Chapter published in:
The Sociolinguistics of Place and Belonging: Perspectives from the margins
Edited by Leonie Cornips and Vincent A. de Rooij
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 45] 2018
► pp. 5588
References

References

Antonsich, M.
2010Searching for belonging – An analytical framework. Geography Compass 4(6): 644–659. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barbiers, S., van der Auwera, J., Bennis, H., Boef, E., De Vogelaer, G. & van der Ham, M.
2008Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch Dialects (SAND), Vol. II. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Beyers, L.
2008From class to culture: Immigration, recession, and daily ethnic boundaries in Belgium, 1940s–1990s. International Review of Social History 53: 37–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L.
2008Loosing grammatical gender in Dutch. The result of bilingual acquisition and/or an act of identity? Special issue ‘Ethnolects? The Emergence of New Varieties among Adolescents’. International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1–2): 105–124.Google Scholar
2009Empirical syntax: Idiolectal variability in two- and three-verb clusters in regional standard Dutch and Dutch dialects. In Describing and Modeling Variation in Grammar, A. Dufter, J. Fleischer & G. Seiler (eds), 203–224. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cornips, L. & Hulk, A.
2006External and internal factors in bilingual and bidialectal language development: Grammatical gender of the Dutch definite determiner. In L2 Acquisition and Creole Genesis. Dialogues [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 42], C. Lefebvre, L. White & C. Jourdan (eds), 355–378. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L. & Nortier, J.
(eds) 2008Ethnolects? The Emergence of New Varieties among Adolescents. International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1–2).Google Scholar
Defoin, G.
1962Vocabulaire professionel du houilleur belge. Liège: Université de Liège.Google Scholar
Delbroek, B.
2008Op zoek naar koolputters. Buitenlandse mijnwerkers in Belgisch-Limburg in de twintigste eeuw. Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geschiedenis 5(3): 80–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delbroek B.
2011‘In de put’. De Dagelijkse Werking van de Arbeidsmarkt voor Mijnwerkers in Belgisch-Limburg (1900–1966). PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.Google Scholar
Delbroek, B.
2016In de put. De Arbeidsmarkt voor Mijnwerkers in Belgisch-Limburg, 1900–1966 [Maaslandse Monografieën, Vol. 79]. Sociaal Historisch Centrum. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar
Dorian, N.
(ed.) 1989Investigating Obsolescence: Studies in Language Contraction and Death. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dorren, G.
2013Met de Minsten der Mijnen. Geschiedenis van de Kleine Zusters van de H. Joseph. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar
Goossens, J.
1965Die Gliederung des Südfränkischen. RhVjBl 30: 79–94.Google Scholar
Himmelreich, H.
1943Volkstümliche Beobachtungen an der Umgangssprache in Gelsenkirchen. PhD dissertation, University of Münster.Google Scholar
Klessman, C.
1986Comparative immigrant history: Polish workers in the Ruhr area and the North of France. Journal of Social History 20(2): 335–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knotter, A.
2012Labour migrants and cross-border commuters. Comparative perspectives on mining labour markets in the Belgian-Dutch-German borderland in the twentieth century. In Montanregion als Sozialregion. Zu gesellschaftlichen Dimension von ‘Region’ in der Montanwirtschaft, A. Westermann (ed.), 125–150. Husum: Mathiesen.Google Scholar
Kohlbacher, J.
2012Cité-Duits. Talk presented at Winterslag, Belgium, 2 June.
McCook, B.
2006 Migration, citizenship, and Polish integration in the Ruhr valley and northeastern Pennsylvania, 1870–1924. German Historical Institute (Washington), Bulletin 38: 119–353.Google Scholar
Minten, L.
2006Beeldvorming. In De Koolputters. Geschiedenis van de Limburgse Mijnwerkers, F. Delarbre, B. Delbroek et al. (eds), 395–416. Zwolle: Waanders.Google Scholar
Muysken, P.
2000Bilingual Speech: A Typology of Code-Mixing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Nortier, J. & Svendsen, B. A.
(eds) 2015Language, Youth and Identity in the 21st Century: Linguistic Practices Across Urban Spaces. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pecht, N.
2013 “Siehs’ du, du wars (…) besser wie du hast gedacht: Du has’ Französisch gesprochen!Taal en Tongval 65(2): 149–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pecht, N.
2015The postfield in Cité Duits: Syntactic variation in in-group speech. In Artikelen van de 8ste Anéla Conferentie Toegepaste Taalwetenschap 2015, M. Boogaard, B. van den Bogaerde, S. Bacchini, M. Curcic, N. de Jong, E. le Pichon & L. Rasier 39–58. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
Rampton, B.
1995Crossing. Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Salewski, K.
1998Zur Homogenität des Substandards älterer Bergleute im Ruhrgebiet. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Stuyck, K., Luyten, S., Kesteloot, C., Meert, H. & Peleman, K.
2008A geography of gender relations: Role patterns in the context of different regional industrial development. Regional Studies 42(1): 69–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I. & Hulk, A.
2013Grammatical gender and the notion of default: Insights from language acquisition Lingua 137: 128–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van de Wijngaard, T. & Crompvoets, H.
1989Mijnwerkersterminologie in de beide Limburgen: Meer verscheidenheid dan eenheid. Mededelingen van de Vereniging voor Limburgse Dialect- en Naamkunde 51. http://​www​.dbnl​.org​/tekst​/wijn035mijn01​_01/>
Yuval-Davis, N.
2006Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice 40(3): 197–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Jaspers, Jürgen
2018.  In The Sociolinguistics of Place and Belonging [IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society, 45],  pp. 17 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.