The Poetics of Time – Metaphors and Blends in Language and Literature

| University of Neuchâtel
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027209870 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027264664 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
How does the concept of time, elusive and inconceivable as it may be, lend itself to verbal creativity? Is it possible to trace something like a “poetics of time”? This book embarks on this endeavor initiated by the assumption that verbal creativity can shed some new light on our understanding of time, challenging everyday linguistic patterns and manipulating mental representations in unforeseen ways. Drawing on empirical evidence from Modern Greek poetry, the book offers a unified account of time conceptualization along a continuum of various degrees of non-conventionality. It also shows, unlike what has been traditionally assumed in the literature, that creativity in the expression of time is not limited to metaphor but extends to other figurative tropes that are perhaps specific to poetry. Poetry thus transpires as an ideal testing frame for exploring temporal cognition and meaning construction alike.
[Figurative Thought and Language, 3]  2018.  xviii, 206 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
List of diagrams
xi
List of figures
xiii
List of tables
xv
Acknowledgements
xvii–xviii
Chapter 1. Time, cognition, and poetics
1–23
Chapter 2. The conceptual structure of time in MG
25–73
Chapter 3. Creative metaphors of time
75–126
Chapter 4. Highly creative metaphors of time
127–153
Chapter 5. Non-metaphorical figurative expressions of time
155–173
Chapter 6. Time from metaphor and beyond?
175–186
References
187–202
Index
203–206
References

References

Aitchison, J.
(1987) Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Akhundov, M. D.
(1986) Conceptions of space and time: Sources, evolution, direction. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Allan, K.
(1995) The anthropocentricity of the English word(s) back . Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 11–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alverson, H.
(1994) Semantics and experience: Universal metaphors of time, in English, Mandarin, Hindi and Sesotho. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Antonopoulou, E., & Nikiforidou, K.
(2002) Deictic motion and the adoption of perspective in Greek. Pragmatics, 12(3), 273–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arstila, V., & Loyd, D.
(2014) Subjective time: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of temporality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, A.
(2007)  Before and after: Relations of anteriority and posteriority along ‘paths’ of conceptual structure. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 5, 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, S., Clear, J., & Ostler, N.
(1992) Corpus design criteria. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 7, 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aurnage, M., Hickmann, M., & Vieu, L.
(Eds.) (2007) The categorization of spatial entities in language and cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bachelard, G.
(1936/1993) La dialectique de la durée. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
(1932/1994) L’ intuition de l’ instant. Paris: Le Livre de Poche.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A.
(1995) Metaphorical models of romantic love in Romeo and Juliet . Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 667–688. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, J. E.
(1998) Time’s pendulum: The quest to capture time – from sundials to atomic clocks, the fascinating history of timekeeping and how our discoveries changed the world. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Balslev, A. N.
(1986) Reflections on time in Indian philosophy. In J. T. Fraser, N. Lawrence, & F. C. Haber (Eds.)., Time, science and society in China and the West: The study of time V (pp. 104–112). Berlin-New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bergson, H.
(1960) Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness (F. L. Pogson, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Black, M.
(1962) Models and metaphor: Studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
(1979) More on metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 19–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Block, R.
(1990) Models of psychological time. In R. Block (Ed.), Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bloom, P., Peterson, M. A., Nadel, L., & Garrett, M. F.
(Eds.) (1996) Language and space. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L.
(2000) Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M.
(2002) The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowdle, B., & Gentner, D.
(2005) The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, M.
(1996) The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: Cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 145–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M., & Choi, S.
(2001) Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In M. Bowerman, & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 475–511). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, L.
(2008) A semiotic approach to fictive interaction as a representational strategy in communicative meaning construction. In T. Oakley, & A. Hougaard (Eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction (pp. 109–148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, L., & Brandt, Per A.
(2005) Making sense of a blend: A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 216–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, P. A.
(2004a) Spaces, domains and meaning: Essays in Cognitive Semiotics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
(2004b) Metaphors and meaning in Shakespeare’s sonnet 73. In G. Bradshaw, T. Bishop, & M. Turner (Eds.), The Shakespearean international yearbook 4: Shakespeare studies today (pp. 123–131). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Brône, G., & Vandaele, J.
(Eds.) (2009) Cognitive Poetics: Applications of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P.
(2012) Time and space in Tzeltal: Is the future uphill?. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–11. Crossref.Google Scholar
Burke, M.
(2004) Cognitive Stylistics in the classroom: A pedagogical account. Style, 39(1), 491–510.Google Scholar
(2010) Why care about Pedagogical Stylistics?. Language and Literature, 19(1), 7–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Literary reading, cognition and emotion: An exploration of the oceanic mind. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, L.
(2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2011) Metaphor in prosaic and poetic creativity. In J. Swann, R. Pope, & R. Carter (Eds.), Creativity in language and literature: The state of the art (pp. 68–82). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A.
(2003) Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3), 149–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, S.
(1990) Circadian rhythms and human temporal experience. In R. Block (Ed.), Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Carston, R.
(2002) Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R.
(1999) Common language: Corpus, creativity and cognition. Language and Literature, 8(3), 195–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Language and creativity. The art of common talk. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D.
(2005) Perceptual foundations of abstract thought (Doctoral dissertation). MIT, Cambridge.Google Scholar
(2008) Who’s afraid of the big bad Whorf? Cross-linguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning, 58(1), 63–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Temporal language and temporal thinking may not go hand in hand. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Conceptualizations of time (pp. 169–186). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D., Boroditsky, L., Phillips, Green J., Goswami, S., Bocanegra-Thiel, S., Santiago-Diaz, I., Fotokopoulou, O., Pitta, R., & Gil, D.
(2004) How deep effects are effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English, Indonesian, Greek and Spanish. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D., Fotakopoulou, O., & Boroditsky, L.
(2010) Space and time in the child’s mind: Evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry. Cognitive Science, 34, 387–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Jasmin, K.
(2012) The hands of time: Temporal gesture in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(4), 643–674. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cavafy, J.
(2003) C. P. Cavafy. Sixty-three poems translated by J. C. Cavafy. Athens: Ikaros.Google Scholar
Cienki, A.
(2008) Looking at analyses of mental spaces and blending / Looking at and experiencing discourse in interaction. In T. Oakley, & A. Hougaard (Eds.). Mental spaces in discourse and interaction (pp. 235–245). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H.
(1973) Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press, 27–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B.
(1985) Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, A.
(2010) Shakespearean neuroplay: Reinvigorating the study of dramatic texts and performance through Cognitive Science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G.
(1994) Discourse and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooperrider, K., & Núñez, R.
(2009) Across time, across the body: Transversal temporal gestures. Gesture, 9(2), 181–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooperrider, K., Núñez, R., & Sweetser, E.
(2014) The conceptualization of time in gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body-language-communication (Vol. 2, pp. 1781–1788). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Coulson, S.
(1996) The Menendez brothers virus: Analogical mapping in blended spaces. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse, and language (pp. 67–81). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(2001) Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Conceptual blending in thought, rhetoric, and ideology. In G. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: current applications and future perspectives (pp. 187–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Coulson, S., & Oakley, T.
(2005) Blending and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in Cognitive Semantics. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1510–1536. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S., & Pagán Cánovas, C.
(2013) Understanding timelines: Conceptual metaphor and conceptual integration. Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 198–219.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2000) Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ø.
(1995)  When the future comes from behind: Malagasy and other time concepts and some consequences for communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 19, 197–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B.
(2012) The language of stories: A cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
(2005) Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deignan, A.
(1999) Linguistic metaphors and collocation in non-literary corpus data. Metaphor and Symbol, 14, 19–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Corpus linguistics and metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 280–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Desagulier, G.
(2005) A cognitive model of variation and language change based on an examination of some emerging constructions in contemporary English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université de Bordeaux 3, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Draaisma, D.
(2004) Why life speeds up as you get older: How memory shapes our past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Droit-Volet, S., & Gil, S.
(2009) The time-emotion paradox. Phil. Trans. R. Soc, 364, 1943–1953. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Droit-Volet, S., & Meck, W. H.
(2007) How emotions colour our perception of time. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(12), 504–513. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C.
(1993) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E.
(1912/1915) The elementary forms of the religious life. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Elias, N.
(1993) Time: An essay (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Emanatian, M.
(1992) Chagga ‘come’ and ‘go’: Metaphor and the development of tense-aspect. Studies in Language, 16, 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, K.
(2001) Space on hand: The exploitation of signing space to illustrate abstract thought. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 148–174). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E.
(1999) Space and time. In J. Allwood, & P. Gärdenfors (Eds.), Cognitive Semantics: Meaning and cognition (pp. 131–152). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V.
(2004a) The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004b) How we conceptualise time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Essays in Arts and Sciences, 33(2), 13–44.Google Scholar
(2005) The meaning of time: Polysemy, the lexicon and conceptual structure. Journal of Linguistics, 41, 33–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Language and time: A Cognitive Linguistics approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V., & Chilton, P.
(Eds.) (2010) Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions. London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G.
(1994) Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Compression and emergent structure. Language and Linguistics, 6(4), 523–538.Google Scholar
(2009) Generalized integration networks. In V. Evans, & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 147–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Sweetser, E.
(1996) Spaces, worlds, and grammars. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(1994) Conceptual projection and middle spaces. UCSD: Department of Cognitive Science Technical Report 9401. [Available at http://​cogsci​.ucsd​.edu and at http://​www​.wam​.umd​.edu​/~mturn]
(1996) Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse, and language (pp. 113–130). Stanford: CSLI Publications/Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, T.
(1998) Principles of conceptual integration. In J. P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 269–283). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(1999) Metonymy and conceptual integration. In K. U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 77–90). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Compression and global insight. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3–4), 283–304.Google Scholar
(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
(2003) Polysemy and conceptual blending. In B. Nerlich, V. Herman, Z. Todd, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language (pp. 79–94). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Rethinking metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 53–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, L., & Jaszczolt, K.
(Eds.) (2012a) Space and time in languages and cultures: Linguistic diversity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(Eds.) (2012b) Space and time in languages and cultures: Language, culture, and cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
(1975) An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In C. Cogen, H. Thompson, G. Thurgood, K. Whistler, & J. Wright (Eds.), Proceeedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 123–131.Google Scholar
(1977) Topics in lexical semantics. In R. Cole (Ed.), Current issues in linguistic theory (pp. 76–138). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
(1978) On the organization of semantic information in the lexicon. In D. Frakas, W. M. Jacobsen, M. Weslay, & K. W. Todrys (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on the lexicon (pp. 148–173). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
(1982) Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.Google Scholar
(1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2), 222–254.Google Scholar
Flaherty, M.
(1999) A watched pot. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Fleischman, S.
(1982) The future in thought and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, L.
(2005) An integration of corpus-based and genre-based approaches to text analysis in EAP/ESP: Countering criticisms against corpus-based methodologies. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 321–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fludernik, M.
(Ed.) (2011) Beyond cognitive metaphor theory: Perspectives on literary metaphor. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fong, V.
(1998) Space and time in the semantics of the Finnish case system. In J. P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 17–28). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Forceville, C.
(2001) Blends and metaphors in multimodal representations. Paper presented at the 7th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, University of California at Santa Barbara.
Fraisse, P.
(1963) The psychology of time. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Freeman, D. C.
(1993)  According to my bond: King Lear and re-cognition. Language and Literature, 2, 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998)  Catch[ing] the nearest way: Macbeth and cognitive metaphor. In J. Culpeper, M. Short, & P. Verdonk (Eds.), Exploring the language of drama: From text to context (pp. 96–111). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1999)  The Rack Dislimns: Schema and rhetorical pattern in Antony and Cleopatra . Poetics Today, 20, 443–460.Google Scholar
Freeman, M. H.
(1995) Metaphor making meaning: Dickinson’s conceptual universe. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 643–666. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Grounded spaces: Deictic-self anaphors in the poetry of Emily Dickinson. Language and Literature, 6, 7–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Poetry and the scope of metaphor: Toward a theory of Cognitive Poetics. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 253–281). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2002) Cognitive mapping in literary analysis. Style, 36, 466–483.Google Scholar
(2005) The poem as complex blend: conceptual mappings of metaphor in Sylvia Plath’s The Applicant . Language and Literature, 14(1), 25–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Cognitive linguistic approaches to literary studies: State of the art in Cognitive Poetics. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1175–1202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, W. J.
(1990) About time: Inventing the fourth dimension. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Galton, A.
(2011) Time flies but space does not: Limits to the spatialization of time. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 695–703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gavins, J., & Steen, G.
(Eds.) (2003) Cognitive Poetics in practice. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
(1989) Prospects and problems of prototype theory. Linguistics, 27, 587–612. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Diachronic prototype semantics: A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D., Grondelaers, S., & Bakema, P.
(1994) The structure of lexical variation: Meaning, naming, and context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geissler, H. G., Schebera, F. U., & Kompass, R.
(1999) Ultra-precise quantal timing: Evidence from simultaneity thresholds in long-range apparent movement. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 707–726. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gell, A.
(1992) The anthropology of time. Cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Gentner, D.
(2001) Spatial metaphors in temporal reasoning. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 203–222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Imai, M.
(1992) Is the future always ahead? Evidence for system mappings in understanding space-time metaphors. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 510–515.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L.
(2002) As time goes by: evidence for two systems in processing space-time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 537–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulos, T.
(2011) Γνωσιακή προσέγγιση της σημασιολογικής αλλαγής των προθέσεων της ελληνικής: Η περίπτωσης της ‘εἰς’. [A cognitive approach to the semantic change of prepositions in Greek: The case of ‘eis’] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulos, T., & Piata, A.
(2012) The meaning of khrónos in Ancient Greek. Selected Papers from UK-CLA Meetings 1, 342–360 (available at http://​www​.uk​-cla​.org​.uk​/proceedings​/volume​_1).
Gibbs, R.
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Making good psychology out of blending theory. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 347–358.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Bogdanovich, J.
(1999) Mental imagery in interpreting poetic metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 14, 37–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr., & Colston, H.
(1995) The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 347–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Tendahl, M.
(2006) Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind and Language, 21, 379–403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J.
(1966) The problem of temporal order in stimulation and perception. Journal of Psychology, 62, 141–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1975) Events are perceivable but time is not. In J. T. Fraser, & N. Lawrence (Eds.), The study of time (Vol. 2, pp. 295–301). New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R.
(2003) On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A.
(1997) The language of metaphors. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goguen, J.
(1999) An introduction to algebraic semiotics, with application to user interface design. In C. Nehaniv (Ed.), Computation for metaphor, analogy, and agents (pp. 242–291). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goutsos, D.
(2003) Σώμα ελληνικών κειμένων: Σχεδιασμός και υλοποίηση [The corpus of Greek texts: Design and application]. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greek Linguistics.Google Scholar
Grady, J.
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
(1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor. In R. Gibbs, & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S.
(1999) Conceptual blending and metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1989) Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Grygiel, M.
(2004) Semantic change as a process of conceptual blending. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2, 285–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guyau, J. M.
(1890/1988) The origin of the idea of time. In J. A. Michon (Ed.), Guyau and the idea of time (pp. 37–148). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hamilton, C.
(1996) Mapping the mind and the body: On W. H. Auden’s personifications. Style, 36, 408–427.Google Scholar
Hanks, P., & Giora, R.
(2011) Metaphor and figurative language (Vols. 1–6). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haralambopoulou, K.
(2010) A principled polysemy approach as an alternative to the conceptual metaphor theory for the study of time in Greek (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
(1997) From space to time: Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Hawking, S. W.
(1988) A brief history of time: From the Bing Bang to black holes. London: Bantam.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M.
(1996) Being and time (trans. by J. Stambaugh). New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Herskovits, A.
(1986) Language and spatial cognition. An interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M., & Robert, S.
(Eds.) (2006) Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hiraga, M. K.
(1998) Metaphor-icon link in poetic texts: A cognitive approach to iconicity. Journal of the University of the Air, 16, 95–123.Google Scholar
(1999) Blending and an interpretation of haiku: A cognitive approach. Poetics Today, 20, 461–81.Google Scholar
(2005) Metaphor and iconicity: A cognitive approach to analyzing texts. Houndmills, UK: Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Husserl
(1928/1999) Phenomenology of internal time consciousness. In D. Welton (Ed.), The essential Husserl. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E.
(1995) Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Material anchors in conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1555–1577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Indefrey, P., & Gullberg, M.
(2008) Time to speak: Cognitive and neural prerequisites for time in language. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Isham, C. J., & Savvidou, K. N.
(2002) Time and modern physics. In K. Ridderbos (Ed.), Time (based on the 2000 Darwin Lectures) (pp. 6–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R.
(1960) Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.) Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
(1987) Poetry of grammar and grammar of poetry. In K. Pomorska, & S. Rudy (Eds.), Language and Literature (pp. 121–144). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., & Waugh, L. R.
(1979) The sound shape of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
James, W.
(1890/1950) The principles of psychology (Vols. 1–2). New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Janda, L.
(2002) Concepts of case and time in Slavic. Glossos, 3, 1–22.Google Scholar
Jaszczolt, K. M.
(2009) Representing time: An essay on temporality as modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.
(1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago/London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I.
(1838) Critique of pure reason (F. Haywood, Trans.). London: William Pickering.Google Scholar
Kemmerer, D.
(2005) The spatial and temporal meanings of English prepositions can be independently impaired. Neuropsychologia, 43, 797–806. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiang, M.
(2005) Conceptual blending theory and psychiatry. Cognitive Science Online, 3(1), 13–24.Google Scholar
Klein, H. E. M.
(1987) The future precedes the past: Time in Toba. Word, 38, 173–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koller, V.
(2002)  A shotgun wedding: Co-occurrence of war and marriage metaphors in mergers and acquisitions discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 179–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövesces, Z.
(1999) Metaphor: Does it reflect or constitute cultural models?. In R. Gibbs, & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 167–188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövesces, Ζ.
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) A new look at metaphorical creativity in Cognitive Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 663–697.Google Scholar
Kranjec, A.
(2006) Extending spatial frames of reference to temporal concepts. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Kyriacou, C. P.
(2002) The genetics of time. In K. Ridderdos (Ed.), The Darwin college lectures: Time (pp. 65–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996)  Sorry, I’m not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualizing the self. In G. Fauconnier, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar (pp. 91–123). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) The neural theory of metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R.
(2000) Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
(1989) More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vols. 1–2). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(1999) Virtual reality. Studies in Linguistic Sciences, 29(2), 77–103.Google Scholar
Leech, G.
(1969) A linguistic guide to English poetry. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Levine, R.
(1997) A geography of time: The temporal misadventures of a social psychologist, or how a culture keeps time just a little bit differently. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
(2003) Space in language and cognition. Exploration in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D.
(2006) Grammars of space. Exploration in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. K.
(1998) Grounded blends, gestures, and conceptual shifts. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(3), 283–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, J. R.
(2002) Time and religion. In K. Ridderdos (Ed.), The Darwin college lectures: Time (pp. 143–165). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ludlow, P.
(1999) Semantics, tense, and time: An essay in the metaphysics of natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, J.
(1999) Inuit time. In K. Lippincott, U. Eco, & E. H. Gombrich (Eds.), The story of time (pp. 92–95). London: Merell Holberton.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B.
(1927) Lunar and seasonal calendari in the Trobriands. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 57, 203–15.Google Scholar
Mandelblit, N.
(1997) Grammatical blending: Creative and schematic aspects in sentence processing and translation (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
(2000) The grammatical marking of conceptual integration: From syntax to morphology. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3–4), 197–252.Google Scholar
Marmaridou, S.
(2006) On the conceptual, cultural and discursive motivations of Greek pain lexicalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3), 393–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Γνωσιακή προσέγγιση στη σημασιολογική ανάλυση του χρόνου στα νέα ελληνικά [A cognitive approach to the semantic analysis of time in Modern Greek]. In A. Moser, A. Mpakakou, H. Haralambakis, & D. Heila-Markopoulou (Eds.), Γλώσσης χάριν. Τόμος αφιερωμένος από τον τομέα γλωσσολογίας στον καθηγητή Γεώργιο Μπαμπινιώτη [Linguae gratia. A volume dedicated to Prof. Georgios Bampiniotis by the department of linguistics] (pp. 57–70). Athens: Ellinika Grammata.Google Scholar
(2010) Cognitive, cultural and constructional motivations of polysemy and semantic change: The case of the Greek ψυχή . Pragmatics and Cognition, 18(1), 68–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matlock, T.
(2001) How real is fictive motion? (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.
(1996a) How abstract is subjective motion? A comparison of coverage path expressions and access path expressions. In A. Goldberg (Ed.). Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 359–374). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(1996b) Subjective motion and English and Japanese Verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 138–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A.
(1996) Corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McTaggart, E.
(1908) The unreality of time. Mind: A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy, 17, 457–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mendelsohn, D.
(2012) C. P. Cavafy. Complete poems. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M.
(1962) Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Michon, J. A.
(1990) Impicit and explicit representations of time. In R. Block (Ed.), Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N.
(1976) Language and perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Minkowski, E.
(1970) Lived time: Phenomenological and psychopathological studies. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, K. E.
(2000) Spatial experience and temporal metaphors in Wolof: Point of view, conceptual mapping, and linguistic practice (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
(2006) Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Ego-perspective and field-based frames of reference: Temporal meanings of front in Japanese, Wolof, and Aymara. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 759–776. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) The spatial language of time: Metaphor, metonymy, and frames of reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moser, A.
(1994) Ποιόν και απόψεις του ρήματος [Verbal aspect and aktionsart]. Athens: Parousia Monograph Series.Google Scholar
Mukarovský, J.
(1932/1964) Standard language and poetic language. In P. Garvin (Ed.), Prague school reader in aesthetics, literary structure and style (pp. 17–30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, C.
(2008) Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago: Chicago University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, R.
(2010) Critical analysis of creative metaphors in political speeches. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan, & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 321–332). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munn, N. D.
(1992) The cultural anthropology of time: A critical essay. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 93–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nänny, M., & Fischer, O.
(Eds.) (2003) Iconicity in language and literature (Vols. 1–4). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nikiforidou, K.
(2005) Conceptual blending and the interpretation of relatives: A case study of Greek. Cognitive Linguistics, 161, 169–206.Google Scholar
Núñez, R.
(1999) Could the future taste purple?. In R. Núñez, & W. Freeman (Eds.), Reclaiming cognition: The primacy of action, intention, and emotion (pp. 41–60). Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
(2008) Conceptual metaphor, human cognition, and the nature of mathematics. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 339–362). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Núñez, R., Cooperrider, K., Doan, D., & Wassmann, J.
(2012) Contours of time: Topographic construals of past, present, and future in the Yupno valley of Papua Nea Guinea. Cognition, 124(1), 25–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Núñez, R., Motz, B., & Teuscher, U.
(2006) Time after time: The psychological reality of the Ego- and Time-reference-point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 133–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Núñez, R., & Sweetser, E.
(2006) With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the cross-linguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, T.
(1998) Conceptual blending, narrative discourse, and rhetoric. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 321–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, T., & Coulson, S.
(2000) Blending basics. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3–4), 175–196.Google Scholar
(2008) Connecting the dots: Mental spaces and metaphoric language in discourse. In T. Oakley, & A. Hougaard (Eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction (pp. 27–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, T., & Hougaard, A.
(Eds.) (2008) Mental spaces approach to discourse and interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E.
(1979) Introduction: What child language can contribute to pragmatics. In E. Ochs, & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 1–17). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ohmann, R.
(1971) Speech acts and the definition of literature. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 4, 1–19.Google Scholar
Ornstein, R.
(1969/1997) On the experience of time. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Özçaliskan, S.
(2002) Metaphors we move by: A crosslinguistic-developmental analysis of metaphorical motion events in English and Turkish (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Pagán Cánovas, C.
(2010) Erotic emissions in Greek Poetry: A generic integration network. Cognitive Semiotics, 6, 7–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The genesis of the arrows of love: Diachronic conceptual integration in Greek mythology. The American Journal of Philology, 132(4), 553–579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Conceptual templates and context: Metaphor, conceptual integration, and relevance. Invited talk at the workshop “Meaning and context”, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris.
Pagán Cánovas, C., & Jensen, M.
(2013) Anchoring time-space mappings and their emotions: The timeline blend in poetic metaphors. Language and Literature, 22(1), 45–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parker, J. A., Crawford, M., & Harris, P.
(Eds.) (2006) Time and memory. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pascual, E.
(2002) Imaginary trialogues: Conceptual blending and fictive interaction in criminal courts. Utrecht: LOT 68.Google Scholar
Pederson, E., Levinson, S., Danziger, E., Kita, S., Wilkins, D., & Senft, G.
(1998) Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language, 74(3), 557–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petterson, A.
(1990) A theory of literary discourse in aesthetics. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Pereira, F. C.
(2007) Creativity and artificial intelligence: A conceptual blending approach. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Piata, A., & Pagán Cánovas, C.
(2017)  Powerful rhyme and sluttish time: A cross-linguistic study of time personification in poetic discourse. Language and Literature, 26(1), 18–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pilkington, A.
(2000) Poetic effects: A relevance theory perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pöppel, E.
(1978) Time perception. In R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, & H. L. Teuber (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. 8, pp. 713–729). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
(1997) A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 56–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, N., & Holland, D.
(1987) Culture and cognition. In D. Holland, & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, N.
(1991) The cultural basis of metaphor. In J. W. Fernandez (Ed.), Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology (pp. 56–93). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Radden, G.
(2006) The metaphor time as space across languages. In E. Górska, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy – metaphor collage (pp. 99–120). Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) Spatial time in the West and the East. In M. Brdar, M. Omazic, V. P. Takac, T. Gradecak-Erdeljic, & G. Buljan (Eds.), Space and time in language (pp. 1–40). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Raju, C. K.
(2003) The eleven pictures of time: The physics, philosophy and politics of time beliefs. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rice, S., Dominiek, S., & Vanrespaille, M.
(1999) Prepositional semantics and the fragile link between space and time. In M. Hiraga, C. Sinha, & S. Wilcox (Eds.), Cultural, psychological and typological issues in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 108–27). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robert, A.
(1998) Blending in the interpretation of mathematical proofs. In J. P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 337–350). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Rosch, E.
(1973) On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In Τ. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 111–144). New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 192–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1978) Principle of categorization. In Ε. Rosch, & Β. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 27–48.Google Scholar
Sandra, D., & Rice, S.
(1995) Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind – the linguist’s or the language user’s?. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 89–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Santa Ana, O.
(1999)  Like an animal I was treated: Anti-immigrant metaphor in U.S. public discourse. Discourse and Society, 10, 191–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Santiago, J., Lupiáñez, J., Pérez, E., & Funes, M. J.
(2007) Time (also) flies from left to right”. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 512–516. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Santiago, J., Román, A., Ouellet, M., Rodríguez, N., & Pérez-Azor, P.
(2008) In Hindsight, life flows from left to right. Psychological Research, 74(1), 59–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sattig, T.
(2006) The language and reality of time. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H. J.
(2007) Entrenchment, salience and basic levels. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 117–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schram, D. H., & Steen, G. J.
(Eds.) (2001) The psychology and sociology of literature: In honor of Elrud Ibsch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.
(1979) Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 83–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Semino, E.
(1995) Schema theory and the analysis of text worlds in poetry. Language and Literature, 4(2), 79–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Language and world creation in poems and other texts. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2006) Blending and characters’ mental functioning in Virginia Woolf’s Lappin and Lapinova . Language and Literature, 15(1), 55–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) Metaphor, creativity, and the experience of pain across genres. In J. Swann, R. Pope, & R. Carter (Eds.) Creativity in language and literature: The state of the art (pp. 83–102). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E., & Culpeper, J.
(Eds.) (2002) Cognitive Stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E., & Short, M.
(2004) Corpus Stylistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Semino, E., & Steen, G.
(2008) Metaphor in literature. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 232–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, C., Sinha, V. S. da, Zinken, J., & Sampaio, W.
(2011) When time is not space: The social and linguistic construction of time intervals and temporal event relations in an Amazonian culture. Language and Cognition, 3(1), 137–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shinohara, K.
(1999) Epistemology of space and time: An analysis of conceptual metaphor in English and Japanese. Nishinomiya, Japan: Kwansei Gakuin University Press.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M.
(1992) The use of diminutives in expressing politeness: Modern Greek versus English. Journal of Pragmatics, 17, 155–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1996) The search for units of meaning. TEXTUS, 9(1), 75–106.Google Scholar
(2005) Corpus and text-basic principles. In M. Wynne (Ed.), Developing linguistic corpora: A guide to good practice (pp. 1–16). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Slife, B. D.
(1993) Time and psychological explanation. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C.
(1949) The river of time. Mind, 58, 483–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). London: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
(2008) A deflationary account of metaphors. In R. Gibbs, (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 84–105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J.
(1994) Understanding metaphor in literature. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Steen, G.
(1999) Analyzing metaphor in literature: With examples from William Wordsworth’s I wandered lonely as a cloud . Poetics Today, 20, 499–522.Google Scholar
Steen, G. J.
(2002) Metaphor in Bob Dylan’s Hurricane: Genre, language, and style. In Semino, E., & Culpeper, J. (Eds.), Cognitive Stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis (pp. 183–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S.
(2006) Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P.
(2002) Cognitive Poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sullivan, K.
(2013) Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svalund, J.
(2007) Metaphor and convention. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(1), 47–89.Google Scholar
Svorou, S.
(1994) The grammar of space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swann, J., Pope, R., & Carter, R.
(Eds.) (2011) Creativity in language and literature: The state of the art. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E.
(1999) Compositionality and blending: Semantic composition in a cognitively realistic framework. In T. Janssen, & G. Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology (pp. 129–162). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Blended spaces and performativity. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3–4), 305–334.Google Scholar
(2006) Whose rhyme is whose reason? Sound and sense in Cyrano de Bergerac . Language and Literature, 15(1), 29–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
(2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics (Vols. 1–2). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.
(1987) Tense and metaphorizations of time in Zulu. In W. Lörscher, & R. Schulze (Eds.), Perspectives on language in performance. Studies in linguistics, literary criticism, and language teaching and learning (pp. 214–229). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
(1989) Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tenbrink, T.
(2007) Space, time, and the use of language. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.Google Scholar
(2011) Reference frames of space and time in language. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 704–722. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tendahl, M.
(2009) A hybrid theory of metaphor: Relevance theory and Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tendahl, M., & Gibbs, R.
(2008) Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive Linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1823–1864. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, V.
(2006) Ways of reading Sherlock Holmes: The entrenchment of discourse blends. Language and Literature, 15(1), 73–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
(1975) Spatial expressions of tense and temporal sequencing: A contribution to the study of semantic fields. Semiotica, 15(3), 207–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1978) On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In J. H. Greenberg, (Ed.), Universals of human language (Vol. 3, pp. 369–400). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tsur, R.
(1992) Toward a theory of Cognitive Poetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
(1998) Poetic rhythm – structure and performance: An empirical study in cognitive poetics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
(2000) Lakoff’s roads not taken. Pragmatics and Cognition, 7, 339–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Aspects of Cognitive Poetics. In E. Semino, & J. Culpeper (Eds.), Cognitive Stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis (pp. 279–318). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) On the shore of nothingness: A study in Cognitive Poetics. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
(2008) Comparing approaches to versification style in Cyrano de Bergerac . Cognitive Semiotics, 5(2), 146–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turetzky, P.
(1998) Time. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M.
(1987) Death is the mother of beauty: Mind, metaphor, criticism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Reading minds: The study of English in the age of Cognitive Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1996) Conceptual blending and counterfactual argument in the social and behavioral sciences. In P. Tetlock, & A. Belkin (Eds.), Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics (pp. 291–295). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) The literary mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Cognitive dimensions of social science: The way we think about politics, economics, law, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Frame blending. In R. Favretti (Ed.), Frames, corpora, and knowledge representation (pp. 13–32). Bologna: Bononia University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G.
(1998) Conceptual integration in counterfactuals. In J. P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 285–296). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(2000) Metaphor, metonymy, and binding. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metonymy and metaphor at the crossroads (pp. 133–145). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tyler, A., & Evans, V.
(2003) The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veale, T.
(1999) Pragmatic forces in metaphor use: The mechanics of blend recruitment in visual metaphors. In C. Nehaniv (Ed.), Computation for metaphor, analogy, and agents (pp. 37–51). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vega Moreno, R.
(2007) Creativity and convention: The pragmatics of everyday figurative speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
(1989) Prototypes in semantics and pragmatics: Explicating attitudinal meanings in terms of prototypes. Linguistics, 27, 731–769. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990)  Prototypes save: On the uses and abuses of the notion of ‘prototype” in linguistics and related fields. In S. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization (pp. 347–367). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, R.
(2004) Making meaning from a clock: Material artifacts and conceptual blending in time-telling instruction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Wilson, D.
(2011) Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and Cognitive Linguistics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(2), 177–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., & Carston, R.
(2006) Metaphor, relevance and the ‘emergent property’ issue. Mind and Language, 21(3), 404–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, M.
(2005) Stylistics: Corpus approaches. In The Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [Available online http://​www​.pala​.ac​.uk​/resources​/sigs​/corpus​-style​/Corpora​_stylistics​.pdf].
Yu, N.
(1998) The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zbikowski, L.
(2001) Conceptualizing music: Cognitive structure, theory, and analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zinken, J.
(2009) Temporal frames of reference. In V. Evans, & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition, and space. The state of the art and new directions. London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2020. Do political cartoons and illustrations have their own specialized forms for warnings, threats, and the like? Speech acts in the nonverbal mode. Social Semiotics  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Piata, Anna
2020.  In Drawing Attention to Metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5],  pp. 207 ff. Crossref logo
Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019. The year’s work in stylistics 2018. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4  pp. 354 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Literature & Literary Studies

Theoretical literature & literary studies
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2017045526 | Marc record