References

[ p. 342 ]References

Arnott, S., Brogden, L. M., Faez, F., Peguret, M., Piccardo, E., Rehner, K., Taylor, S. K., & Wernicke, M.
(2017) The Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) in Canada: A research agenda. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20 (1), 31–54.Google Scholar
Arnott, S., & Vignola, M. J.
(2018) Using a language portfolio in FSL teacher education: Student and instructor perspectives. Paper presentation at the conference of the Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics, Regina, SK, 29 May 2018.
Association canadienne des professionnels de l’immersion, ACPI
(2017) Sondage pancandien: Résultats préliminaires du sondage mené par l’ACPI, en octobre 2017, dans le but de mieux comprendre les réalités des professionnels de l’immersion française au Canada. Retrieved from http://​www​.acpi​.ca​/evenements​/consultation​-pancanadienne​-de​-l​-acpi
Bayliss, D., & Vignola, M. J.
(2007) Training non-native second language teachers: The case of Anglophone FSL teacher candidates. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63 (3), 371–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Assessing language proficiency of FSL candidates: What makes a successful candidate? Canadian Modern Language Review, 57 (2), 217–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergil, A. S., & Sariçoban, A.
(2017) The use of EPOSTL to determine the self-efficacy of prospective EFL teachers: Raising awareness in English language teacher education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13 (1), 399–411.Google Scholar
Bournot-Trites, M.
(2008) Vision pour le soutien des acquis linguistiques des enseignants de FLS. Revue Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée, 11 (1), 21–39.Google Scholar
Burkert, A., & Schwienhorst, K.
(2008) Focus on the student teacher: The European portfolio for student teachers of languages (EPOSTL) as a tool to develop teacher autonomy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2 (3), 238–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cakir, A., & Balcikanli, C.
(2012) The use of the European portfolio for student teachers of languages (EPOSTL) to foster teacher autonomy: English language teaching (ELT) student teachers’ and teacher trainers’ views. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (3), 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Parents for French
(2014) French second language programs and student performance. Retrieved from https://​cpf​.ca​/en​/files​/CPFMagazine​_SPR​-SUMM2014​​_eVersion​.pdf
(2017) French second language enrolment statistics: 2011–12 to 2015–16. Retrieved from https://​cpf​.ca​/en​/files​/Enrolement​-Stats​.pdf
Carr, W.
(2010) Raising FLAGS: Renewing core French at the pre-service teacher level. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13 (1), 37–51.Google Scholar
Centre for Applied Second Language Studies (University of Oregon)
(2017) Linguafolio Online. Retrieved from https://​linguafolio​.uoregon​.edu/
Christiansen, H., & Laplante, B.
(2004) Second language pre-service teachers as learners: The language portfolio project. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 60 (4), 439–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 343 ]
Council of Europe
(2001) A Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://​www​.coe​.int​/t​/dg4​/linguistic​/source​/framework​_en​.pdf
(2017a) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors. Retrieved from https://​rm​.coe​.int​/common​-european​-framework​-of​-reference​-for​-languages​-learning​-teaching​/168074a4e2
(2017b) Developing an ELP. Retrieved from http://​www​.coe​.int​/en​/web​/portfolio​/home1
Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC)
(2010) L’exploitation du Cadre européen commun de reference pour les langues (CECR) dans le contexte canadien: Guide à l’intention des responsables de l’élaboration des politiques et des concepteurs de programmes d’études. Retrieved from http://​cmec​.ca​/docs​/CECR​-contexte​-canadien​.pdf
Creswell, J. W.
(2012) Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Day, E. M., & Shapson, S.
(1996) A national survey: French Immersion teachers’ preparation and their professional development needs. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52 , 248–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donato, R., & McCormick, D.
(1994) A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. Modern Language Journal, 78 , 453–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ElAtia, S., & Lemaire, E.
(2013) Engager les apprenants dans l’auto-évaluation de leurs productions écrites: Le cas du portfolio d’erreurs. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16 (1), 111–134.Google Scholar
Faez, F.
(2011) Points of departure: Developing the knowledge base of ESL and FSL teachers for K-12 programs in Canada. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14 (1), 29–49.Google Scholar
Flewelling, J.
(1995) Addressing the challenge for FSL teachers: How to maintain and improve language, pedagogical skills and cultural knowledge. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52 (1), 22–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, A., & Thomas, R.
(2011) Language portfolio design for a concurrent teacher education program in Ontario. Synergies Europe, 6 , 219–228.Google Scholar
Karsenti, T., Collin, S., Villeneuve, S., Dumouchel, G., & Roy, N.
(2008) Why are new French immersion and French as a second language teachers leaving the profession? Results of a Canada-wide survey. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association of Immersion Teachers.Google Scholar
Lapkin, S., MacFarlane, A., & Vandergrift, L.
(2006) Teaching French in Canada: FSL teachers’ perspectives. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Teachers’ Federation.Google Scholar
Laplante, B. & Christiansen, H.
(2001) Portfolio langagier en français. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57 , 495–501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazaruk, W.
(2007) Avantages linguistiques, scolaires et cognitifs de l’immersion française. La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 63 (5), 629–654. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lemaire, E.
(2013) L’intégration du Portfolio européen des langues en milieu ouest-canadien minoritaire et universitaire. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69 (4), 487–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Little, D.
(2009) Language learner autonomy and the European Language Portfolio: Two L2 English examples. Language Teaching, 42 (2), 222–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 44 (3), 381–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 344 ]
Mandin, L.
(2010) Portfolio langagier: Les finissants des programmes d’immersion se révèlent. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13 (1), 104–118.Google Scholar
Mathison, S.
(1988) Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17 , 13–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newby, D.
(2012) Supporting good practice in teacher education through the European portfolio for student teachers of languages. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6 (3), 207–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newby, D., Allan, R., Fenner, A. B., Jones, B., Komorowska, H., & Soghikyan, K.
(2007) The European portfolio for student teachers of languages (EPOSTL). Graz: European Center for Modern Languages.Google Scholar
Newby, D., Fenner, A. B. & Jones, B.
(2011) Using the European portfolio for student teachers of languages. Graz: European Center for Modern Languages.Google Scholar
Nihlén, C.
(2011) What goes into the EPOSTL dossier and why? In D. Newby, A. B. Fenner & B. Jones (eds.), Using the European portfolio for student teachers of languages (pp. 55–63). Graz: European Center for Modern Languages.Google Scholar
North, B.
(2014) Putting the common European framework of reference to good use. Language Teaching, 47 (2), 228–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ontario College of Teachers
Ontario Ministry of Education
(2013) The Ontario Curriculum: French as a second language (Core French, Grades 4–8; Extended French, Grades 4–8; French Immersion, Grades 1–8). Retrieved from http://​www​.edu​.gov​.on​.ca​/eng​/curriculum​/elementary​/fsl18​-2013curr​.pdf
Orlova, N.
(2011) Challenges of integrating EPOSTL into pre-service teacher training. In D. Newby, A. B. Fenner & B. Jones (eds.), Using the European portfolio for student teachers of languages (pp. 19–28). Graz: European Center for Modern Languages.Google Scholar
Piccardo, E.
(2011) Du CECR au développement professionnel: Pour une démarche stratégique. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14 (2), 20–52.Google Scholar
(2013) Plurilingualism and curriculum design: Towards a synergic vision. TESOL Quarterly, 47 (3), 600–614. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ragoonaden, K. O.
(2011) La compétence interculturelle et la formation initiale: Le point sur le CECR et l’IDI. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14 (2), 86–105.Google Scholar
Salvatori, M.
(2009) A Canadian perspective on language teacher education: Challenges and opportunities. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (2), 287–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tedick, D. J.
(2013) Embracing proficiency and program standards and rising to the challenge: A response to Burke. Modern Language Journal, 97 (2), 535–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, M.
(2011) The Canadian language portfolio for teachers. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association of Second Language Teachers (CASLT).Google Scholar
Veilleux, I., & Bournot-Trites, M.
(2005) Standards for the language competence of French immersion teachers: Is there a danger of erosion? Canadian Journal of Education, 28 (3), 487–507. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 345 ]
Wernicke, M.
(2017) Navigating native-speaker ideologies as FSL teacher. Canadian Modern Language Review, 73 (2), 208–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Mård-Miettinen, Karita, Stephanie Arnott & Marie-Josée Vignola
2021.  In Handbook of Early Language Education [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.