Article published in:
FORUM
Vol. 15:1 (2017) ► pp. 127

Full-text

Identifying political and ideological bias in translated newspaper articles
References

References

Artstein, Ron and Masimo Poesio
2008 “Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics”. Computational Linguistics 34 (4): 555–596. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mona
2006Translation and Conflict. A Narrative Account. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2007Activist Communities of Translators and Interpreters. Paper presented at Translation, Interpreting and Social Activism 1st International Forum . Granada: University of Granada.
2010 “Narratives of terrorism and security: ‘accurate’ translations, suspicious frames”. Critical Studies on Terrorism 3 (3): 347–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bánhegyi, Mátyás
2006 “A kanadai politikai diskurzus vizsgálata fordítástudományi szempontból [An Analysis of Canadian Political Discourse from the Perspective of Translation Studies]”. Fordítástudomány 8 (2): 21–38.Google Scholar
2008 “A Translation Studies Oriented Integrative Approach to Canadian Political Discourse”. Across Languages and Cultures 9 (1): 77–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Politikai szövegek és fordítástudomány 1. rész: A kritikai diskurzuselemzés gyökerei és legfontosabb iskolái [Political Texts and Translation Studies, Part 1: The Roots of Critical Discourse Analysis and its most Important Schools]”. Fordítástudomány 12 (1): 16–30.Google Scholar
2011a “Politikai szövegek and fordítástudomány 2. rész: Szövegnyelvészeti trendek a politikai diskurzuselemzés fordítástudományi megközelítése terén [Political Texts and Translation Studies, Part 2: Text Linguistic Trends in Political Discourse Analysis from the Perspective of Translation Studies]”. Fordítástudomány 12 (2): 24–41.Google Scholar
2011b “Politikai szövegek és fordítástudomány 3. rész: Van Dijk kritikai diskurzuselemzés modellje és a fordításközpontú diskurzus-társadalom hatásmodell [Political Texts and Translation Studies, Part 3: Van Dijk’s Critical Discourse Analysis Model and the Translation-centred Discourse-Society Interface Model]”. Fordítástudomány 13 (1): 22–39.Google Scholar
2012a “A fordításközpontú diskurzus-társadalom hatásmodell gyakorlati alkalmazása 1. rész [The Application of the Translation-centred Discourse-Society Interface Model: Part 1]”. Fordítástudomány 13 (2): 37–55.Google Scholar
2012b “A fordításközpontú diskurzus-társadalom hatásmodell gyakorlati alkalmazása 2. rész [The Application of the Translation-centred Discourse-Society Interface Model: Part 2]”. Fordítástudomány 14 (1): 69–81.Google Scholar
2012c “A politikai manipuláció fordítástudományi kutatása európai kontextusban: a fordításközpontú politikai tömegkommunikációs modell [The Translation Studies Oriented Research of Political Manipulation in a European Context]”. In Studia Caroliensia 2011, ed. by Sepsi Enikő, 177–192. Budapest: Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary.Google Scholar
2013a “Exposing Political Manipulation and Bias in Mediatised Translations. The Translation-centred Political Mass Communication Model”. Intralinea 15. http://​www​.intralinea​.org​/archive​/article​/exposing​_political​_manipulation​_and​_bias​_in​_mediatised​_translations.
2013b “Politikai manipuláció és/vagy fordítástudomány. A fordításközpontú politikai tömegkommunikációs modell elméleti alapjai [Political manipulation and/or Translation Studies. The Translation-centred Political Mass Communication Model]”. In Fordítás és tolmácsolás a harmadik évezred elején, ed. by Kinga Klaudy, 77–93. Budapest: ELTE BTK Fordító- és Tolmácsképző Központ.Google Scholar
2014 “Translation and Political Discourse”. Philologica 6 (2): 139–158.Google Scholar
Baumann, Gerd, Marie Gillespie and Annabelle Sreberny
eds. 2011 “Transcultural journalism and the politics of translation: Interrogating the BBC World Service”. Journalism 12 (2): 135–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Calzada-Pérez, Maria
ed. 2003Apropos of Ideology: Translation Studies on Ideology. Ideologies in Translation Studies. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. and Christina Schäffner
eds. 2002Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conway, Kyle
2010 “Paradoxes of translation in television news”. Media, Culture and Society 32 (6): 979–996. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
1980Macrostructure. An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structure in Discourse, Interaction and Cognition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis”. Discourse and Society 4 (1): 249–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 “Discourse as interaction in society”. In Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 1–37. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
2001 “Critical Discourse Analysis”. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Tannen, Deborah Schiffrin and Heidi E. Hamilton, 352–371. London: Oxford Blackwell.Google Scholar
2003 Accessed November 16, 2016. Ideology and Discourse – A Multidisciplinary Introduction. http://​www​.discourses​.org​/download​/articles/.
Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak
1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis”. In Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 258–283. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gagnon, Chantal
2006 “Language Plurality as Power Struggle, or: Translating Politics in Canada”. Target 18 (1): 69–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, Astrid
2016aTraduction et implicites idéologiques. Paris: Editions La Völva.Google Scholar
2016bIdéologie et Traductologie. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael
2001Textual Interaction. An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Inghilleri, Moira and Sue-Anne Harding
2010 “Translating Violent Conflict”. The Translator 16 (2): 165–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Károly, Krisztina
2007Szövegtan és fordítás [Text Studies and Translation]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Kintsch, Walter and Teun A. van Dijk
1978 “Toward a model of text comprehension and production”. Psychological Review 85 (5): 363–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Charles U.
2001Persuasion, Reception and Responsibility. Stamford: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Mazzoleni, Gianpietro
2002 [1998]Politikai kommunikáció [Political Communication]. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar
Munday, Jeremy
2007 “Translation and Ideology. A Textual Approach”. The Translator 13 (2): 195–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salama-Carr, Myriam
ed. 2007Translating and Interpreting Conflict. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Schäffner, Christina
1997 “Strategies of Translating Political Texts”. In Text Typology and Translation, ed. by Anna Trosborg, 119–143. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Political Discourse Analysis from the Point of View of Translation Studies. Journal of Language and Politics 3 (1): 117–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spooren, Wilbert and Liesbeth Degand
2010 “Coding coherence relations: Reliability and validity”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6 (2): 241–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja
1985Argumentative Text Structure and Translation. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Valdeón, Roberto. A.
ed. 2012 “Journalisme et traduction/Journalism and Translation”. Special issue of META 57 (4).Google Scholar
Zanettin, Federico
2016 “ ‘The deadliest error’: translation, international relations and the news media”. The Translator 22 (3): 303–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar