Categories and Case
The sentence structure of Korean
The principal objective of this book is to provide a unified treatment of morphological case in Korean. Focussing on the nominative, accusative and dative suffixes, the author seeks to show that each of these morphemes consistently encodes a corresponding combinatorial relation in the 'surface' form of sentences.
In support of his analysis, the author discusses a broad and representative range of Korean case marking patterns, providing one of the more complete treatments of case available for any language. This book should therefore be useful not only to Koreanists but also to researchers interested in the case systems of other languages.Written in a style that makes it accessible to readers from a variety of backgrounds in linguistics and other disciplines, Categories and Case also provides a good introduction to many important syntactic phenomena in the Korean language.
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 71] 1991. vii, 294 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
1. The Problem
|
1–12
|
|
2. The Grammar
|
13–24
|
|
3. Grammatical Relations and Thematic Roles
|
25–32
|
|
4. The Case System
|
33–45
|
|
5. Passivization and Dative Advancement
|
47–65
|
|
6. Possessor Ascension
|
67–95
|
|
7. Inversion Constructions
|
97–115
|
|
8. Focus Constructions
|
117–138
|
|
9. Subject-to-Object Raising
|
139–151
|
|
10. Lexical Causatives
|
153–169
|
|
11. Syntactic Causatives
|
171–196
|
|
12. Case and Word Order
|
197–210
|
|
13. Floated Quantifiers
|
211–224
|
|
14. Some Special Challenges
|
225–248
|
|
15. The Acquisition Problem
|
249–268
|
|
16. Concluding Remarks
|
269–273
|
|
References
|
283–292
|
Cited by
Cited by 23 other publications
No author info given
2015.
In Semantics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 168],
No author info given
2019.
In Korean,
► pp. 146 ff.
No author info given
2019.
In Reference Point and Case [Human Cognitive Processing, 68],
Blake, Barry J.
2001.
In Case,
Carroll, Susanne
1999. Review article.
Second Language Research 15:3 ► pp. 319 ff.
Eckman, Fred R.
1996. On evaluating arguments for special nativism in second language acquisition theory.
Second Language Research 12:4 ► pp. 398 ff.
Hamilton, Robert
1996. Against underdetermined reflexive binding.
Second Language Research 12:4 ► pp. 420 ff.
KIM, HYUNWOO & THERES GRÜTER
2019. Cross-linguistic activation of implicit causality biases in Korean learners of English.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22:3 ► pp. 441 ff.
Lee, Youngjoo
2005. Exhaustivity as Agreement: The Case of Korean Man ?only?.
Natural Language Semantics 13:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Levin, Theodore
2017. Successive-cyclic case assignment: Korean nominative-nominative case-stacking.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35:2 ► pp. 447 ff.
Melcuk, Igor
2004. Actants in semantics and syntax II: actants in syntax.
Linguistics 42:2
O'Grady, William
1996. Language acquisition without Universal Grammar: a general nativist proposal for L2 learning.
Second Language Research 12:4 ► pp. 374 ff.
Oh, Eunjeong
2010. Recovery from first-language transfer: The second language acquisition of English double objects by Korean speakers.
Second Language Research 26:3 ► pp. 407 ff.
Park, Chongwon
2013. Setting and location.
Constructions and Frames 5:2 ► pp. 192 ff.
Schütze, Carson T.
2001. On Korean Case Stacking: The varied functions of the particles ka and lul.
The Linguistic Review 18:3
Son, Myeongeun
2020. Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Korean learners of English.
Applied Psycholinguistics 41:5 ► pp. 1223 ff.
Song, Eu-Jong & Min-Chang Sung
2017. A corpus-based study of contextual factors influencing Korean EFL learners’ dative alternation.
Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 40:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
SONG, YOONSANG & YOUNGAH DO
2018. Cross-linguistic structural priming in bilinguals: priming of the subject-to-object raising construction between English and Korean.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21:1 ► pp. 47 ff.
Sung, Jee Eun, Sujin Choi, Bora Eom, Jae Keun Yoo & Jee Hyang Jeong
2020. Syntactic Complexity as a Linguistic Marker to Differentiate Mild Cognitive Impairment From Normal Aging.
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 63:5 ► pp. 1416 ff.
YEAR, JUNGEUN & PETER GORDON
2009. Korean Speakers' Acquisition of the English Ditransitive Construction: The Role of Verb Prototype, Input Distribution, and Frequency.
The Modern Language Journal 93:3 ► pp. 399 ff.
Yoon, James H.
2004. Review of Yeon (2003): Korean Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning.
Korean Linguistics 12 ► pp. 209 ff.
Yoon, James H.
2007. Raising of major arguments in Korean and Japanese.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25:3 ► pp. 615 ff.
Yoon, James Hye Suk
2015.
In The Handbook of Korean Linguistics,
► pp. 79 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General