Chapter published in:
Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency
Edited by Lars Hellan, Andrej L. Malchukov and Michela Cennamo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 237] 2017
► pp. 432–469

Circumfixed causatives in Polish against a panorama of active and non-active voice morphology

| Catholic University of Lublin
This paper deals with an interesting problem of circumfixed causatives in Polish, which do not behave with respect to anticausatives in the way causative structures function in other (European) languages. This subclass of causatives does not have corresponding synthetic (single-word) anticausatives, while other causatives in Polish possess such correspondents. We propose to explain this situation within the model of root based construction morphology, where causatives assume no derivational connection with other verbs: Nevertheless they arise from the substructures resulting in causative meaning , which are shared with anticausatives. The substructures, together with the delimited class of roots common to causatives and anticausatives, allow us to account for the similarities in the alternating part of the material. The adverse relationship that the circumfixed causatives have with the synthetic anticausatives will be accounted for with the use of the distinction into Active voice and Non-active voice verbal structures, which has been proposed within the root-based morpho-syntax by Alexiadou and Doron (2012).
Published online: 30 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.237.14mal
References

References

Alexiadou, Artemis
2010 On the morpho-syntax of (anti)causative verbs. In Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure, Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds), 177–203. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2004) Voice morphology in the causative-inchoative alternation; Evidence for a non-unified structural analysis of unaccusatives. In Alexiadou, Anagnostopoulou & Everaert (eds), 114–136.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian
2006 The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 187–211. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Doron, Edit
2012 The syntactic construction of two non-active voices: Passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 48(1): 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Agnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian
2015 External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations. A Layering Approach. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arad, Maya
2005 Roots and Patterns: Hebrew Morpho-syntax. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
1988 Psych-verbs and Ɵ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloch-Trojnar, Maria
2013 A note on the alleged hybrid status of -nie/-cie in Polish. In Ambiguity. Multifaceted Structures in Syntax, Morphology and Phonology, Anna Bondaruk & Anna Malicka-Kleparska (eds), 35–58. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005 The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1970 Meaning and the Structure of Languages. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
2004 A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In Alexiadou, Anagnostopoulou & Everaert (eds), 22–59.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
1972 On the syntax and semantics of the atomic predicate CAUSE. In Papers from the 8th Regional meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 62–74. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
Cançado, Márcia & Franchi, Carlos
1999 Exceptional binding with psych-verbs? Linguistic Inquiry 30(1): 133–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The Minimalist Program [Current Studies in Linguistics 28]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
1979 Word Meaning and Montague Grammar – The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague's PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dziwirek, Katarzyna
1994 Polish Subjects [Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics]. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Embick, David
2004 On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3): 355–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Roots, states, and stative passives. Abstract for Root Workshop, University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Everaert, Martin, Marelj, Marijana & Siloni, Tal
2012a The Theta system: An introduction. In Everaert, Marelj & Siloni (eds), 1–19.Google Scholar
(eds) 2012 The Theta System. Argument Structure at the Interface. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio & Marín, Rafael
2012 State nouns are Kimian states. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory. Selected Papers from 'Going Romance' 2010 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 4], Irene Franco, Sara Lusini & Andrés Saab (eds), 41–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1970 The grammar of hitting and breaking. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 120–133. Waltham MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1982 On the lexical representation of Romance reflexive clitics. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Joan Bresnan (ed.), 87–148. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1990 Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grzegorczykowa, Renata, Laskowski, Roman & Wróbel, Henryk
(eds) 1984 Morfologia. Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar
Gussmann, Edmund
2007 The Phonology of Polish. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993 More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives & Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel Jay
1993 On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Maranz
1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Honour of Sylvain Bromberger, Jennifer Cole & Samuel Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence
1985 Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61: 121–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horvath, Julia & Siloni, Tal
2003 Against the little-ν hypothesis. In Proceedings of IATL 19, Yehuda Falk (ed.).http://​www​.iatl​.org​.il​/?page​_id​=145
Jackendoff, Ray S.
1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jabłońska, Patrycja
2007 Radical Decomposition and Argument Structure. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay
1978 Stative and Middle in Indo-European [Innsbrucker Beitrӓge zur Sprachwissenschaft 23]. Innsbruck: Institut fur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Junghanns, Uwe, Fermann, Dorothee, & Lenertová, Denisa
2011 Decausatives in a minimal theory of reflexive marking. A paper presented on the 9th of December 2011 at FDSL conference in Goettingen, Germany.Google Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew
2009 Anticausativization. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27(1): 77–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelica
1996 Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuznecova, Ariadna I. & Efremova, Tat’jana F.
1986 Slovar morfem russkogo jazyka. Moskva: Russkij jazyk.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1965/70 On the Nature of Syntactic Irregularity. PhD Indiana University. Published by Holt, Rinhard and Winston as Irregularity in Syntax .Google Scholar
1968 Some verbs of change and causation. In Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Translation, Report NSF- 20, Susumo Kuno (ed.), 1–27. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2010 The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Langendoen, D. Terence
1969 The Study of Syntax. The Generative Transformational Approach to the Structure of American English. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Lemmens, Maarten
1998 Lexical Perspective on Transitivity and Ergativity. Causative Constructions in English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 166]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995 Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-lexical Semantics Interface [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 26]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lunt, Horace G.
2001 Old Church Slavonic Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Madariaga, Nerea
2010 The development of Indo-European middle-passive verbs: A case study in Ancient Greek and Old Church Slavonic. Indogermanische Forschungen. Zeitschrift für Indogermanistik und allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 115: 149–178.Google Scholar
Lomashvili, Leila
2011 Complex Predicates.The Syntax-morphology Interface [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 174]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James
1976 Remarks on what can cause what. In The Grammar of Causative Constructions [Syntax and Semantics 6], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 117–129. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Jonathan E.
2008 The Syntactic Nature of Inner Aspect. A Minimalist Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 133]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malicka-Kleparska, Anna
2013 In search of causative structures in the root based morphology: A case of Polish roz-/roze- causatives. Studies in Polish Linguistics 8(2): 58–75.Google Scholar
2012 Decausatives in Polish: A non-reflexive analysis. Studies in Polish Linguistics 7: 35–58.Google Scholar
2014 Polish anticausative morpho-syntax; A case for a root-based model against lexicalist reflexivization. In New Insights into Slavic Linguistics [Sprach und Kulturkontakte in Europas Mitte. Studien zur Slawistik und Germanistik 3], Jacek Witkoś & Sylwester Jaworski (eds). 253–269. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2015 Circmfixed causatives in Russian and Polish – A root-based account. Roczniki Humanistyczne 63(11): 85–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Under review.
Marantz, Alec
1984 On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997 No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Proceedings of the 21st Penn Linguistics Colloquium. UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics, Alexis Dimitriadis (ed), 201–225. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
To appear. Phases and words.
Marín, Rafael & McNally, Louise
2011 Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 467–502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura
2011 Stative by construction. Linguistics 49(6): 1359–1399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Młynarczyk, Anna
2004 Aspectual Pairing in Polish. Utrecht: LOT. http://​www​.lotpublications​.nl​/publish​/articles​/000630​/bookpart​.pdf
Neeleman, Ad & van de Koot, Hans
2012 The linguistic expression of causation. In Everaert, Marelj & Siloni (eds), 20–51.Google Scholar
Olszewska, Teresa
1986 Causativity as a Linguistic Phenomenon. A Study based on English and Polish. Lublin: UMCS.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995 Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Piñon, Chistopher
2001 Modelling the causative-inchoative alternation. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 76: 273–293.Google Scholar
Przepiórkowski, Adam, Bańko, Mirosław, Górski, Rafał, & Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara
(eds) 2012 Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1995 The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008 Introducing Arguments [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 48]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Giljan
2008 Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, & Beth Levin
2012 Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation. In The Theta System. Argument Structure at the Interface, Marelj Everaert, Marelj Marijana & Siloni (eds), 150–176. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
2002 The Theta system – An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28(3): 229–290.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Siloni, Tal
2004 Against an unaccusative analysis of reflexives. In Alexiadou, Anagnostopoulou & Everaert (eds), 159–180.Google Scholar
2005 The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3): 389–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rościńska-Frankowska, Magda.
2012 On the Derivation of Causative and Inchoative Verb Forms in Polish [Generative Linguistics in Wrocław 1]. Wrocław: Center for General & Contrastive Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rothmayr, Antonia
2009 The Structure of Stative Verbs [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 143]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rozwadowska, Bożena
To appear. Psychological verbs and psychological adjectives. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax.
Savčenko, Aleksej N.
1974 Sravnitel’naja grammatika indoevropejskix jazykov. Moskva.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian
2007 On the Nature of Anticausative Morphology: External Arguments in Chang-of-state Contexts. PhD dissertation, University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Segal, Zehavit & Landau, Idan
2012  Clear from and Clear of: The Asymmetric syntax of detaching. Linguistic Review 29: 223–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szcześniak, Konrad
2008 Unaccusativity marks. Second Language Acquisition 29: 121–131.Google Scholar
Szymanek, Bogdan
2010 A Panorama of Polish Word-Formation. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
Tabakowska, Elżbieta
2003 Those notorious Polish reflexive pronouns: A plea for Middle Voice. Glossos 4: 1–18.Google Scholar
Tihonov, Aleksandr N.
1985 Slvoobrazovatelnyj slovar russkogo jazyka. Moskva: Russkij jazyk.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr.
2013 Lexical representation, co-composition, and linking syntax and semantics. In Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory, James Pustejovsky et al. (eds), 67–107. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1975 Why ‘kill’ does not mean ‘cause to die’. The semantics of action sentences. Foundations of Language 13: 491–528.Google Scholar
Wróbel, Henryk
1984 Słowotwórstwo czasowników (Word formation of verbs). In Grzegorczykowa, Laskowski & Wróbel (eds), 467–511.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, Andrej A.
1977 Gramaticeskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka; Slovoizmenenie. Moscow: Russkij Jazyk.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria L.
1992 The lexical encoding of scope relations among arguments. In Syntax and Semantics, 26: Syntax and the Lexicon, Eric Wherli & Tim Stowell (eds), 211–255. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Corpora

Codex Marianus in the Corpus Cyrillo-Methodianum Helsingiense
http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/slaavilaiset​/ccmh/
National Corpus of Russian
http://​www​.ruscorpora​.ru​/en/