Article published in:
Verb Classes and Aspect
Edited by Elisa Barrajón López, José Luis Cifuentes Honrubia and Susana Rodríguez Rosique
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 9] 2015
► pp. 312333
References
Arad, Maya
1998 “Psych-Notes.” UCL Working papers in linguistics 10: 203–222.Google Scholar
Belletti, Andrea and Rizzi, Luigi
1988 “Psych Verbs and Theta Theory.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bialy, Adam
2005Polish Psychological Verbs at the Lexicon-Syntax Interface in Cross Linguistic Perspective. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Blum, Laurence A.
1980Friendship, Altruism, and Morality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cançado, Márcia
1995 “A teoria da proeminência de Grimshaw e os psico-verbos do portugûes brasileiro.” D.E.L.T.A. 11/2: 279–299.Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory N.
1978Reference to kinds in English. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Cifuentes, José Luis
This volume. “Causativity and Psychological Verbs in Spanish.” Crossref
Di Desidero, Linda
1993 “Psych Verbs and the Nature of Complex Events.” Northwestern Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 11–22.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
1979Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dortrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 “Non-Verbal Thematic Proto-Roles.” Language 67 (3): 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul
1994 “All Emotions Are Basic.” In Ekman, Paul & Davidson, Richard J. (eds.), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. New York: Oxford University Press, 15–19.Google Scholar
Filip, Hana
2012 “Lexical Aspect.” In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, R.I. Binnick (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A.
& Van Valin Robert D 1984Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1990Argument structure. Cambridge, MA / London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Härtl, Holden
2001Cause und Change: thematische Relationen und Ereignisstrukturen in Konzeptualisierung und Grammatikalisierung. Berlin: Akademieverlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kailuweit, Rolf
2005Linking: Syntax und Semantik französischer und italienischer Gefühlsverben. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “El enlace de los verbos de sentimiento – un cálculo de rasgos.” In Cano López, Pablo (Ed.), Actas del VI Congreso de Lingüística General, Santiago de Compostela, 3–7 de mayo de 2004, Vol. 2, Tomo 1, 2007 (Las lenguas y su estructura (IIa)), 1699–1708.Google Scholar
2013 “Radical Role and Reference Grammar (RRRG): A Sketch for Remodelling the Syntax-Semantics-Interface.” In Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics. The Role of Constructions in Grammar, B. Nolan and E. Diedrichsen (eds.), 103–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1989 “An investigation of the lumps of thought.” In Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (5): 607–653. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan
2002The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Ms. Ben Gurion University.Google Scholar
2010The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marín, Rafael
2011 “Casi todos los predicados psicológicos son estativos.” In Sobre estados y estatividad, A. Carrasco (ed.), 26–44. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Martin, Fabienne
2002 “La préposition de du complément d’agent des verbes psychologiques causatifs : un génitif.” Scolia 15: 57–70.Google Scholar
Martín, Juan
1998 “The Lexico-Semantic Interface: Psych Verbs and Psych Nouns.” Hispania 81: 619–631. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, Yannik Y.
2000Les verbes de sentiment. De l’analyse linguistique au traitement automatique. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Nissenbaum, Helen F.
1985Emotion and Focus. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambrigde, MA/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2000 “On Stativity and Causation.” In Events as Grammatical Objects. The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax, C. Tenny and J. Pustojovsky (eds.), 417–444. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
2001Experiencing Derivations. [http://​www​.let​.uu​.nl​/~tanya​.reihart].Google Scholar
2002 “The Theta system – Overview.” Theoretical Linguistics 28 (3): 229–290.Google Scholar
Rozwadowska, Bożena
1988 “Thematic Restrictions on Derived Nominals.” In Syntax and Semantics 21. Thematic Relations, W. Wilkins (ed.), 147–165. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas
1972 “A propos d’une classe de verbes ‘psychologiques’.” In Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français, N. Ruwet (ed.), 181–251. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
1994 “Être ou ne pas être un verbe de sentiment.” Langue Française 103: 45–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 “Les verbes de sentiment peuvent-ils être agentifs?Langue Française 105: 28–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1983Intentionality. An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tenny, Carol
1994Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. and LaPolla, Randy J.
1997Syntax. Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Voorst, Jan
1992 “The Aspectual Semantics of Psychological Verbs.” Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 65–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 “Le contrôle de l’espace psychologique.” Langue Française 105: 17–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanhoe, Henk
2002Aspectos de la sintaxis de los verbos psicológicos en español. Un análisis léxico funcional. Dissertation. Universiteit Gent.
Verkuyl, H.J.
1989 “Aspectual Classes and Aspectual Composition.” Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 39–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vermandere, Dieter
2002I verbi psicologici italiani. Uno studio semantico e sintattico. Dissertation. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Google Scholar
Wanner, Anja
2001 “The Optimal Linking of Arguments: The Case of English Psychological Verbs.” In Competition in Syntax, Müller Gereon & Sternefeld, Wolfgang (eds.), 377–399. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, Stanley M.
1995 “Gustar and Other Psych Verbs. A Problem in Transitivity.” Hispania 78: 573–585. CrossrefGoogle Scholar