Quantifying Expressions in the History of German
Syntactic reanalysis and morphological change
| University of North Texas
| University of Mississippi
This study describes the 1200-year history of German quantifying expressions like nîoman anderro > niemand anderer ‘nobody else’, analyzing the morpho-syntactic developments within the generative framework. The quantifiers examined arose from various lexical sources/categories (nouns, adjectives, and pronouns) but all changed to adjectival quantifiers. These changes are interpreted as a novel type of upward reanalysis from head to specifier, which we associate with degrammaticalization driven by analogy. As for the quantified phrases, most appeared in the genitive in Old High German, indicating a bi-nominal structure. During the Early New High German period, most quantified nouns and adjectives changed to agreement with the quantifier. By Modern German, only quantified DPs and pronouns remain in the genitive. These changes involve downward reanalysis of the quantified elements, being integrated into the matrix nominal depending on the structural size of the quantified phrase. Overall, we conclude that diachronically quantifying expressions may have different syntactic analyses.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 230] 2016. xvii, 299 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
Preface
|
xiii–xiv
|
List of abbreviations
|
xv–xvi
|
Chapter 1. Introduction
|
1–32
|
Chapter 2. Simplex quantifying word: viel
|
33–96
|
Chapter 3. From lexical adjective to quantifying adjective: wenig
|
97–122
|
Chapter 4. Universal quantifiers all and jeder
|
123–174
|
Chapter 5. Complex indefinite pronouns: jemand, niemand, and nichts
|
175–224
|
Chapter 6. A different complex indefinite pronoun: etwas
|
225–256
|
Chapter 7. Exceptional adjectives: ander, folgend and solch
|
257–272
|
Chapter 8. Conclusions
|
273–290
|
References
|
291–296
|
Index
|
297–300
|
“The authors of Quantifying Expressions in the History of German provide an in-depth empirical study of the diachronic changes affecting a representative group of quantifying words in the history of German. Some of the changes they report are well known, like the loss of genitive marking with quantifying words like viel and wenig. Historical developments of other quantifiers—that is, strong quantifiers or indefinite pronouns—have until now received only little attention. The book contains a wealth of data for each quantifying expression under investigation and for each historical period of German: future work on the diachrony of quantifying expressions will consider the present book to be an extremely valuable source of data. In addition, the study impressively shows how the multitude of small changes found in the realm of quantifying expressions in German can be accounted for in terms of a more general change triggering Head-to-Specifier reanalysis from the functional head Card to its specifier position SpecCardP. Even if one might not subscribe to each syntactic analysis R&S suggest, the overall picture, taking into account the specific development
of individual quantifying expressions, presents itself as a convincing proposal for the diachrony of quantifying expressions.”
of individual quantifying expressions, presents itself as a convincing proposal for the diachrony of quantifying expressions.”
Ulrike Demske, University of Potsdam, in Language 94(1), 228-231, March 2018.
Cited by
Cited by other publications
Roehrs, Dorian & Christopher Sapp
Sapp, Christopher & Dorian Roehrs
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
References
References
Abney, Steven
1987 The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Abraham, Werner
Alexiadou, Artemis
Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane & Stavrou, Melita
Authier, J.-Marc
Behaghel, Otto
Das Bonner Frühneuhochdeutsch-Korpus
Korpora.org. [http://www.korpora.org/fnhd/] (25 February, 2016).
Bošković, Željko
Braune, Wilhelm & Reiffenstein, Ingo
Büring, Daniel & Hartmann, Katharina
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giusti, Giuliana
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal
Cinque, Guglielmo
Corver, Norbert
Demske, Ulrike
2013 (Dis-)continuous noun phrases in early New High German: Evidence for information structure? Presentation at
35th Conference of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft
, Potsdam.
2014 Changes in noun phrase structure. Lecture at SUM-UP, University of Potsdam.
Deutsches Wörterbuch von
Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm
Trier Center for the Digital Humanities. http://woerterbuchnetz.de/DWB (15 November 2013).
Déprez, Viviane
Doetjes, Jenny Sandra
1997 Quantifiers and Selection: On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch and English. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.
Donhauser, Karin
1998a Das Genitivproblem und (k)ein Ende? Anmerkungen zur aktuellen Diskussion um die Ursachen des Genitivschwundes im Deutschen. In Historische germanische und deutsche Syntax. Akten des Internationalen Symposiums anläßlich des 100. Geburtstages von Ingerid Dal, Oslo 1995, John Ole Askedal (ed.), 69-86. Bern: Peter Lang.
Dudenredaktion
Ebert, Robert Peter, Reichmann, Oskar, Solms, Hans-Joachim & Wegera, Klaus-Peter
Fanselow, Gisbert
Fehlisch, Ulrike
Fleischer, Jürg & Schallert, Oliver
Fobbe, Eilika
van Gelderen, Elly
Giusti, Giuliana
Götz, Ursula
2010
vnd schwermen so waidlich / als jemandt anders schwermen kan: Nominalphrasen mit jemand und niemand in der Geschichte des Deutschen. In Historische Textgrammatik und Historische Syntax des Deutschen: Traditionen, Innovationen, Perspektiven, Vol. 1, Arne Ziegler (ed.), 139-156. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 

Hartweg, Frédéric & Wegera, Klaus-Peter
Haspelmath, Martin
Haupt, Moritz
Helbig, Gerhard & Buscha, Joachim
Higginbotham, James
Hogg, Richard M. & Fulk, R.D.
Hulsey, Sarah & Sauerland, Uli
Jäger, Agnes
Julien, Marit
Kayne, Richard S.
Kehrein, Joseph
Kessler, Brett
2002 The Old Saxon Heliand, with some lexical statistics. http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~bkessler/OS-Heliand/ (23 June 2015).
Kiparsky, Paul
Köbler, Gerhard
2014 Althochdeutsches Wörterbuch, 6th edn. http://www.koeblergerhard.de/ahdwbhin.html (29 July 2015).
Kroch, Anthony S.
Lexer, Matthias
Löbel, Elisabeth
Longobardi, Giuseppe
Martí, Núria
2010 The Syntax of Partitives. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Milner, Jean-Claude
Milsark, Gary
Norde, Muriel
Norris, Mark
2014 A Theory of Nominal Concord. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Nykiel, Jerzy
Ott, Dennis
2011a Local Instability. The Syntax of Split Topics. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Partee, Barbara. H.
Postal, Paul M.
van Riemsdijk, Henk
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
Roehrs, Dorian
Roehrs, Dorian & Julien, Marit
Roehrs, Dorian & Sapp, Christopher D.
2015 Quantifying expressions as heads and phrases: Explaining the differences in the cardinal and proportional constructions in OE, OHG, and OIcel. Presented at Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop 30, University of Chicago.
Rubin, Edward J.
Sapp, Christopher D. & Roehrs, Dorian
2016 Head-to-modifier reanalysis: The rise of the adjectival quantifier viel and the loss of genitive case assignment. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 28: 91-168.
Schoorlemmer, Erik
Solt, Stephanie D.
Sportiche, Dominique
Svenonius, Peter
TITUS (Thesaurus Indogermanischer Text- und Sprachmaterialien)
University of Frankfurt. http://titus.uni-frankfurt.de (20 June 2012).
Vater, Heinz
van de Velde, Freek
Wegera, Klaus-Peter
Wesemann, Monika
Willis, David
Wood, Johanna L. & Vikner, Sten
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF/2AC – Linguistics/Germanic & Scandinavian languages
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General