Chapter published in:
Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages: MIPVU around the world
Edited by Susan Nacey, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr and W. Gudrun Reijnierse
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 22] 2019
► pp. 92112
References

References

Aarts, F. G. A. M., & Wekker. H. C. (1987) A contrastive grammar of English and Dutch/Contrastieve grammatica Engels/Nederlands. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Blom, C.
(2005) Complex predicates in Dutch: Synchrony and diachrony. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Booij, G. E.
(2002a) Constructional idioms, morphology, and the Dutch lexicon. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14, 301–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002b) Separable complex verbs in Dutch: A case of periphrastic word formation. In N. Deh, R. Jackendoff, A. Macintyre & S. Urban (Eds.), Verb-Particle explorations (pp. 21–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L.
(1999) Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse data. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 105–132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Deignan, A.
(2005) Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Den Boom, T., & Geeraerts, D.
(Eds.) (2005) Van Dale groot woordenboek van de Nederlandse taal. Utrecht & Antwerpen: Van Dale Lexicografie. (Electronic version)Google Scholar
Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., De Rooij, J., & Van der Toorn, M. C.
(1997) Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst. Tweede, geheel herziene druk. Groningen & Deurne: Martinus Nijhoff uitgevers / Wolters Plantyn.Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S.
(1998) English prepositions explained. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oostdijk, N.
(2002) The design of the Spoken Dutch Corpus. In P. Peters, P. Collins & A. Smith (Eds.), New frontiers of corpus research (pp. 105–112). Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22(1), 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Biernacka, E., Dorst, A. G., Kaal, A. A., López-Rodríguez, I., & Pasma, T.
(2010) Pragglejaz in practice: Finding metaphorically used words in natural discourse. In: G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 165–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bosch, A., Busser, G. J., Daelemans, W., & Canisius, S.
(2007) An efficient memory-based morphosyntactic tagger and parser for Dutch. In F. van Eynde, P. Dirix, I. Schuurman & V. Vandeghinste (Eds.), Selected papers of the 17th Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Meeting (99–114). Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
Verhagen, A.
(2005) Constructiegrammatica en ‘usage based’ taalkunde. Nederlandse Taalkunde 10, 197–222.Google Scholar