Review published in:
Vol. 19:2 (2017) ► pp. 271279


Bucholtz, M. & Hall, K.
(2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7, 585–614. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1991) Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Haug, T., Bontempo, K., Leeson, L., Napier, J., Nicodemus, B., van den Bogaerde, B. & Vermeerbergen, M.
(2017) Deaf Leaders’ strategies for working with sign language interpreters: An examination across seven countries. Across Language and Cultures 18 (1), 107–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, T. & Shaffer, B.
(2008) Intersubjectivity in interpreted interactions: The interpreter’s role in co-constructing meaning. In J. Zlatev, T. P. Racine, C. Sinha & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 333–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, T. J. & Shaffer, B.
(2014) The interpreter’s stance in intersubjective discourse. In L. Meurant, A. Sinte, M. Van Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), Sign language research: Uses and practices. Boston/Berlin/Nijmegen: De Gruyter Mouton & Ishara Press, 63–84.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. E. & Peal, E.
(1962) The relation of bilingualism to intelligence. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 27 (3), 1–23.Google Scholar
Metzger, M.
(1999) Sign language interpreting: Deconstructing the myth of neutrality. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Santiago, R. & Barrick, L.
(2007) Handling and incorporation of idioms in interpretation. In M. Metzger & E. Fleetwood (Eds.), Translation, sociolinguistic, and consumer issues in interpreting. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, 3–44.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S. & Shaffer, B.
(2005) Towards a cognitive model of interpreting. In T. Janzen (Ed.), Topics in Signed Language Interpreting. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 27–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar