Article published in:
The Lexicon–Syntax Interface: Perspectives from South Asian languages
Edited by Pritha Chandra and Richa Srishti
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 209] 2014
► pp. 197216
References

References

Ahmed, Tafseer
2009Spatial Expressions and Case in South Asian Languages. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Balachandran, Lakshmi Bai
1970A Case Grammar of Hindi with Special Reference to Causative Sentences. Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Embick, David
2004Causative Derivations in Hindi. Ms. University of Texas & University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris
2005A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8(2): 81–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davison, Alice
1982On the form and meaning of Hindi passive sentences. Lingua 58(1–2): 149–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1989aVerb agreement in Proto-Tibeto-Burman verb. Bulletin of the School of Oriental & African Studies 52(2): 315–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David
1997Voice and the Interfaces of Syntax. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter
1979Hindi structures: Intermediate level. Michigan Papers on South and South East Asia 16, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna
1980 Aspects of Hindi Syntax . Manohar Publications: Delhi.Google Scholar
Khokholova, Ludmila
V. 1997. Infringement of morphological and syntactic operations’ pairing in “Second causative” formation. Paper presented at the XVIII South Asian Language Analysis Round Table , JNU, New Delhi.
Kidwai, Ayesha
1995Binding and Free Word Order Phenomenon in Hindi-Urdu. PhD thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru University.Google Scholar
2000 XP-Adjunction in Universal Grammar: Scrambling and Binding in Hindi-Urdu . New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Mahajan, Anoop
1990 On the A/A-Bar Distinction and Movement Thoery . PhD Thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Manning, Christopher
1994 Argument Structure as a Locus for Binding Theory . Ms. University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P.
1991 The Indo-Aryan Languages . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanan, Tara
1994 Argument Structure in Hindi . Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina & Tolskaya, Maria
2001 A Grammar of Udihe . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari
1981Transitivity in Hindi. 11(2): 161–179. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2002Introducing Arguments. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008 Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Licensing of instrumental case in Hindi/Urdu in Causatives. Working Papers on Language & Linguistics 38. Tromsø University: Septentrio Acdemic Publishing.Google Scholar
Richa
2003Possessive Reflexives and Pronominals in Hindi-Urdu and Indian sign Language: A Minimalist Analysis. M.Phil. Dissertation, Jawaharlal Nehru University.Google Scholar
2008Unaccusativity, Unergativity and the Causative Alternation in Hindi: A Minimalist Analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, J.N.U. Delhi.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2008Smuggling, Affectness and Argument Structure Alternation. Ms. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosen, Carol & Wali, Kashi
1989Twin passives, inversion, and multistratalism in Marathi. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7(1): 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saksena, Anuradha
1982 Topics in the Analysis of Causatives with an Account of Hindi Paradigms . Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Yeon, Jaehoon
2003 Korean Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning . London: Saffron Books.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee
1945Grammatical categories. Language 21(1): 1–11. Linguistic Society of America. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Arkadiev, Peter M. & Jurgis Pakerys
2015.  In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 2],  pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.