Chapter published in:
Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages: MIPVU around the world
Edited by Susan Nacey, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr and W. Gudrun Reijnierse
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 22] 2019
► pp. 160181


Ambrazas, V., Geniušienė, E., Girdenis, A., Sližienė, N., Tekorienė, D., Valeckienė, A., & Valiulytė, E.
(1997) Lithuanian grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar
Ambrazas, V.
(Ed.) (2006) Dabartinės lietuvių kalbos gramatika [A grammar of modern Lithuanian]. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R.
(1993) Inflectional morphology. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp.150–201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corpus of the Contemporary Lithuanian Language
(1998-2016) Kaunas: Vytautas Magnus University. http://​tekstynas​.vdu​.lt/Google Scholar
Creissels, D.
(2008) Spatial cases. In A. Malchukov & A. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case (pp.609–625). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holvoet, A., Grzybowska, M., & Rembiałkowska, A.
(2015) Middle-voice reflexives and argument structure in Baltic. In A. Holvoet & N. Nau (Eds.), Voice and argument structure in Baltic (pp.181–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakaitienė, E.
(2010) Leksikologija [Lexicology]. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.Google Scholar
Keinys, S.
(Ed.) (2012) Dabartinės lietuvių kalbos žodynas [Dictionary of Contemporary Lithuanian] 7th revised edition. Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas. www​.lkiis​.lki​.ltGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, S.
(2003) On the meaning of prepositions and cases: The expression of semantic roles in Ancient Greek. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Case in cognitive grammar. In A. Malchukov & A. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of case (pp.136–150). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marcinkevičienė, R.
(2011) Žodžio reikšmė. Žodynai ir tekstynai [The meaning of a word. Dictionaries and corpora]. Kaunas: VDU.Google Scholar
McHugh, M. L.
(2012) Inter-rater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem Med 22(3), 276–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Naktinienė, G., Paulauskas, J., Petrokienė, R., Vitkauskas, V., & Zabarskaitė, J.
(Eds.) (2008) Lietuvių kalbos žodynas [Dictionary of the Lithuanian language] Vol. 1–20. Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas, www​.lkz​.ltGoogle Scholar
Paulauskienė, A.
(1994) Lietuvių kalbos morfologija: paskaitos lituanistams [The morphology of the Lithuanian language: Lectures to specialists of Lithuanian]. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidykla.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1), 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rimkutė, E., Kovalevskaitė, J., Melninkaitė, V., Utka, A., & Vitkutė-Adžgauskienė, D.
(2010) Corpus of Contemporary Lithuanian Language – the Standardised Way. In I. Skadiņa & A. Vasiļjevs (Eds.), Human language technologies – the Baltic perspective: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference Baltic HLT 2010 (pp.154–160). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Rundell, M.
(Ed.) (2002) Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners. Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sheshkin, D. J.
(2004) The handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall / CRC. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Urbonaitė, J.
(2015) Metaphor identification procedure MIPVU: An attempt to apply it to Lithuanian. Taikomoji kalbotyra 7, 1–25. www​.taikomojikalbotyra​.ltGoogle Scholar