Article published in:
New Perspectives on the Study of Ser and E star
Edited by Isabel Pérez-Jiménez, Manuel Leonetti and Silvia Gumiel-Molina
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 5] 2015
► pp. 267–292

Eventive and stative passives and copula selection in Canadian and American Heritage Speaker Spanish

| University of Ottawa
| Macquarie University
| University of Reading
| University of Ottawa
| Texas Tech University
| Utrecht University
Spanish captures the difference between eventive and stative passives via an obligatory choice between two copula; verbal passives take the copula ser and adjectival passives take the copula estar. In this study, we compare and contrast US and Canadian heritage speakers of Spanish on their knowledge of this difference in relation to copula choice in Spanish. The backgrounds of the target groups differ significantly from each other in that only one of them, the Canadian group, has grown up in a societal multilingual environment. We discuss the results as being supportive of two non-mutually exclusive explanation factors: (a) French facilitates (bootstraps) the acquisition of eventive and stative passives and/or (b) the US/Canadian HS differences (e.g. status of bilingualism and the languages at stake) is a reflection of the uniqueness of the language contact situations and the effects this has on the input HSs receive.
Keywords: bilingualism, copula, estar, heritage speakers, passives, ser, syntax
Published online: 28 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.5.10val
Cited by

Cited by other publications

DeLuca, Vincent, Jason Rothman, Ellen Bialystok & Christos Pliatsikas
2019. Redefining bilingualism as a spectrum of experiences that differentially affects brain structure and function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116:15 ► pp. 7565 ff. Crossref logo
Sánchez Walker, Noelia & Silvina Montrul
2020. Language Experience Affects Comprehension of Spanish Passive Clauses: A Study of Heritage Speakers and Second Language Learners. Languages 6:1 ► pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Beaudrie, S., & Fairclough, M.
(Eds.) (2012) Spanish as a heritage language in the US: State of the field. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y.
(1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 57(1), 289–300.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M.
(2013) Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39, 129–181.Google Scholar
Bentley, D., & Eythórsson, T.
(2004) Auxiliary selection and the semantics of unaccusativity. Lingua, 114, 447–471. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bley Vroman, R.
(1983) The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language learning, 33(1), 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J.
(2009) Eventive and stative passives: The role of transfer in the acquisition of ser and estar by German and English L1 speakers. In J. Collentine et al. (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 27–38). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J., & Valenzuela, E.
(2008) Eventive and stative passives in Spanish L2 acquisition: A matter of aspect. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(3), 323–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) The status of ser and estar in late and early bilingual L2 Spanish. In C. Klee & T. Face (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 100–109). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Camacho, J.
(2012)  Ser and estar: Individual/stage level predicates or aspect? In J.I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (Eds.), The handbook of hispanic linguistics (Blackwell handbooks in linguistics) (pp. 453–476). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carrasco, A, & Fernández, L.
(2006) Diccionario de perífrasis verbales. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Clements, C.
(1988) The semantics and pragmatics of the Spanish < copula+ adjective> construction. Linguistics 26(5), 779–822. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delbecque, N.
(1997) The Spanish copulas SER and ESTAR. In M. Verspoor, K.D. Lee & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and Syntactical constructions and the Construction of Meaning: Proceedings of the Bi-annual ICLA Meeting (pp. 247–270). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falk, J.
(1979) Ser y estar con atributos adjetivales: anotaciones sobre el empleo de la cópula en catalán y en castellano. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K.L.
(2002a) The acquisition of Spanish copula choice and its relationship to language change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(3), 419–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002b) Semantic transparency as a predictor of copula choice in second language acquisition. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences, 40(2), 439–446.Google Scholar
(2001) Changing norms, moving targets and the SLA of copula choice. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 5(1–2), 29–55.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K.L., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P.
(2008) Variation in contemporary Spanish: Linguistic predictors of estar in four cases of language contact. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(3), 365–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) The acquisition of copula choice in instructed Spanish: The role of individual characteristics. In D. Eddington (Ed.), Studies in the Acquisition of the Hispanic Languages: Papers from the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 66–77). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Gumiel-Molina, S., & Pérez-Jiménez, I.
(2012) Aspectual composition in <ser/estar+adjective> structures: Adjectival scalarity and verbal aspect in copular constructions. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 33–62. Retrieved from http://​septentrio​.uit​.no​/index​.php​/borealis​/article​/view​/2321​/2166 DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltsa, M., Tsimpli, I., & Rothman J.
(2012) Syntax-discourse phenomena in heritage speakers and first language attriters: evidence from pronominal resolution (Unpublished manuscript). Presented at Wuppertal Workshop on Heritage Languages. Aristotle University of Thessalonik and University of Reading. Wuppertal, Germany: October, 4–6, 2012.
Lema, J.
(1992) Distinguishing copular and aspectual auxiliaries: Spanish ser and estar . In J. Amastae, G. Goodall, M. Montalbetti & P. Phinney (Eds.), Contemporary research in Romance linguistics (pp. 257–274). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Leonetti, M.
(1994)  Ser y estar: estado de la cuestión. Barataria, 1, 182–205.Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport, M.
(1986) The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry, 17(4), 623–661.Google Scholar
Luján, M.
(1981) The Spanish copulas as aspectual indicators. Lingua, 54, 165–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maienborn, C.
(2005) A discourse-based account of Spanish ser/estar . Linguistics, 43(1), 155–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S.
(2008) Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 125–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pascual y Cabo, D., & Rothman, J.
(2012) The (il)logical problem of heritage speaker bilingualism and incomplete acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 450–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Patten, B.
(1985) The acquisition of ser and estar in adult second language learners: A preliminary investigation of transitional stages of competence. Hispania, 68, 399–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pires, A., & Rothman, J.
(2009) Disentangling sources of incomplete acquisition: An explanation forcompetence divergence across heritage grammars. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2) 211–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky M.
(2011) Reanalysis in adult heritage language: A case for attrition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 305–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M.
(2008) Russian gender under incomplete acquisition. The Heritage Language Journal, 6(1), 40–70.Google Scholar
(2007) Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14, 191–262.Google Scholar
Roby, D.B.
(2009) Aspect and the categorization of states: The case of ser and estar in Spanish. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J.
(2009) Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 155–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Heritage speaker competence differences, language change and input type: Inflected infinitives in heritage Brazilian Portuguese. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(4), 359–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Treffers-Daller, J.
(2014) A prolegomenon to the construct of the native speaker: Heritage speaker bilinguals are natives too! Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 93–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C.
(1992)  Ser and estar: A matter of aspect. In NELS 22 Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (pp. 411–425). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Schmitt, C., & Miller, K.
(2007) Making discourse-dependent decisions: The case of the copulas ser and estar in Spanish. Lingua, 117(11), 1907–1929. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C.
(1994) Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(1986) Bilingualism and language change: The extension of estar in Los Angeles Spanish. Language, 62, 587–608. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C., & Montanari, S.
(2008) The acquisition of ser, estar (and be) by a Spanish-English bilingual child: The early stages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(03), 341–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A.
(2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Native language attrition and developmental instability at the syntax-discourse interface: Data, interpretations and methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 143–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Syntactic optionality in non-native grammars. Second Language Research, 16(2), 93–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Incomplete and divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 9, 22–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vañó-Cerdá, A.
(1982) Ser y estar+adjetivos: un estudio sincrónico y diacrónico. Tubingen, Germany: Narr.Google Scholar
Varela, S.
(1992) Verbal and adjectival participles in Spanish. In C. Laeufer & T.A. Morgan (Eds.), Theoretical analyses in romance linguistics (pp. 219–234). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zagona, K.
(2013) Tense, aspect and modality. In M. den Dikken (Ed.), Encyclopedia of generative syntax. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2012)  Ser and estar: Phrase structure and aspect. In C. Nishida & C. Russi (Eds.), Building a bridge between linguistic communities of the Old and the New World, Cahiers Chronos, 25 (pp. 303–327). Amsterdam, The Netherlands and New York, NY: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Zeiger, S.L., & Liang, K.Y.
(1986) Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics, 42, 121–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar