Article published in:
Advances in the Syntax of DPs: Structure, agreement, and case
Edited by Anna Bondaruk, Gréte Dalmi and Alexander Grosu
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 217] 2014
► pp. 1360
References

References

Babby, Leonard
1974Towards a formal theory of ‘part of speech’. In Slavic Transformational Syntax, Richard Brecht & Catherine Chvany (eds), 151–181. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Materials.Google Scholar
1998Subject control as direct prediction. In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Connecticut Meeting, Željko Bošković, Steven Franks & William Snyder (eds), 17–37. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Materials.Google Scholar
2009The Syntax of Argument Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bailyn, John
2002Overt predicators. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 10: 23–52.Google Scholar
2012The Syntax of Russian. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bhaskararao, Peri & Subbarao, Karumuri V.
2004Non-nominative Subjects [Typological Studies in Language 60 & 61]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan
2008Where’s phi? Agreement as a postsyntactic operation. In Phi-Theory: Phi Features across Interfaces and Modules, Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds), 295–328. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan & Landau, Idan
2009Icelandic control is not A-movement: The case from case. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 113–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric & Hornstein, Norbert
2006Control in Icelandic and theories of control. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 591–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric, Hornstein, Norbert & Nunes, Jairo
2010Icelandic control really is A-movement: Reply to Bobaljik and Landau. Linguistic Inquiry 41: 111­–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bondaruk, Anna
2013Copular Clauses in English and Polish. Structure, Derivation and Interpretation. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
Bowers, John
1993The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591–656.Google Scholar
2002Transitivity. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 183–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko
1997The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation: An Economy Approach. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brecht, Richard
1974Tense and infinitive complements in Russian, Latin and English. In Slavic Transformational Syntax, Richard Brecht & Catherine Chvany (eds), 193–218. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Materials.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard
1993The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, & Theo Vennemann (eds), 506-569. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Citko, Barbara
2011Symmetry in Syntax: Merge, Move, and Labels. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1974The second dative: A transformational approach. In Slavic Transformational Syntax, Richard Brecht & Catherine Chvany (eds), 123–150. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Materials.Google Scholar
Despić, Miloje
2011Syntax in the Absence of Determiner Phrase. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Frampton, John
2004Copies, traces, occurrences, and all that: Evidence frm Bulgarian multiple wh-phenomena. Ms, Northeastern University. <http://​www​.math​.neu​.edu​/ling​/lingindex​.html>Google Scholar
Frampton, John & Gutmann, Sam
2000Agreement is feature sharing. Ms, Northeastern University. <http://​www​.math​.neu​.edu​/ling​/lingindex​.html>Google Scholar
Franks, Steven
1990Case, configuration and argumenthood: Reflections on the second dative. Russian Linguistics 14: 231–154.Google Scholar
1995Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1998 Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax revisited: A minimalist retrospective. In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Connecticut Meeting, Željko Bošković, Steven Franks & William Snyder (eds), 134–165. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Materials.Google Scholar
2002A Jakobsonian feature-based analysis of the Slavic numeric quantifier genitive. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 10: 145–184.Google Scholar
2014Multiattachment syntax, “movement” effects, and Spell-Out. In Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the Interfaces [Language Faculty and Beyond 11], Peter Kosta, Steven Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork and Lilia Schürcks (eds), 209–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franks, Steven & Hornstein, Norbert
1992Secondary predication in Russian and proper government of PRO. In Control and Grammar, Richard Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri & James Higginbotham (eds), 1–50. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grebenyova, Lydia
2005Agreement in Russian secondary predicates. In Proceedings of the 40 th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , 69–81. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Gerald
1983Another look at the second dative and related subjects. Linguistic Analysis 11: 167–218.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Gerald & Franks, Steven
1991A parametric approach to dative subjects and the second dative in Russian. Slavic and East European Journal 35: 71–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert
2001Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kozinskij, Icxak Š.
1983O kategorii “podležaščee” v russkom jazyke. Moscow: Institut russkogo jazyka AN SSSR.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2003Movement out of control. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 471– 498. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Two routes of control: Evidence from case transmission in Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 877–924. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laurençot, Elizabeth
1997On secondary predication and null case. In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Indiana Meeting, Martina Lindseth & Steven Franks (eds), 191– 206. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Materials.Google Scholar
Law, Paul
1991Effects of Head Movement on Theories of Subjacency and Proper Government. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Madariaga, Nerea
2006Why Russian semipredicative items always agree. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 14: 45–78.Google Scholar
Moore, John & Perlmutter, David
2000What does it take to be a dative subject? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 373–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neidle, Carol
1988The Role of Case in Russian Syntax. Kluwer: Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya
2007Copular Sentences in Russian. A Theory of Intra-Clausal Relations. New York NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1982Paths and Categories. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther
2007The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 101], Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy Wilkins (eds), 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Przepiórkowski, Adam
1999Case Assignment and the Complement/Adjunct Dichotomy. PhD dissertation, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
Richardson, Kylie
2007Case and Aspect in Slavic. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schein, Barry
1982Nonfinite complements in Russian. In Papers in Syntax: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 4, Alec Marantz & Tim Stowell (eds), 217–243. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór
1991Icelandic case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 327–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002To be an oblique subject: Russian vs. Icelandic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 691–724. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008The case of PRO. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 403–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1994Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Witkoś, Jacek
2009Movement, case transmission and case independence in Polish control. In Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure, Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Denisa Lenertová & Petr Biskup (eds), 235-253. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2010On the lack of case on the subject of infinitives in Polish. Folia Linguistica 44: 179–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susan
2001Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause Structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar