Article published in:
Hispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads: Theoretical linguistics, language acquisition and language contact. Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 2013
Edited by Rachel Klassen, Juana M. Liceras and Elena Valenzuela
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 4] 2015
► pp. 113–126

Temporal and spectral dependencies in the processing of Spanish and English stop consonant voicing

| Purdue University
| Purdue University
| Purdue University
| Purdue University
Previous findings show that listeners do not rely on onset f0 when processing stop consonant voicing with lead VOT (Llanos et al., 2013). According to a temporal-based account, onset f0 has no effect because the voicing decision is biased by the presence of prevoicing that precedes the occurrence of onset f0 in the signal. According to a spectral-based account, onset f0 has no effect because its contribution to low frequency energy is insignificant compared to that of VOT in voicing lead. Specific predictions of the two hypotheses for the whole VOT continuum were evaluated in English and Spanish voicing decisions. Results support the spectral-based account, demonstrating that the peak effect of onset f0 occurred in both languages at the VOT values where onset f0’s contribution to the low frequency energy would be most appreciable.
Keywords: auditory enhancement, logistic deviance., onset f0, spectral processing, stop consonant voicing, VOT
Published online: 30 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.4.06lla
References

References

Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
(2009) Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1. 05)[Computer program]. Retrieved May 1, 2009.Google Scholar
Cho, T., & Ladefoged, P.
(1999) Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 27(2), 207–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dmitrieva, O., Llanos, F., Shultz, A., & Francis, A.
(2015) Phonological status, not voice onset time, determines the acoustic realization of onset f0 as a secondary voicing cue in Spanish and English. Journal of Phonetics, 49, 77–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
House, A.S., & Fairbanks, G.
(1953) The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holt, L.L., Lotto, A., & Diehl, R.
(2004) Auditory discontinuities interact with categorization: Implications for speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 1763–1773. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hombert, J.M.
(1978) Consonant types, vowel quality, and tone. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey (pp. 77–111). New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hosmer Jr, D.W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R.X.
(2013) Applied logistic regression. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.com. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Idemaru, K., & Holt, L.L.
(2011) Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6), 1939. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keating, P.
(1984) Phonetic and phonological representations of stop consonant voicing. Language, 60, 286–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, J., Diehl, R.L., Kirk, C.J., & Castleman, W.A.
(2008) On the internal perceptual structure of distinctive features: The [voice] contrast. Journal of phonetics, 36(1), 28–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, J., & Diehl, R.L.
(1994) Phonetic knowledge. Language, 70, 419–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klatt, D.H.
(1980) Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67(3), 971–995. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, L.
(1978) In qualified defense of VOT. Language and speech, 21(4), 375–383.Google Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A.S.
(1964) A crosslinguistic study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.Google Scholar
Llanos, F., Dmitrieva, O., Shultz, A., & Francis, A.L.
(2013) Auditory enhancement and second language experience in Spanish and English weighting of secondary voicing cues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(3), 2213–2224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Löfqvist, A., Baer, T., McGarr, N.S., & Story, S.R.
(1989) The cricothyroid muscle in voicing control. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 1314–1321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McMurray, B., & Jongman, A.
(2011) What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations. Psychological review, 118(2), 219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, N.R.
(1983) The effect of consonant type on fundamental frequency and larynx height in Danish. Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics of the University of Copenhagen, 17, 55–86.Google Scholar
Repp, B.H.
(1982) Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 81–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shultz, A.A., Francis, A.L., & Llanos, F.
(2012) Differential cue weighting in perception and production of consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(2), EL95–EL101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toscano, J.C., & McMurray, B.
(2012) Cue-integration and context effects in speech: Evidence against speaking-rate normalization. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(6), 1284–1301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, D.H., Abramson, A.S., Lisker, L., & Mody, M.
(1993) F0 gives voicing information even with unambiguous voice onset times. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2152–2159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar