Article published in:
Word Classes: Nature, typology and representations
Edited by Raffaele Simone and Francesca Masini
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 332] 2014
► pp. 263282
References
Fillmore, Charles J.
1968 “The Case for Case”. Universals in Linguistic Theory ed. By Emmon Bach & Robert Thomas Harms, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Ganter, Bernard & Rudolf Wille
1998Formal Concept Analysis. Mathematical foundations. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Hanks, Patrick
1994 “Linguistic Norms and Pragmatic Exploitations, or Why Lexicographers Need Prototype Theory and Vice Versa”. Papers in Computational Lexicography: Complex ‘94 ed. by Ferenc Kiefer, Gábor Kiss & Júlia Pajzs. Budapest: Hungary Academy of Science.Google Scholar
2004“The Syntagmatics of Metaphor and Idiom”. International Journal of Lexicography 17.254–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, Patrick & James Pustejovsky
2005 “A Pattern Dictionary for Natural Language Processing”. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 10:2.63–82.Google Scholar
Hearst, Marti A.
1992 “Automatic Acquisition of Hyponyms from Large Text Corpora”. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics , 539–545.
Jackendoff, Ray
2002Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koenig, Jean-Pierre & Anthony R. Davis
2001“Sublexical Modality and the Structure of Lexical Semantics”. Linguistics and Philosophy 24.71–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Classes and Alternation: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor, Nadia Arbatchewsky-Jumarie, Léo Elnitsky, Lidija Iordanskaja & Adèle Lessard
1984Dictionnaire explicatif et combinatoire du français contemporain. Recherches lexico-sémantiques I. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor, Nadia Arbatchewsky-Jumarie, Louise Dagenais, Léo Elnitsky, Lidija Iordanskaja, Marie-Noëlle Lefebvre & Suzanne Mantha
1988Dictionnaire explicatif et combinatoire du français contemporain. Recherches lexico-sémantiques II. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor, Nadia Arbatchewsky-Jumarie, Lidija Iordanskaja & Suzanne Mantha
1992Dictionnaire explicatif et combinatoire du français contemporain. Recherches lexico-sémantiques III. Montréal: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey
1979The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy. Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (2): 143–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1982Paths and Categories. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Ivan A. Sag
1994Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James & Elisabetta Jezek
2004“Semantic Coercion in Language: Beyond distributional analysis.” Italian Journal of Linguistics 20.181–214.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
2000The theta system: syntactic realization of verbal concepts. OTS working papers.Google Scholar