11. Interlingual text comprehension: Linguistic and extralinguistic determinants

Renée van Bezooijen | Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen

Charlotte Gooskens | Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

The three West-Germanic languages Dutch, Frisian and Afrikaans are so closely related that they can be expected to be mutually intelligible to a large extent. In the present investigation, we established the intelligibility of written Afrikaans and Frisian by Dutch-speaking subjects. It appeared that it is easier for speakers of Dutch to understand Afrikaans than Frisian. In order to explain the results, attitudes as well as linguistic distances were assessed. There was no evidence of a relationship between attitude and intelligibility. Three linguistic distances did show a relationship with reading comprehension, namely the number of non-cognates, the transparency of the lexical relatedness of cognates, and the Levenshtein distance, which calculates the similarity between the written forms of words.

Keywords: Afrikaans, attitudes, Dutch, Frisian, Levenshtein distance, linguistic distance, mutual intelligibility

Published online: 05 June 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.6.17bez

Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given

2021. In Contested Languages [Studies in World Language Problems, 8],

Bahtina, Daria & Jan D. ten Thije

2012. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,

Belmar, Guillem & Sara Pinho

2020. ‘Kinsto it Frysk ferstean?’. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics

Gooskens, Charlotte

2017. In The Handbook of Dialectology, ► pp. 204 ff.

Impe, Leen, Dirk Geeraerts & Dirk Speelman

2008. Mutual Intelligibility of Standard and Regional Dutch Language Varieties. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 2:1-2 ► pp. 101 ff.

Kürschner, Sebastian, Charlotte Gooskens & Renée van Bezooijen

2008. Linguistic Determinants of the Intelligibility of Swedish Words among Danes. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 2:1-2 ► pp. 83 ff.

Marx, Nicole

2012. Reading across the Germanic languages: Is equal access just wishful thinking?. International Journal of Bilingualism 16:4 ► pp. 467 ff.

Psaltou-Joycey, Angeliki & Zoe Kantaridou

2009. Plurilingualism, language learning strategy use and learning style preferences. International Journal of Multilingualism 6:4 ► pp. 460 ff.

Sağın-Şimşek, Çiğdem & Wolf König

2012. Receptive multilingualism and language understanding: Intelligibility of Azerbaijani to Turkish speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 16:3 ► pp. 315 ff.

Stenger, Irina, Klára Jágrová, Andrea Fischer, Tania Avgustinova, Dietrich Klakow & Roland Marti

2017. Modeling the impact of orthographic coding on Czech–Polish and Bulgarian–Russian reading intercomprehension. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 40:2 ► pp. 175 ff.

Şimşek, Çiğdem Sağın & Elena Antonova Ünlü

2019. A hearer-based analysis of Turkish–Azerbaijani receptive multilingual communication. International Journal of Bilingualism 23:4 ► pp. 843 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.