Article published in:
The Acquisition of Spanish in Understudied Language Pairings
Edited by Tiffany Judy and Silvia Perpiñán
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 3] 2015
► pp. 233–254

The Construal of Goal-Oriented Motion Events by Swedish Speakers of L2 Spanish

Encoding of motion endpoints and Manner of motion

The current study investigates motion event construal in Swedish speakers of L2 Spanish. In particular, the study examines the encoding of motion endpoints and manner of motion through elicited video clip descriptions of everyday motion event situations. The results show that Swedish learners of Spanish exhibit the same, high endpoint frequencies as their monolingual Swedish peers, thus deviating from the Spanish native pattern. Moreover, the learners used the same amount of manner verbs as Spanish natives, but were more prone to give additional manner information in periphrastic constructions. These findings are interpreted in relation to previous literature on the construal of motion events in L2 learners and the notion of conceptual transfer (Cadierno & Ruiz 2006; Jarvis & Pavlenko 2008; von Stutterheim 2003). Keywords: Motion events; event construal; endpoint encoding; satellite-framed languages; verb-framed languages; Path; Manner; Spanish; Swedish
Published online: 18 February 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.3.09don
References

References

Aske, J.
(1989) Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15, 1–14.Google Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P., & Bylund, E.
(2013) Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science, 37, 286–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R.A., & Slobin, D.I.
(1994) Development of linguistic forms: English. In R.A. Berman & D.I. Slobin (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E.
(2008) Procesos de conceptualización de eventos en sueco y en español: Diferencias translingüísticas [Event conceptualization processes in Swedish and Spanish: Crosslinguistic differences]. Revue Romane, 43(1), 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) The effects of age of L2 acquisition on L1 event conceptualization principles. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 305–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E., & Athanasopoulos, P.
(2014) Language and thought in a multilingual context: The case of isiXhosa. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 431–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E., & Jarvis, S.
(2011) L2 effects on L1 event conceptualization. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 47–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E., Athanasopoulos, P., & Oostendorp, M.
(2013) Motion event cognition and grammatical aspect. Evidence from Afrikaans. Linguistics, 51, 929–955. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T.
(2004) Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 13–49). SOLA Studies on Language Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Motion in Danish as a second language: Does the learner’s L1 make a difference? In Z. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic Relativity in SLA: Thinking for Speaking (pp. 1–33). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T., & Ruiz, L.
(2006), Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 183–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M., & von Stutterheim, C.
(2006) The impact of grammaticalized temporal categories on ultimate attainment in advanced L2 acquisition. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Educating for Advanced Foreign Language Capacities (pp. 40–53). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, M., von Stutterheim, C., & Nüse, R.
(2004) The language and thought debate: A psycholinguistic approach. In C. Habel & T. Pechmann (Eds.), Multidisciplinary Approaches to Language Production (pp. 183–218). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M., Weimar, K., Flecken, M., Lambert, M., & von Stutterheim, C.
(2012) Tracing trajectories: Motion event construal by advanced L2 French-English and L2 French-German speakers. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 3(2), 202–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donoso, A.
(2013) Camino, base y manera en español y sueco. Un estudio contrastivo [Path, Ground and Manner in Spanish and Swedish. A contrastive study]. Revue Romane, 48(1), 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hasselgård, H., Johansson, S., Behrens, B., & Fabricius-Hansen, C.
(Eds.) (2002) Information Structure in a Cross-linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, H., & Hickmann, M.
(2011) Space in second language acquisition. In V. Cook & B. Bassetti (Eds.). Language and Bilingual Cognition (pp. 315–339). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A.
(2011) La expresión de eventos de movimiento y su adquisición en segundas lenguas. Unpublishd Ph.D. dissertation. Universidad de Zaragoza.
Hohenstein, J., Eisenberg, A., & Naigles, L.
(2006) Is he floating across or crossing afloat? Cross-influence of L1 and L2 in Spanish–English bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 249–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
(2004) Dicotomías frente a continuos en la lexicalización de los eventos de movimiento. Revista Española de Lingüística, 34(2), 481–510.Google Scholar
(2009) Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & S. Özçalişkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 403–414). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ijaz, H.
(1986) Linguistic and cognitive determinants of lexical acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 36, 401–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Odlin, T.
(2000) Morphological type, spatial reference, and language transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 535–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A.
(2008) Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, J., & Martinovic-Zic, A.
(2004) Why manner matters. Contrasting English and Serbo-Croatian typology in motion description. In C.L. Moder & A. Martinovic-Zic (Eds.), Discourse across Languages and Cultures (pp. 211–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
(2000) Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larrañaga, P., Treffers-Daller, J., Tidball, F., & Ortega, M.
(2012) L1 transfer in the acquisition of manner and path in Spanish by native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(1), 117–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, M.
(1969) Frog: Where are you? New York, NY: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Naigles, L., & Terrazas, P.
(1998) Motion-verb generalizations in English and Spanish: The influence of language and syntax. Psychological Science, 9(5), 363–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Naigles, L., Eisenberg, A., Kako, E., Highter, M., & McGraw, N.
(1998) Speaking of motion: Verb use in English and Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(5), 521–549. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, S., & Nicoladis, E.
(2005) Describing motion events in adult L2 Spanish narratives. In D. Eddington (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second languages (pp. 102–107). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Negueruela, E., Lantolf, J.P., Jordan, S., & Gelabert, J.
(2004) The “private function” of gesture in second language speaking activity: A study of motion verbs and gesturing in English and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 113–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T.
(1989) Language Transfer: Cross-linguistic Influence in Language Learning. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Crosslinguistic influence. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 436–486). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, J.
(2012) Spanish expressions of directed motion revisited – variable type framing. In H. Boas & F. Gonzálvez-García (Eds.), Constructional Approaches to Romance Languages (pp. 269–304). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ragnarsdóttir, H., & Strömqvist, S.
(2004) Time, space and manner in Icelandic and Swedish. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives (pp. 113–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schmiedtová, B., & Flecken, M.
(2008) The role of aspectual distinctions in event encoding: Implications for second language acquisition. In S. de Knop & T. de Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar (pp. 357–384). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmiedtová, B., von Stutterheim, C., & Carroll, M.
(2011) Language-specific patterns in event construal of advanced second language speakers. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), Thinking and Speaking in Two Languages (pp. 112–141). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sjöström, S.
(1990) Spatial Relations. Towards a Theory of Spatial Verbs, Prepositions and Pronominal Adverbs in Swedish. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Gothenburg University, Sweden.
Slobin, D.
(1996) Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions. Their Form and Meaning (pp. 195–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind (pp. 157–191). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2004) How people move. In C.L. Moder & A. Martinovic-Zic (Eds.), Discourse across Languages and Cultures (pp. 195–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stam, G.
(2010) Can an L2 speaker’s patterns of thinking for speaking change? In Z. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic Relativity in SLA: Thinking for Speaking (pp. 59–83). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strömqvist, S., & Verhoeven, L.
(2004) Relating Events in Narrative, Vol. 2: Typological and Contextual Perspectives. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
(1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Semantic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(1991) Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 480–519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
(2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C.
(2003) Linguistic structure and information organisation. The case of very advanced learners. In S. Foster-Cohen & S. Pekarek Dohler (Eds.), EuroSLA Yearbook (pp. 183–206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., & Nüse, R.
(2003) Processes of conceptualization in language production: Language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics, 41(5), 851–881. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., Andermann, M., Carroll, M., Flecken, M., & Schmiedtová, B.
(2012) How grammaticized concepts shape event conceptualization in language production: Insights from linguistic analysis, eye tracking data, and memory performance. Linguistics, 50(4), 833–867. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Yangklang, P.
(2004) A third way to travel: The place of Thai in motion event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative. Typological and Contextual Perspectives (pp. 159–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M.L., & Oh, E.
(2007) On the Syntactic Composition of Manner and Motion. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Bylund, Emanuel & Panos Athanasopoulos
2015. Motion event categorisation in a nativised variety of South African English. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18:5 ► pp. 588 ff. Crossref logo
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2019. How language type influences patterns of motion expression in bilingual speakers. Second Language Research ► pp. 026765831987721 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.