter – Konditionalsätze. Königstein im Taunus: Scriptor.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2011Questions. In Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning Vol. 2, Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 1742–1758. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Utpal
2002Questions and Answers in Embedded Contexts. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lohnstein, Horst
2005Sentence connection as quantificational structure. In Event Arguments. Foundations and Applications, Claudia Maienborn & Angelika Wöllstein (eds), 113–138. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007On clause types and sentential force. Linguistische Berichte 209: 63–86.Google Scholar
2016Verum focus. In Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 290–313. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg, Altmann, Hans & Steinbach, Markus
2013Kontroversen in der Forschung zu Satztypen und Satzmodus. In Satztypen des Deutschen, Jörg Meibauer, Hans Altmann & Markus Steinbach (eds), 1–19. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montague, Richard
1969[1974]On the nature of certain philosophical entities. In Formal Philosophy. Selected Papers of Richard Montague, Richmond H. Thomason (ed.), 148–187. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Öhl, Peter
2007Unselected embedded interrogatives in German and English: S-Selection as dependency formation. Linguistische Berichte 212: 403–437.Google Scholar
2009Sprachwandel und kognitive Ökonomie: Zur Grammatikalisierung und Substitution von Satzkonnektoren. Linguistische Berichte 220: 393–438.Google Scholar
2017Zur Akzeptanz der Einbettung von ob-Sätzen unter veridischen Prädikaten. Eine Hypothese bezogen auf epistemische Weltenmodelle – mit einem Seitenblick auf das Persische. In Deutsch als Bindeglied zwischen Inlands- und Auslandsgermanistik. Beiträge zu den 23. GeSuS-Linguistik-Tagen in Sankt Petersburg, 22.–24. Juni 2015, Sergej Nefedov, Ljubov Grigorieva & Bettina Bock (eds), 385–394. Hamburg: Kovač.Google Scholar
2018Zum Denotat von Subjunktionen. In Sprachen verbinden. Beiträge der 24. Linguistik- und Literaturtage, Brno/Tschechien, 2016, Vera Janikova, Alice Brychová, Jana Veličková & Roland Wagner (eds), 107–118. Hamburg: Kovač.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga
1999On sentence types in German: An enquiry into the relationship between grammar and pragmatics. Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 4: 195–236.Google Scholar
Schwabe, Kerstin
2016aIrritierende ob-Sätze. Paper presented at Wuppertaler Linguistisches Forum, 28 Januar.
2016bTowards a typology of German ob-interrogatives embedding predicates. Paper presented at SLE 2016, University of Naples, 1 September.
Spector, Benjamin & Egré, Paul
2015A uniform semantics for embedded interrogatives: An answer, not necessarily the answer. Synthese 192(6): 1729–1784.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Schwabe, Kerstin
2019.  In Language, Logic, and Computation [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11456],  pp. 253 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.