The Spatial Language of Time
Metaphor, metonymy, and frames of reference
The Spatial Language of Time presents a crosslinguistically valid state-of-the-art analysis of space-to-time metaphors, using data mostly from English and Wolof (Africa) but additionally from Japanese and other languages. Metaphors are analyzed in terms of their most direct motivation by basic human experiences (Grady 1997a; Lakoff & Johnson 1980). This motivation explains the crosslinguistic appearance of certain metaphors, but does not say anything about temporal metaphor systems that deviate from the types documented here. Indeed, we observe interesting culture- and language-specific metaphor phenomena. Refining earlier treatments of temporal metaphor and adapting to temporal experience Levinson’s (2003) idea of frames of reference, the author proposes a contrast between perspective-neutral and perspective-specific frames of reference in temporal metaphor that has important crosslinguistic ramifications for the temporal semantics of FRONT/BEHIND expressions. This book refines the cognitive-linguistic approach to temporal metaphor by analyzing the extensive temporal structure in what has been considered the source domain of space, and showing how temporal metaphors can be better understood by downplaying the space-time dichotomy and analyzing metaphor structure in terms of conceptual frames. This book is of interest to linguists, psychologists, anthropologists, philosophers, and others who may have wondered about relationships between space and time.
[Human Cognitive Processing, 42] 2014. xxv, 340 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
List of diagrams
List of tables
Abbreviations and special symbols
Part I. Temporal metaphor and ego’s perspective
Introduction: Talking about time as if it were space
The deictic nature of Moving Ego and Ego-centered Moving Time expressions
The experiential bases (grounding, motivation) of Moving Ego and Ego-centered Moving Time
From earlier to later
Frame of reference and alternate construals of ego-centered time
Part II. Perspectival neutrality
A field-based frame of reference
The psychological reality of sequence is relative position on a path
Illustrating the field-based/ego-perspective contrast: The case of sequence is relative position in a stack
Part III. The temporal semantics of in-front and behind
The contrasting front/behind schemas of sequence is relative position on a path and Moving Ego
The crosslinguistic pairing of in-front and behind with ‘earlier’ and ‘later’
The alignment of ego with a field-based frame of reference
When back is not the opposite of front: A temporal relative frame of reference in Wolof
The Ego-opposed temporal metaphor and contexts of shared perspective
Modes of construal of front and behind
In search of primary metaphors of time
Part IV. Location without translational motion
Expressions of static temporal “location”
Beyond metaphor and metonymy: Mental spaces and conceptual integration
Other-centered Moving Time and Wolof fekk ‘become co-located with’
Times as bounded regions
Part V. Fundamentally different temporal concepts
Having and wasting Wolof counterparts of time
“Time is not a mystery when you examine how people talk about events—remembered, ongoing, anticipated. Kevin Moore has done just that, in a detailed and insightful exploration of temporal expressions in several unrelated languages. His in-depth description of Wolof is worth a book in itself. With the addition of English, Japanese, and Aymara the result is a valuable contribution to comparative cognitive linguistics. And above all, Moore has contributed an exhaustive and carefully considered reanalysis of the conceptual domains of time and space, showing that conceptions of space also have temporal characteristics. Moore’s fresh approach goes beyond space-based metaphors to include metonymy and blending, and to solve old puzzles by distinguishing between motion and location in space, and between ego-centered and field-based fields of reference. The Spatial Language of Time is a landmark in a series devoted to cognitive foundations of language structure and use.”
Dan I. Slobin, University of California, Berkeley
“In everyday life, we take for granted the metaphors we live by, and have no awareness of the extraordinary thought processes that lie behind them. Kevin Moore's admirable book explores the many dimensions involved for "time as space," with unprecedented rigor and scholarship.
Moore's compelling analysis of surprisingly deep conceptual mappings is a major contribution to cognitive science and linguistics.”
Moore's compelling analysis of surprisingly deep conceptual mappings is a major contribution to cognitive science and linguistics.”
Gilles Fauconnier, UCSD
“Spatial metaphors for time have become a major theme in cognitive science and linguistics. Kevin Moore's thoughtful book, The Spatial Language of Time, not only adds to the crosslinguistic comparative range of our understanding of spatiotemporal metaphor - it also raises the level of detail in linguistic analysis of the mappings between the two domains. It is a valuable contribution to linguistics, but also to the general study of cognition and of culture.”
Eve Sweetser, University of California, Berkeley
“The book has a cohesive objective about metaphor that is established in Chapter 1 and restated again in the conclusion, namely to “explore the details of certain spatial construals of time as thoroughly as possible for a few languages, in order to gain an understanding of some of the principles involved in applying spatial concepts to time.” Each of the book’s 22 chapters helps develop and further this objective through a detailed description of metaphor in both English and Wolof. Moore weaves connections between the two languages with finesse, letting the reader clearly see the commonalities and providing explanations for areas of difference. This book is an excellent resource for researchers interested in conceptual metaphors of time, providing a unique, cross-linguistic perspective to the ongoing conversation.”
Kathryn Bailey Farmer, University of North Texas, on Linguist List 26.1329 (09/03/2015)
“Moore provides a comprehensive account of the metaphorical understanding of time through space, with a new focus on Wolof, his language of specialization. His work represents a valuable contribution to the literature on human cognition in general, and on how people in Anglo-American and Senegalese cultures use the Spatial Language of Time.”
José Antonio Jódar-Sánchez, San José State University, in Metaphor and the Social World Vol. 5:1 (2015)
Cited by 30 other publications
No author info given
Brdar, Mario, Rita Brdar-Szabó & Benedikt Perak
DICKEY, STEPHEN M.
FEIST, MICHELE I. & SARAH E. DUFFY
Jódar Sánchez, José Antonio
Li, Heng, Van Quynh Bui & Yu Cao
Li, Heng & Yu Cao
Li, Heng & Yu Cao
Moore, Kevin Ezra
MOORE, KEVIN EZRA
Moore, Kevin Ezra
Napoli, Donna Jo & Lorraine Leeson
Pagán Cánovas, Cristóbal
Rickles, Dean & Maria Kon
Sinha, Chris & Peter Gärdenfors
Turner, Sarah, Jeannette Littlemore, Danielle Fuller, Karolina Kuberska & Sheelagh McGuinness
Valenzuela, Javier & Daniel Alcaraz Carrión
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Allen, Robert & Clifford Hill
1997 The unergative-unaccusative distinction and the benefactive applicative in Amharic. In Bailey, Moore & Moxley (eds.), 1–13.
Axmaker, Shelly, Annie Jaisser & Helen Singmaster
Bailey, Ashlee C., Kevin E. Moore & Jeri L. Moxley
1999 Seeing Clearly : Frame Semantic, Psycholinguistic, and Cross-Linguistic Approaches to the Semantics of the English Verb See. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
2000b On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In Barcelona (eds.), 31–58.
2002 Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In Dirven & Pörings (eds.), 207–277.
Barnden, John A.
Bender, Andrea, Giovanni Bennardo & Sieghard Beller
Bender, Andrea, Sieghard Beller & Giovanni Bennardo
Bender, Andrea, Annelie Rothe-Wulf, Lisa Hüther & Sieghard Beller
2010 The language-specificity of conceptual structure: Path, fictive motion and time relations. In Malt & Wolff (eds.), 111–137.
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Carolyn O’Meara
2012 Vectors and frames of reference: Evidence from Seri and Yucatec. In Filipović & Jaszczolt (eds.) 2012b, 217–249.
1997 Evidence for metaphoric representation: Perspective in space and time. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society page 869.
Boroditsky, Lera & Michael Ramscar
Boroditsky, Lera, Orly Fuhrman & Kelly McCormick
Boroditsky, Lera & Alice Gaby
Brdar, Mario, Marija Omazic
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1998 From body to space and time: Hausa gaba and baya . In Peter Zima & Veronicka Tax (eds.), Language and Location in Space and Time , 36–44. HAL-Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société. http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/.
Casad, Eugene H.
Casasanto, Daniel, Lera Boroditsky, W. Phillip, J. Greene, S. Goswami & Bocanegra-Thiel
, et al 2004 How deep are effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English, Indonesian, Greek, and Spanish. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner & T. Regier (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 575–580. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Casasanto, Daniel & Lera Boroditsky
Casasanto, Daniel & Kyle Jasmin
CENTRE D’ETUDE DES CIVILISATIONS, DAKAR
n.d.) Démb ak tey: Cahiers du mythe . No. 3 Kocc Barma Faal. Les Nouvelles Éditions Africaines.
