Chapter published in:
Advances in Iranian Linguistics
Edited by Richard K. Larson, Sedigheh Moradi and Vida Samiian
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 351] 2020
► pp. 173236
References

References

Anderson, Stephen
2013The marker of the English ‘Group Genitive’ is a special clitic, not an inflection. In Kersti Börjars, David Denison & Alan Scott (eds.), Morphosyntactic categories and the expression of possession, 193–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aghaei, Behrad
2006The Syntax of ke-clause and clausal extraposition in Modern Persian. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
Babby, Leonard
1987Case, prequantifiers, and discontinuous agreement in Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5. 91–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Noun phrase internal case agreement in Russian. In Michael Barlow & Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in natural language, 287–304. Stanford, CA: CSLI Stanford.Google Scholar
Barwise, Jon & Robin Cooper
1981Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4. 159–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bopp, Franz
1848Über das Georgische in sprachverwandtschaftlicher beziehung. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, philosophisch- historiche Klasse 1846 259–339.Google Scholar
Bork, Ferdinand
1905Kaukasiches. Orientalistische Litteratur-Zeitung 8. 184–187.Google Scholar
Bowers, John
1993The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 591–656.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
2010The syntax of adjectives: A comparative study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Citko, Barbara
2004On headed, headless, and light-headed relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22. 95–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
1987The morphology/syntax interface: Evidence from possessive adjectives in Slavonic. Language 63. 299–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel
2006Relators and linkers: A study of predication, predicate inversion and copulas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel & Pornsiri Singhapreecha
2004Complex noun phrases and linkers. Syntax 7. 1–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Downing, Bruce
1978Some universals of relative clause structure. In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language, volume 4: Syntax, 375–418. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
1976A transformational approach to English syntax: Root, structure-preserving, and local transformations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Finck, Franz Nikolas
1910Die Haupttypen des Sprachbaus. Leipzig: Teubner. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franco, Ludovico, M. Rita Manzini & Leonardo Savoia
2015Linkers and agreement. The Linguistic Review 32. 277–332.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1990Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Göksel, Asli & Celia Kerslake
2005Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey
2011Linker, relativizer, nominalizer, tense-particle: On the Ezafe in West Iranian. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives, 363–390. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene & Angelika Kratzer
1998Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1973The base rules for prepositional phrases. In Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 345–356. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1977X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan
2014Revisiting the Persian Ezafe construction: A roll-up movement analysis. Lingua 150. 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karimi, Simin & Michael Brame
1986A generalization concerning the Ezafe construction in Persian. West Coast Conference in Linguistics (WECOL 86), Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
2012A generalization concerning the Ezafe construction in Persian. Linguistic Analysis 38. 111–144.Google Scholar
Karimi, Yadgar
2007Kurdish Ezafe construction: Implications for DP structure. Lingua 117. 2159–2177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward
1965Studies in diachronic syntax. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University dissertation.Google Scholar
Krause, Cornelia
2001On reduced relatives with genitive subjects. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Lapointe, Steven
1990EDGE features in GPSG. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 26. 221–235. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
1992Life on the EDGE: Arguments in favor of an autolexical account of edge inflections. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 28. 318–332. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard and Gabriel Segal
1995Knowledge of meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard & Hiroko Yamakido
2008Ezafe and the deep position of nominal modifiers. In Louise McNally & Christopher Kennedy (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics and discourse, 43–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard
2009Chinese as a reverse Ezafe language. Yuyanxue Luncong [Essays on Linguistics] 39. 30–85.Google Scholar
2018Zazaki ‘double Ezafe’ as double case-marking. Manuscript, Stony Brook University.Google Scholar
2018AP-地adverbs in Mandarin. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 39. 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard & Vida Samiian
2018Ezafe, PP and the nature of nominalization. Paper presented at the 54th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Larson, Richard, Elias Abdollahnejad, Mohammad Ghaderibaneh, Songül Gündoğdu, Ali Salehi & Vida Samiian
2019Turkish influence in Iranian relative clause syntax? Paper presented at Tu+4, NYU, February 17, 2019.
Lavine, James
2003Resumption in Slavic: Phases, cyclicity and case. In Mila Tasseva-Kurktchieva, Steven Franks & Frank Y. Gladney (eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 13. 195–206. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1986On the typology of relative clauses. Linguistics 24. 663–680. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Toward a typology of clause linkage. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 181–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Rita
2010The structure and interpretation of (Romance) complementizers. In Phoevos Panagiotidi (ed.), The complementiser phase: Subjects and operators, 167–199. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, James
2002Resumption, successive cyclicity, and the locality of operations. In Samuel Daniel Epstein & T. Daniel Seely. (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, 184–226. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2004Resumptivity and non-movement. Studies in Greek Linguistics 24. 471–481. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Miller, Philip
1991Clitics and constituents in phrase structure grammar. Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht dissertation.Google Scholar
Nevis, Joel
1986Finnish particle clitics and general clitic theory. Working Papers in Linguistics 33. Columbus, OH: Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Palmer, Adrian
1971The Ezafe construction in Modern Standard Persian. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan dissertation.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego
2007The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Simin Kairimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pikkert, Peter
2010A basic course in Kurmanji. Ontario: Alev Books.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans
1995(Re-)Introducing Suffixaufnahme. In Frans Plank (ed.), Double case, 3–110. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk
1990Functional prepositions. In Harm Pinkster & Inge Genée (eds.), Unity in diversity, 229–241. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samiian, Vida
1983Structure of phrasal categories in Persian: An X-bar analysis. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA dissertation.Google Scholar
1994The Ezafe construction: Some implications for the theory of X-bar syntax. In Mehdi Marashi (ed.), Persian Studies in North America, 17–41. Bethesda, MD: Iranbooks.Google Scholar
Samvelian, Pollet
2007A (phrasal) affix analysis of the Persian Ezafe. Journal of Linguistics 43. 605–645. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008The Ezafe as a head-marking inflectional affix: Evidence from Persian and Kurmanji Kurdish. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Donald Stilo (eds.), Aspects of Iranian linguistics, 339–361. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten
2014Complement clauses and complementation systems: A cross-linguistic study of grammatical organization. Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena dissertation.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2003Limits on P: Filling in holes vs. falling in holes. Nordlyd, Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics. Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, 31, 431–445.Google Scholar
Todd, Terry Lynn
1985A grammar of Dimili (also known as Zaza). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan unpublished dissertation.Google Scholar
Yoshie, Satoko
1996Sari dialect (of Mazandarani language). Tokyo, Japan: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold
1987Suppressing the Zs. Journal of Linguistics 23. 133–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar