Chapter published in:
Complement Clauses in Portuguese: Syntax and acquisition
Edited by Ana Lúcia Santos and Anabela Gonçalves
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 17] 2018
► pp. 241–260

Comments on complementation in Portuguese

| University of Lisbon
Published online: 16 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.17.08dua
References

References

Ambar, M.
(1992) Para uma sintaxe da inversão sujeito-verbo em português. Lisboa: Colibri.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P.
(2013)  Pro as a minimal pronoun: Towards a unified approach to pro-drop (Unpublished manuscript). Universidade do Minho.
Bobaljik, J.
(2006) Where’s phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In D. Harbour, D. Adger, & S. Béjar (Eds.), Phi-theory: Phi features across interfaces and modules (pp. 295–328). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borer, H.
(1989) Anaphoric AGR. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 69–109). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carstens, V.
(2001) Multiple agreement and case deletion: Against φ-(in)completeness. Syntax, 3, 147–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) DP in Bantu and Romance. In K. Demuth & C. De Cat (Eds.), The Bantu-Romance connection (pp. 131–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(2000) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Costa, J.
(2010) PB e PE: Orientação para o discurso importa? Estudos da Língua(gem), 8(1), 123–143.Google Scholar
Costa, J., & Rooryck, J.
(1995) On pseudo-raising in English and Portuguese. In L. Nash, G. Tsoulas, & A. Zribi-Hertz (Eds.), Proceedings of Langue et Grammaire 2 (pp. 48–58). Paris VII.
Duarte, I.
(1987) A construção de topicalização: regência, ligação e condições sobre movimento (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Lisbon.
Farkas, D.
(1992) On obviation. In I. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (Eds.), Lexical matters (pp. 85–109). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Fernández-Salgueiro, G.
(2008) The Case-F valuation parameter in Romance. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation (pp. 295–310). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, M.
(2004) Hyperraising and null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 47, 57–85.Google Scholar
Fuss, E.
(2005) The rise of agreement: A formal approach to the syntax and grammaticalization of verbal inflection. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, A., Santos, A. L., & Duarte, I.
(2014) (Pseudo-)Inflected infinitives and Control as Agree. In K. Lahousse & S. Marzo (Eds.), Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ (pp. 161–180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, N., & San Martin, I.
(2001) Obviation as Anti-control. International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology (ASJU), 35(1), 367–84.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N., Martins, A. M., & Nunes, J.
(2006) Infinitival complements of perception and causative verbs: A case study on agreement and intervention effects in English and European Portuguese. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 81–110.Google Scholar
(2008) Perception and causative structures in English and European Portuguese: φ-Feature agreement and the distribution of bare and prepositional infinitives. Syntax, 11, 198–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kempschinsky, P.
(1990) Más sobre el efecto de referencia disjunta del subjuntivo. In I. Bosque, (Ed.), Indicativo y subjuntivo (pp. 234–258). Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
(2009) What can the subjunctive disjoint reference effect tell us about the subjunctive? Lingua, 119, 1788–1810. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landau, I.
(2000) Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, 811–877. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martins, A. M., & Nunes, J.
(2006) Raising issues in Brazilian and European Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 4, 53–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Apparent hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese: Agreement with topics across a finite CP. In P. E. Panagiotidis (Ed.), The complementiser phase: Subjects and wh-dependencies (pp. 143–163). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mensching, G.
(2000) Infinitive constructions with specified subjects: A syntactic analysis of Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D.
(1976) Evidence for subject downgrading in Portuguese. In J. Schmidt-Radefeldt (Ed.), Readings in Portuguese linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D., & Torrego, E.
(2001) T-to-C movement: Causes and Consequences. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 355–426). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Tense, case, and the nature of syntactic categories. In J. Guéron & J. Lecarme (Eds.), The syntax of time (pp. 495–537). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pires, A.
(2002) Cuebased change: Inflection and subjects in the history of Portuguese infinitives. In D. Lightfoot (Ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological change (pp. 143–159). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pires, A., & Rothman, J.
(2009) Acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese in late childhood: Implications for syntactic theory and language change. In A. Pires & J. Rothman (Eds.), Minimalist inquiries into child and adult language acquisition: Case studies across Portuguese (pp. 129–154). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M., & Potsdam, E.
(2001) Long-distance agree and topic in Tsez. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19, 583–646. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raposo, E.
(1987) Case Theory and Onfl-to-Comp: The inflected infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry, 18(1), 85–110.Google Scholar
Raposo, E., & Uriagereka, J.
(1996) Indefinite SE. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14(4), 749–810. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruwet, N.
(1984) Je veux partir/*je veux que tu partes. On the distribution of finite complements and infinitival complements in French. In N. Ruwet (1991), Syntax and human experience (pp. 1–55). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A.
(2009) Overt nominative subjects in infinitival complements crosslinguistically: Data, diagnostics, and preliminary analyses. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics – Papers in Syntax, 2, 1–53.Google Scholar