2000 Loci of diversity and convergence in thought and language. In Pütz & Verspoor (eds.), 101–123.
Chang, Nancy, Daniel Gildea & Srini Narayanan
Cissé, Mame Thierno, Mammadu Guèye & Mangoné Touré
1996b Communities, Commonalities, and Communication. In Gumperz & Levinson (eds.), 324–355.
Craig, Cathy & Reinoud Bootsma
Cruise O'Brien, D.B.
1998 Précis de grammaire wolof. Journal of Asian and African Studies 56.
Dirven, René & Ralf Pörings
Duchan, Judith, Gail Bruder & Lynne Hewitt
Duffy, Sarah E. & Michele I. Feist
In press. “Individual differences in the interpretation of ambiguous statements about time.” Cognitive Linguistics .
1999 Congruence by degree: On the relation between metaphor and cultural models. In Gibbs & Steen (eds.), 205–218.
2001 Space on hand: The exploitation of signing space to illustrate abstract thought. In Meredith Gattis (eds.), 147–174.
2000 On linguocentrism. In Pütz & Verspoor (eds), 125–157.
Evans, Vyvyan & Paul Chilton
Fauconnier, Gilles & Eve Sweetser
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
2008 Rethinking metaphor. In Raymond Gibbs (eds.), 53–66.
Fedden, Sebastian & Lera Boroditsky
1999 Metonymic hierarchies: The conceptualization of stupidity in German idiomatic expressions. In Panther & Radden (eds.), 309–332.
2000 Refining the inheritance hypothesis: interaction between metaphoric and metonymic hierarchies. In Barcelona (eds.), 59–78.
Filipović, Luna & Kasia Jaszczolt
Fillmore, Charles & Beryl Atkins
Fillmore, Charles & Collin Baker
Fillmore, Charles, Collin Baker & Hiroaki Sato
2004 FrameNet as a “Net”. Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation LREC 4, 1091–1094.
1982b The past and the future: are they coming or going? In Monica Macaulay, Orin Gensler, Claudia Brugman, Inese Civkulis, Amy Dahlstrom, Katherine Krile & Rob Sturm (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society . 322–334.
Funk and Wagnalls
2006 A Grammar of Kuuk Thaayorre. PhD. Dissertation. University of Melbourne.
Geissler, Hans-Georg, Frank-Uwe Schebera & Raul Kompass
2001 Spatial metaphors in temporal reasoning. In Meredith Gattis (eds.), 203–222.
Gentner, Dedre, Brian Bowdle, Phillip Wolff & Consuelo Boronat
Gentner, Dedre, and Donald R. Gentner
Gentner, Dedre, M. Imai & L. Boroditsky
1999 Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In Gibbs & Steen (eds.), 145–166.
2012 Universals and specifics of ‘time’ in Russian. In Filipovic! & Jaszczolt (eds.) 2012b, 167–188.
1995 From three respectable horses’ mouths: Metonymy and conventionalization in a diachronically differentiated data base. In Luis Goossens, Paul Pauwels, Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen & Johan Vanparys (eds.), By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective , 175–204. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
1997a Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. PhD. Dissertation. University of California at Berkeley.
1999 A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. In Gibbs & Steen (eds.), 79–100.
Grady, Joseph & Christopher Johnson
2002 Converging evidence for the notions of subscene and primary scene . In Dirven & Pörings (eds.), 533–554.
Grady, Joseph, Todd Oakley & Seana Coulson
1999 Blending and metaphor. In Gibbs & Steen (eds.), 101–124.
Grebe, M. Ester
Greenberg, J.H., C.A. Ferguson & E. Moravcsik
Gumperz, John & Stephen Levinson
1996b Introduction: Linguistic relativity reexamined. In Gumperz & Levinson (eds.), 1–18.
1996c Introduction to part III. In Gumperz & Levinson (eds.), 225–231.
1996b Language form and communicative practices. In Gumperz & Levinson (eds.), 232–270.
Hardman, M, J. Vásquez & J.D. Yapita
Harris, L. & E. Strommen
1996 Projections, transpositions, and relativity. In Gumperz & Levinson (eds.), 271–323.
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991b From cognition to grammar: evidence from African languages. In Traugott & Heine (eds.), 149–188.
Heine, Bernd, Tom Guldemann, Christa Kilian-Hatz, Donald A. Lessau, Heinz Roberg, Mathias Schladt & Thomas Stolz
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
(n.d.) Motion predicates and aspectual profile. Wellesley College: manuscript.
Hidalgo, Jorge, Virgilio Schiappacasse, Hans Niemayer, Carlos Aldunate & Pedro Mege
eds.), Etnografia: Sociedades Indigenas Contemporáneas y su Ideologia . Santiago (Chile): Andrés Bello.
1978 Linguistic representation of spatial and temporal orientation. In Jeri Jaeger, Anthony Woodbury, Farrell Ackerman, Christine Chiarello, Orin Gensler, John Kingston, Eve Sweetser, Henry Thompson & Kenneth Whistler (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 524–538.
Hiraga, Masako, Chris Sinha & Sherman Wilcox
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
1999a Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: the case of see . In Hiraga, Sinha & Wilcox (eds.), 155–169.
Juuf, Mamadu Jara
Kay, Paul & C.K. McDaniel
Kesteloot, Lilyan & Chérif Mbodj
2009a Concepts of time. In Klein & Li (eds.), 5–38.
2009b How time is encoded. In Klein & Li (eds.), 39–81.
1999 Frame and contiguity: On the cognitive bases of metonymy and certain types of word formation. In Panther & Radden (eds.), 139–167.
Kövecses, Zoltán & Günter Radden
2006 Extending spatial frames of reference to temporal concepts. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, July 2006 Vancouver, BC. 447–452.
2008 The neural theory of metaphor. In Gibbs (ed.), 17–38.
2012 Linguistic manifestations of the space-time (dis)analogy. In Filipović & Jaszczolt (eds) 2012b, 191–215.
Le Guen, Olivier & Lorena Ildefonsa Pool Balam
Le Runigo, Cyrille, Nicolas Benguigui & Benoit Bardy
Levinson, Stephen C. & Asifa Majid
Lucy, John. A.
Malt, Barbara C. & Phillip Wolff
Matlock, Teenie, Michael Ramscar & Lera Boroditsky
1996 Subjective-change expressions in Japanese and their cognitive and linguistic bases. In Fauconnier & Sweetser (eds.), 124–156.
McGlone, Matthew & Jennifer Harding
2008 Imagery for speaking. Accessed online 22 July 2012 at mcneilllab.uchicago.edu/pdfs/imagery_for_speaking_2008.pdf
Moore, Kevin Ezra
1997a The conventional association of a lexeme with a metaphor: The case of the Wolof verb fekk-e . In Marjolijn Verspoor, Kee Dong Lee & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning: Proceedings of the Bi-annual ICLA Meeting in Albuquerque, July 1995 , 207–229 [Current issues in linguistic theory 150]. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
1997b Parameters of meaning in the spatial structure of temporal semantics: an investigation of Wolof lexicon and grammar. In Bailey, Moore & Moxley (eds.), 86–97.
1999 Metaphor, linguistic practice, and the temporal meanings of gannaaw ‘back’ and kanam ‘front’ in Wolof. In Chang, Steve; Lily Liaw; & Josef Ruppenhofer (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society . 225–237.
2012 A metaphor of static temporal ‘location’ in Wolof and English: Metonymy, motivation, and morphosyntax. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society .
Munro, Pamela & Dieynaba Gaye
Njie, Codou Mbassy
1988 Interpretation under ambiguity. In Axmaker, Jaisser & Singmaster (eds.), 188–201.
Núñez, Rafael & Kensy Cooperrider
Núñez, Rafael, Kensy Cooperrider, D. Doan & Jürg Wassmann
Núñez, Rafael & Carlos Cornejo
Núñez, Rafael, Benjamin Motz & Ursina Teuscher
Núñez, Rafael & Eve Sweetser
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda Thornburg
Pederson, Eric, Eve Danziger, David Wilkins, Stephen Levinson, Sotaro Kita & Gunter Senft.
Peirce, Charles Sanders.
Pütz, Martin & Marjolijn Verspoor
2002 How metonymic are metaphors? In Dirven & Pörings (eds.), 407–434.
2011 Spatial time in the West and the East. In Brdar et al.. (eds.), 1–40.
Radden, Günter & Zoltán Kövecses.
1999 Towards a theory of metonymy. In Panther & Radden (eds.), 17–59.
Radden, Günter & Klaus-Uwe Panther.
2004 Introduction: Reflections on motivation. In Radden & Panther (eds.), 1–46.
Radden, Günter & Klaus-Uwe Panther
Ramscar, Michael, Teenie Matlock & Melody Dye
Regier, Terry, Paul Kay, Aubrey L. Gilbert & Richard B. Ivry
Rice, Sally, Dominiek Sandra & Mia Vanrespaille
1999 Prepositional semantics and the fragile link between space and time. In Hiraga, Sinha & Wilcox (eds.), 107–127.
1997 From body to argumentation: grammaticalization as a fractal property of language (the case of Wolof ginnaaw ). In Bailey, Moore & Moxley (eds.), 116–127.
1996 Alternate grounds in the interpretation of deictic expressions. In Fauconnier & Sweetser (eds.), 227–261.
Schmidt, Goran & Marija Omazic
! 2011 Time metaphors in English and Croatian: A corpus-based study. In Brdar et al.. (eds.), 235–246.
Shinohara, Kazuko & Yoshihiro Matsunaka
2010 Frames of reference, effects of motion, and lexical meanings of Japanese front/back terms. In Evans & Chilton (eds.), 293–315.
Shinohara, Kazuko & Prashant Pardeshi
Silva Sinha, Vera da, Chris Sinha, Wany Sampaio & Jörg Zinken.
2012 Event-based time intervals in an Amazonian culture. In Filipović & Jaszczolt (eds) 2012b, 15–35.
Sinha, Chris, Vera da Silva Sinha, Jörg Zinken & Wany Sampaio
1996 From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In Gumperz & Levinson (eds.), 70–96.
2012 “Featured guest: Dan Slobin”. [Web posting from The Economist website. Accessed21 July 2012 at http://www.economist.com/debate/days/view/631]
Sullivan, Karen Sorensen.
2007 Grammar in Metaphor: A Construction Grammar Account of Metaphoric Language. PhD. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
Sullivan, Karen & Eve Sweetser
1988 The Experiential Basis of the Grammar of Space: Evidence from the Languages of the World. Ph.D. Dissertation. State University of New York at Buffalo.
1988 Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In Axmaker, Jaisser & Singmaster (eds.), 389–405.
Taylor, John R.
2004 The ecology of constructions. In Radden & Panther (eds.), 49–73.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs.
1978 On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In Greenberg, Ferguson & E. Moravcsik (eds.), 369–400.
1986 From polysemy to internal semantic reconstruction. In Vassiliki Nikiforidou, Mary VanClay, Mary Niepokui & Deborah Feder (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 539–550.
1988 Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In Axmaker, Jaisser & Singmaster (eds.), 406–416.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Bernd Heine
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Ekkehard König.
1991 The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott & Heine (eds.), 189–218.
1978 The nature of future tenses . In Greenberg, Ferguson & Moravcsik (eds.), 83–123.
van Kessel, Juan
1996a Los aymaras contemporáneos de Chile [The Aymara of contemporary Chile]. In Hidalgo et al.. (eds.), 47–67.
1996b La cosmovisión aymara [The Aymara cosmovision]. In Hidalgo et al.. (eds.), 169–187.
A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic . Beirut: Librairie du Liban/London: MacDonald & Evans Ltd.
Whorf, Benjamin Lee.
1999 Spatial conceptualization of time in Chinese. In Hiraga, Sinha & Wilcox (eds.), 69–84.
Zacks, Jeffrey M. & Barbara Tversky
2012 More than ‘time’: The grammaticalisation of the German tense system and ‘frame of reference’ as a crucial interface between space and time. In Filipović & Jaszczolt (eds) 2012a, 157–178.
2010 Temporal frames of reference. In Evans & Chilton (eds.), 479–498.
Zubin, David & Lynne Hewitt
1995 The deictic center: A theory of deixis in narrative. In Duchan, Bruder & Hewitt (eds.), 129–158.