Diachronic evidence and the affix-clitic distinction

Cited by 11 other publications

Ackermann, Tanja

2019.  In Morphological Variation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 207], ► pp. 27 ff.

Ahmed, Samuel K., Samuel Andersson & Bert Vaux

2020.  In The Handbook of English Linguistics, ► pp. 345 ff.

Alexiadou, Artemis

2005. Possessors and (in)definiteness. Lingua 115:6 ► pp. 787 ff.

ANDERSON, STEPHEN R.

2008. THE ENGLISH ^|^ldquo;GROUP GENITIVE^|^rdquo; IS A SPECIAL CLITIC. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Börjars, Kersti

1994. Swedish Double Determination in a European Typological Perspective. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17:2 ► pp. 219 ff.

Herslund, Michael

2001. The Danish -s genitive: From affix to clitic. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 33:1 ► pp. 7 ff.

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria

2006.  In Linguistic Areas, ► pp. 182 ff.

Lowe, John J.

2016. English possessive ’s: clitic and affix. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34:1 ► pp. 157 ff.

Payne, John

2009. The English genitive and double case. Transactions of the Philological Society 107:3 ► pp. 322 ff.

Picard, Marc

1991. Clitics, affixes, and the evolution of the question marker ‘tu’ in Canadian French. Journal of French Language Studies 1:2 ► pp. 179 ff.

Picard, Marc

2009. Aspects synchroniques et diachroniques du tu interrogatif en québécois. Revue québécoise de linguistique 21:2 ► pp. 65 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.