Article published in:
Hispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads: Theoretical linguistics, language acquisition and language contact. Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 2013
Edited by Rachel Klassen, Juana M. Liceras and Elena Valenzuela
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 4] 2015
► pp. 25–48

Overt PRO in Romance

Towards a unification of PRO and pro

| University of Salzburg
Several types of infinitives in Spanish, Italian, and Catalan can have overt nominative subjects. These elements are morphologically pronominal although they are syntactically anaphoric in Obligatory Control contexts and pronominal in Nonobligatory Control contexts. The data will be taken as evidence for a unification of PRO and pro to an externally merged D head with fully variable phi-features (in the spirit of Sigurðsson’s (2008) notion of ‘reference variable’), whose status with respect to Binding Theory is determined by interpretable features on T, implementing a version of Borer’s (1989) and Landau’s (2000, 2004) anaphoric AGR. In this approach, overt subjects in infinitives are the result of post-syntactic realization of D[φ:_], triggered by discourse-related rather than Case-related needs.
Keywords: control, infinitives, overt subjects, pro-drop, Romance languages
Published online: 30 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.4.02her
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Herbeck, Peter
2018.  In Pronouns in Embedded Contexts at the Syntax-Semantics Interface [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 99], ► pp. 171 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E.
(1998) Parameterizing AGR: Word order,V-movement, and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 491–539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E, Iordǎchioaia, G., & Marchis, M.
(2010) No objections to Backward Control. In N. Hornstein & M. Polinsky (Eds.), Movement theory of control (pp. 89–117). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alonso-Ovalle, L., & F. D’Introno
(2001) Full and Null Pronouns in Spanish – The Zero Pronoun Hypothesis. In H. Campos, E. Herburger, A. Morales Front & T.J. Walsh (Eds.), Hispanic linguistics at the turn of the millenium (pp. 400–414). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P.
(1995) Null subjects. Doctoral Dissertation. MIT. Retrieved from áhttp://​www​.ai​.mit​.edu​/projects​/dm​/theses​/barbosa95​.pdfñGoogle Scholar
(2009a) A case for an Agree-based theory of control. 11th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar Proceedings, 101–123.
(2009b) Two kinds of subject pro. Studia Linguistica, 63(1), 2–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Overt subjects in raising and control complements. LSA Meeting Extended Abstracts. Retrieved from áhttp://​elanguage​.net​/journals​/lsameeting​/article​/view​/2010​.3​/pdfñGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A.
(2004) Aspects of the low IP area. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The structure of CP and IP (pp. 16–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Extended doubling and the VP periphery. Probus, 17, 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, V.
(2003) On finiteness as logophoric anchoring. In J. Guéron & L. Tasmowski (Eds.), Temps et point de vue / Tense and point of view (pp. 213–246). Paris: Publidix.Google Scholar
Boeckx, C., Hornstein, N., & Nunes, J.
(2010) Control as movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonet, E.
(1989) Subjects in Catalan. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 13, 1–26.Google Scholar
(1991) The Person-Case-Constraint: A morphological approach. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 22, 33–52.Google Scholar
Borer, H.
(1989) Anaphoric AGR. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 69–109). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, L.
(1986) Italian syntax – A Government-Binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A.
(1999) Italian emphatic pronouns are postverbal subjects. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 9(1.2), 59–92.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A., & Starke, M.
(1999) The typology of structural deficiency. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 145–233). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1981) Lectures on government and binding – The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) The Minimalist program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–115). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Beyond explanatory adequacy. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond (pp. 104–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) On phases. In R. Freidin, C.P. Otero, & M.L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Contreras, H.
(1991) On the position of subjects. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Perspectives on phrase structure: Heads and licensing (Syntax and Semantics 25; pp. 63–79). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Embick, D., & Halle, M.
(2005) On the status of stems in morphological theory. In T. Geerts, I. van Ginneken, & H. Jacobs (Eds.), Proceedings of Going Romance 2003 (pp. 37–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, D., & Noyer, R.
(2007) Distributed Morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces (pp. 289–324). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Embick, D., & Marantz, A.
(2008) Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry, 39(1), 1–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, D.
(2010) Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Lagunilla, M.
(1987) Los infinitivos con sujetos léxicos en español. In V. Demonte & M. Fernández-Lagunilla (Eds.), Sintaxis de las lenguas románicas (pp. 125–147). Madrid: Ediciones el arquero.Google Scholar
Fernández-Lagunilla, M., & Anula-Rebollo, A.
(1994) Procesos de filtrado de rasgos categoriales en la sintaxis. Los infinitivos y la legitimación del caso nominativo. In V. Demonte (Ed.), Gramática del español (pp. 471–530). México: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Fernández-Salgueiro, G.
(2011) Romance null subjects at the sensory-motor interface. Syntax, 14(1): 1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Soriano, O.
(1989) Strong pronouns in null-subject languages and the Avoid Pronoun Principle. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 11, 228–239.Google Scholar
Fortuny, J.
(2008) The emergence of order in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Á.
(2010) Phase theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A.
(1993), Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from Building 20 (pp. 111–76). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, H., & Noyer, R.
(1999) Distributed Morphology. Glot International, 4(4), 3–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herbeck, P.
(2011) Overt subjects in Spanish control infinitives and the theory of empty categories. Generative Grammar in Geneva, 7, 1–22.Google Scholar
(2014) (Backward) Control and clitic climbing: On the deficiency of nonfinite domains in Spanish and Catalan. ConSOLE XXI Proceedings 2013, 123–142.Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. Ll
(1999) El infinitivo. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 2197–2356). Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
(2011) Sobre la periferia de los infinitivos. In A V. Escandell-Vidal, M. Leonetti, & C. Sánchez López (Eds.), 60 problemas de Gramática dedicados a Ignacio Bosque (pp. 263–270). Madrid: Ediciones Akal.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A.
(2005) Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(4), 533–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, N.
(1999) Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 69–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.T.J.
(1989) Pro-Drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 185–214). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y.
(2000) Anaphora – A crosslinguistic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kato, M.A.
(1999) Strong and weak pronominals in the null subject parameter. Probus 11: 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R.
(2002) Pronouns and their antecedents. In S.D. Epstein & T.D. Seely (Eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program (pp. 133–166). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, A.
(1998) More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. SALT VIII, MIT.
(2009) Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 40(2): 187–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landau, I.
(2000) Elements of control. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, 811–877. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013a) Control in generative grammar: A research companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013b) A two-tiered theory of control. Ms. Retrieved from áhttp://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/001937ñ
(2013c) Agreement at PF: An argument from partial control. Ms. Retrieved from áhttp://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/001813ñ
Livitz, A.
(2011) Incorporating PRO: A defective goal analysis. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 95–119.Google Scholar
López, L.
(2002) Toward a grammar without TopP or FocP. In S. Mauck & J. Mittelstaedt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on the Syntax and Semantics of the C-domain – Georgetown Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 181–219.Google Scholar
(2009) A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mensching, G.
(2000) Infinitive constructions with specified subjects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, S.
(2007) Unifying agreement and agreementless languages. In M. Kelepir & B. Öztürk (Eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 54, 47–66.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F.
(1998) Postverbal asymmetries in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 313–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Observacions sobre la posició dels subjectes postverbals en català i castellà. Caplletra, 42, 251–272.Google Scholar
(2009) Backwards or in situ? Infinitival Overt Subjects in Romance (Handout). 19th Colloquium on Generative Grammar. UPV-EHU.
Pérez Vázquez, E.
(2007) El infinitivo y su sujeto en español. Bologna: Gedit edizioni.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D.
(1989) Language-particular processes and the Earliness Principle. Ms. MIT. Retrieved from áhttp://​web​.mit​.edu​/linguistics​/people​/faculty​/pesetsky​/earliness​.pdfñ
Piera, C.
(1987) Sobre la estructura de las cláusulas de infinitivo. In V. Demonte & M. Fernández-Lagunilla (Eds.), Sintaxis de las lenguas románicas (pp. 148–166). Madrid: Ediciones el arquero.Google Scholar
Pöll, B.
(2007) On the licensing of overt subjects in Spanish infinitival clauses. Probus, 19, 93–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M., & Potsdam, E.
(2002) Backward Control. Linguistic Inquiry, 33, 245–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Postal, P.
(1969) On so-called pronouns in English. In D. Reibel & S. Schane (Eds.), Modern studies in English: Readings in transformational grammar (pp. 201–224).Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T., & Reuland, E.
(1993) Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 657–720.Google Scholar
Richards, M.D.
(2011) Deriving the edge: What’s in a phase? Syntax, 14(1), 74–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rigau, G.
(1988) Strong pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), 503–511.Google Scholar
(1995) The properties of the temporal infinitive constructions in Catalan and Spanish. Probus, 7, 279–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(1982) Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 501–557.Google Scholar
(1997) The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax (pp. 281–337). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, L.
(1993) On the licensing and interpretation of non-argumental nominals. Ms. University of Southern California.
Sánchez-López, C.
(1996) Los pronombres enfáticos y la estructura subeventiva. Verba, 23, 147–175.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, H.Á.
(2008) The case of PRO. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, 403–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sitaridou, I.
(2007) Romance infinitives with subjects, subjunctive obviation and control theory. In L. Eguren & O. Fernández Soriano (Eds.), Coreference, modality, and focus (pp. 191–219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Solà, J.
(1992) Agreement and subjects. Doctoral Dissertation. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Retrieved from áhttp://​filcat​.uab​.es​/clt​/publicacions​/tesis​/pdf​/Sola​.pdfñ
Sundaresan, S.
(2010) A reductionist treatment of control and anaphora. Ms. University of Tromsø & University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Suñer, M.
(1986) Lexical subjects of infinitives in Caribbean Spanish. In O. Jaeggli & C. Silva-Corvalan (Eds.), Studies in Romance linguistics (pp. 189–203). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A.
(2009) Overt nominative subjects in infinitival complements crosslinguistically: Data, diagnostics, and preliminary analyses. Ms. Retrieved from áhttp://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingBuzz​/00044ñ
Torrego, E.
(1996) On quantifier float in control clauses. Linguistic Inquiry, 27, 111–126.Google Scholar
(1998) Nominative subjects and Pro-Drop Infl. Syntax, 1–2, 206–219.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M.L.
(1998) Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar