Article published in:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 35:2 (2020) ► pp. 293–331

Changes in the functions of already in Singapore English

A grammaticalization approach

| Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3 , France
The use of the adverb already in Colloquial Singapore English has long been known as one of the most readily recognizable features defining the contact dialect, marking aspectual nuances such as anterior, completive, inchoative and inceptive functions, as noted by Bao (2005, 2015). Recent observations note that the uses of already as an inchoative marker (distinguishing the adverb as an iamitive) are more frequently found than completive uses across a small, synchronic sample of speakers (Teo 2019). It is perhaps less often recognized, though, that the aspectual use of already co-exists with the variable marking for past tense in Singlish (Ho & Platt 1993), and that both the aspectual adverb and the past tense may be seen to co-occur in the same construction. The frequency of already in its various functions is examined across two corpora, and the relative frequency of completive vs. non-completive functions is quantified diachronically. It is hypothesized that, rather than grammaticalizing onwards to become a past tense marker, as is predictable for some Portuguese creole iamitives (ya ‘already’) (Clements 2006), already is becoming increasingly restricted in its functional range in today’s Singlish, and that its perfect and completive functions may be at a stage of selective renovation by the use of the past tense in Standard Singapore English.
Keywords: Singlish, already , iamitives, past tense, contact grammaticalization, renovation/renewal
Published online: 01 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00062.zie
References

[ p. 327 ]References

Alanne, Eero
1972 Zur Rolle der syntaktischen Interferenz der verwandten und unverwandten Sprachen. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 73: 568–574.Google Scholar
Alsagoff, Lubna
2010 English in Singapore: culture, capital and identity in linguistic variation. World Englishes 29. 336–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alsagoff, Lubna & Chee Lick Ho
1998 The grammar of Singapore English. In Joseph A. Foley, Thiru Kandiah, Zhi-Ming Bao, Anthea Fraser Gupta, Lubna Algasoff, Chee Lick Ho, Lionel Wee, Ismail S. Talib & Wendy Bokhorst-Heng, English in new cultural contexts. Reflections from Singapore, 127–151. Singapore: Oxford University Press [Singapore Institute of Management].Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming
1995  Already in Singapore English. World Englishes 14. 181–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 The origins of empty categories in Singapore English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 16(2). 275–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 The aspectual system of Singapore English and the systemic substratist explanation. Journal of Linguistics 41. 237–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 A usage-based approach to substratum transfer: the case of four unproductive features in Singapore English. Language 86(4). 792–820. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 The making of vernacular Singapore English: System, transfer and filter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Alan
1988 A grammar of Kristang (Malacca Creole Portuguese). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics Series.Google Scholar
2018 Malacca Creole Portuguese in the 19th century: Evidence of a wider lectal range? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 33(2). 247–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Alan, & Hugo C. Cardosa
2017 Early notices regarding Creole Portuguese in former Portuguese Timor. Journal of Language Contact 10. 264–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter
2004 Grammaticalization without coevolution of form and meaning: The case of tense-aspect-modality in East and mainland Southeast Asia. In Walter Bisang & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 109–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, & Östen Dahl
1989 The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13(1). 51–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren
1976 Aspects of Chinese Sociolinguistics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, Robert
2001 Creolization of language and culture. Translated from the French by Sheri Pargman. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clements, J. Clancy
2003 The tense-aspect system in pidgins and naturalistically learned L2. Studies in Second language Acquisition 25. 245–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 328 ]
2006 The lexicalization-grammaticalization continuum. In J. Clancy Clements, Thomas A. Klingler, Deborah Piston-Hatlen & Kevin J. Rottet (eds.), History, society and variation. In honor of Albert Valdman, 77–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Portugueses-based creoles in Africa and Asia. In Corey Yoquelet (ed.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Feb. 14–17 2003 55–69. (Special session on Minority and Diasporic Languages of Europe).Google Scholar
Clements, J. Clancy & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2002 Two Indo-Portuguese creoles in contrast. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 17(2). 191–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1985 Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006 Relativism and universalism from the perspective of areal typology and grammaticalization theory. Plenary talk presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea , University of Bremen, 30 August-2 September.
Dahl, Östen & Viveka Velupillai
2013 The Perfect. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Accessed online at http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/68 (17 Sept. 2019).
Dahl, Östen & Bernhard Wälchli
2016 Perfects and iamitives: two gram types in one grammatical space. Letras de Hoje 51(3). 325–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2019 Gram types as clusters in grammatical space. Paper presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea , 21–24 August, University of Leipzig.
Deuber, Dagmar, Jakob Leimgruber, & Andrea Sand
2018 Singaporean internet chit chat compared to informal spoken language: linguistic variation and indexicality in a language contact situation. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 33(1). 48–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
2008 Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12. 453–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles
1959 Diglossia. Word 15 (2). 325–340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fong, Vivienne
2017 World Englishes and syntactic and semantic theory. In Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola & Devyani Sharma (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes, 84–102. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, Anthea F.
1991 Almost a creoloid: Singapore English. California Linguistic Notes 23(1). 9–21.Google Scholar
1994 The step-tongue. Children’s English in Singapore. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gupta, Anthea Fraser
1998 The situation of English in Singapore. In Joe Foley, T. Kandiah, Zhiming Bao, Anthea Gupta, Lubna Alsagoff, Chee Lick Ho, Lionel Wee, IS. Talib, & Wendy Bokhorst-Heng, English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore, 106–126. Singapore: Singapore Institute of Management/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ian
2009 The Portuguese creoles of Malacca. Revue Romaine de Linguistique LIV. 3–4. 295–306.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie
(eds.) 2005 World atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 329 ]
Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil, & Bernard Comrie
(eds.) 2008 The world atlas of language structures online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. München: Max Planck Digital Library. http://​wals​.info/
Heine, Bernd
2012 Isomorphism and formulas of equivalence in language contact. In Guangshun, Cao, Hilary Chappell, Redouane Djamouri & Thekla Wiebusch (eds.), Breaking down the Barriers: Interdisciplinary Studies in Chinese Linguistics and Beyond” (Festschrift for Prof. Alain Peyraube). Taiwan: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica. (Pre-print version.)Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, & Tania Kuteva
2002 World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2003 On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27. 529–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hiramoto, Mie
2015 Sentence-final adverbs in Singapore English and Hong Kong English. World Englishes 34(4). 636–653. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ho, Mian Lian & John T. Platt
1993 Dynamics of a contact continuum. Singaporean English. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991 On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
The International Corpus of English
http://​ice​-corpora​.net​/ice​/avail​.htm
Kuteva, Tania
2017 Contact and borrowing. In Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of historical syntax, 163–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019 World lexicon of grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Seongha Rhee, Debra Ziegeler, & Jessica Sabban
2018 Are you the Queen of England, or what? On sentence-final what . Journal of Language Contact 11. 32–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire
1998 Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: The case of Haitian Creole. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2015 Thoughts on grammaticalization. 3rd edition. Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leimgruber, Jacob R. E.
2009 Modelling variation in Singapore English. PhD dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Leimgruber, Jakob
2018 Ethnic and gender variation in the use of Colloquial Singapore English discourse particles. Paper presented at the 5th Conference of the International Society for the Linguistics of English, University College London, July 17–20.
Li, Charles N., & Sandra A. Thompson
1989 [1981] Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lijun, Li & Peter Siemund
2020 From phasal polarity expression to aspectual marker: grammaticalization of already in Asian and African varieties of English. In Raija Kramer (ed.), The expression of phasal polarity in African languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
[ p. 330 ]
Lim, Lisa
2007 Mergers and acquisitions: on the ages and origins of Singapore English particles. World Englishes 26. 446–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip
2009 Contact-induced grammaticalization: Evidence from bilingual acquisition. Studies in Language 33. 366–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Philippe
& the APiCS Consortium 2013 Tense-aspect systems (https://​apics​-online​.info​/parameters​/49​.chapter​.html). In Susanne Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath, & Magnus Huber (eds.) 2013 The atlas of pidgin and creole language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://​apics​-online. (16 Sept. 2019).
McCawley, James
1971 Tense and time reference in English. In Charles Fillmore & Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics, 96–113. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath, & Magnus Huber
(eds.) 2013 The atlas of pidgin and creole language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (https://​apics​-online.)
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
1990 Transfer and the substrate hypothesis in creolistics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12. 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter
1986 Bonnet blanc and blanc bonnet: adjective-noun order, substratum and language universals. In Pieter Muysken & Norvil Smith (eds.), Substrata vs. universals in creole genesis, 41–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
OED Online
= Oxford English Dictionary Online, 3rd edition (updated September 2012) http://​www​.oed​.com​.ezproxy​.univ​-paris​.fr (15 July 2019)
Olsson, Bruno
2013 Iamitives. Perfects in Southeast Asia and beyond. Masters thesis, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Pakir, Anne
2019 English in Singapore: Achieving a new balance. Colloquium given at the SESYLIA research group meeting, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle 10 May.Google Scholar
Platt, John T.
1975 The Singapore English speech continuum and its basilect ‘Singlish’ as a creoloid. Anthropological Linguistics 17(7). 363–74.Google Scholar
Platt, John T., Heidi Weber & Mian Lian Ho
1984 The New Englishes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Reinöhl, Uta, & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann
2017 Renewal: a figure of speech or a process sui generis? Language 93(2). 381–413. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siemund, Peter
2013 Varieties of English: A typological approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szeto, Pui Yiu, Stephen Matthews, & Virginia Yip
2017 Multiple correspondence and typological convergence in contact-induced grammaticalization: Evidence from Cantonese-English bilingual development. Journal of Language Contact 10(3). 485–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019 Bilingual children as “laboratories” for studying contact outcomes: Development of perfective aspect. Linguistics 57(3). 693–723. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teo, Ming Chew
2019 The role of parallel constructions in imposition. A synchronic study of already in Colloquial Singapore English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 34(2). 347–377. ( Crossref)Google Scholar
Tongue, Ray K.
1979 The English of Singapore and Malaysia. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 331 ]
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1982 From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Winifred Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Perspective on historical linguistics, 245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald
2003 An introduction to contact linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald, & Bettina Migge
2007 Substrate influence on the emergence of the TMA systems of the Surinamese creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 22(1). 73–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra
1995 Diachronic factors in the grammaticalisation of counterfactual implicatures in Singaporean English. Language Sciences 17(4). 305–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 On the interaction of past tense and potentiality in Singaporean Colloquial English. Language Sciences 34. 229–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Converging grammars. Constructions in Singapore English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra & Sarah Lee
2019 Lexical retention in contact grammaticalisation : already in Southeast Asian Englishes. Journal of Language Contact 12. 737–783. CrossrefGoogle Scholar