Article published in:
Formal Studies in Slovenian Syntax: In honor of Janez Orešnik
Edited by Franc Lanko Marušič and Rok Žaucer
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 236] 2016
► pp. 193220
References

References

Aboh, Enoch O. & Pfau, Roland
2011What’s a wh-word got to do with it? In Mapping the Left Periphery: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 5, Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds), 91–124. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Carl L.
1970Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question morpheme. Foundations of language 6: 197–219.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko
2002On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 351−383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Topicalization, focalization, lexical insertion, and scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry 35(4): 613–638. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai Shen
1991On the Typology of Wh-questions. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi
2008The cartography of syntactic structures. Studies in Linguistics 2: 42–58.Google Scholar
Dyakonova, Marina
2009A phase-based approach to Russian free word order. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert
2010Semantic type effects on crossing movement in German. Language and Logos: Studies in Theoretical and Computational Linguistics 72: 48–63.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert & Aäussler, Jana & Weskott, Thomas
2013Constituent order in German multiple questions: Normal order and (apparent) anti-superiority effects. The Mind Research Repository (beta), Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Golden, Marija
1997Multiple wh-questions in Slovene. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Cornell Meeting, 1995, Wayles Browne, Ewa Dornisch, Natasha Kondrashova & Draga Zec (eds), 240−266. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold & Postal, Paul
1964An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krapova, Iliyana
2004Word order in Topic-Focus structures in the Balkan languages. In Romània Orientale XVII. Atti del IX convegno internazionale di studi sul sud-est europeo (Tirana, 30.08–3.09. 2004): 139–162.Google Scholar
Krapova, Iliyana & Cinque, Guglielmo
2005On the order of wh-phrases in Bulgarian multiple wh-fronting. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 171–197.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1993Grammar and Discourse Principles: Functional Syntax and GB Theory. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laenzlinger, Christopher & Soare, Gabriela
2005On merging positions for arguments and adverbs in the Romance Mittelfeld. In Contributions to the thirtieth Incontro di Grammatica Generativa 2005, Laura Brugè, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert & Giuseppina Turano (eds), 105–128. Venice: Università Ca’Foscari Venezia.Google Scholar
Lambova, Mariana
2003On the interaction of multiple (non) wh-fronting and multiple Topicalization in Bulgarian. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 8(1): 127–142.Google Scholar
Marvin, Tatjana & Stegovec, Adrian
2012On the syntax of ditransitive sentences in Slovenian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 59(1–2): 177–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Roland
2004Superiority effects in Russian, Polish and Czech: Judgments and Grammar. Ms, University of Leipzig & University of Regensburg.Google Scholar
Mišmaš, Petra
2014Multiple wh-fronting can be optional too. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: the McMaster Meeting 2013, Cassandra Chapman, Olena Kit & Ivona Kučerová (eds), 225–244. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
2015On the Optionality of Wh-fronting in a Multiple Wh-fronting Language. PhD dissertation, University of Nova Gorica.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990Relativized minimality. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. A Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
2001aOn the position ―Int(errogative) in the left periphery of the clause. In Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to L. Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 287–296. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2001bRelativized minimality effects. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Martin Baltin & Chris Collins (eds), 89–110. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Locality and left periphery. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rojina, Nina
2011The Syntactic Structures of Russian Wh-questions. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Rudin, Catherine
1988On multiple questions and multiple fronting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 445−501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur & Soare, Gabriela
2011Where’s ‘Why’? Linguistic inquiry 42(4): 651–669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soare, Gabriela
2007A cross-linguistic typology of question formation and the antisymmetry hypothesis. Generative Grammar in Geneva 5: 107–133.Google Scholar
Stepanov, Arthur
1998On Wh-fronting is Russian. In Proceedings of NELS 28, Pius N. Tamanji & Kiyomi Kusumoto (eds), 453–467. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Stepanov, Arthur & Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
2008Cartography and licensing of wh-adjuncts: A cross-linguistic perspective. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26(3): 589–638. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toporišič, Jože
2004Slovenska slovnica (Slovenian grammar). Maribor: Obzorja.Google Scholar