Article published in:
Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics
Edited by Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba and Giuliano Bernini
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 48] 1987
► pp. 151
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

Ackermann, Tanja
2019.  In Morphological Variation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 207],  pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo
Ahmed, Samuel K., Samuel Andersson & Bert Vaux
2020.  In The Handbook of English Linguistics,  pp. 345 ff. Crossref logo
Alexiadou, Artemis
2005. Possessors and (in)definiteness. Lingua 115:6  pp. 787 ff. Crossref logo
2008. THE ENGLISH ^|^ldquo;GROUP GENITIVE^|^rdquo; IS A SPECIAL CLITIC. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 25:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Börjars, Kersti
1994. Swedish Double Determination in a European Typological Perspective. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17:2  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Herslund, Michael
2001. The Danish -s genitive: From affix to clitic. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 33:1  pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2006.  In Linguistic Areas,  pp. 182 ff. Crossref logo
Lowe, John J.
2016. English possessive ’s: clitic and affix. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34:1  pp. 157 ff. Crossref logo
Payne, John
2009. The English genitive and double case. Transactions of the Philological Society 107:3  pp. 322 ff. Crossref logo
Picard, Marc
1991. Clitics, affixes, and the evolution of the question marker ‘tu’ in Canadian French. Journal of French Language Studies 1:2  pp. 179 ff. Crossref logo
Picard, Marc
2009. Aspects synchroniques et diachroniques du tu interrogatif en québécois. Revue québécoise de linguistique 21:2  pp. 65 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.