Article published in:
Discourse-oriented Syntax
Edited by Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl and Andreas Trotzke
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 226] 2015
► pp. 41–70

On the interpretation of modal particles in non-assertive speech acts in German and Bellunese

| University Ca’Foscari, Venezia
| University Ca’Foscari, Venezia
In this article, we analyze the syntactic and semantic properties of modal particles appearing in non-assertive speech acts in German and in Bellunese. We propose that modal particles in exclamations and special questions function as evidential markers interacting with the evaluative component to derive the diverse expressive meanings. In order to provide an adequate syntactic account of the distribution of these particles, we propose that they occupy head positions in Bellunese, but are specifiers of their respective functional projections in German, and that their semantic impact requires the syntactic representation of separate evaluational and evidential phrases pertaining to speaker and hearer as well as the syntactic representation of the speech act operator. The intrinsic relation between the evidence of a discourse participant and his evaluation is made visible by the interaction of modal particles in evidential projections and an autosegmental intonational morpheme in the evaluative projection in German and by a paradigm of minimal oppositions of particles occupying the evidential projections in Bellunese.
Published online: 16 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.226.03hin
References

References

Abraham, Werner
2010 Diskurspartikeln zwischen Modalität, Modus und Fremdbewußtseins-abgleich. In 40 Jahre Partikelforschung, Theo Harden & Elke Hentschel (eds), 33-77. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bartels, Christine
1999 The Intonation of English Statements and Questions: A Compositional Interpretation. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Batliner, Anton
1988 Der Exklamativ: Mehr als Aussage oder doch nur mehr oder weniger Aussage? Experimente zur Höhe und Position des F0-Gipfels. In Intonationsforschungen, Hans Altmann (ed.), 243-271. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Obenauer, Hans-Georg
2011 Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic Review 28: 449-491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel
1997 The Meaning of Topic and Focus: The 59th Street Bridge Accent. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
2011 German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review 28: 493-531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2009 Deutsche Modalpartikeln in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. In Modalität. Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 191-221. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2011 Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: Ihre Distribution und Lizenzierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Avis, Franz-Josef
2014 Exklamativsatz. In Handbuch der Satztypen des Deutschen, Hans Altmann, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds), 171-201. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Lancey, Scott
2001 The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369-382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra
2010 About the Speaker: Towards a Syntax of Indexicality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick
2011 German particles, modality, and the semantics of imperatives. In Proceedings of NELS 39, Suzi Lima, Kevin Mullin & Brian Smith (eds), 323-336. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David
1999 The Meaning of ouch and oops. Talk presented at the Cornell Conference on Theories of Context Dependency .
Krifka, Manfred
2013 Response particles and discourse particles: ja, doch and eben. Talk presented at the Workshop on the role of modal particles in diverse speech acts , 3-4 October 2013, Venice.
2014 Embedding illocutionary acts. In Recursion: Complexity in Cognition, Thomas Roeper & Margaret Speas (eds), 125-155. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Lasersohn, Peter
2005 Context dependence, disagreement and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 643-686. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munaro, Nicola
1999 Sintagmi interrogativi nei dialetti italiani settentrionali. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Munaro, Nicola & Obenauer, Hans-Georg
1999 On underspecified wh-elements in pseudo-interrogatives. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 181-253.Google Scholar
Munaro, Nicola & Poletto, Cecilia
2008 Sentential particles and clausal typing in Venetian dialects. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 173-199. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Obenauer, Hans-Georg
1994 Aspects de la syntaxe A-barre. Thèse de Doctorat d’Etat, University of Paris VIII.Google Scholar
2004 Nonstandard wh-questions and alternative checkers in Pagotto. In Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds), 343-384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oppenrieder, Wilhelm
1987 Aussagesätze im Deutschen. In Satzmodus zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik, Jörg Meibauer (ed.), 161-189. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
1989 Selbständige Verb-Letzt-Sätze. In Zur Intonation von Modus und Fokus im Deutschen, Hans Altmann, Anton Batliner & Wilhelm Oppenrieder (eds), 163- 244. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Zanuttini, Raffaella
2003 Making Imperatives: Evidence from Central Rhaetoromance. In The Syntax of Italian Dialects, Christina Tortora (ed.), 175-207. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2010 Sentential particles and remnant movement. In Mapping the Left Periphery, Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds), 201-227. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2005 The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica
2011 Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Proceedings of SALT XVIII . Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craige
1996 Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 49: 91-136.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret & Tenny, Carol
2003 Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol.1: Syntax and Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 57], Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), 315-344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
2004 Zur Strukturbedeutung von Interrogativsätzen. Linguistische Berichte 199: 313-350.Google Scholar
2013 An analysis of prosodic F-effects in interrogatives: Prosody, syntax and semantics. Lingua 124: 131-175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zaefferer, Dietmar
1983 The semantics of non-declaratives: Investigating German exclamatories. In Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 466-490. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2011 Discourse particles. In Semantics, Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 2011-2038. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Badan, Linda
2020.  Italian Discourse Markers: The Case of Guarda te * . Studia Linguistica 74:2 ► pp. 303 ff. Crossref logo
Bayer, Josef & Andreas Trotzke
2015.  In Discourse-oriented Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 226], ► pp. 13 ff. Crossref logo
Colasanti, Valentina & Giuseppina Silvestri
2019.  In Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 251], ► pp. 155 ff. Crossref logo
Cruschina, Silvio & Eva-Maria Remberger
2018. Speaker-oriented syntax and root clause complementizers. Linguistic Variation 18:2 ► pp. 336 ff. Crossref logo
Munaro, Nicola
2019.  In Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 251], ► pp. 185 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.