Article published in:
Forms of Address in the Spanish of the Americas
Edited by María Irene Moyna and Susana Rivera-Mills
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 10] 2016
► pp. 289–304

Making the case for increased prestige of the vernacular

Medellín’s voseo

| College of Charleston
Voseo is common in conversations in Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia, but it is not commonly prescribed for written venues. Currently, voseo appears to have a burgeoning presence, which appears to mark a shift from previous trends. This study focuses on the use of the vernacular voseo and prescriptive tuteo and ustedeo in the linguistic landscape of Colombia’s second largest city. An examination of over 300 samples shows that written voseo has an increasing presence in city government communiqués and a limited presence in other domains. Given Medellín’s recent transformation, this study makes the case that increased prestige in paisa (from Antioquia) culture appears to result in increased prestige for that city’s voseo.
Published online: 25 August 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.10.14wey
References

References

Ades, R.
(1953) My first encounter with the Spanish of Medellín. Hispania, 36, 325-327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alcaldía de Medellín
(2013)  at -Prender, recursos académicos . Retrieved from http://​www​.medellin​.edu​.co
Benavides, C.
(2003) The distribution of vos in Hispanic America. Hispania, 86, 612-623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bertolotti, V., & Coll, M.
(2003) A synchronical and historical view of the tú/vos option the Spanish of Montevideo. In S. Montrul & F. Ordóñez (Eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages: Papers from the 5 th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium and the 4th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese (pp. 1-12). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
Borrell, J.
(1988) Colombia: The most dangerous city. Time. Retrieved from http://​www​.time​.com​/time​/magazine​/article​/0,9171,967029​-1,00​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., & Gilman, A.
(1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T.A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 253-276). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bursik, B.
(2008) Las formas de tratamiento en la publicidad periodística de hoy y de hace 25 años. (Unpublished MA thesis). Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Retrieved from http://​is​.muni​.cz​/th​/146604​/ff​_b​/Las​_formas​_de​_tratamiento​.pdf
Elizaincín, A., Malcuori, M., & Bertolotti, V.
(1997) El español en la Banda Oriental del Siglo XVIII. Montevideo: Universidad de la República.Google Scholar
Ferrer, E.
(1995) El lenguaje de la publicidad. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Fishman, J.
(1960) A systemization of the Whorfian hypothesis. Behavioral Science 4, 323-339.Google Scholar
Flórez, L.
(1957) Habla y cultura popular en Antioquia: Materiales para un estudio. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Fontanella de Weinberg, M.B.
(1989) Avances y rectificación en el estudio del voseo americano. Thesaurus 44, 227-241.Google Scholar
(1990-1991) La generalización del voseo y la estandardización policéntrica del español bonaerense del siglo XX. Cuadernos del Sur, 23/24, 35-49.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.
(1974) Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Jang, J.S.
(2010) Fórmulas de tratamiento pronominales en los jóvenes universitarios de Medellín (Colombia) desde la óptica sociopragmática: Estrato socioeconómico y sexo. Íkala, 15(26), 43-116.Google Scholar
(2012) La dinámica de la alternancia entre tú, vos y usted in Medellín (Colombia) desde la teoría de la acomodación comunicativa. Forma y función, 25. Retrieved from http://​www​.redalyc​.org​/articulo​.oa​?id​=21925383003Google Scholar
(2013)  Voseo medellinense como expresión de identidad paisa. Íkala, 18, 61-81.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
(2001) Principles of linguistic change. Social factors. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R.
(1997) Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16, 23-49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lipski, J.
(1994) Latin American Spanish. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Millán, M.
(2011) Pronouns of address in informal contexts: A comparison of two dialects of Colombian Spanish. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Milroy, J., & Milroy, L.
(1985) Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics, 21, 339-384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Molina, I.
(1993) Las fórmulas de tratamiento de los jóvenes madrileños: Estudio sociolingüístico. Lingüística Española Actual, 15, 249-263.Google Scholar
(2002) Evolución de las fórmulas de tratamiento en la juventud madrileña a lo largo del siglo XX: Un estudio en tiempo real. In F. Rodríguez (Ed.), El lenguaje de los jóvenes (pp. 91-121). Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Montes Giraldo, J.
(1967) Sobre el voseo en Colombia. Thesaurus, 22, 21-44.Google Scholar
Moyna, M.I.
(2009) Child acquisition and language change: Voseo evolution in Río de la Plata Spanish. In J. Collentine, B. Lafford, M. García, & F. Marcos Marín (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 131-142). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Páez Urdaneta, I.
(1981) Historiografia hispanoamericana del voseo. Caracas: La Casa de Bello.Google Scholar
Penny, R.
(2000) Variation and change in Spanish. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Resnick, M., & Hammond, R.
(2011) Introducción a la historia de la lengua española (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M.
(1989) The ethnography of communication: An introduction (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Steffen, J.
(2010) El tratamiento en el Uruguay. In M. Hummel, B. Kluge, & M.E. Vázquez Laslop (Eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico (pp. 449-464). Mexico City/Graz: El Colegio de México/Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.Google Scholar
Urban Land Institute
(2013) City of the year. Retrieved from http://​online​.wsj​.com​/ad​/cityoftheyear
Vázquez Ortega, I., & Hickey, L.
(1990) Old information and presupposition in advertising language. International Journal of Advertising, 9, 189-196.Google Scholar
Villa Mejía, V.
(2010) La solidaridad y poder del vos antioqueño. Lingüística y Literatura, 58, 69-85.Google Scholar
Vestergaard, T., & Shroder, K.
(1985) The language of advertising. NewYork, NY: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weyers, J.
(2009) The impending demise of tú in Montevideo, Uruguay. Hispania, 92, 829-839Google Scholar
(2011)  Tú and usted in Mexican advertising: The politeness systems of written public discourse. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 30, 117-133.Google Scholar
(2012)  Voseo in Montevideo’s advertising: Reflecting linguistic norms. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 5, 369-385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weyers, J., & Canale, G.
(2013)  Tuteo and voseo in the classroom: Linguistic attitudes among Montevidean educators. Spanish in Context, 10, 371-389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2021.  In Aspects of Latin American Spanish Dialectology [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 32], Crossref logo
Foster, Daniel, Suzanne Aalberse & Wessel Stoop
2019.  In It’s not all about you [Topics in Address Research, 1], ► pp. 76 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.