Chapter published in:
Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency
Edited by Lars Hellan, Andrej L. Malchukov and Michela Cennamo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 237] 2017
► pp. 376406
References

References

Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian
2006The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 187–211. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arad, Maya
2003Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 737–778. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John & Koontz-Garboden, Andrew
2013In defense of the reflexivization analysis of anticausativization. Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 131: 199–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
1982'Morphological passive' and pro-drop: The impersonal construction in Italian. Journal of Linguistic Research 2(4): 1–34.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005In Name Only. Structuring Sense (1). Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1986Italian Syntax. A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campanini, Cinzia & Schäfer, Florian
2011Optional Se-constructions in Romance: Syntactic encoding of conceptual information. Talk given at Generative Linguistics in the Old World 34.Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela
1993The Reanalysis of Reflexives: A Diachronic Perspective. Liguori MO: Liguori Publications.Google Scholar
1999Late Latin pleonastic reflexives and the Unaccusativity Hypothesis. Transactions of The Philological Society 97(1):103–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Unexpressed objects and the semantics of predicates in Italian. Talk given at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1988On Si constructions and the Theory of Arb. Linguistic Inquiry 19(4): 521–581.Google Scholar
De Miguel, Elena & Fernández Lagunilla, Marina
2000El operador aspectual “se”. Revista Española de Lingüística 30(1): 13–44.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen
1998Impersonal se constructions in Romance and the passivization of unergatives. Linguistic Inquiry 29(3): 399–437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006The SE-anaphor and its role in argument realization. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doron, Edit
2003Agency and voice: The semantics of the Semitic templates. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 1–67.Google Scholar
Everaert, Martin
1986The Syntax of Reflexivization. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
García Fernández, Luis
2011Algunas observaciones sobre “se” aspectual. In Estudios sobre perífrasis y aspecto, Juan Cuartero Otal, Luis García Fernández & Carsten Sinner (eds), 43–71. Madrid: Peniope.Google Scholar
Harves, Stephanie & Kayne, Richard S.
2012Having Need and needing Have . Linguist Inquiry 43: 120–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1987Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type. Arbeitspapiere 4.Google Scholar
Heidinger, Steffen
2012Spontaneity, relative frequency and the encoding of anticausatives: A contrastive analysis of French and Spanish. Talk given at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea.Google Scholar
Horvath, Julia & Siloni, Tal
2011Causatives across components. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29(3): 657–704. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Anticausatives have no cause(r): A rejoinder to Beavers and Koontz-Garboden. Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 131: 217–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1987The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18(3): 369–411.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1988Romance se/si. GLOW Newsletter 20.Google Scholar
1991Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO. Linguist Inquiry 22: 647–686.Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie
2008The French reflexive and reciprocal se. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 833–876. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan
2009The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1999Objecthood: An event structure perspective. In Proceedings from CLS 35. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
2000Aspect, lexical semantic representation and argument expression. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkely CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport-Hovav, Malka
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995Unaccusativity at the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca
2012Costruzioni verbo-pronominali “intensive” in italiano. In Linguaggio e Cervello / Semantica [Proceedings of the XLII Convegno della Società di Linguistica Italiana], Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bambini & Irene Ricci (eds). Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Google Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita
1986On Italian si. In Syntax and Semantics, 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Hagit Borer (ed.), 241–262. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec
2013Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 130: 152–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marín, Rafael & McNally, Louise
2011Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 267–502. Retrieved from Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, Maria Antonia
1979Las construcciones pronominales en Español. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Masullo, Pascual José
1999La interfaz léxico-sintaxis: Presencia y ausencia del clítico se en construcciones inacusativas. Trabajo inédito. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional del Comahue & Seattle WA: University of Washington.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya
1992On the Nature of Agreement: The Syntax of ARB SE in Spanish. PhD dissertation, York University.Google Scholar
1997Clitics as AGR, and PRO in Finite Clauses. In Proceedings of the IV Colloquim of Generative Grammar, Tarragona, 15-18 March 1994, Nàtalia Català & Maria Bargalló (eds), 84–121. Tarragona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universitat Rovira i Virgili.Google Scholar
1999aConstrucciones con se. Medias, pasivas e impersonales. In Gramática de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
1999bConstrucciones inacusativas y pasivas. In Gramática de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
2008Clitic impersonal constructions in Romance: Syntactic features and semantic interpretation. In Transactions of the Philological Society, Paul Rowlett & Anna Siewierska (eds), 290–336. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Otero, Carlos Peregrín
1986Arbitrary subjects in finite clauses. In Generative Studies in Spanish Syntax, Ivonne Bordelois Helen Contreras & Karen Zagona (eds), 81–109. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1999Pronombres reflexivos y recíprocos. In Gramática de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 1428–1517. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1996Zero Syntax: Experiencer and Cascades. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1991The syntax of event structure. In Lexical and Conceptual Structure, Beth Levin & Steven Pinker (eds), 47–81. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008Introducing Arguments. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian Catriona
2007Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo & Uriagereka, Juan
1996Indefinite SE. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 749–810. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, Malka & Levin, Beth
1988What to do with theta-roles. In Syntax and Semantics, 21: Thematic Relations, Wendy Wilkins (ed.), 7–36. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
2000The Theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics 00,01/TL. Utrecht: Utrecht University.Google Scholar
2002The Theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28(3): 229–290.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Reuland, Eric
1991Anaphors and logophors: An argument structure perspective. In Long-Distance Anaphora, Jan Koster & Eric Reuland (eds), 283–321. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4): 657–720.Google Scholar
1995Pronouns, anaphors and case. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Hubert Haider, Susan Olsen, & Sten Vikner (Eds), 241–268. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Siloni, Tal
2004Against the unaccusative analysis of reflexives. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Studies on the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds). Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3): 389–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reuland, Eric
2001Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry 32(3): 439–492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Logophoricity. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rigau, Gemma
1994Les propietats dels verbs pronominals. Els Marges 50: 29–39.Google Scholar
Rivero, Maria Luisa
2002On impersonal reflexives in Romance and Slavic and semantic variation. In Romance Syntax, Semantics and L2 Acquisition [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 216], Jaoquim Camps & Caroline R. Wiltshire (eds), 169–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sanz, Montserrat
1995Telic clitics in Spanish. Ms, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian
2008The Syntax of (Anti-)Causatives. External Arguments in Change-of-State Contexts [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 126]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teomiro García, Ismael Iván
2010Anaphors at the Interfaces. A Comparative Study of the Variation of the Anaphoric Systems of English, Dutch and Spanish. PhD dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
2011Reflexivity and adjustment strategies at the interfaces. Tromsø Nordlyd Working Papers in Linguistics 37: 119–149.Google Scholar
2013Low applicatives and optional “se” in Spanish non-anticausative intransitive verbs. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 8: 248–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teomiro García, Ismael Iván & Romero Pascual, Cristina
2012Theta meets aspect: The Spanish aspectual “se” with consumption verbs. Topics in Linguistics 10: 20–27.Google Scholar
Zagona, Karen
1996Compositionality of aspect: Evidence from Spanish aspectual se. In Aspects of Romance Linguistics, Claudia Parodi (ed.), 475–488. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar