Article published in:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 20:1 (1993) ► pp. 2547
References

References

I.Primary sources

Abbo of Fleury
, Questiones grammaticales Ed. by A. Guerreau-Jalabert. Paris: Les Belles Lettres 1982.Google Scholar
Aggressus quídam, GL
8.xxxix–xli.
Alcuin
, De orthographia Ed. by A. Marsili. Pisa: 1952; GL 7.295–312.Google Scholar
Dialogus Franconis et Saxonis de octo partibus orationis, PL 101.854–902.
Aldhelm
, De metris et enigmatibus ac pedum regulis Ed. by R. Ehwald. Aldhelmi Opera. Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Auctores Antiquissimi 15. Berlin: Weidmann 1919, pp.59–204. The De metris and part of De pedum regulis was transl, by Neil Wright in Michael Lapidge and James L. Rosier 1985 Aldhelm: The Poetic Works, 183–219. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Anonymus ad Cuimnanum
Expossitio latinitatis Ed. by Bernard Bishoff and Bengt Löfstedt CCSL 1330
Ars Ambianensis
. Unprinted grammar usually cited from Amiens, Bibliothéque Municipale 426, ff.48r–71v. For other MSS see Law (1982:67).Google Scholar
Ars Ambrosiana
Ed. by Bengt Löfstedt CCSL 133C
Ars Augiensis
Uuoluuinus”). Unique copy in Karlsruhe, Badische Landesbibliothek, Aug. CXII ff.61v–101vb.
Ars Bernensis, GL
8.62–142.
Ars Brugensis
Unprinted grammar in Bruges, Bibliothèque de la ville, 537, ff.l9rb–38vb and 41rb–46va.
Ars Laureshamensis
Ed. by Bengt Löfstedt CCCM 40A
Ars Toletana
Unique copy in Toledo, Biblioteca del Cabildo 99–30, ff.33v–34v.
Asper/Asperius/Asporius/Asper minor
Ars. GL 8.39–61.
Beatus quid est
Ed. by Martha Bayless This volume pp.85 109
Bede
. De arte metrica Ed. by C. B. Kendall. CCSL 123A.59–141; also in C. B. Kendall 1966Bede’s De arte metrica: Introduction, Text and Notes. Berkeley; and in GL 7.227–260.Google Scholar
De orthographia Ed. by C. W. Jones CCSL 123A 1 57 also in GL 7 261 294
. De schematibus et tropis Ed. by C. B. Kendall. CCSL 123A.142–171. English translation by Gussie Hecht Tanenhaus 1962 “Bede’s De schematibus et tropis – a translation”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 48.237–253. Repr. in Readings in Medieval Rhetoric, ed. by J. M. Miller et al., 96–122. Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1973.Google Scholar
Boniface
Ars grammatica Ed. by George John Gebauer and Bengt Löfstedt CCSL 133B 13 99
Ars metrica Ed. by Bengt Löfstedt CCSL 133B 109 113
Christian
Ars minor Ed. by Vivien Law This volume, pp.231 238
Clemens Scottus
. dementis Ars grammatica Ed. by J. Tolkiehn 1928Philologus Supplementband 20.3. Leipzig: Dieterich. Reviewed by Karl Barwick 1930 Gnomon 6.385–395. Edition by A. M. Puckett and F. Glorie forthcoming (CCCM 40E).Google Scholar
Clm/Nancy
See Sapientia ex sapore.
Codex quae pars
excerpt printed in GL 8, xxi. Found in Berne 207, ff.l7r–18v (19r–20v), and in Leiden Voss. lat. Q. 33, f.71rv.
Congregatio Salcani filii de verbo
Ed. by Bengt Löfstedt 1965Der hibernolateinische Grammatiker Malsachanus, 194–260. Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.Google Scholar
Cruindmel
, Ars metrica Ed. by J. Huemer 1883Cruindmeli sive Fulcharii Ars metrica: Beitrag zur Geschichte der karolingischen Gelehrsamkeit. Vienna: Alfred Hölder.Google Scholar
Cunabula grammaticae artis Donati, PL
90.613–32.
Declinationes nominum
Usually cited from Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Clm 6281, ff.l08v–114v. A short version was printed in GL 8.61 app. crit.; and another version is embedded in the Ars Donati quam Paulus Diaconus exposuit, 4,12–10,22.
De dubiis nominibus
Ed. by F. Glorie CCSL 133A 743 820
Dicuil
Ed. by Max Manitius 1912 “Micons von St. Riquier De primis syllabis”. Münchener Museum für Philologie des Mittelalters und der Renaissance 1.121–177, at x,21–177.Google Scholar
Distributio omnium specierum nominum inter cathegorias Aristotilis
Ed. by Paul Piper 1882Die Schriften Notkers und seiner Schule I: Schriften philosophischen Inhalts, lxxv–lxxxix. Freiburg: J.C.B. Mohr, completed in his “Zu Notkers Rhetorik”, Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie 22 (1890), 277–286.Google Scholar
Donatus Ortigraphus
Ars grammatica (Eclogae de libris grammaticorum) Ed. by John Chittenden CCCM 40D
Dynamius
. Ars grammatica Ed. by Angelo Mai 1852Nova patrum bibliotheca vol. I part 2.182–198. Rome: Typis Sacri Consilii Propagando Christiano Nomini.Google Scholar
Erchanbert
. Erchanberti Frisingensis Tractatus super Donatum Ed. by Wendell Vernon Clausen 1948 Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Ermanric of Ellwangen
Ed. by D. C. Lambot 1945Œuvres théologiques et grammaticales de Godescalc d’Orbais, 504–508. Louvain: “Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense” Bureaux.Google Scholar
Excerptiones de Prisciano
Usually cited from Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale N.A. lat. 586.
Godescalc
Ed. by D. C. Lambot 1945Œuvres théologiques et grammaticales de Godescalc d’Orbais, 351–496. Louvain: “Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense” Bureaux.Google Scholar
Hildericus of Monte Cassino
. Partial edition by Anselmo Lentini 1975Ilderico e la sua “Ars grammatica” (= Miscellanea Cassinese 39). Montecassino: Abbazia.Google Scholar
Hrabanus Maurus
Excerptio de arte grammatica Prisciani. PL 111.613–670.
Isidorus Iunior
. De vitiis et virtutibus orationis Ed. by Ulrich Schindel 1975Die lateinischen Figurenlehren des 5. bis 7. Jahrhunderts und Donats Vergilkommentar (mit zwei Editionen). (= Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 3rd ser., 91), 184–241. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Israel the Grammarian
. Versus Israhelis de arte metrica super nomen et verbum (De syllabis finalibus) Ed. by Edouard Jeauneau 1985 “Pour le dossier d’Israël Scot”. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 60.7–72, at 22–24.Google Scholar
Julian of Toledo
, Ars Ed. by Maria A. H. Maestre Yenes 1973Ars Iuliani Toletani episcopi: una gramática latina de la España visigoda. Toledo: Instituto Provincial de Investigaciones y Estudios Toledanos.Google Scholar
. De partibus orationis Ed. by Luigi Munzi 1980–1981 “ Il De partibus orationis di Giuliano di Toledo Annali dell’ Istituto Universitario Orientale di Napoli, Seminario di Studi del Mondo Classico, Sezione Filologico-Letteraria 2–3.153–228.Google Scholar
Magnus quae uox
Cited from Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Clm 14737, ff. 157v–183v.
Malsachanus
. Ars Malsachani Ed. by Bengt Löfstedt 1965Der hibernolateinische Grammatiker Malsachanus, 173–260. Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.Google Scholar
Mico of Saint-Riquier
. De primis syllabis Ed. by Max Manitius 1912 “Micons von St. Riquier De primis syllabis”. Münchener Museum für Philologie des Mittelalters und der Renaissance 1.121–177, at 126,1–154,20.Google Scholar
Murethach (Muridac)
In Donati artem maiorem Ed. by Louis Holtz CCCM 40
Ordo ad cognoscendi nomen (Quid est doctus?)
Cited from St Gall, Stiftsbibliothek, 876, pp.30–32.
Paulus Diaconus
. Ars Donati quam Paulus Diaconus exposuit Ed. by Ambrogio M. Amelli 1899 Montecassino: Abbazia.Google Scholar
Peter of Pisa
. Ars Facsimile ed. by Bernhard Bischoff 1973Sammelhandschrift Diez. B Sant. 66. Grammatici Latini et Catalogus Lib-rorum, 3–66. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt. Excerpts in GL 8.161–171.Google Scholar
Primum quaeritur quare Donatus
Cited from Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale, lat. 13025, ff.60va–62vb.
Quae sunt quae
Best cited from the only complete MS, Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale, lat. 13025, ff.52vb–59vb.
Remigius
Expositio super Bedae De arte metrica et De schematibus et tropis libros Ed. by M. H. King CCSL 123A 77 171
. In artem Donati minorem commentum Ed. by W. Fox 1902 Leipzig: Teubner; GL 8.202–218.Google Scholar
. In artem maiorem Donati commentum. GL 8.219–74, supplemented by John Petersen Elder 1947 “The missing portions of the Commentum Einsidlense on Donatus’s Ars grammatica Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 56–57.129–160; and M. L. Coletti 1985 “Un’opera grammaticale di Remigio di Auxerre: il commento al De barbarismo di Donato”. Studi Medievali 26.951–967.Google Scholar
. In Eutychis Artem de verbo commentum Excerpts ed. by Max Manitius 1913 “Remigiusscholien”. Münchener Museum für Philologie des Mittelalters und der Renaissance 2.79–113.Google Scholar
. In Phocae Artem de nomine et verbo commentum Excerpts ed. by Max Manitius 1913 “Zu Iohannes Scottus und Remigius”. Didaskaleion 2.43–88, at 73–88.Google Scholar
. In Prisciani Institutionem de nomine commentum Ed. by Maria De Marco 1952 “Remigii inedita”, Aevum 26.495–517; supplemented by R. B. C. Huygens 1954 “Remigiana I. Le commentaire sur Priscien De nomine ”. Aevum 28.330–342.Google Scholar
Sapientia ex sapore
Clm/Nancy). Anonymous florilegium best cited from Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Clm 6415, ff.lr–44v.
Sedulius Scottus
. In Donati artem maiorem Ed. by Bengt Löfstedt. CCCM 40B; and by Denis Brearley 1975Commentum Sedulii Scotti in maiorem Donatum grammaticum. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
In Donati Artem minorem Ed. by Bengt Löfstedt CCCM 40C 1 54
In Eutychem Ed. by Bengt Löfstedt CCCM 40D 85 130
In Priscianum Ed. by Bengt Löfstedt CCCM 40D 55 84
Septem IIOPIOXAI (sic, for IIEPIOXAI) (Glosa Prisciani)
Cited from Barcelona, Archivo de la Corona de Aragón, Ripoll 59, ff.257v–288v.
Sergilius
Ars (Tractatio litterae). Cited from Leiden, Bibliotheek der Rijksuniversiteit, BPL 135, ff.71v–72r.
Smaragdus
Liber in partibus Donati Ed. by Bengt Löfstedt, Louis Holtz, Adele Kibre CCCM 68
Tatwine
Ars Ed. by Maria De Marco CCSL 133 1 93
Terminationes nominum
Ed. by Vivien Law 1991 “A French metamorphosis of an English grammatical genre: declinationes into terminationes ”. France and the British Isles in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, ed. by Gillian Jondorf and David N. Dumville, 17–42. Wood-bridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
Ursus of Beneventum
. Adbreuiatio Prisciani. Excerpts printed by C. Morelli 1910 “I trattati di grammatica e retorica del cod. Casanatense 1086”. Rendiconti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei, Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche. Ser. 5, 19.287–328.Google Scholar
Usuard of Saint-Germain
. Artis grammaticae introductiones Ed. by Josep M. Casas Horns 1964 “Una gramàtica inèdita d’Usuard”. Miscelºlània Anselm M. Albareda 2 (= Analecta Montserratensia 10), 77–129.Google Scholar
Versus de nominibus litterarum seu Versus cuiusdam Scoti de alphabeto
Ed. by F. Glorie CCSL 133A 725 741
Virgilius Maro Grammaticus
. Epitomae and Epistolae Ed. by Giovanni Polara 1979Virgilio Marone Grammatico, Epitomi ed Epistole. Naples: Liguori. With Italian translation.Google Scholar
Walahfrid Strabo
Cited from St Gall, Stiftsbibliothek 878, pp. 5–18 and 50–69.
Uuoluuinus”. See Ars Augiensis.

II.Secondary literature

Amsler, Mark
1989Etymology and Grammatical Discourse in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1990 “Commentary and metalanguage in early medieval Latin grammar”. History and Historiography of Linguistics (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 51), ed. by Hans-Josef Niederehe and Konrad Koerner, 175–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baebler, J. J.
1885Beiträge zu einer Geschichte der lateinischen Grammatik im Mittelalter. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Ballaira, Guglielmo
1982Per il catalogo dei codici di Prisciano. Torino: G. Giappichelli.Google Scholar
Barabino, Giuseppina
1976 “Le citazioni virgiliane in Malsacano”. Grammatici latini d’età imperiale, 195–218. Genoa: Istituto di Filologia Classica e Medievale.Google Scholar
Barwick, Karl
1924 “Zur Geschichte und Rekonstruktion des Charisius-Textes”. Hermes 59.420–429.Google Scholar
1930Review of Tolkiehn’s edition of Clemens. Gnomon 6.385–395.Google Scholar
Beeson, Charles
1924 “The ars grammatica of Julian of Toledo”. Miscellanea Francesco Ehrle (= Studi e Testi 37), vol. 1.50–70. Rome: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana.Google Scholar
1927 “Paris Lat. 7530. A study in Insular symptoms”. Raccoltà di scritti in onore di Felice Ramorino, 199–211. Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Bethmann, L. C.
