Article published in:
Hispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads: Theoretical linguistics, language acquisition and language contact. Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 2013
Edited by Rachel Klassen, Juana M. Liceras and Elena Valenzuela
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 4] 2015
► pp. 251–268

An experimental approach to hypercorrection in Dominican Spanish

| The University of Texas
| The University of Texas
A stigmatized trait of popular Dominican Spanish is the insertion of pre-consonantal or final [s] into a lexical item (e.g. Ja[s]queline). The predominant explanation among phonologists for this uniquely Dominican phenomenon is that the uneducated are ‘lost-s’ speakers who do not know which words contain lexical /s/ so they insert [s] into any coda, subject to theoretical constraints (Núñez Cedeño, 1988a; Harris, 2002; Bradley, 2006). However, a sociolinguistic analysis of rural Dominicans revealed that the majority of ‘s-ful’ tokens realized in spontaneous speech were correct productions (Bullock et al., 2014). The present analysis reports the results of a follow-up, controlled study designed to assess whether speakers could perceive and correctly reproduce coda [s] equally well across different phonological contexts, or whether internal and external factors (gender, literacy, age) affect how a speaker lexically codes and produces novel ‘s-ful’ tokens.
Keywords: Dominican Republic, hypercorrection, insertion, intrusion, s-deletion, Spanish
Published online: 30 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.4.13bul
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2016.  In Spanish Language and Sociolinguistic Analysis [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 8], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Alba, O.
(2004) Cómo hablamos los Dominicanos. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: Ramón Jimenés.Google Scholar
(2009) La identidad lingüística de los Dominicanos. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: Ediciones Librería La Trinitaria.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
(2013) Praat. Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.51).Google Scholar
Bullock, B.E., & Toribio, A.J.
(2009) Reconsidering Dominican Spanish: Data from the rural Cibao. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 14, 49–73.Google Scholar
(2010) Correcting the record on Dominican [s]-hypercorrection. In S. Colina, A. Olarrea, & A. Carvalho (Eds.), Romance linguistics 2009 (pp. 15–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, B.E., Toribio, A.J., & Amengual, M.
(2014) The status of [s] in Dominican Spanish. Lingua, 143, 20–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, T.
(2006) Spanish rhotics and Dominican hypercorrect s. Probus,18, 1–33 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drager, K., & Hay, J.
(2012) Exploiting random intercept: Two case studies in sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change, 2, 59–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
File-Muriel, R.
(2007) The role of lexical frequency and phonetic context in the weakening of syllable-final lexical /s/ in the Spanish of Barranquilla, Colombia. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Indiana University.
Guion, S.
(2003) The vowel systems of Quichua [s]panish bilinguals. Phonetica, 60, 98–128 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J.
(1983) Syllable structure and stress in Spanish. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Flaps, trills and syllable structure in Spanish. In A. Csirmaz, Z. Li, A. Nevins, O. Vaysman, & M. Wagner (Eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 42, (pp. 31–108). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Janda, R.D., & Auger, J.
(1992) Quantitative evidence, qualitative hypercorrection, sociolinguistic variables — And French speakers’ ‘eadaches with English h/Ø. Language & Communication, 12, 195–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D.E.
(2009) Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistic Compass, 3(1), 359–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(1966) The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
(1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lipski, J.
(2008) Varieties of Spanish in the United States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
López Morales, H.
(1990) En torno a la /s/ final dominicana: cuestiones teóricas. Voz y Letra, 1, 129–137.Google Scholar
Morgan, T.
(1998) The linguistic parameters of /s/-insertion in Dominican Spanish: A case study of qualitative hypercorrection. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach & J. del Valle (Eds.), Perspectives on Spanish linguistics (pp. 79–96). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Ñúñez Cedeño, R.
(1986) La /s/ ultracorrectiva en dominicano y la estructura silábica. In J.M. de Alba (Eds.), Actas del II Congreso Internacional sobre el Español de América, (pp. 337–47). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Núñez Cedeño, R.
(1988a) Structure-preserving properties of an epenthetic rule in Spanish. In D. Birdsong & J.P. Montreuil (Eds.), Advances in Romance linguistics, (pp. 319–335). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(1988b) La discontinuidad fonética como criterio dialectológico. Thesaurus, 43, 1–17.Google Scholar
Núñez Cedeño, R. & Morales-Front, A.
(1999) Fonología generativa contemporánea de la lengua española. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
R. Development Core Team
(2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-0701, URL áhttp://​www​.R​-project​.orgñ
Terrell, T.
(1979) Final /s/ in Cuban Spanish. Hispania, 62, 599–612. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1982) Relexificación en el español dominicano: Implicaciones para la educación. In O. Alba (Ed.), El español del Caribe, (pp.301–318). Santiago de los Caballeros: Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra.Google Scholar
(1986) La desaparición de /s/ posnuclear a nivel léxico en el habla dominicana. In R. Núñez Cedeño, I. Páez Urdaneta, & J. Guitart (Eds.), Estudios sobre la fonología del Caribe, (pp. 117–134). Caracas: Ediciones la casa de Bello.Google Scholar
Vaux, B.
(2001) Consonant epenthesis and hypercorrection. Unpublished manuscript. Harvard University.
(2002) Consonant epenthesis and the problem of unnatural phonology. Unpublished manuscript. Harvard University.
Vaux, B., & Nevins, A.
(2008) Rules, constraints and phonological phenomena. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, T.
(1972) Rule inversion. Lingua, 29, 290–242.Google Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, M.
(1992) Introduction. Language & Communication, 12, 181–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar