Dichotomies and types of debate

Cited by 23 other publications

Abrantes, Paulo C.

2020.  In Controversies and Interdisciplinarity [Controversies, 16], ► pp. 133 ff.

Dascal, Marcelo

2014.  In Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 3], ► pp. 219 ff.

David, Joseph E.

2017. DIVINITY, LAW, AND THE LEGAL TURN IN THE STUDY OF RELIGIONS. Journal of Law and Religion 32:1 ► pp. 172 ff.

Greco, Roberto

2020.  In Controversies and Interdisciplinarity [Controversies, 16], ► pp. 217 ff.

Greco, Sara & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria

2021. Mediators’ reframing as a constitutive element of a reconciliatory argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1

Ilie, Cornelia

2020. Discussion, dispute or controversy?. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict

Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna Visser

2016. ‘Subjectivity’ in newspaper reports on ‘controversial’ and ‘emotional’ debates: An appraisal and controversy analysis. Language Matters 47:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

Lewiński, Marcin

2015.  In Argumentation in Political Deliberation [Benjamins Current Topics, 76], ► pp. 151 ff.

Lewiński, Marcin

2016. Shale gas debate in Europe: Pro-and-con dialectics and argumentative polylogues. Discourse & Communication 10:6 ► pp. 553 ff.

Lewiński, Marcin & Mark Aakhus

2014. Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry. Argumentation 28:2 ► pp. 161 ff.

Lorentzen, David Gunnarsson

2020. Bridging polarised Twitter discussions: the interactions of the users in the middle. Aslib Journal of Information Management ahead-of-print:ahead-of-print

Malloy, Jacquelynn A., Kelly N. Tracy, Roya Q. Scales, Kristin Menickelli & W. David Scales

2020. It’s Not About Being Right: Developing Argument Through Debate. Journal of Literacy Research 52:1 ► pp. 79 ff.

Sariel, Aviram

2016. Marcelo Dascal’s Theory of Controversies. Pragmatics & Cognition 23:3 ► pp. 437 ff.

Scarafile, Giovanni

2016. Perpetual beginners. Pragmatics & Cognition 23:3 ► pp. 359 ff.

Shoham, Kuti

2019.  In Controversies in the Contemporary World [Controversies, 15], ► pp. 29 ff.

Spranzi, Marta

2012.  In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 22], ► pp. 163 ff.

Uzelgun, Mehmet ali, Marcin Lewiński & Paula Castro

2016. Favorite Battlegrounds of Climate Action. Science Communication 38:6 ► pp. 699 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2013.  In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2014.  In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 677 ff.

Van Herzele, Ann & Noelle Aarts

2019. Arguing Along Fault-lines: A Rhetorical Analysis of Public Divides over Wildlife Comeback. Conservation and Society 17:4 ► pp. 343 ff.

Van Herzele, Ann, Noelle Aarts & Jim Casaer

2015. Wildlife comeback in Flanders: tracing the fault lines and dynamics of public debate. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61:4 ► pp. 539 ff.

van Laar, Jan Albert & Erik C. W. Krabbe

2013. The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance. Argumentation 27:2 ► pp. 201 ff.

van Laar, Jan Albert & Erik C.W. Krabbe

2016. Fair and unfair strategies in public controversies. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:3 ► pp. 315 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.