1851 “Paulus Diaconus Leben und Schriften”. Archiv der Gesellschaft für ältere deutsche Geschichtkunde 10.247–334.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Dante
1958 “Paolo Diacono e l’Ars Donati ”. Atti e Memorie della Deputazione di storia patria per le antiche provincie modenesi 8th ser., 10.185–202.Google Scholar
1958–59 “Paolo Diacono e Prisciano”. Memorie storiche forogiuliesi 43.159–172.Google Scholar
Biggs, Frederick M., Thomas D. Hill and Paul E. Szarmach
1990Sources of Anglo-Saxon Literary Culture: A Trial Version. Binghamton, N.Y.: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
Bischoff, Bernhard
1967 [1950] “Eine Sammelhandschrift Walahfrid Strabos (Cod. Sangall. 878)”. In his Mittelalterliche Studien vol. 2.34–51. Stuttgart: A. Hiersemann.Google Scholar
1967 [1960] “Muridac doctissimus plebis, ein irischer Grammatiker des IX. Jahrhunderts”. In his Mittelalterliche Studien vol. 2.51–56. Stuttgart: A. Hiersemann.Google Scholar
1981 [1972] “Die Bibliothek im Dienste der Schule”. In his Mittelalterliche Studien vol. 3.213–233. Stuttgart: Hiersemann.Google Scholar
1981 [1976] “Bannita: 1. syllaba, 2. littera”. In his Mittelalterliche Studien 3.243–247. Stuttgart: A. Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Bischoff, Bernhard and Ludwig Bieler
1956 “Fragmente zweier frühmittelalterlicher Schulbücher aus Glendalough”. Celtica 3.211–220. [Clemens]Google Scholar
Boas, M.
1930 “Cato und Julianus von Toledo”. Rheinisches Museum 79.183–196.Google Scholar
Boyer, Blanche B.
1937 “A Paris fragment of codex Bern 207”. Classical Philology 32.113–120.Google Scholar
Bradley, Henry
1921–1923 “On the text of Abbo of Fleury’s Quaestiones grammaticales ”. Proceedings of the British Academy pp. 173–180.Google Scholar
Brearley, Denis G.
1980 “A bibliography of recent publications concerning the history of grammar during the Carolingian Renaissance”. Studi Medievali. 3rd ser. 21.917–923.Google Scholar
Brunner, Karl
1961 “Sprachlehrbücher im Mittelalter”. Language and Society: Essays presented to Arthur M. Jensen on his Seventieth Birthday, 37–43. Copenhagen: Det Berlingske Bogtrykkeri.Google Scholar
Buffa, M. F.
1979 “Una pagina anonima di sintassi latina nell’VIII secolo”. Studi e ricerche dell’ Istituto di latino, Faccoltà di Magistero, Università di Genova 2.19–34.Google Scholar
Campbell, Jackson J.
1967 “Knowledge of rhetorical figures in Anglo-Saxon England”. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 66.1–20.Google Scholar
Cervani, Roberta
1979 “La pubblicazione di grammatiche e glossari mediolatini e lo studio della cultura medievale”. Cultura e scuola 70.44–49.Google Scholar
Clausen, Wendell Vernon
1948 See Bibliography II under Erchanbert.Google Scholar
Clausi, Benedetto
1990 “Elementi di ermeneutica monastica nel De schematibus et tropis di Beda”. Orpheus n.s. 11.277–307.Google Scholar
Closa Farres, J.
1976 “Notas sobre la difusión medieval hispana del Arte Menor de Elio Donato”. Anuario de Filologi̇́a 2.36–67.Google Scholar
Coallier, Christine
1986 “Le vocabulaire des arts libéraux dans le Periphyseon ”. Jean Scot écrivain, ed. by G.-H. Allard, 343–360. Montreal: Bellarmin.Google Scholar
Cobbs, Susan Parker
1937Prolegomena to the “Ars grammatica Tatvini”. Diss. Chicago.Google Scholar
Coletti, Maria Laetitia
1981 “La trattazione del patronimico nella grammatica medievale”. Studi e ricerche dell’Istituto di Latino, Università degli Studi di Genova, Facoltà di Magistero A31–12.Google Scholar
1982 “Citazioni latine come esempi di barbarismus nei commenti medievali irlandesi all’ Ars maior di Donato”. Sandalion 5.283–299.Google Scholar
1982–1983 “Gli esempi di soloecismus nei commenti irlandesi a Donato del sec. IX”. Romanobarbarica 7.77–109.Google Scholar
1983 “Il barbarismus e il soloecismus nei commentatori altomedievali di Donato alla luce della tradizione grammaticale greco-latina”. Orpheus n.s. 4.67–92.Google Scholar
Collignon, A.
1883 “Note sur une grammaire latine manuscrite du VIIIe siècle appartenant à la bibliothèque de Nancy contenant des fragments inédits de Virgilius Maro”. Revue de Philologie 2nd ser., 7.13–22.Google Scholar
Coronad, Lia
1981–1982 “La dottrina del tetrametro trocaico in Beda”. Romanobarbarica 6.53–62.Google Scholar
Curtius, Ernst Robert
1947 “Das mittelalterliche Bildungswesen und die Grammatik”. Romanische Forschungen 60.1–26.Google Scholar
De Marco, Maria
1952 “Remigii inedita”. Aevum 26.495–517.Google Scholar
1957 “Letture grammaticali a Lorsch nel s. X”. Aevum 31.273–277.Google Scholar
De Nonno, Mario
1979 “Contributo alla tradizione di Prisciano in area beneventano-cassinese: il Valliceli. C. 9”. Revue d’histoire des textes 9.123–139. [Hildericus and Ursus]Google Scholar
Della Casa, Adriana
1985 “Rassegna di studi sui grammatici latini (1934–1984)”. Bollettino di Studi Latini 15.85–113.Google Scholar
Dionisotti, Anna Carlotta
1982 “On Bede, grammars, and Greek.” Revue Bénédictine 92.111–141.Google Scholar
Donnini, M.
1984 “Sul De orthographia di Beda nel cod. Neap. IV A 34”. Studi e ricerche 6.35–41. Genoa: Istituto di Civiltà classica e medievale della Facoltà di Magistero.Google Scholar
Draak, Maartje
1967 “The higher teaching of Latin grammar in Ireland during the ninth century”. Mededelingen der koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, afd. Letterkunde, n.s. 30.109–144.Google Scholar
Dubreucq, Alain
1986 “Smaragde de Saint-Mihiel et son temps: enseignement et bibliothèques à l’époque carolingienne”. Mélanges de la Bibliothèque de la Sorbonne 7.7–36.Google Scholar
Dutton, Paul Edward
1992 “Evidence that Dubthach’s Priscian codex once belonged to Eriugena”. From Athens to Chartres: Neoplatonism and Medieval Thought. Studies in Honour of Edouard Jeauneau, ed. by Haijo Jan Westra, 15–45. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, W. A.
1969 “Das Kaufunger Fragment der Bonifatius-Grammatik”. Scriptorium 23.280–297.Google Scholar
Elder, John Petersen
1947 “Did Remigius of Auxerre comment on Bede’s De schematibus et tropis? Mediaeval Studies 9.141–150.Google Scholar
Esposito, Mario
1917 “A ninth-century commentary on Donatus”. Classical Quarterly 11.94–97, repr. in his Irish Books and Learning in Mediaeval Europe, ed. by Michael Lapidge. London: Variorum 1990.Google Scholar
Evans, G. R.
1982 “The grammar of predestination in the ninth century”. Journal of Theological Studies 33.134–145.Google Scholar
Fickermann, Norbert
1932 “Nachrichten. 408”. Neues Archiv 49.762–764. [Boniface]Google Scholar
1935 “Der Widmungsbrief des hl. Bonifatius”. Neues Archiv 50.210–221.Google Scholar
Fortgens, H. W.
1947 “De paedagoog Alcuin en zijn Ars grammatica”. Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 60.57–65.Google Scholar
Frey, J.
1886De Alcuini arte grammatica commentano. (= Jahresbericht über das königliche Gymnasium zu Münster ) Münster.Google Scholar
Funaioli, Gino
1911 “Su Giuliano Toletano”. Rivista di filologia e istruzione classica 39.42–79.Google Scholar
Gavinelli, Simona
1985 “Un manuale scolastico carolingio: il codice bolognese 797”. Aevum 59.181–195.Google Scholar
Gebauer, George John
1942Prolegomena to the “Ars grammatica Bonifatii”. Guilford, N.C. (diss. Chicago 1940).Google Scholar
Gibson, Margaret
1972 “Priscian, Institutiones grammatical A handlist of manuscripts”. Scriptorium 26.105–124.Google Scholar
1990 [1981] “Rãg. reads Priscian”. Charles the Bald. Court and Kingdom, ed. by Margaret T. Gibson and Janet L. Nelson, 261–266. Aldershot: Variorum.Google Scholar
1992 “Milestones in the study of Priscian, circa 800-circa 1200”. Viator 23.17–33.Google Scholar
Gładysz, Bronislas
1932–1933 “Éléments classiques et post-classiques de l’oeuvre de Bède De arte metrica ”. Eos 34.319–343.Google Scholar
Gneuss, Helmut
1990 “The study of language in Anglo-Saxon England”. Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 72.3–32.Google Scholar
Gribomont, Jean
1963 “Conscience philologique chez les scribes du haut moyen âge”. Settimane 10.601–630.Google Scholar
Guerreau-Jalabert, Anita
1979–80 “A propos du Quaestiones grammaticales d’Abbon de Fleury: essai de statistique lexicale”. Archivum Latinitatis Medii Aevi 42.85–128.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Galindo, M. A.
1989 “Sobre la presencia de los autores cristianos en los tratados latinos de gramática”. Helmantica 40.311–319.Google Scholar
Haslam, M. W.
1988 “On the Sedulius commentary on Donatus’ Ars maior ”. Revue d’Histoire des Textes 18.243–256.Google Scholar
Hauréau, B.
1894Singularités historiques et littéraires. Paris: Calmann Lévy. [Malsachanus]Google Scholar
Herren, Michael
1981 “Classical and secular learning among the Irish before the Carolingian Renaissance.” Florilegium 3.118–157.Google Scholar
1992 “Die Anfänge der Grammatikstudien auf den Britischen Inseln: von Patrick bis zur Schule von Canterbury”. Medialität und mittelalterliche insulare Literatur, ed. by Hildegard L. C. Tristram, 57–79. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Hofman, Rijcklof
1988 “Glosses in a ninth century Priscian Ms. probably attributable to Heiric of Auxerre († ca. 876) and their connections”. Studi Medievali 3rd ser. 29.805–839.Google Scholar
1992 “The Priscian text used in three ninth-century Irish Donatus commentaries”. Diversions of Galway (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 68), ed. by Anders Ahlqvist, 7–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Holtz, Louis
1971 “Tradition et diffusion de l’œuvre grammaticale de Pompée, commentateur de Donat”. Revue de philologie 45.48–83.Google Scholar
1972 “Sur trois commentaires irlandais de l’Art majeur de Donat au IXe siècle”. Revue d’Histoire des Textes 2.45–72.Google Scholar
1974 “Édition et tradition des manuels grammaticaux antiques et médiévaux”. Revue des études latines 52.75–82.Google Scholar
1975 “Le Parisinus Latinus 7530, synthèse cassinienne des arts libéraux.” Studi medievali 3rd ser. 16.97–152.Google Scholar
1977 “A l’école de Donat, de saint Augustin à Bède”. Latomus 36.522–538.Google Scholar
1977a “Grammairiens irlandais au temps de Jean Scot: quelques aspects de leur pédagogie”. Jean Scot Érigène et l’histoire de la philosophie, ed. by René Roques, 69–78. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
1977b “Le rôle des irlandais dans la transmission des grammaires latines”. Influence de la Grèce et de Rome sur l’Occident moderne (= Caesarodunum 12 bis), ed. by R. Chevallier, 55–65. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
1977c “La typologie des manuscrits grammaticaux latins”. Revue d’histoire des textes 7.247–267.Google Scholar
1978 “Sur les traces de Charisius”. Varron, grammaire antique et stylistique latine. Recueil offert à Jean Collari, 225–233. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
1981aDonat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical: étude sur l’Ars Donati et sa diffusion (IVe-IXe siècle) et édition critique. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
1981b “Irish grammarians and the Continent in the seventh century”. Columbanus and Merovingian Monasticism (= BAR International Series 113), ed. by H. B. Clarke and Mary Brennan, 135–152. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
1983a “Les grammairiens hiberno-latins étaient-ils des anglo-saxons?”. Feritia 2.170–184.Google Scholar
1983b “Nouveaux prolégomènes à l’édition du Liber in partibus Donati de Smaragde de Saint-Mihiel”. Bulletin de la Société nationale des antiquaires de France, 157–170.Google Scholar
1984 “Les manuscrits latins à gloses et à commentaires de l’Antiquité à l’époque carolingienne”. Atti del Convegno Internazionale II libro e il testo, ed. by Cesare Questa and Renato Raffaelli, 141–167. Urbino: Università degli studi.Google Scholar
1986 “La tradition ancienne du Liber in partibus Donati de Smaragde de Saint-Mihiel”. Revue d’Histoire des Textes 16.171–200.Google Scholar
1987 “Pline et les grammairiens. Le Dubius sermo dans le haut Moyen Âge”. Helmantica 38.233–254.Google Scholar
1988 “Les innovations théoriques de la grammaire carolingienne: peu de chose. Pourquoi?L’héritage des grammairiens latins de l’Antiquité aux Lumières, ed. by Irène Rosier, 133–145. Paris: Société pour l’Information Grammaticale.Google Scholar
1989 “L’enseignement de la grammaire au temps de Charles le Chauve”. Giovanni Scoto nel suo tempo: l’organizzazione del sapere in età carolingia, 153–169. Spoleto: Centro italiano di studi sull’alto Medioevo.Google Scholar
1989/1990 “Les nouvelles tendances de la pédagogie grammaticale au Xe siècle”. Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 24/25.163–173.Google Scholar
1991 “Murethach et l’influence de la culture irlandaise à Auxerre”. L’école carolingienne d’Auxerre de Murethach à Remi 810–908. Entretiens d’Auxerre 1989, ed. by Dominique Iogna-Prat, Colette Jeudy, Guy Lobrichon, 147–156. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
1992a “Continuité et discontinuité de la tradition grammaticale au VIIe siècle”. Le septième siècle. Changements et continuités, ed. by Jacques Fontaine & J. N. Hillgarth, 41–57. London: Warburg Institute.Google Scholar
1992b “La grammaire carolingienne”. Histoire des idées linguistiques 2. Le développement de la grammaire occidentale, ed. by Sylvain Auroux, 96–106. Liège: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Hovdhaugen, Even
1982Foundations of Western Linguistics: From the Beginning to the End of the First Millenium (sic) A.D. Oslo: Univer-sitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Huntsman, Jeffrey F.
1983 “Grammar”. The Seven Liberal Arts in the Middle Ages, ed. by David L. Wagner, 58–95. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Huygens, Rene B. C.
1954 “Remigiana”. Aevum 28.330–344.Google Scholar
Irvine, Martin
1986a “Anglo-Saxon literary theory exemplified in Old English poems: interpreting the Cross in The Dream of the Rood and Elene ”. Style 20.157–181. [Bede’s De schematibus et tropis ]Google Scholar
1986b “Bede the grammarian and the scope of grammatical studies in eighth-century Northumbria”. Anglo-Saxon England 15.15–44.Google Scholar
1987 “A guide to the sources of medieval theories of interpretation, signs, and the arts of discourse: Aristotle to Ockham”. Semiotica 63.89–108.Google Scholar
Isola, Antonio
1976 “Il De schematibus et tropis di Beda in rapporto al De doctrina Christiana di Agostino”. Romanobarbarica 1.71–82.Google Scholar
Jeudy, Colette
1971 “La tradition manuscrite des Partitiones de Priscien et la version longue du commentaire de Rémi d’Auxerre”. Revue d’Histoire des Textes 1.123–143.Google Scholar
1972 “ L’Institutio de nomine, pronomine et verbo de Priscien: manuscrits et commentaires médiévaux”. Revue d’Histoire des Textes 2.73–144.Google Scholar
1974a “L’Ars de nomine et verbo de Phocas: manuscrits et commentaires médiévaux”. Viator 5.61–156.Google Scholar
1974b “Les manuscrits de l’Ars de uerbo d’Eutychès et le commentaire de Rémi d’Auxerre”. Études de civilisation médiévale (IXe-XIIe siècles). Mélanges offerts à Edmond-René Labande, 421–436. Poitiers: C.É.S.C.M.Google Scholar
1977 “Israël le grammairien et la tradition manuscrite du commentaire de Remi d’Auxerre à l’Ars minor de Donat”. Studi Medievali 18.185–248.Google Scholar
1978a “Donat et commentateurs de Donat à l’abbaye de Ripoll au Xe siècle (ms. Barcelone, Archivo de la Corona de Aragón, Ripoll 46)”. Lettres latines du moyen âge et de la Renaissance, ed. by Guy Cambier, Carl Deroux and Jean Préaux, 56–75. Brussels: Collections Latomus.Google Scholar
1978b “Un manuscrit glosé d’Eutychès à Reims à l’époque de Rémi d’Auxerre (MS. Milano, Biblioteca Ambrosiana B. 71 sup.)”. Varron, grammaire antique et stylistique latine. Recueil offert à Jean Collari, 235–243. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
1979 “Un nouveau manuscrit du commentaire de Remi d’Auxerre à l’Ars maior de Donat”. Saints, Scholars and Heroes. Studies in Medieval Culture in Honour of Charles W. Jones, ed. by Margot H. King and Wesley M. Stevens, vol. 2.113–125. Collegeville, Minn.: Hill Monastic Manuscript Library.Google Scholar
1982a “Complément à un catalogue récent des manuscrits de Priscien”. Scriptorium 36.313–325.Google Scholar
1982b “Un manuscrit de Remi d’Auxerre à Corbie au début du Xe siècle”. La chanson de geste et le mythe carolingien. Mélanges René Louis, vol. 1.171–175. Saint-Père-sous-Vézelay: Musée Archéologique Régional.Google Scholar
1982–1983 “Le Scalprum Prisciani et sa tradition manuscrite”. Revue d’histoire des textes 12–13.181–193.Google Scholar
1984–1985 “Nouveaux fragments de textes grammaticaux”. Revue d’histoire des textes 14–15.131–141.Google Scholar
1985 “Le florilège grammatical inédit du manuscrit 8° 8 de la bibliothèque d’Erfurt”. Archivum Latinitatis Medii Aevi 44–45.91–128.Google Scholar
1986 “L’attitude de Rémi d’Auxerre face aux innovations linguistiques de Jean Scot”. Jean Scot écrivain, ed. by G.-H. Allard, 299–310. Montreal: Bellarmin and Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
1990a “A propos du mot paropsis: Isidore, Jean Scot et Rémi d’Auxerre”. Archives et Documents de la Société d’Histoire et d’Épistémologie des Sciences du Langage (SHESL) 2nd ser. 4.53–60.Google Scholar
1990b “Un commentaire anonyme de l’Ars minor de Donat”. De ortu grammaticae. Studies in Medieval Grammar and Linguistic Theory in Memory of Jan Pinborg (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 43), ed. by G. L. Bursill-Hall, Sten Ebbesen and Konrad Koerner, 133–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1991 “L’œuvre de Remi d’Auxerre: état de la question”. L’école carolingienne d’Auxerre de Murethach à Remi 810–908. Entretiens d’Auxerre 1989, ed. by Dominque Iogna-Prat, Colette Jeudy, Guy Lobrichon, 373–396. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Jeudy, Colette and Yves-François Riou
1975 “Tradition textuelle et commentaire des auteurs classiques latins conservés dans les manuscrits de la Bibliothèque Vaticane: III. Le commentaire de Rémi d’uxerre au livre III de l’Ars maior de Donat (ms. Vatican, Reg. lat. 1560).” Settimane di studio del Centro italiano di studi sull’alto medioevo 22.213–229.Google Scholar
Jolivet, Jean
1966 “Quelques cas de ‘platonisme grammatical’ du VIIe au XIIe siècle”. Mélanges offerts à René Crozet, ed. by Pierre Gallais and Yves-Jean Riou, vol. 1.93–99. Poitiers: Société d’Études Médiévales.Google Scholar
1977 “L’enjeu de la grammaire pour Godescalc”. Jean Scot Erigène et l’histoire de la philosophie, ed. by René Roques, 79–87. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Kaiinka, E.
1894 “Analecta latina”. Wiener Studien 16.78–120; 254–313. [Smaragdus; Distributio omnium specierum nominum; etc.]Google Scholar
Keil, Heinrich
1848Analecta grammatica. Halle: Typis Orphanotrophei.Google Scholar
1868De grammaticis quibusdam latinis infimae aetatis commentano. Erlangen: Joann. Paul. Adolph. Junge et filii.Google Scholar
Kerlouégan, François
1978 “Grammairiens latins du moyen âge”. Revue des études latines 56.85–89. [review of CCCM 40–40C]Google Scholar
1990 “Un exemple de metaphora reciproca dans le De excidio Britanniae: Gildas et le ‘Donat chrétien’”. Britain 400–600: Language and History, ed. by Alfred Bammesberger and Alfred Wollmann, 79–83. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kibre, Adele
1930Prolegomena to the Unpublished Text of Smaragdus’ Commentary on Donatus, “De partibus orationis”. (Diss. Chicago.)Google Scholar
King, Margot H.
1979 “ Grammatica mystica, a study of Bede’s grammatical curriculum”. Saints, Scholars and Heroes: Studies in Medieval Culture in Honour of Charles W. Jones, ed. by Margot H. King and Wesley M. Stevens, vol. 1.145–159. Collegeville, Minn.: Hill Monastic Manuscript Library.Google Scholar
Kleiner, Yu. A.
1985 “Latinskaja grammatičeskaja tradicija v Anglii VII-XI vv. (Beda, Alkuin, El’frik)” [“The Latin grammatical tradition in England, s.vii-s.xi (Bede, Alcuin, Ælfric)”]. Istorija lingvističeskix učenij: srednevekovaja Evropa, ed. by A. V. Desnickaja and S. D. Kacnel’son, 62–76. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Lage Cotos, María Elisa
1992 “Gramática y exégesis: sobre la interpretación de la elipsis en algunos autores hibérnicos”. Helmantica 43.41–49.Google Scholar
Lagorio, Valerie M.
1975a “An unreported manuscript of Bede’s De orthographia in Codex Vaticanus Reginensis Latinus 1587”. Manuscripta 19.98–106.Google Scholar
1975b “Bede’s De orthographia in codex Vat. Ottob. Lat. 687”. Classical Philology 70.206–208.Google Scholar
Lambert, Pierre-Yves
1981 “La traduction du pronom relatif latin dans les gloses en vieil-irlandais”. Études celtiques 18.121–133.Google Scholar
1982 “Les gloses du manuscrit BN lat. 10290”. Études celtiques 19.173–213.Google Scholar
1987a “Les gloses grammaticales brittoniques”. Études celtiques 24.285–308.Google Scholar
1987b “Les signes de renvois dans le Priscien de Saint-Gall”. Études celtiques 24.217–238.Google Scholar
Lambot, D. C.
1932 “Opuscules grammaticaux de Gottschalk”. Revue Bénédictine 44.120–124.Google Scholar
Lammert, Friedrich
1912 “Der Grammatiker Hieronymus des Mittelalters”. Berliner philologische Wochenschrift 32.1139–1140.Google Scholar
1913 “Zum Grammatiker Hieronymus des Mittelalters”. Berliner philologische Wochenschrift 33.1408.Google Scholar
Lane, Mary Charlotte
1941A Study of the Commentarium Ambrosianum in Donati Artem maiorem. Diss. Chicago.Google Scholar
Lapidge, Michael
1991 “Textual criticism and the literature of Anglo-Saxon England”. Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 73.17–45.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien
1979 “The transmission of the Ars Bonifacii and the Ars Tatuini ”. Revue d’histoire des textes 9.281–288.Google Scholar
1981 “Malsachanus reconsidered: a fresh look at a Hiberno-Latin grammarian”. Cambridge Medieval Celtic Studies 1.83–93.Google Scholar
1982aThe Insular Latin Grammarians. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
1982b “Notes on the dating and attribution of anonymous Latin grammars of the early Middle Ages”. Peritia 1.250–267.Google Scholar
1983 “The study of Latin grammar in eighth-century Southumbria”. Anglo-Saxon England 12.43–71.Google Scholar
1984a “Irish symptoms and the provenance of sixth- and seventh-century Latin grammars”. Matériaux pour une histoire des théories linguistiques, ed. by Sylvain Auroux et al., 77–85. Lille: Université de Lille III.Google Scholar
1984b “The first foreign-language grammars.” The Incorporated Linguist 23.211–216.Google Scholar
1985 “Linguistics in the earlier Middle Ages: the Insular and Carolingian grammarians”. Transactions of the Philological Society 85.171–93.Google Scholar
1986a “Late Latin grammars in the early Middle Ages: a typological history”. Historiographia Linguistica 13.365–380.Google Scholar
1986b “Originality in the medieval normative tradition”. Studies in the History of Western Linguistics, ed. by Theodora Bynon and F. R. Palmer, 43–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Boniface]Google Scholar
1986c “When is Donatus not Donatus? Versions, variants and new texts”. Peritia 5.235–261. [ Ars Toletana ]Google Scholar
1987 “Grammars and language change: an eighth-century case”, in Latin vulgaire – latin tardif, ed. by József Herman, 133–144. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. [Boniface]Google Scholar
1990 “The history of morphology: expression of a change in consciousness”. Understanding the Historiography of Linguistics: Problems and Projects, ed. by Werner Hüllen, 61–74. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
1991 “A French metamorphosis of an English grammatical genre: declinationes into terminationes ”. France and the British Isles in the Middle Ages and Renaissance: Essays by Members of Girton College, Cambridge, in Memory of Ruth Morgan, ed. by Gillian Jondorf and David N. Dumville, 17–42. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
1992a “Carolingian grammarians and theoretical innovation”. Diversions of Galway. Papers on the History of Linguistics (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 68), ed. by Anders Ahlqvist et al., 27–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1992b “La grammaire latine durant le haut moyen âge”. Histoire des idées linguistiques 2. Le développement de la grammaire occidentale, ed. by Sylvain Auroux, 83–95. Liège: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. “Grammar”. Medieval Latin Studies: An Introduction and Bibliographical Guide Ed. by Frank A. C. Mantello and A. G. Rigg Washington, D.C. The Catholic University of America Press grammatical terminology
1993 “The study of grammar”. Culture and Society under the Carolingians, ed. by Rosamond McKitterick, 88–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leclercq, J.
1948 “Smaragde et la grammaire chrétienne”. Revue du moyen âge latin 4.15–22.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Paul
1931 “Ein neuentdecktes Werk eines angelsächsischen Grammatikers vorkarolingischer Zeit”. Historische Vierteljahrschrift 26.738–756. [Boniface]Google Scholar
1932 “Die Grammatik aus Aldhelms Kreise”. Historische Vierteljahrschrift 27.758–771. [Boniface]Google Scholar
Lemoine, Louis
1986 “Les méthodes d’enseignement dans la Bretagne du haut Moyen Âge d’après les manuscrits bretons: l’exemple du Paris, B.N., Lat. 10290”. Landévennec et le monachisme breton dans le haut Moyen Âge, 45–63. Landévennec: Association Landévennec, pp. 45–63.Google Scholar
1989 “Symptômes insulaires dans un manuscrit breton de l’Ars de verbo d’Eutychès”. Études celtiques 26.145–157.Google Scholar
Lentini, Anselmo
1932 “Ilderico e la sua Grammatica contenuta nel codice cassinese 299”. Bullettino dell’Istituto Storico Italiano e Archivio Muratoriano 47.167–72; repr. in his Medioevo Letterario Cassinese, 411–416.Google Scholar
1952 “La grammatica d’Ilderico documento dell’attività letteraria di Paolo Diacono”. Atti del 2° Congresso Internazionale di studi sull’Alto Medioevo, 217–240. Spoleto: Centro Italiano di Studi sull’Alto Medioevo; repr. in his Medioevo Letterario Cassinese, 451–476.Google Scholar
1953a “Citazioni di grammatici e di classici nell’Ars di Ilderico”. Aevum 27.240–250; repr. in his Medioevo Letterario Cassinese, 477–489.Google Scholar
1953b “L’Ars Hilderici del codice cassinese 299”. Benedictina 7.191–217; repr. in his Medioevo Letterario Cassinese, 417–450.Google Scholar
1988Medioevo Letterario Cassinese. Scritti vari (= Miscellanea Cassinese 57), ed. by Faustino Avagliano. Montecassino: [Abbazia].Google Scholar
Leonhardt, Jürgen
1989Dimensio syllabarum. Studien zur lateinischen Prosodie- und Verslehre von der Spätantike bis zur frühen Renaissance (= Hypomnemata 92). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Leotta, Rosario
1980 “Considerazioni sulla tradizione manoscritta del De pedum regulis di Aldelmo”. Giornale Italiano di Filologia 32.119–134.Google Scholar
Löfstedt, Bengt
1965Der hibernolateinische Grammatiker Malsachanus. Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.Google Scholar
1972a “Zu Tatwines Grammatik”. Arctos N.S. 7.47–65.Google Scholar
1972b “Weitere Bemerkungen zu Tatwines Grammatik”. Acta Classica 15.85–94.Google Scholar
1976 “Zur Grammatik des Asper minor.” Latin Script and Letters 400–900, ed. by John J. O’Meara and Bernd Naumann, 132–140. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
1979 “Some linguistic remarks on Hiberno-Latin”. Studia Hibernica 19.161–169.Google Scholar
1979–80 “Notizen zu mittelalterlichen Grammatiken”. Archivum Latinitatis Medii Aevi 42.79–83. [Tatwine, Paulus Diaconus, Hildericus]Google Scholar
1980a “Zu den Quellen des hibernolateinischen Donatkommentars im cod. Ambrosianus L 22 sup.” Studi Medievali 3rd ser. 21.301–320.Google Scholar
1980b “Zwei weitere Handschriften mit der Ars Laureshamensis ”. Latomus 39.418–420.Google Scholar
1981 “Spät- und Vulgärlateinisches in der Sprache des Virgilius Maro Grammaticus.” Latomus 40.121–126.Google Scholar
1982 “Zum Wortschatz des Virgilius Maro Grammaticus”. Philologus 126.99–110.Google Scholar
1984 “Zu Sedulius Scottus’ Kommentar zu Donatus Maior”. Sacris Erudiri 27.433–442.Google Scholar
1986 “Nochmals zu Sedulius Scottus’ Kommentar zu Donatus Maior”. Sacris Erudiri 29.119–120.Google Scholar
1987 “Eine wenig beachtete hibernolateinische Grammatik”. Irland und die Christenheit: Bibelstudien und Mission, ed. by Próinséas Nĺ Chatháin and Michael Richter, 272–276. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. [Würzburg UB M.p.misc.f.28]Google Scholar
Luiselli, Bruno
1976 “Il De arte metrica di Beda di fronte alla tradizione metricologica tardo-latina”. Grammatici latini d’età imperiale: miscellanea filologica, 169–180. Genoa: Istituto di Filologia Classica e Medievale.Google Scholar
McKitterick, Rosamond
1989The Carolingians and the Written Word. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1990The Uses of Literacy in Early Mediaeval Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manitius, Max
1886 “Zu Aldhelm und Baeda”. Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historische Classe der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Vienna) 112.535–634.Google Scholar
1911aGeschichte der lateinischen Literatur des Mittelalters 1. Von Justinian bis zur Mitte des 10. Jahrhunderts. Munich: CH. Beck.Google Scholar
1911b “Zur karolingischen Literatur I. Remigius von Auxerre und Mico von St.-Riquier; III. Zu Smaragd von St.-Mihiel”. Neues Archiv 36.43–57; 60–66.Google Scholar
1912a “Micons von St. Riquier De primis syllabis”. Münchener Museum für Philologie des Mittelalters und der Renaissance 1.121–177.Google Scholar
1912b “Zur Grammatik Peters von Pisa”. Münchener Museum für Philologie des Mittelalters und der Renaissance 1.178–184.Google Scholar
1913 “Remigiusscholien”. Münchener Museum für Philologie des Mittelalters und der Renaissance 2.79–113.Google Scholar
Marenbon, John
1983Early Medieval Philosophy (480–1150): An Introduction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mariotti, Scevola
1966 “Accio in Malsacano”. Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 94.181–184.Google Scholar
Marsili, Aldo
1954 “De Smaragdi opere, quod Liber in partibus Donati vulgo inscribitur”. Studi mediolatini e volgari 2.71–96.Google Scholar
Martin, Lawrence T.
1984 “Bede as a linguistic scholar”. American Benedictine Review 35.204–217.Google Scholar
Matter, E. Ann
1990 “Alcuin’s question-and-answer texts”. Rivista di storia della filosofia n.s. 45.645–656.Google Scholar
Morelli, Camillo
1910 “I trattati di grammatica e retorica del cod. Casanatense 1086”. Rendiconti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei, Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche, ser. 5. 19.287–328. [Ursus]Google Scholar
Morin, Germain
1931 “Gottschalk retrouvé”. Revue Bénédictine 43.303–312.Google Scholar
Müller, Lucian
1865 “Versus Scoti cuiusdam de alphabeto”. Rheinisches Museum 20.357–374.Google Scholar
1867 “Zur Geschichte der lateinischen Grammatik im Mittelalter”. Rheinisches Museum 22.634–637.Google Scholar
Munzi, Luigi
1979 “Note testuali all’Ars grammatica di Giuliano di Toledo”. Annali dell Istituto Universitario Orientale di Napoli. Seminario di Studi del Mondo Classico. Sezione filologico-letteraria 1.171–173.Google Scholar
1980 “Cipriano in Giuliano Toletano Ars gramm. 197,52–54 M.Y.Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 108.320–321.Google Scholar
1980–81 “Ancora sul testo dell’ Ars grammatica di Giuliano di Toledo”, ibid. 2–3.229–231.Google Scholar
Negri, Angela Maria
1959 “De codice Bononiensi 797”. Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica n.s. 37.260–277.Google Scholar
Neuhauser, Walter
1983 “Ein bisher unbekannter Textzeuge eines mittelalterlichen Donat-Kommentars (Murethach, 9. Jh.)”. Festschrift für Robert Muth, ed. by Paul Händel and Wolf gang Meid, 251–278. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Norberg, Dag
1975–1976 “Latin scolaire et latin vivant”. Archivum Latinitatis Medii Aevi 40.51–63.Google Scholar
Ó Cuív, Brian
1981 “Medieval Irish scholars and classical Latin literature”. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 81C.239–248.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. R.
1976 “Alcuin’s Priscian ”. Latin Script and Letters A.D. 400–900, ed. by John J. O’Meara and Bernd Naumann, 222–235. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Orchard, A. P. McD.
1987–88 “Some aspects of seventh-century Hiberno-Latin syntax: a statistical approach”. Peritia 6–7.158–201.Google Scholar
Palmer, Robert B.
1959 “Bede as textbook writer: a study of his De arte metrica Speculum 34.573–584.Google Scholar
Passalacqua, Marina
1978I codici di Prisciano. Rome: Storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
1988 “Un manuscrit ‘cultivé’ de Saint-Amand: le Par. lat. 7498”. L’héritage des grammairiens latins de l’Antiquité aux Lumières, ed. by Irène Rosier, 147–154. Paris: Société pour l’Information Grammaticale.Google Scholar
Piacente, L.
1986–1987 “Un nuovo frammento ciceroniano in Beda”. Romanobarb arica 9.229–245.Google Scholar
Poli, Diego
1984 “La ‘beatitudine’ fra esegesi e grammatica nell’Irlanda altomedioevale”. Giornale italiano di filologia 36.231–244.Google Scholar
Riché, Pierre
1962Éducation et culture dans l’occident barbare VIe-VIIIe siècles. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
1979Les écoles et l’enseignement dans l’Occident chrétien de la fin du Ve siècle au milieu du XIe siècle. Paris: Aubier Montaigne.Google Scholar
de Rijk, L. M.
1963 “On the curriculum of the arts of the trivium at St. Gall from c. 850-c. 1000”. Vivarium 1.35–86.Google Scholar
Roger, Maurice
1905aL’enseignement des letteres classiques d’Ausone à Alcuin. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
1905bArs Malsachani. Traité du verbe publié d’après le ms. lat. 13026 de la Bibliothèque nationale. Paris: Alphonse Picard et fils.Google Scholar
1906 “Le Commentariolum in artem Eutycii de Sedulius Scottus”. Revue de Philologie 2nd ser. 30.122–123.Google Scholar
Sabbadini, Remigio
1903 “Spogli Ambrosiani latini: commenti a Donato”. Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 11.165–185.Google Scholar
Scaglione, Aldo D.
1970 “The historical study of ars grammatica: a bibliographic survey”. In his Ars grammatica, 11–43. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Schindel, Ulrich
1968 “Die Quellen von Bedas Figurenlehre”. Classica et Mediaevalia 29.169–186.Google Scholar
1975Die lateinischen Figurenlehren des 5. bis 7. Jahrhunderts und Donats Vergilkommentar (mit zwei Editionen) (= Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 3rd ser., 91). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Schmitz, W.
1908 Alcuins Ars grammatica, die lateinische Schulgrammatik der karolingischen Renaissance. Ratingen: Peter Jos. Brehmen. (Diss. Greifswald.)Google Scholar
Shanzer, Danuta
1984 “Tatwine: an independent witness to the text of Martianus Capella’s De grammatica? ”. Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 112.292–313.Google Scholar
Sivo, Vito
1981 “Studi sui trattati grammaticali mediolatini”. Quaderni Medievali 11.232–244.Google Scholar
1987 “Appunti sull’ Opus prosodiacum di Micone di Saint-Riquier. Gli estratti del codice Parigino Bibl. Nat. lat. 8499”. Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia, Università degli Studi, Bari, 30.217–236.Google Scholar
1990 “Nuovi studi sui trattati grammaticali mediolatini”. Quaderni medievali 30.267–284.Google Scholar
Strati, Roberta
1982 “Venanzio Fortunato (e altre fonti) nell’Ars grammatica di Giuliano di Toledo”. Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 110.442–445.Google Scholar
1984 “Ancora sulle citazioni di Giuliano di Toledo (Ars grammatica e De partibus orationis)”. Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 112.196–199.Google Scholar
Strecker, Karl
1922 “Studien zu karolingischen Dichtern. I. Zu Micons Schrift De primis syllabis”. Neues Archiv 43.479–487.Google Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre
1985 “Latijnse grammatica en de vroege middeleeuwen”. Klio 14.82–95.Google Scholar
Taeger, Burkhard
1978 “Exzerpte aus Martianus Capella in einer frühen hibernolateinischen Grammatik (Anonymus ad Cuimnanum)”. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 100.388–420.Google Scholar
Thurot, Charles
1868Extraits de divers manuscrits latins pour servir à l’histoire des doctrines grammaticales au Moyen Age. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, repr. Frankfurt: Minerva 1964.Google Scholar
1870–72 “Un opuscule grammatical de Sedulius”. Revue Celtique 1.264–265.Google Scholar
Tolkiehn, Johannes
1912 “Der Kirchenvater Hieronymus als Donaterklärer”. Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift 32.766–767.Google Scholar
1913 “Noch einmal der Donatkommentar des Hieronymus”. Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift 33.447–448.Google Scholar
Vineis, Edoardo
1988 “Grammatica e filosofia del linguaggio in Alcuino”. Studi e saggi linguistici 28.403–429.Google Scholar
Vineis, Edoardo and Alfonso Maierù
1990 “La linguistica medioevale”. Storia della linguistica, ed. by Giulio C. Lepschy, 11–168. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
van de Vyver, A.
1935 “Dicuil et Micon de Saint-Riquier”. Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire 14.25–47.Google Scholar
Wright, Roger
1982Late Latin and Early Romance in Spain and Carolingian France. Liverpool: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
1983 “Unity and diversity among the Romance languages”. Transactions of the Philological Society 81.1–22.Google Scholar
Zaffagno, Elena
1976 “La dottrina ortografica di Beda”. Romanobarbarica 1.325–339.Google Scholar