Chapter published in:
Current Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics
Edited by Diego Pascual y Cabo and Idoia Elola
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 27] 2020
► pp. 153–174

Neural evidence for the processing of referential ambiguity and referential failure in Spanish

| University of Kansas
| University of Kansas
| University of Kansas | Montclair State University
| University of Kansas
The present study uses event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine how native Spanish speakers comprehend overt pronouns in two referentially challenging contexts: sentences in which a pronoun has two gender-matching antecedents (referential ambiguity), and sentences in which there are no gender-matching antecedents (referential failure). Participants read these sentences for comprehension while their brain activity was recorded. Results revealed a sustained positivity for referentially ambiguous pronouns, in contrast to a sustained negativity observed in previous studies of English and Dutch, and a positivity (P600) for referential failure, in line with previous studies. There was no relationship between ERPs and working memory measures. These results suggest that speakers of different languages may differ in how they process referential ambiguity, but not referential failure.
Keywords: anaphora, pronouns, Spanish, ERPs, individual differences
Published online: 04 June 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.27.07fer
References

References

Alemán Bañón, J., Gabriele, A., & Fiorentino, R.
(2012) The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of structural distance. Brain Research, 1456, 49–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, R., & Pease-Álvarez, L.
(1996) Null and expressed pronoun variation in Mexican-descent children’s Spanish. In J. Arnold, R. Blake, & B. Davidson (Eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory, and analysis (pp. 85–99). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
(1997) Null pronoun variation in Mexican-descent children’s narrative discourse. Language Variation and Change, 9, 349–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bentivoglio, P.
(1983) Topic continuity and discontinuity in discourse: A study of spoken Latin American Spanish. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (pp. 255–311). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1987) Los sujetos pronominales de primera persona en el habla de Caracas. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.Google Scholar
Boudewyn, M. A., Long, D. L., Traxler, M. J., Lesh, T. A., Dave, S., Mangun, G. R., Carter, C. S., & Swaab, T. Y.
(2015) Sensitivity to referential ambiguity in discourse: The role of attention, working memory, and verbal ability. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(12), 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, P.
(2006) Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 98(2), 159–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, R.
(1992) Pronominal and null subject variation in Spanish: Constraints, dialects, and functional compensation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
(1994) Switch reference, verb class and priming in a variable syntax. In K. Beals (ed.), Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Volume 2: The parasession on variation in linguistic theory, 27–45. Chicago, IL: CLS.Google Scholar
(1995) The scope and limits of switch-reference as a constraint on pronominal subject expression. Hispanic Linguistics, 6(7), 1–27.Google Scholar
Carreiras, M., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J.
(1993) The use of superficial and meaning-based representations in interpreting pronouns: Evidence from Spanish. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5(1), 93–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, A. M., & Child, M.
(2011) Subject pronoun expression in a variety of Spanish in contact with Portuguese. In J. Michnowicz & R. Dodsworth (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp. 14–25). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Carvalho, A. M., Orozco, R., & Shin, N. L.
(2015) Introduction. In A. M. Carvalho, R. Orozco, & N. L. Shin (Eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective (pp. xiii–xxvi). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W.
(2005) Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(5), 769–786. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A.
(1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enríquez, E. V.
(1984) El pronombre personal sujeto en la lengua española hablada en Madrid [The subject personal pronoun in the Spanish language spoken in Madrid]. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Instituto Miguel de Cervantes.Google Scholar
Flores-Ferrán, N.
(2004) Spanish subject personal pronoun use in New York City Puerto Ricans: Can we rest the case of English contact? Language Variation and Change, 16, 49–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A., & Weissenborn, J.
(2007) Mapping sentence form onto meaning: The syntax-semantic interface. Brain Research, 1146, 50–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garnham, A.
(2001) Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Goikoietxea, E., Pascual, G., & Acha, C.
(2008) Normative study of the implicit causality of 100 interpersonal verbs in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 760–772. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hochberg, J.
(1986) Functional compensation for /s/ deletion in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language, 62(3), 609–621. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jegerski, J., VanPatten, B., & Keating, G. D.
(2011) Cross-linguistic variation and the acquisition of pronominal reference in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 27(4), 481–507. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E.
(2007) Event-related potentials and language processing: A brief overview. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(6), 571–591. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S.
(2004) Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 125–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Bilingual background questionnaire for Spanish/English speakers. The National Heritage Language Resource Center. Retrieved from http://​international​.ucla​.edu​/nhlrc​/data​/questionnaires (12 November, 2019).Google Scholar
Morales, A.
(1997) La hipótesis funcional y la aparición de sujeto no nominal: El español de Puerto Rico. Hispania, 80(1), 153–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nieuwland, M. S.
(2014) “Who’s he?” Event-related brain potentials and unbound pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A.
(2006) Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs. Brain Research, 1118, 155–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, R. C.
(1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A.
(1995) Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 739–773. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, R., Zentella, A. C., & Livert, D.
(2007) Language and dialect contact in Spanish in New York: Toward the formation of a speech community. Language, 83(4), 770–802. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shin, N. L., & Cairns, H. S.
(2012) The development of NP selection in school-age children: Reference and Spanish subject pronouns. Language Acquisition, 19(1), 3–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shin, N. L. & Montes-Alcalá, C.
(2014) El uso contextual del pronombre sujeto como factor predictivo de la influencia del inglés en el español en Nueva York. Sociolinguistic Studies, 8(1). 85–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C.
(1994) Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silva-Pereyra, J., Gutiérrez-Sigut, E., & Carreiras, M.
(2012) An ERP study of coreference in Spanish: Semantic and grammatical gender cues. Psychophysiology, 49, 1401–1411. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F.
(2006) Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliaferri, B.
(2005) Paradigm [Software] (Version 1.0). Lawrence, KS: Perception Research Systems. www​.perceptionexperiments​.com (14 November, 2019).Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C.
(2010) Variable yo expression in New Mexico: English influence? In S. Rivera-Mills & D. V. Crésap (Eds.), Spanish of the U.S. southwest: A language in transition (pp. 189–210). Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W.
(1989) Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P.
(1999) Early referential context effects in sentence processing: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 147–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Zwitserlood, P.
(2003) Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 40, 235–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar