Article published in:
Exaptation and Language Change
Edited by Muriel Norde and Freek Van de Velde
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 336] 2016
► pp. 37–55
Published online: 24 February 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.336.02jos
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2020. Reinforcement by realignment in diachronic construction grammar. Constructions and Frames 12:2 ► pp. 206 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Anttila, Raimo
1972 An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
1989 Historical and Comparative Linguistics. (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 6.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins (2nd edn. of Anttila 1972). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel & Dieter Stein
1995 “Functional Renewal”. Historical Linguistics 1993 (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 124) ed. by Henning Andersen, 33–47. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
2000 Explaining Language Change. An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
De Cuypere, L.
2005 “Exploring Exaptation in Language Change”. Folia Linguistica Historica 26.13–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1991 “The Last Stages of Grammatical Elements: Contractive and expansive desemanticization”. Approaches to Grammaticalization (= Typological Studies in Language, 19) ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine, 301–314. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2004 “Directionality in Language Change, with Special Reference to Unidirectionality in Grammaticalization”. Up and Down the Cline – The Nature of Grammaticalization (= Typological Studies in Language, 59) ed. by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, & Harry Perridon, 17–44. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2003 “On Degrammaticalization”. Historical Linguistics 2001 (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 237) ed. by Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge, 163–179. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J.
1991 “On some principles of grammaticalization”. Approaches to Grammaticalization (= Typological Studies in Language, 19) ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1994 “Phonogenesis”. Perspectives on Grammaticalization (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 109) ed. by William Pagliuca, 29–45. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janda, Richard D. and Brian D. Joseph
1985 “One Rule or Many? Sanskrit Reduplication as Fragmented affixation”. Proceedings of the Second Eastern States Conference on Linguistics [ESCOL ‘85], 103–119. Columbus: OSU Department of Linguistics. [Reprinted in slightly revised form in Studies on Language Change. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 34 (1986), pp. 84–107.]Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D.
1998 “Historical Morphology”. The Handbook of Morphology ed. by Arnold Zwicky & Andrew Spencer, 351–373. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
2004 “Rescuing Traditional (Historical) Linguistics from Grammaticalization ‘Theory’”. Up and Down the Cline – The Nature of Grammaticalization (= Typological Studies in Language, 59) ed. by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, & Harry Perridon, 44–71. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref.Google Scholar
2006 “How Accommodating of Change is Grammaticalization? The case of ‘lateral shifts’”. Logos and Language. Journal of General Linguistics and Language Theory 6.2.1–7.Google Scholar
2011 “Grammaticalization: A general critique”. Handbook of Grammaticalization ed. by Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine, 193–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014 “What Counts as (an Instance of) Grammaticalization?”. Refining Grammaticalization (Special Issue) ed. by Ferdinand von Mengden and Horst Simon. Folia Linguistica Historica 48.361–384.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D.
1988 “The How and Why of Diachronic Morphologization and Demorphologization”. Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics ed. by Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan, 193–213. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1990 “How to Do Things with Junk: Exaptation in language evolution”. Journal of Linguistics 26.79–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko
2007 “Exaptation, Grammaticalization, and Reanalysis”. California Linguistic Notes 32(1). http://​hss​.fullerton​.edu​/linguistics​/cln​/pdf​/Exaptation​_Narrog​.pdf.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2009 Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2004 “Exaptation and Grammaticalization”. Linguistic Studies Based on Corpora ed. by M. Akimoto, 133–156. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek
2006 “Herhaalde exaptatie. Een diachrone analyse van de Germaanse adjectiefflexie” [“Iterative Exaptation. A diachronic analysis of the Germanic adjectival inflection”]. Nederlands tussen Duits en Engels ed. by M. Hüning, A. Verhagen, U. Vogl & T. van der Wouden, 47–69. Leiden: Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek and Muriel Norde
This volume. “Exaptation: taking stock of a controversial notion in linguistics”. Crossref
Vincent, Nigel
1995 “Exaptation and Grammaticalization”. Historical Linguistics 1993 (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 124) ed. by Henning Andersen, 433–445. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, William D.
1889 Sanskrit Grammar. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar