Article published in:
Controversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theoryEdited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Controversies 6] 2008
► pp. 125–133
On the role of pragmatics, rhetoric and dialectic in scientific controversies
Published online: 17 December 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.6.08fer
https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.6.08fer
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
de Donato Rodríguez, Xavier & Jesús Zamora Bonilla
2014. Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the Face of Rational Disagreement.
Argumentation 28:1 ► pp. 39 ff. 
Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna Visser
2016. ‘Subjectivity’ in newspaper reports on ‘controversial’ and ‘emotional’ debates: An appraisal and controversy analysis.
Language Matters 47:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013.
In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,
► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014.
In Handbook of Argumentation Theory,
► pp. 677 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.