Zero person in Finnish

A grammatical resource for construing human reference

Lea Laitinen

Lea Laitinen’s article deals with the grammar and meaning of Finnish constructions containing the so-called ‘zero person’ subject. In these constructions, there is no overt subject, and the verb is in the 3^rd person singular form. The meanings of the construction are investigated in conversational data, and its globally marked non-specific reference is compared to the non-specific use of personal pronouns, used as generic forms referring to humans in many languages. As crystallizations of human experience, the zero person constructions express changes of state, emotions, perceptions, or other processes that affect human beings in particular situations. Laitinen shows how this potentiality of grammar is used in interaction by the speech act participants, and how these constructions which leave the conceptualizer of the situation implicit, provide a more subjective perspective on the experience than explicit personal pronouns. This paper has implications for the understanding of impersonal use of pronouns, non-specific pronominal reference, and zero persons in languages generally.

Published online: 19 October 2006
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.277.15lai

Cited by

Cited by 17 other publications

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Marja Etelämäki

2014. In Requesting in Social Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 26], ► pp. 115 ff.

Etelämäki, Marja & Laura Visapää

2014. Why blend conversation analysis with cognitive grammar?. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 24:3 ► pp. 477 ff.

Halonen, Mia & Marja-Leena Sorjonen

2008. Usingniin-interrogative to treat the prior speaker's action as an exaggeration. Discourse Studies 10:1 ► pp. 37 ff.

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa

2020. In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128], ► pp. 72 ff.

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa & Maria Vilkuna

2008. Impersonal is Personal: Finnish perspectives. Transactions of the Philological Society 106:2 ► pp. 216 ff.

Herlin, Ilona & Laura Visapää

2016. Dimensions of empathy in relation to language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39:2 ► pp. 135 ff.

Jaakola, Minna, Maija Töyry, Merja Helle & Tiina Onikki-Rantajääskö

2014. Construing the reader: A multidisciplinary approach to journalistic texts. Discourse & Society 25:5 ► pp. 640 ff.

Jokela, Hanna & Helen Plado

2015. In Subjects in Constructions – Canonical and Non-Canonical [Constructional Approaches to Language, 16], ► pp. 73 ff.

Lappalainen, Hanna

2019. In It’s not all about you [Topics in Address Research, 1], ► pp. 100 ff.

Laury, Ritva

2012. Syntactically Non-Integrated FinnishJos‘If’-Conditional Clauses as Directives. Discourse Processes 49:3-4 ► pp. 213 ff.

Logren, Aija, Johanna Ruusuvuori & Jaana Laitinen

2017. Self-reflective talk in group counselling. Discourse Studies 19:4 ► pp. 422 ff.

Logren, Aija, Johanna Ruusuvuori & Jaana Laitinen

2020. Stories of Change: Comparative Time-Framed Experience Telling in Health Promotion Group Discussions. Qualitative Health Research 30:2 ► pp. 279 ff.

Raevaara, Liisa

2017. In Imperative Turns at Talk [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 30], ► pp. 381 ff.

Repo, Elisa

2020. Discourses on encountering multilingual learners in Finnish schools. Linguistics and Education 60 ► pp. 100864 ff.

Sylak-Glassman, John, Christo Kirov, Matt Post, Roger Que & David Yarowsky

2015. In Systems and Frameworks for Computational Morphology [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 537], ► pp. 72 ff.

Vuolteenaho, Jani, Hanna Lappalainen & Terhi Ainiala

2019. A slightly slummier area? Negotiations of place‐bound identities through social spatializations and unofficial toponyms. Journal of Sociolinguistics 23:2 ► pp. 140 ff.

Wide, Camilla, Hanna Lappalainen, Anu Rouhikoski, Catrin Norrby, Camilla Lindholm, Jan Lindström & Jenny Nilsson

2019. Variation in address practices across languages and nations. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 29:4 ► pp. 595 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.