Article published in:
Discourse-oriented Syntax
Edited by Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl and Andreas Trotzke
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 226] 2015
► pp. 121–158

Is particle a (unified) category?

| University of Patras
The aim of this paper is to identify the syntactic status of so-called modal particles in Greek, bearing in mind their relation with complementizers, their interaction with modality and the left periphery, and to show that they belong to the repertoire of grammatical categories independently attested. It is argued that their ‘discourse’ linking is related to their presence in the left periphery. The Greek particles under consideration are next shown to have a grammatical function and to fall into two basic categories, verbal (tha, as) and nominal (na, mi). As such they occupy (extended-) projections associated with the verb and its argument structure respectively.
Published online: 16 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.226.06rou
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Badan, Linda
2020.  Italian Discourse Markers: The Case of Guarda te * . Studia Linguistica 74:2 ► pp. 303 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Abraham, Werner
2012 Illocutive force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? Templates vs. derivational structure? In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 67-108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aelbrecht, Lobke, Haegeman, Liliane & Nye, Rachel
(eds) 2012 Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Agouraki, Yoryia
1991 A Modern Greek complementizer and its significance for UG. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 1–24.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
2003 Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1983 English Word-formation. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef
2010 Discourse particles in questions. Proceedings of GLOW in Asia VII 2009. Hyderabat: EFL University Press.
Bayer, Josef & Obenauer, Hans-Georg
2011 Discourse particles, clause structure and question types. The Linguistic Review 28: 449-491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Camaj, Martin
1984 Albanian Grammar with Exercises, Chrestomathy and Glossaries, collaborated and translated by Leonard Fox. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrasowitz.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
2011 German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review 28: 493-531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giusti, Giuliana
2000 “Semi-lexical” motion verbs in Romance and Germanic. University of Venice, Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 1-43.Google Scholar
Chatzopoulou, Katerina
2012 Negation and Non-veridicality in the History of Greek. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
2013 The history of the Greek NEG2: Two parameter resets linked to a syntactic status shift. Journal of Historical Syntax 2: 1-48.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1982 Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1986 Knowledge of Language. New York NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1-52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, Maria
2011 The pragmatics of the Modern Greek modal particles θα, να, μη(ν) and ας. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Greek Linguistics (ICGL10), University of Chicago. http://​www​.icgl​.gr​/en​.html
Christidis, Anastasios Ph
1985 Το δεικτικό να . Studies in Greek Linguistics 6: 221-241.Google Scholar
1990 On the categorial status of particles: The case of ‘holophrasis’. Lingua 82: 53-82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006 Restructuring and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Clairis, Christos & Babiniotis, George
2005 Γραμματική της Νέας Ελληνικής. Athens: Ellinika Grammata.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2008 Modal particles in Italian. University of Venice, Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 91-129.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans
1983 On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In On the Formal Syntax of Westgermania [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 3], Werner Abraham (ed.), 47-132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Efthimiou, Angeliki
2008 Negative morphemes in Modern Greek: The case of a- and mi . In La raison morphologique, B. Fradin (ed.), 55-68. Amsterdam: John Benjamims. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Danny & Katzir, Roni
2011 On the characterization of alternatives. Natural Language Semantics 19: 87-107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
1970 Root and Structure-preserving Transformations. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia
1998 Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)veridical Dependency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006  Only, emotive factives, and the dual nature of polarity dependency. Language 82: 575-603. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 The dependency of the subjunctive revisited: Temporal semantics and modality. Lingua 120: 1883-1908. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2002 Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of CP. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2: 117-180.Google Scholar
2014 West Flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the Speech Act layer. Studia Linguistica 68: 116-139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Hill, Virginia
2013 The syntacticization of discourse. In Syntax and its Limits, Rafaella Folli, Christian Sevdali & Roberts Truswell (eds), 370-390. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Ken & Keyser, Samuel J.
1993 On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building 20, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 53-109. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L.
1958 Questions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 36: 159-168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heycock, Caroline
2006 Embedded root phenomena. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. II, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 174-219. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Virginia
2007 Romanian adverbs and the pragmatic field. The Linguistic Review 24: 61-86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holton, David, Mackridge, Peter & Philippaki-Warburton, Irene
1997 Greek: A Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Greek Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Horn, Larry
1989 A Natural History of Negation. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard & Joseph, Brian
1999 The Modern Greek mi(n) as a morphological constellation. Greek Linguistics 97 (Proceedings of ICGL3) , 341-351. Athens.
Joseph, Brian
1981 On he synchrony and diachrony of na. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 7: 139-154.Google Scholar
1983 The Synchrony and Diachrony of the Balkan Infinitive. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2002 Balkan insights into the syntax of *mē in Indo-European. In Indo-European Perspectives, Mark Southern (ed.),103-120. Washington DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian & Philippaki-Warburton, Irene
1987 Modern Greek. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1982 Predicate and arguments, verbs and nouns. GLOW Newsletter 8. Tilburg.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics, Vol. 2. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Makri, Maria-Margarita
2013 Expletive Negation beyond Romance. Clausal Complementation and Epistemic Modality. MA dissertation, University of York.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita. & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2007 A Unification of Morphology and Syntax: Investigations into Romance and Albanian Dialects. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2011 Grammatical Categories: Variation in Romance Languages. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 On the lexical/functional divide: The case of negation. In Functional Heads, Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 338-350. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markantonatou, Stella & Tambouratzis, George
2000 Μερικές ποσοτικές παρατηρήσεις για τη χρήση της γραμματικής άρνησης στη νέα ελληνική. Studies in Greek Linguistics 21: 436-447.Google Scholar
Markopoulos, Theodore
2009 The Future in Greek: From Ancient to Medieval. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Munaro, Nicola & Poletto, Cecilia
2003 Ways of clausal typing. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 27: 87-105.Google Scholar
Pangalos, George
1955 Περί του γλωσσικού ιδιώματος της Κρήτης. Athens.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, Irene
1994 The subjunctive mood and the syntactic status of the particle na in Modern Greek. Folia Linguistica 28: 297-328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 Functional categories and Modern Greek syntax. The Linguistic Review 15: 159–186 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rivero, M.-L.
1994 Clause structure and V-movement in the languages of the Balkans. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 63-120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rivero, Maria-Luisa & Terzi, Arhonto
1995 Imperatives, V-movement, and logical mood. Journal of Linguistics 31: 301-332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur
2007 Strategies of subject extraction. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, Hans-Martin Gärtner & Uli Sauerland (eds), 115-160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
2003 Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1984 Association with Focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Rooth, Matts
1992 A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75-116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, Peter S.
1967 The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roussou, Anna
2000 On the left periphery: Modal particles and complementizers. Journal of Greek Linguistics 1: 65-94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 In the mood for control. Lingua 119: 1811-1836. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010a Selecting complementizers. Lingua 120: 582-603. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010b Subjects on the edge. In The Complementizer Phase: Subjects and Operators, Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.), 76-116. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roussou, Anna & Tsangalidis, Anastasios
2010 Modal particles reconsidered. Journal of Greek Linguistics 10: 45-73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speas, Margaret & Tenny, Carol
2003 Configurational properties of point-of-view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol.1: Syntax and Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 57], Anna-Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), 315-344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomić, Olga
2004 The syntax of the Balkan Slavic future tenses. Lingua 114: 517-542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsangalidis, Anastasios
1999 A Comparative Study of the Category Future. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi M. & Roussou, Anna
1996 Negation and polarity items in Modern Greek. The Linguistic Review 13: 49-81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsoulas, George
1993 Remarks on the structure and interpretation of na-clauses. Studies in Greek Linguistics. 191-206. Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Turano, Giuseppina
2000 On clitics and negation in Albanian. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 25: 81-117.Google Scholar
Tzartzanos, Achilleas
1946 [1989] Νεοελληνική Σύνταξις. Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Veloudis, Ioannis
1982 Negation in Modern Greek. PhD dissertation, University of Reading.Google Scholar
2001 Νά και να. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greek Linguistics (ICGL4) , 243-250. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.
Yoon, Suwon
2010 ‘Not’ in the Mood. The Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Evaluative Negation. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Rafaella
2008 Encoding the addressee in the syntax: Evidence from English imperative subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 185-218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold
1985 Clitics and particles. Language 61: 283-305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar