Article published in:
Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages
Edited by Kristin Bech and Kristine Gunn Eide
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 213] 2014
► pp. 5378
References

References

Arnold, Jennifer E., Losongco, Anthony, Wasow, Thomas & Ginstrom, Ryan
2000Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76(1): 28–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian
2008Cascading parameter changes. Internally-driven change in Middle and Early Modern English. In Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory. The Rosendal Papers [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 113], Þórhallur Eyþórsson (ed.), 79–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bies, Ann Elizabeth
1996Syntax and Discourse Factors in Early New High German: Evidence for Verb-Final Word Order. MA dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty J.
2006Inferential relations and noncanonical word order. In Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning. Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn [Studies in Language Companion Series 80], Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds), 31–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Sasha, Nissim, Malvina, Steedman, Mark & Brenier, Jason
2005A framework for annotating information structure in discourse. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotation II: Pie in the Sky , 45–52. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Computational Linguistics.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
1980Beyond definiteness: the trace of identity in discourse. In The Pear Stories. Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production , Wallace L. Chafe (ed.), 203–274. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
1993Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2): 274–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haug, Dag T.T.
2011Guidelines for annotation of givenness: The PROIEL project. <http://​folk​.uio​.no​/daghaug​/info​_guidelines​.pdf>
Haviland, Susan E. & Clark, Herbert H.
1974What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13: 512–521. Crossref http:​/folk​.uio​.no​/daghaug​/info​_guidelines​.pdf#​_blank
Karttunen, Lauri
1976Discourse referents. In Syntax and Semantics 7. Notes from the Linguistic Underground , James D. McCawley (ed.), 363–385. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1996 Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou & Komen, Erwin R.
2012The Pentaset: Annotating information state primitives. Ms, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Nissim, Malvina, Dingare, Shipra, Carletta, Jean & Steedman, Mark
2004An annotation scheme for information status in dialogue. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) , 1023–1026, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan
1996Cliticization in Old English. In Approaching Second. Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena , Aaron L. Halpern & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 366–400. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
1999 Phrase Structures in Competition. Variation and Change in Old English Word Order . New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Taylor, Ann
2006The loss of OV order in the history of English. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 249–278. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1981Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics , Peter Cole (ed.), 223–255. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1992The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In Discourse Description. Diverse Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], Sandra A. Thompson & WilliamC. Mann (eds), 195–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riester, Arndt, Lorenz, David & Seemann, Nina
2010A recursive annotation scheme for referential information status. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) , 717–722, Valetta, Malta.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan
2011The interaction of syntactic change and information status effects in the change from OV to VO in English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 71–94.Google Scholar
2012aThe effect of information structure on object position in Old English: A pilot study. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change, María José López Couso, Bettelou Los & Anneli Meurman-Solin (eds), 71–94. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012bRethinking the OV/VO alternation in Old English: The effect of complexity, grammatical weight and information structure. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 835–845. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann & van der Wurff, Wim
(eds) 2005Special issue on aspects of OV and VO order in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics 9(1): 1–4. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallenberg, Joel C.
2009Antisymmetry and the Conservation of C-Command: Scrambling and Phrase Structure in Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas
1997Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change 9: 81–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

No author info given
2016.  In Element Order in Old English and Old High German Translations [NOWELE Supplement Series, 28], Crossref logo
Chrambach, Susanne
2019.  In Developments in English Historical Morpho-Syntax [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 346],  pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo
Dreschler, Gea
2017.  In Word Order Change in Acquisition and Language Contact [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 243],  pp. 103 ff. Crossref logo
Taylor, Ann & Susan Pintzuk
2018. Split coordination in English. Diachronica 35:3  pp. 310 ff. Crossref logo
Taylor, Ann & Susan Pintzuk
2020.  In Diachronic Treebanks for Historical Linguistics [Benjamins Current Topics, 113],  pp. 16 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.