Chapter published in:
Advances in Iranian Linguistics
Edited by Richard K. Larson, Sedigheh Moradi and Vida Samiian
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 351] 2020
► pp. 275300
References

References

Authier, Gilles
2012Grammaire juhuri, ou judéo-tat, langue iranienne des Juifs du Caucase de l’est [A grammar of Juhuri or Judeo-Tat, the Iranian language of the Jews of the East Caucasus]. Beiträge zur Iranistik 36 [Bibliothèque iranienne 76]. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg
1985Empirische Universalienforschung: Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den neuiranischen Sprachen [Empirical Universals Research: Differential Object Marking in New Iranian Languages]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Dum-Tragut, Jasmine
2009Armenian: Modern Eastern Armenian (London Oriental and African Language Library 14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Tim
2003Linguistic influences on the Balochi spoken in Karachi. In Carina Jahani & Agnes Korn (eds.), The Baloch and their neighbours. Ethnic and linguistic contact in Balochistan in historical and modern times, 169–210. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Grjunberg, Aleksandr
1963Jazyk severoazerbajdžanskix tatov [The language of the Tats of Northern Azerbaijan]. Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Ġalt‘axč‘yan, Sergey
1957Hamaṙotaki Madrasayi hay-t‘at‘ereni masin [Briefly on Armeno-Tat of Mədrəsə]. Hayastan SSR Gitut‘yunneri akademiayi teġekargir – Hasarakakan gitut‘yunner 4. 85–96.Google Scholar
1970Madrasac‘inneri t‘at‘eren lezun [The Tat language of the residents of Mədrəsə]. Yerevan: Unpublished Candidate of Sciences thesis defended at the Academy of Sciences of the Armenian SSR Sector of Oriental Studies.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vladimir & Lejli Dodyxudoeva
2017Sintaksičeskie otnošenija imen v severo-zapadnyx iranskix jazykax (na mazanderanskom i gilanskom materiale) [Syntactic relations of nouns in Northwestern Iranian language (based on a corpus from Mazandarani and Gilaki)]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 2. 77–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jügel, Thomas
2016Enclitic pronouns in Middle Persian and the placeholder construction. Quarterly Journal of Language and Inscription 1(1). 41–63.Google Scholar
2019The development of the object marker in Middle Persian. In Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference of Iranian Studies, 203–219. St. Petersburg: State Hermitage Publishers.Google Scholar
Karimi, Simin
1990Obliqueness, specificity, and discourse functions. Linguistic Analysis 20. 139–191.Google Scholar
1996Case and specificity: Persian revisited. Linguistic Analysis 3(4). 173–194.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
1970Étude quantitative de l’évolution d’un morphème: la postposition en persan [Quantitative study of the evolution of a morpheme: the postposition in Persian]. In David Cohen (ed.), Mélanges Marcel, 381–388. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1982Le morphème en persan et les relations actancielles [The morpheme in Persian and grammatical relations]. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 77(1). 177–207.Google Scholar
1994Le persan et le ba chinois [The Persian and the Chinese ba ]. Cahiers de linguistique – Asie orientale 23(1). 169–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lopatinskij, Lev
(ed.) 1894Armjano-tatskie teksty [Armeno-Tat texts]. In Sbornik materialov dlja opisanija mestnostej i plemen Kavkaza 20, Section 2, 25–32.Google Scholar
Mammadova, Nayiba
2018Eléments de description et documentation du tat de l’Apshéron, langue iranienne d’Azerbaïdjan. Paris: Institut national des langues et civilisations orientales dissertation. https://​tel​.archives​-ouvertes​.fr​/tel​-01801775
Miller, Boris
1929Taty, ix rasselenie i govory (materialy i voprosy) [Tats, their distribution and dialects (corpora and issues)]. Azərbajcanь өqrənən Cəmijjətin Xəbərləri 8(7). 3–33.Google Scholar
1945Tatskie teksty: Materialy po govoram tatov Sovetskogo Azerbajdžana [Tat Texts: Materials on the Dialects of the Tats of Soviet Azerbaijan]. In Vasilij Abaev & Ivan Meščaninov (eds.), Iranskie jazyki 1 [Iranian Languages 1] (Iranica 3), 107–126. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Paul, Ludwig
2008Some remarks on Persian suffix -râ as a general and historical issue. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Donald Stilo (eds.), Aspects of Iranian linguistics, 329–337. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2017The case system of Modern West Iranian languages in typological and historical perspective (with special reference to *rādī). Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Iranian Linguistics . Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Poplack, Shana & Stephen Levey
2010Contact-induced grammatical change: A cautionary tale. In Peter Auer & Jürgen Erich Schmidt (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation 1, 391–419. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rastorgueva, Vera & Džoj Ėdel’man
1982Giljanskij, mazanderanskij (s dialektami šamerzadi i velatru) [Gilaki, Mazandarani (including the Shamerzādi and Velātru dialects)]. In Vasilij Abaev, Mixail Bogoljubov & Vera Rastorgueva (eds.), Novoiranskie jazyki: zapadnaja gruppa, prikaspijskie jazyki (Osnovy iranskogo jazykoznanija 3), 447–554. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Shokri, Guiti
2018Ditransitivity constructions in three Caspian dialects. In Agnes Korn & Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Ditransitive constructions in a cross-linguistic perspective, 135–145. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Soltanov, Ağacamal & Məmmədxan Soltanov
2013Tati-türki, türki-tati lüğət – Tatca-azərbaycanca, azərbaycanca-tatca lüğət [Tat–Azeri, Azeri–Tat Dictionary]. Baku: Qanun.Google Scholar
Stilo, Donald
2004Coordination in three Western Iranian languages: Vafsi, Persian and Gilaki. In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 269–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Iranian as buffer zone between the universal typologies of Turkic and Semitic. In Éva Á Csató, Bo Isaksson & Carina Jahani (eds.), Linguistic convergence and areal diffusion: Case studies from Iranian, Semitic and Turkic, 35–63. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Šokri, Giti
1995 [1374]Guyeš-e Sāri [The dialect of Sāri]. Tehran: Pažuhešgāh-e ’olum-e ensāni va motāle’āt-e farhangi.Google Scholar
Windfuhr, Gernot
1979Persian grammar: History and state of its study (Trends in Linguistics 12). The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Windfuhr, Gernot & John Perry
2009Persian and Tajik. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 416–544. London: Routledge.Google Scholar