Article published in:
Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across linguistic subfields
Edited by Meghan E. Armstrong, Nicholas Henriksen and Maria del Mar Vanrell
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 6] 2016
► pp. 91–114

Cost of the action and social distance affect the selection of question intonation in Catalan

| The Open University
| Freie Universität Berlin
| ICREA-Universitat Pompeu Fabra
This chapter examines how politeness in offers and requests is encoded by intonation in Catalan, a language which uses two distinct intonational pitch contours for unbiased yes-no questions. Fifteen Central Catalan speakers participated in a Discourse Completion Task that elicited offers and requests in scenarios controlled for level of social distance, power, and cost of the action. The data were prosodically and pragmatically analyzed. The results showed that cost of the action and social distance have significant effects on intonation choices: speakers used rising pitch pattern more frequently with high-level than with low-level cost offers and requests, and also with high-level distance requests. In general, the falling pattern tended to be used more frequently with offers. The study shows that politeness factors need to be taken into account in the description of intonation choices across languages.
Keywords: intonation, offers, politeness, requests
Published online: 31 March 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.6.05ast
References

References

Albelda, M., & Estellés, M.
(2014) Intonation, evidentials and politeness in Spanish. A corpus analysis. Journal of Politeness Research, 10(1), 29-62.Google Scholar
Armstrong, M.
(2012) The development of yes-no question intonation in Puerto-Rican Spanish. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Astruc, L., & Vanrell, M.M.
Submitted). Intonational phonology and politeness in L1 and L2 Spanish. Probus.
Astruc, L.
(2008) Cortesía y entonación: Las interrogativas absolutas en catalán. Revista de letras, 7, 41-53. Departamento de Letras. Centro de Estudos em Letras. Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro.Google Scholar
Barros García, M.J.
(2010) Actos de habla y cortesía valorizadora: las invitaciones. Tonos. Revista Electrónica de Estudios filológicos, Retrieved from http://​www​.um​.es​/tonosdigital​/znum19​/secciones​/estudios​-4bis​.htmGoogle Scholar
Billmyer, K., & Varghese, M.
(2000) Investigating instrument-based pragmatic variability: Effects of enhancing discourse completion tests. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 517-552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., & House, J.
(1989) Cross-cultural and situational variation in requesting behavior. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (pp. 123-153). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G.
(1989) Investigating cross-cultural pragmatics: An introductory overview. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (pp. 1-34). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
(2013) Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.3.56. Retrieved from http://​www​.praat​.org/
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.
(1987) Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chodorowska-Pilch, M.
(2002) Las ofertas y la cortesía en español peninsular. In M.E. Placencia & D. Bravo (Eds.), Actos de habla y cortesía en español. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
(2003) Las ofertas corteses en el español peninsular. In D. Bravo (Ed.), Actas del Primer Coloquio EDICE. La perspectiva no etnocentrista de la cortesía: identidad sociocultural de las comunidades hispanohablantes (pp. 306-314). Universidad de Estocolmo: Libro-e.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M.
(1996) Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 11-56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, V.
(1998) Intonation and procedural encoding: the case of Spanish interrogatives. In V. Rouchota & A.H. Jucker (Eds.), Current issues in relevance theory (pp. 169-203). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Estrella-Santos, A.
(2007) Politeness and prosody: Interaction of prosody in the requests with “dar” as a benefactive in Ecuadorian Andean Spanish. Paper presented at the Phonetics and Phonology in Iberia 2007 Conference (PaPI) , Braga (Portugal), June, 24-27.
Félix-Brasdefer, J.C.
(2005) Indirectness and politeness in Mexican requests. In D. Eddington (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistic Symposium (pp. 66-78). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2010) Data collection methods in speech act performance: DCTs, role plays, and verbal reports. In E. Usó Juán & A. Martínez-Flor (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical, and methodological issues (pp. 41-56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García, C.
(1993) Making a request and responding to it: A case study of Peruvian Spanish speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 127-152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gili Fivela, B., & Bazannella, C.
(2014) The relevance of prosody and context to the interplay between intensity and politeness, Journal of Politeness Research, 10(1), 97-126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1967) Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C.
(2005) The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henriksen, N., Armstrong, M.E., & García-Amaya, L.
this volume). The intonational meaning of polar questions in Manchego Spanish spontaneous speech. In M.E. Armstrong, N.C. Henriksen, & M. del Mar Vanrell (Eds.) Intonational grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across linguistic subfields pp. 181 205 Amsterdam John Benjamins
Hidalgo, A., & Cabedo, A.
(2014) On the importance of the prosodic component in the expression of linguistic (im)politeness. Journal of Politeness Research, 10(1), 5-27.Google Scholar
Koike, D.A.
(1986) Negation in Spanish and English suggestions and requests: Mitigation effects? Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 513-526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labastía, L.O.
this volume). Declarative utterances in Buenos Aires Spanish. In M.E. Armstrong, N.C. Henriksen, & M. del Mar Vanrell (Eds.) Intonational grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across linguistic subfields pp. 207 226 Amsterdam John Benjamins
Ladd, D.R.
(2001)  Intonation . In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook (pp. 1380-1390). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leech, G.N.
(1983) Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maekawa, K.
(1999) Contributions of lexical and prosodic factors to the perception of politeness. In J.J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville, & A.C. Bailey (Eds.), Proceedings of ICPhS99 . University of California, Berkeley.
Nadeu, M., & Prieto, P.
(2011) Pitch range, gestural information, and perceived politeness in Catalan. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 841-854. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ofuka, E., McKeown, J.D., Waterman, M.G., & Roach, P.J.
(2000) Prosodic cues for rated politeness in Japanese speech. Speech Communication, 32, 199-217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, J.J.
(1982) Cross-language use of pitch: An ethological view. Phonetica, 40, 1-18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orozco, L.
(2008) Peticiones corteses y factores prosódicos. In P.M. Butragueño & E. Herrera (Eds.), Fonología instrumental: patrones fónicos y variación (pp. 335-356). Mexico City DF: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
(2010) Estudio sociolingüístico de la cortesía en tratamientos y peticiones. Datos de Guadalajara. Unpublished PhD dissertation. El Colegio de México, Mexico City, DF.Google Scholar
Ortiz, H., Fuentes, M., & Astruc, L.
(2010) Chilean Spanish intonation. In P. Prieto & P. Roseano (Eds.), Transcription of intonation of the Spanish language. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Payà, M.
(2003) Politeness strategies in spoken Catalan: when prosodic and non prosodic elements don’t match. Paper presented at the 6th NWCL International Conference: Prosody and Pragmatics , Preston (UK), November 15, 2003.
Payrató, Ll
(2002) L'enunciació i la modalitat oracional. In J. Solà, M-R. Lloret, J. Mascaró, & M. Pérez Saldanya (Eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani (pp. 1151-1222). Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Prieto, P., & Rigau, G.
(2007) The syntax-prosody interface: Catalan interrogative sentences headed by que . Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 6(2), 29-59.Google Scholar
Prieto, P., & Cabré, T.
(Eds.) (2007-2012) Atles interactiu de l’entonació del català. Retrieved from http://​prosodia​.upf​.edu​/atlesentonacioGoogle Scholar
Prieto, P.
(2002) Entonació. In J. Solà, M-R. Lloret, J. Mascaró & M. Pérez Saldanya (Eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani (pp. 393-462). Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
(2014) The intonational phonology of Catalan. In S.-A. Jun (Ed.). Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 43-80). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Zarobe, L.
(2001) Estrategias de invitación en español e imagen social de los hablantes: Un estudio empírico. Pragmalingüística, 8(9), 261-278.Google Scholar
Vanrell, M.M., Mascaró, I., Torres-Tamarit, F., & Prieto, P.
(2013) Intonation as an encoder of speaker’s certainty: Information and confirmation yes-no questions in Catalan. Language and Speech, 56(2), 163-190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanrell, M.M., Armstrong, M.E., & Prieto, P.
(2014) The role of prosody in the encoding of evidentiality in Catalan. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2014 (pp. 1022-1025).
Wennerstrom, A.K.
(2001) The music of everyday speech: prosody and discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wichmann, A.
(2000) Intonation in text and discourse: Beginnings, middles, and ends. London: Longman.Google Scholar