Article published in:
Word Classes: Nature, typology and representations
Edited by Raffaele Simone and Francesca Masini
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 332] 2014
► pp. 114
References
Ansaldo, Umberto, Jan Don & Roland Pfau
eds. 2008Parts of Speech: Descriptive tools, theoretical constructs. (= Special issue of Studies in Language 32:3.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anward, Jan, Edith Moravcsik & Leon Stassen
1997 “Parts of Speech: A challenge for typology”. Linguistic Typology 1:2.167–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine & Pierre Nicole
1666 [1965] La Logique ou l’art de penser ed. by Pierre Clair & François Girbal. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
2003Lexical Categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Franz
1911 “Introduction”. Handbook of American Indian Languages ed. by Franz Boas (= Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 40), vol. 1, 1–83. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of American Ethnology.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2003 “Exo-skeletal vs. Endo-skeletal Explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon”. The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory ed. by John Moore & Maria Polinsky, 31–67. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg
1992 “Reflections on the History of the Study of Universals: The example of the partes orationis”. Meaning and Grammar: Cross-linguistic perspectives ed. by Michel Kefer & Johan van der Auwera, 3–16. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Broschart, Jürgen
1997“Why Tongan Does It Differently: Categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs”. Linguistic Typology 1.123–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bursill-Hall, Geoffrey L.
1971Speculative Grammars of the Middle Ages: The doctrine of Partes Orationis of the Modistae. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
2007 “A Note on Linguistic Theory and Typology”. Linguistic Typology 11:1.93–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1966Cartesian Linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York & London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2009 “Grammatical Categories and Relations: Universality vs. language-specificity and construction-specificity”. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:1.441–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2000 “Parts of Speech as Language Universals and as Language-Particular Categories”. Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes ed. by Petra M. Vogel & Bernard Comrie, 65–102. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2001Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria
2005Asymmetry in Morphology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
eds. 2004Adjective Classes: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleisch, Henri
1953Manuel de philologie arabe. 2 vols. Beyrouth: Librairie Orientale.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Granger, Gaston-Gilles
1994Formes, opérations, objets. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2007 “Pre-Established Categories Don’t Exist: Consequences for language description and typology”. Linguistic Typology 11:1.119–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012“How to Compare Major Word-Classes across the World’s Languages”. Theories of Everything: In honor of Ed Keenan ed. by Thomas Graf, Denis Paperno, Anna Szabolcsi & Jos Tellings, 109–130. (= UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 17.) Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Eva van Lier
2008“Parts of Speech and Dependent Clauses in Functional Discourse Grammar”. Studies in Language 32.3:753–785. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Sandra A. Thompson
1984 “The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar”. Language 60:4.703–752. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
1992 “Y a-t-il des catégories interlangagières?”. Texte, Sätze, Wörter und Moneme: Festschrift für Klaus Heger zum 65. Geburtstag ed. by Susanne Anschütz & Klaus Heger, 427–434. Heidelberg: Heidelberger Orient-Verlag.Google Scholar
2006La quête des invariants interlangue: La linguistique est-elle une science? Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio C.
ed. 1994 1998 History of Linguistics 4 vols London Longman
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Classes and Alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
2000 “Gli aggettivi giapponesi fra Nome e Verbo”. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 29:2.311–345.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1997 “No Escape from Syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4:2.201–225.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995Zero Syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge. Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans
1997 “Word Classes in Typology: Recommended reading”. Linguistic Typology 1:2.185–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan & Eva van Lier
eds. 2013Flexible Word Classes: A typological study of underspecified parts-of-speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R.
1972 “The Category Squish: Endstation Hauptwort.” Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 316–328. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
2001 “Scales between Nouniness and Verbiness”. Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook ed. by Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible, vol. 1, 495–509. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul & Timothy Shopen
2007 “Parts-of-speech Systems”. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Volume I: Clause Structure ed. by Timothy Shopen, 2nd ed., 1–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele
1969 “Introduzione”. “Grammatica” e “Logica” di Port-Royal ed. by Raffaele Simone, VIII–XLVIII. Rome: Ubaldini [reprinted as “Grammatica e Logica di Port-Royal”. Il sogno di Saussure by Raffaele Simone, 93–132. Rome & Bari: Laterza, 1992).Google Scholar
1998 “The Early Modern Period”. History of Linguistics III. Renaissance and early modern linguistics ed. by Giulio Lepschy, 149–236. London: Longman,Google Scholar
2000 “Cycles lexicaux”. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 29:2.259–287.Google Scholar
2001 “Sull’utilità e il danno della storia della linguistica”. Storia del pensiero linguistico: Linearità, fratture e circolarità. Atti della SIG – Società Italiana di Glottologia (11–13 novembre 1999) ed. by Giovanna Massariello Merzagora, 45–67. Roma: Il Calamo.Google Scholar
2003Maṣdar, ’ismu al-marrati et la frontière verbe/nom”. Estudios ofrecidos al Profesor José Jesús de Bustos Tovar ed. by José Luis Girón Alconchel, Silvia Iglesias Recuero, Francisco Javier Herrero Ruiz de Loizaga & Antonio Narbona, vol. 1, 901–918. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele & Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri
2010“Natural Constraints on Language. Nature and Consequences”. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 63.205–224.Google Scholar
2011“Natural Constraints on Language. The ergonomics of the software”. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 64.119–141.Google Scholar
Taylor, John
2003Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, Petra M. & Bernard Comrie
eds. 2000Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1986 “What’s in a Noun? (Or: How do nouns differ in meaning from adjectives?)”. Studies in Language 10:2.353–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar