Article published in:
Formal Studies in Slovenian Syntax: In honor of Janez Orešnik
Edited by Franc Lanko Marušič and Rok Žaucer
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 236] 2016
► pp. 283312
References

References

Adger, David & Harbour, Daniel
2007Syntax and syncretism of the person case constraint. Syntax 10(1): 2–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2003The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2005Strong and weak person restrictions: A feature checking analysis. In Clitic and Affix Combinations. Theoretical Perspectives [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 74], Lorie Heggie & Franciso Ordoñez (eds), 199–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Béjar, Susana & Řezáč, Milan
2003Person licensing and the derivation of PCC effects. In Romance Linguistics: Theory and Acquisition [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 244], Ana Teresa Perez-Leroux & Yves Roberge (eds), 49–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David
2008Where’s phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Phi-Theory: Phi Features across Interfaces and Modules, Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds), 295–328. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric
2000Quirky agreement. Studia Linguistica 54: 451–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonet, Eulalia
1991Morphology after Syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance languages. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
1994The person-case constraint: A morphological approach. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 22: 33–52.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko
2004On the clitic switch in Greek imperatives. In Balkan Syntax and Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 67], Olga Mišeska Tomić (ed.), 269–291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry 38(4): 589–644. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Unifying first and last conjunct agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27: 455–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011aOn unvalued uninterpretable features. In Proceedings of NELS 39, Susan Lima, Kevin Mullin & Brian Smith (eds), 109–120. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
2011bRescue by PF deletion, traces as (non)interveners, and the that-trace effect. Linguistic Inquiry 42(1): 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal
1994The typology of structural deficiency: On the three grammatical classes. Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): 41–109. University of Venice.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalism in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Erschler, David
2014Person Case Constraints beyond the Dative and Accusative: Evidence from Ossetic. Ms, Max Planck Institut/Tübinger Zentrum für Linguistik.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven
2013Orphans, doubling, coordination, and phases: On nominal structure in Slovenian. Slovenski Jezik — Slovene Linguistic Studies 9: 55–92.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven & King, Tracy Holloway
2000Handbook of Slavic Clitics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris
1997Impoverishment and fission. In PF: Papers at the Interface [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30], Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang & Martha McGinnis (eds), 425–450. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth L. Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
1995Abstracting away from abstract case. In Proceedings of NELS 25, Jill Beckman (ed.), 207–221. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders & Hróarsdóttir, Thórhallur
2004Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions. Lingua 114: 651–673. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, Johannes Gisli
1996Clausal Architecture and Case in Icelandic. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amsherst.Google Scholar
Kalin, Laura & van Urk, Coppe
2015Aspect splits without ergativity: Agreement asymmetries in Neo-Aramaic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(2): 659–702. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
2009Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40(2): 187–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Saito, Mamoru
1999On the subject of infinitives. In Minimalist Analysis, Howard Lasnik (ed.), 7–24. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Montalbetti, Mario
1984After Binding: On the Interpretation of Pronouns. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew
2007The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effect. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(2): 273–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David
1971Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther
2007The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 101], In honor of Joseph E. Emonds., Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds), 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M.
1974On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer
2014Agreement and its Failures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rivero, Maria Luisa
2004Spanish quirky subjects, person restrictions, and the person-case constraint. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3): 494–502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson T.
2003Syncretism and double agreement with Icelandic nominative objects. In Grammar in focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack, Vol. 2, Lars-Olof Delsing, Cecilia Falk, Gunlög Josefsson & Halldór Á. Sigurðsson (eds), 295–303. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á.
1990–1991Beygingarsamræmi. Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði, 12–13; 31–77.Google Scholar
1996Icelandic finite verb agreement. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 57: 1–46.Google Scholar
Stegovec, Adrian
2015Now you PCC me, now you don’t. In Proceedings of NELS 45, Vol. 3, Thuy Bui & Deniz Özyıldız (eds), 107–117. Amherst MA: GSLA.Google Scholar
2016aPersonality Disorders and Missing Persons: Deriving the Person-Case Constraint without Case. Ms, University of Connecticut. http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/002632
2016bWhat we aren’t given: The influence of selection on ditransitive passives in Slovenian. Talk given at FASL 25 at Cornell University , May 13.
In preparation. Locality and passives of ditransitives in Slovenian.
Taraldsen, Tarald
1995On agreement and nominative objects in Icelandic. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Hubert Haider, Susan Olsen & Sten Vikner (eds), 307–327. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Terzi, Arhonto
1999Clitic combinations, their hosts and their ordering. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17(1): 85–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Řezáč, Milan
2004The EPP. In Breton: An uninterpretable categorial feature. In Triggers, Henk van Riemsdijk & Anne Breitbarth (eds), 451–492. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina
2014The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a Formal Typology. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan & Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1985Case and Grammatical Function: The Icelandic Passive. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaela, Pak, Miok & Portner, Paul
2012A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 1231–1274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Stegovec, Adrian
2020. Taking case out of the Person-Case Constraint. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 38:1  pp. 261 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.