Article published in:
Verb Classes and Aspect
Edited by Elisa Barrajón López, José Luis Cifuentes Honrubia and Susana Rodríguez Rosique
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 9] 2015
► pp. 185217
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Altshuler, Daniel
2015.  In Logic, Language, and Computation [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8984],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Matthewson, Lisa
2017. Semantics in Indigenous American Languages: 1917–2017 and Beyond. International Journal of American Linguistics 83:1  pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo
Schulz, Petra
2018.  In Semantics in Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 24],  pp. 124 ff. Crossref logo
van Hout, Angeliek
2018.  In Semantics in Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 24],  pp. 96 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena and Schäfer, Florian
2006 “The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically.” In Phases of interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed), 187–212. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
to appear. External arguments in transitivity alternations: a layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref
Altschuler, Daniel
2013 “There is no neutral aspect.” Proceedings of SALT 23: 40–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Altshuler, Daniel
2014 “A typology of aspectual operators.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32 (3): 735–775. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arche, Maria
2014 “The construction of viewpoint aspect: the imperfective revisited.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(3): 791–831. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter M. and Letuchiy, Alexander
2009The syntax and semantics of event structure and Adyghe causatives. Ms, Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Bar-El, Leora
2005Aspectual distinctions in Skwxwú7mesh. University of British Columbia PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Bar-El, Leora, Davis, Henry and Matthewson, Lisa
2005 “On Non-Culminating Accomplishments.” In Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 35) 1: 87–102.Google Scholar
Beavers, John
2006Argument/oblique alternations and the structure of lexical meaning. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
2010 “Aspectual Analysis of Ditransitive Verbs of Caused Possession in English.” Journal of Semantics 28: 1–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bittner, Maria
2007 “Aspectual universals of temporal anaphora.” In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect, Susan Rothstein (ed), 349–385. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bochnak, Ryan
2013 “Two sources of scalarity within the verb phrase.” In Studies in the composition and decomposition of event predicates, Boban Arsenijević, Berit Gehrke and Rafael Marín (eds), 99–123. Amsterdam: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Copley, Bridget and Wolff, Philip
2014 “Non-culmination and agency. Exploring the hypothesis space.” Talk given to Chronos 11 , Pisa.
Cusic, David
1981Verbal plurality and aspect. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Davis, John
1978. Pronominal paradigms in Sliammon. In Papers for the 13th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages , 208–236.
Davis, Henry
2000 “Salish evidence on the causative-inchoative alternation.” Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science series 4: 25–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Henry and Matthewson, Lisa
2009 “Issues in Salish Syntax and Semantics.” Language and Linguistics Compass 3(4): 1097–1166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dell, François
1983 “An aspectual distinction in Tagalog.” Oceanic Linguistics 22-23: 175–206.Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida
1997 “Out of control in St’át’imcets Salish and event (de)composition.” In Theoretical issues in the morphology-syntax interface, Amaya Mendikoetxea and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria (eds), 97–143: Diputacion Foral de Gipuzkoa.Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida and Martin, Fabienne
2013 “Agent control over non-culminating events,” Ms, University of Nantes and University of Stuttgart.
Demirdache, Hamida and Sun, Chaofen
2014 “On non-culminating accomplishments in Mandarin.” Ms, University of Nantes.Google Scholar
Filip, Hana
2008 “Events and Maximalization: The case of telicity and perfectivity.” In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect, Susan Rothstein (ed), 217–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filip, Hana and Rothstein, Susan
2006 “Telicity as a semantic parameter.” In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 14: The Princeton Meeting, James Lavine, Steven Franks, Hana Filip and Mila Tasseva-Kurkchieva (eds), 139–156. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella, and Harley, Heidi
2005 “Flavors of v.” Aspectual inquiries, Paula Kempchinsky and Roumyana Slabakova (eds), 95–120. Netherlands: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freed, Alice
1978The Semantics of English aspectual complementation. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Gerdts, Donna
2008 “Halkomelem limited control as speaker’s viewpoint.” Handout for the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America (LSA), Chicago.
Gropen, Jess, Pinker, Steven, Hollander, Michelle Goldberg, Richard and Wilson, Ronald
1989 “The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English.” Language: 203–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine
2006Aspects of modality. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshihiko
1985 “Activity, Accomplishment, Achievement: A Language that Can’t Say, ‘I Burned It, But it Didn’t Burn’ and One that Can.” In Linguistics and Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Rulon S. Wells, Makkai, Adam and Alan K. Melby (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Peter
2011Control in Skwxwú7mesh. PhD Dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher
2010 “Incremental Change.” In Telicity, Change, and State, Violeta Demonte and Louise McNally (eds), 103–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher and McNally, Louise
2005 “Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicate.” Language 81(2): 345–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiyota, Masaru
2008Situation aspect and viewpoint aspect: From Salish to Japanese. British Columbia: Doctoral Dissertation University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Koenig, Jean-Pierre and Muansuwan, Nuttanart
2000 “How to End Without Ever Finishing: Thai Semi–perfectivity.” Journal of Semantics 17(2): 147–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, Jean-Pierre and Davis, Anthony
2001 “Sublexical modality and the structure of lexical semantic representations.” Linguistics and Philosophy 24(1): 71–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, Jean-Pierre and Chief, Lian-Cheng
2008 “Scalarity and State-Changes in Mandarin, Hindi, Tamil, and Thai.” In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 7, Oliver Bonami and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds), 241–262.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
2013Creating a family: constructing transfer of possession verbs. Plenary talk given to the Little V workshop, Leiden, December.
Krifka, Manfred
1989 “Nominal reference, temporal constitution, and quantification in event semantics.” In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem and Peter van Emde Boas (eds), Semantics and Contextual Expressions. Foris, Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1992 “Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution.” In Lexical Matters, Ivan Sag and Anna Szabolci (eds), Stanford: CSLI Publications, 29–53.Google Scholar
1998 “The origins of telicity.” In Events and Grammar, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 197–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1999 “Objecthood: An Event Structure Perspective.” Proceedings of CLS 35, volume 1: The Main Session. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Lyutikova, Ekaterina and Tatevosov, Sergei
2010 “Atelicity and anticausativization.” In Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations: A cross-linguistic perspective, Maia Duguine, Susana Huidobro and Nerea Madariaga (eds), 35–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mari, Alda and Martin, Fabienne
2009On the interaction between aspect and verbal polysemy: (im-) perfectivity and (non-) implicativity. Ms, Institut Jean Nicod and Stuttgart University.Google Scholar
Martin, Fabienne
2006Prédicats statifs, causatifs et résultatifs en discours. Sémantique des adjectifs évaluatifs et des verbes psychologiques. PhD dissertation, Université libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
To appear. “Explaining the link between agentivity and non-culminating causation.” In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistics Theory 25 (SALT 25), Sarah d’Antonio, Carole-Rose Little, Mary Rose Moroney and Mia Wiegand (eds) Crossref
Martin, Fabienne and Schäfer, Florian
2012 “The modality of offer and other defeasible causative verbs.” In Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 30), Nathan Arnett and Ryan Bennett (eds), 248–258. Somerville, MA, USA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
2013 “On the Argument Structure of Verbs with Bi-and Mono-Eventive Uses.” In Proceedings of the 42nd annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 42), Stefan Keine and Shayne Sloggett (eds), 297–308. Amherst: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
2014 “Causation at the syntax/semantics interface.” In Causation in grammatical structures, Bridget Copley and Fabienne Martin (eds), 209–244. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
to appear. “Sublexical modality in defeasible causative verbs.” In Modality across syntactic categories, Ana Arregui, María Luisa Rivero and Andrés Salanova (eds) Oxford Oxford University Press
Mateu, Jaume and Rigau, Gemma
2010“Verb-particle constructions in Romance: A lexical-syntactic account.” Probus, 22(2), 241–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa
2004 “On the absence of telic accomplishments in St’át’imcets.” In Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on the Structure and Constituency of the Languages of the Americas. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Nash, Léa
2006 “Dative voice.” Talk given to the Atelier franco-allemand Stuttgart/Paris 8, University of Stuttgart.
Oehrle, Richard
1976The grammatical status of the English dative alternation. PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Park, Ki-Seong
1993Korean causatives in role and reference grammar.MA Dissertation, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence
1990Events in the Semantics of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pederson, Eric
2008 “Event realization in Tamil.” In Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability, Melissa Bowerman and Penelope Brown (eds), 331–355: New York/ London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Piñón, Christopher
1997 “Achievements in an event semantics.” In Proceedings of SALT 7, Aaron Lawson (ed), 276–293.Google Scholar
2008 “Aspectual composition with degrees.” In Adjectives and Adverbs. Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse, Louise McNally and Christopher Kennedy (eds), 183–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2009 “Incrementality by degrees.” Plenary talk given to Chronos 9, Paris.Google Scholar
2014 “Reconsidering Defeasible Causative Verbs.” Talk given to Chronos 11, Pisa.Google Scholar
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta and Renato Miguel Basso
2014 “Perfectivity and Telicity in Brazilian Portuguese. Time boundaries, worlds and pragmatics.” Talk given to Chronos 11, Pisa.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1998The generative lexicon. Cambridge, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka
2008 “Lexicalized Meaning and the Internal Temporal Structure of Events.” In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect, Susan Rothstein (ed), 13–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Beth Levin
1998 “Building verb meanings.” In The projection of arguments: lexical and compositional factors, Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan
2012 “Another look at accomplishments and incrementality.” In Telicity, Change, and State, Violeta Demonte and Louise McNally (eds), 60–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Florian
2012 “Two types of external argument licensing–the case of causers.” Studia Linguistica 66(2): 128–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Munindar
1998 “On the semantics of the perfective aspect.” Natural Language Semantics 6(2): 171–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlota
1991The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smollett, Rebecca
2005 “Quantized direct objects don’t delimit after all.” In Perspectives on aspect, Henk J. Verkuyl, Henriette De Swart and Angeliek Van Hout (eds), 41–59. Netherlands: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985 “Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms.” In Language typology and syntactic description: Grammatical categories and the lexicon 3, Timothy Shopen (ed), 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000Toward a cognitive semantics 2: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei
2008 “Subevental structure and non-culmination.” Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 7, Oliver Bonami and Patricia Cabredo-Hofherr (eds), 7, 393–422.Google Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei and Ivanov, Mikhail
2009 “Event structure of non-culminating accomplishments.” In Cross-linguistic Semantics of Tense, Aspect, and Modality, Lotte Hogeweg, Helen de Hoop and Andrej Malchukov (eds), 83–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Laurence
1985 “Control in Salish grammar.” In Relational typology, Frans Plank (ed). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Lisa
2005 “Agents and causes in Malagasy and Tagalog.” In The Syntax of Aspect, Nomi Erteschik-Shir and Tova Rapoport (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsujimura, Natsuko
2003 “Event cancellation and telicity.” Japanese/Korean Linguistics 12: 388–399.Google Scholar
Turner, Claire
2011Representing events in Saanich (Northern Straits Salish): the interaction of aspect and valence. PhD Dissertation, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert
2005Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, Henk
1993A theory of Aspectuality: The ineraction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Honoré
2003 “A Morphological Description of Sliammon, Mainland Comox Salish: With a Sketch of Syntax.” Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim, Osaka: Osaka Gakuin University.Google Scholar
Yoon, Youngeun
1996 “Total and partial predicates and the weak and strong interpretations.” Natural language semantics, 4/3, 217–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar